General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhy Hobby Lobby could open a Pandora’s box of legal discrimination
Some effects of the Supreme Courts decision on Monday in Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores will be relatively immediate: Women who work at companies with owners who decide its against their religious beliefs to provide birth control will lose free or cheap access to contraceptives such as the Plan B pill, IUDs and, potentially, condoms, as well as the most popular pill form of birth control.
But other consequences of the Hobby Lobby decision could take years to pan out, and they would affect not only contraceptives but also various women's rights as well as LGBT rights and the rights of the disabled.
Despite the assurance by Justice Samuel Alito in his majority opinion on Hobby Lobby that the implications of the case are narrow solely focused on closely held companies and likely to affect only birth control legal scholars say the ruling could open a Pandoras box of court cases in which discrimination is justified under the rubric of religious freedom.
I dont think his assurances say this case wont be applied to anything else, said Kevin Russell, a partner at Goldstein & Russell, a law firm that represents cases before the Supreme Court. It is going to arise again when someone sues over gender or sexual orientation discrimination.
Russell says it may take a few years, but its not hard to imagine a case in which an employer decides to treat a woman differently than a man, or doesnt provide equal health coverage to a same-sex couple, and justifies the decision by citing his or her religious beliefs.
http://america.aljazeera.com/articles/2014/7/3/hobby-lobby-future.html
|
RKP5637
(67,107 posts)freedom being used as leverage for discrimination. It was a blatantly stupid SCOTUS decision.
etherealtruth
(22,165 posts)It was their intention and they succeeded.
LiberalLoner
(9,761 posts)Vattel
(9,289 posts)Given the Hobby Lobby decision and opinion, the Court would have to say that the belief that it would be sinful to provide certain benefits to a same sex couple qualifies as a religious belief and so is protected under RFRA. But I suspect that even with the strict scrutiny required by that statute, the court would find a way to say that the government interest in preventing discrimination would be sufficient to justify the infringement upon the free exercise of religion. I am not sure about that, though. Just making an educated guess.
Ilsa
(61,694 posts)It would not surprise me that some asshole would proclaim his belief that God causes some people to be "less than" and discriminate accordingly.
The extreme form of capitalism and un-Godly discrimination embraced by the 5 and allowed to unify and be practiced by the 1% and will cause the ruin of this nation. The united assholes.
littlemissmartypants
(22,634 posts)TlalocW
(15,381 posts)It's not going to take a few years. It will happen this year.
TlalocW
Quantess
(27,630 posts)BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)Religious groups are asking an exemption to the executive order that says that federal contractors can't discriminate based on sexual orientation. "Violating" any religious beliefs will take precedence over all other rights. This decision will be the greatest victory for religious nutjobs for decades to come.
Iliyah
(25,111 posts)because their GAWD say so. Discriminate against anyone who does not toll their line of so called "Christianity" with laws backing it up per the 5 asshole justices. Talk about impeach, I consider at least two of them to be valid.
HockeyMom
(14,337 posts)Right of employers to force their religion on employees. Only way around that? Start your own business or your boss will be your Master.
ballyhoo
(2,060 posts)more than another diversion so the MIC can work on other matters with reduced interference. They do this successfully time and time again.
Justice
(7,186 posts)Hobby Lobby