Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDoes a Christian White-Supremacist Business Have the "Religious Freedom" to Discriminate?
http://www.alternet.org/belief/does-christian-white-supremacist-business-have-religious-freedom-discriminateThe slide towards American theocracy was nudged one more step forward by the Supreme Court decision in support of the "freedom" of corporations with "religious" beliefs to restrict the rights of their employees. In essence, religious "beliefs" trump the obligations, rights, and responsibilities that come with being members of the polity and a broader political community.
The NY Times details the logic of the theocrats as:
The 5-to-4 decision, which applied to two companies owned by Christian families, opened the door to challenges from other corporations to many laws that may be said to violate their religious liberty.
Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr., writing for the courts five more conservative justices, said a federal religious-freedom law applied to for-profit corporations controlled by religious families. He added that the requirement that the companies provide contraception coverage imposed a substantial burden on the companies religious liberty. He said the government could provide the coverage in other ways.
The dissent offers up this chilling observation:
On that point, Justice Ginsburg, joined by Justice Sonia Sotomayor, said the courts decision is bound to have untoward effects in other settings.
The courts expansive notion of corporate personhood, Justice Ginsburg wrote, invites for-profit entities to seek religion-based exemptions from regulations they deem offensive to their faiths.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 1052 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (14)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Does a Christian White-Supremacist Business Have the "Religious Freedom" to Discriminate? (Original Post)
xchrom
Jul 2014
OP
blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)1. Why not?!?!
handmade34
(22,756 posts)2. excellent read...
"...The beautiful thing about religious faith is its malleability and vagueness. "Faith" is a belief which cannot be proven by ordinary or empirical means: this trait makes religion dangerous and disruptive to a functioning democratic-liberal polity..."
malaise
(269,119 posts)3. Who Hobby Lobby?
Of course - ask the Supremes
kwijybo
(235 posts)4. I'm going to start a religion
Tithes are 1%, You don't believe in taxes, environmental protections, worker protections, minimum wage, or health insurance, They'll flock to me...
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)5. The craven five appeared to have carved out race.
Which just further illustrates the complete dishonesty of their position.