Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
123 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
If she's elected I fear she'll bomb something immediately to prove she's Tough Enough (Original Post) elehhhhna Jul 2014 OP
I think Bildo O'Liely said the exact same thing recently snooper2 Jul 2014 #1
So? Hitler said "good morning" once. wtf does that have to do with anything? elehhhhna Jul 2014 #13
Hitler never said good morning, ever- Here are his actual final words- EVER snooper2 Jul 2014 #20
WTF does your OP have to do with reality? muriel_volestrangler Jul 2014 #22
Look muriel, you and I agree much more than we disagree elehhhhna Jul 2014 #28
WTF is an "ook muriel"? And why are you one? snooper2 Jul 2014 #39
ook muriel lol geez youse guys elehhhhna Jul 2014 #67
Answer: Nothing. LordGlenconner Jul 2014 #52
Who are you talking about? Thinkingabout Jul 2014 #2
I think I saw this once on TV. Nuclear Unicorn Jul 2014 #48
Warren? I don't think so...nt SidDithers Jul 2014 #3
Like you will be voting. L0oniX Jul 2014 #5
Sounds like you won't be voting for her, either. MineralMan Jul 2014 #11
Sounds like you are bothered about me not voting for Hillary. L0oniX Jul 2014 #15
Not really bothered. You clearly state the fact, right below this subthread. MineralMan Jul 2014 #18
"I don't stalk anybody" ...whatever. L0oniX Jul 2014 #21
This message was self-deleted by its author SidDithers Jul 2014 #27
This message was self-deleted by its author ChisolmTrailDem Jul 2014 #88
Do I? Hmm. MineralMan Jul 2014 #89
It's not a comment. It's a question. nt ChisolmTrailDem Jul 2014 #92
As was my response. MineralMan Jul 2014 #93
I'm not demanding anything. You refusal to answer my question stands. We're all adults here. nt ChisolmTrailDem Jul 2014 #94
As you say, of course. MineralMan Jul 2014 #95
I will self-delete nearly every post I make that I feel may be alterted on by anyone out ChisolmTrailDem Jul 2014 #96
OK. Just so you know, though, MineralMan Jul 2014 #97
It wasn't you I was worried about. I know your policy on alerting. There are others ChisolmTrailDem Jul 2014 #98
If she wins the Primary and you DON'T vote for her....YOU sir or madame are no Democrat... VanillaRhapsody Jul 2014 #63
Doesn't matter what she does. I will never vote for her. L0oniX Jul 2014 #4
So you are outright right here and now admitting you WON'T vote for her if she wins the Primary? VanillaRhapsody Jul 2014 #64
ADMINS!! Thought crime in aisle 5!!!1!11 elehhhhna Jul 2014 #70
Not hypothetical at all....IF you won't vote for the winner of the Primary....whomever that is... VanillaRhapsody Jul 2014 #117
Can't wait for Election Season...nt SidDithers Jul 2014 #71
neither can I....it just cannot come soon enough for me.....are we within 3 mos yet? VanillaRhapsody Jul 2014 #116
A vote for Hillary is a vote for more trade agreements and more wars and more lost jobs. JDPriestly Jul 2014 #86
So you aren't really a Democrat either then? VanillaRhapsody Jul 2014 #114
I'm 71, and I have voted for and worked for Democrats in every election in which I have lived JDPriestly Jul 2014 #118
wow you sure needed alot of words to prove your bonafides.... VanillaRhapsody Jul 2014 #119
So far, we haven't entered the primaries. I hope to vote for either Elizabeth Warren or JDPriestly Jul 2014 #120
that doesn't even matter....YOU cannot commit to voting for the winner of the Primary that WE VanillaRhapsody Jul 2014 #121
Actually, that is up to the Secretary of State of California and the Recorder's or Registrar's JDPriestly Jul 2014 #123
OMG! ADMINS! Someone had an independent thought! EX-TER-MIN-ATE! nt ChisolmTrailDem Jul 2014 #90
Independent EXACTLY my point....IF you are sooooo "Independent" voting....YOU are not a Democrat.... VanillaRhapsody Jul 2014 #115
Hahahahahaha! nt ChisolmTrailDem Jul 2014 #122
Who? bravenak Jul 2014 #6
I love primaries too JustAnotherGen Jul 2014 #24
So exciting to have the debates! bravenak Jul 2014 #26
Excellent analogy! JustAnotherGen Jul 2014 #30
Fighting to the death in the arena, with fans screaming for blood in the stands. bravenak Jul 2014 #34
No flames total agreement. Faux pas Jul 2014 #7
a bunch of sexist dribble. trumad Jul 2014 #8
Beat me to it. Nt riqster Jul 2014 #33
Who?! Chan790 Jul 2014 #9
What no Tequila? Stellar Jul 2014 #10
She liberal N proud Jul 2014 #12
joan rivers? spanone Jul 2014 #14
*SNARF* CatWoman Jul 2014 #16
I agree completely CincyDem Jul 2014 #17
Must have been. riqster Jul 2014 #35
Unrec for attacking needlessly attacking Elizabeth Warren. FSogol Jul 2014 #19
I agree... SidDithers Jul 2014 #29
I think she will. OilemFirchen Jul 2014 #41
When she wins the election, I'll get bombed! FSogol Jul 2014 #43
See? OilemFirchen Jul 2014 #46
