General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsShocking! Battery Tech From MIT (an awesome presentation)
Donald Sadoway
One of the engineering opportunities (nee problems) still open to green energy production by solar and wind technologies is the very real issue of generation and demand. As currently configured the electrical grid must be ready to deliver as much energy as is needed at any time. This may not be possible in a system primarily dependent on solar or wind energy generators.
An obvious solution would be to store electrical energy in industrial quantities so that peaks in demand could be met smoothly. Donald Sadoway has an idea about how to do just that.
Below is Dr. Sadoway's presentation at TED in March of this year. It is about 15 minutes and worth the time. He is an interesting lecturer.
More: http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/04/04/1080441/-Shocking-Battery-Tech-From-MIT
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)uponit7771
(90,335 posts)..."market price point" is the real deal
CJCRANE
(18,184 posts)An engineer told me that you can run your household electricity needs from a truck battery.
You can then trickle-charge the battery via solar power/wind power/the grid.
TheMadMonk
(6,187 posts)A truck battery will just suffice for lights. Again if used frugally.
Both are highly toxic.
For static applications, a NiFe battery is a cheap option. It's not the best performer in the world and it has a low energy density, but they're cheap, non-toxic, abuse tollerant and easy to maintain.
CJCRANE
(18,184 posts)but the idea is for off-gridders to trickle-charge the battery during the day using solar power. That way you have the power when you need it at night.
I like the sound of the NiFe battery, I'll look it up.
IDemo
(16,926 posts)The V2G (Vehicle-to-Grid) concept can help:
http://www.udel.edu/V2G/V2Gconcept.html
Junkdrawer
(27,993 posts)we would be living in a completely different world.
But they don't; sociopaths whose political power relies on 100 yr. old technology do.
And THAT's why Human Extinction is staring us eyeball-to-eyeball.
Egalitarian Thug
(12,448 posts)the biggest problem we face. We have to rid ourselves of the myth that these monstrosities are a source of innovation. That their "success" indicates that they are the best at what they do, and that they create jobs.
Only government, nominally the sole representative of the people, is the only institution with the resources and motivation to achieve progress.
Pick the field, medical, energy, transportation, pure research, education, employment, social/sexual/racial/economic equality, or whatever else you can think of. Big Business has zero incentive to compete or to innovate. Collusion is always more profitable than competition and innovation is expensive and usually results in diminished profits at best and frequently the elimination of their industry.
Junkdrawer
(27,993 posts)If there was one post I wish everyone on this site would read....
Old and In the Way
(37,540 posts)Based on the system that is contained in a 40' container handling power needs for 200 homes, a home version ought to be feasible in the space of a small closet. Great presentation.
longship
(40,416 posts)Advances are, so far, incremental. Revolutions are rare and dependent on breakthroughs which take decades of hard work and, most importantly, advances in the science which may not yet be achieved.
That's the regrettable situation right now.
aint_no_life_nowhere
(21,925 posts)I remember listening to a presentation on Pacifica radio by two top engineers from the Jet Propulsion Laboratory at Caltech regarding a way to have continuous sources of power on Earth, night or day, from the sun. They said it would be feasible to put gigantic solar collectors in outer space and beam the energy back to Earth as microwave beams and to do it in a way that wouldn't fry an airplane that happened to fly into the path of the beam. Of course it would require a serious funding commitment to a space program, an area in which we seem to have lost our way.