LOL FSogol Jul 2014 #50
Oh yes I forgot,....this is Democratic Mindreading Underground! VanillaRhapsody Jul 2014 #65
Every time a bomb drops, someone makes $$$ grahamhgreen Jul 2014 #23
. MohRokTah Jul 2014 #25
Best. Image. Ever. riqster Jul 2014 #36
Especially if she's "on the rag." Amirite? Amirite?11? Your OP is disgusting. If you have an Squinch Jul 2014 #31
Okay. Whatever. elehhhhna Jul 2014 #53
I need to allay your fears that Hillary will bomb something simply to prove she is tough? I need Squinch Jul 2014 #57
and you think you've got "something" that is not pure speculation that is? VanillaRhapsody Jul 2014 #66
Nah, she's gotta be post-menopausal. tammywammy Jul 2014 #84
I read a while back that post-menopausal women are the most hormonally balanced of all Squinch Jul 2014 #110
That's interesting. tammywammy Jul 2014 #111
I'll see if I can find it. If I do, I'll post it to you here. Squinch Jul 2014 #113
Wasn't that W's schtick? KansDem Jul 2014 #32
And Maggie Thatchers. JDPriestly Jul 2014 #91
I have some obnoxious neighbors she can practice on. nt hack89 Jul 2014 #37
Everyone has their own opinion, even if they are just repeating right wing talking points. TeamPooka Jul 2014 #38
Especially when they quote a RW backing up their story. Thinkingabout Jul 2014 #40
If she's not elected sharp_stick Jul 2014 #42
... OilemFirchen Jul 2014 #44
This is pretty sexist thinking. Plus, just because Warren was a Republican for so many long years Bluenorthwest Jul 2014 #45
She voted for the IWR to "keep faith with" the US military. closeupready Jul 2014 #47
because she's a woman? bigtree Jul 2014 #49
Agreed. We need someone strong enough to resist the calls for war LittleBlue Jul 2014 #51
Oh cripes! Don't let facts and history get in the way of all this righteous indignation. elehhhhna Jul 2014 #55
Unlike Romney who actually protested FOR the Viet Nam war from his bunker in France! VanillaRhapsody Jul 2014 #68
true story elehhhhna Jul 2014 #73
You mean Clinton hasn't voted for war? /nt Ash_F Jul 2014 #75
I think elehaa was being facetious/sarcastic - i.e., you and she agree. closeupready Jul 2014 #99
Thanks Ash_F Jul 2014 #102
no I think you are wrong....I think she agreed with me.... VanillaRhapsody Jul 2014 #112
I just think we have enough to worry about CanonRay Jul 2014 #54
That's ridiculous treestar Jul 2014 #56
And in today's america, belief trumps reality elehhhhna Jul 2014 #58
pot calling kettle black treestar Jul 2014 #103
BUSTED!!! nahnah boobooo elehhhhna Jul 2014 #106
Not like she doesn't have a record. Fuddnik Jul 2014 #59
Really? n/t EC Jul 2014 #60
This must be some sort of DU insider's thread, or a game where we all have to guess who the fuck Ed Suspicious Jul 2014 #61
Yeah, the OP could be about Warren. Ash_F Jul 2014 #77
Good point . . . Or anybody really. I figured he was talking about Palin, but I didn't understand Ed Suspicious Jul 2014 #80
What have I missed? ecstatic Jul 2014 #62
FFS. TBF Jul 2014 #69
Between this and the manufactured outrage over Hil's performing her duties as defense counsel for stevenleser Jul 2014 #72
Seriously - TBF Jul 2014 #82
The jury results are in. In_The_Wind Jul 2014 #74
The PUMAs are back. nt LittleBlue Jul 2014 #100
Who here is a puma? hrmjustin Jul 2014 #105
Rather the imaginative prophecy you've created LanternWaste Jul 2014 #76
Is this your view or is this sarcasm? hrmjustin Jul 2014 #78
Like the moon? JoePhilly Jul 2014 #79
Yeah that's it! treestar Jul 2014 #104
She'll FRACK the moon too!!! JoePhilly Jul 2014 #107
Yep. Tough guy PR is what got us into Vietnam, Iraq, and Afghanistan. Tierra_y_Libertad Jul 2014 #81
Who Sarah Palin or Golda Meir or Indira Gandhi? whistler162 Jul 2014 #83
I very much agree. And all this Benghazi nonsense is intended to goad her on. JDPriestly Jul 2014 #85
I agree but I don't think Palin has a chance of being elected. n/t zappaman Jul 2014 #87
Assuming "she" is HRC... HooptieWagon Jul 2014 #101
I think that Hillary is just naturally hawkish. amandabeech Jul 2014 #108
You know, I had a similar fear about Obama in 2008, kiva Jul 2014 #109

muriel_volestrangler

(101,315 posts)
22. WTF does your OP have to do with reality?
Tue Jul 8, 2014, 10:36 AM
Jul 2014

Your thoughts are not our problem. You don't appear to have arrived at them by any form of reasoning. Perhaps you fell asleep while listening to Bill O'Reilly, and that's how it got into your head. The only explanation so far, anyway.

 

elehhhhna

(32,076 posts)
28. Look muriel, you and I agree much more than we disagree
Tue Jul 8, 2014, 10:47 AM
Jul 2014

but I've wanted to say that (the OP) for months. I feel she is a somewhat cravenly opportunistic corporatist poli and given her sorry/not sorry IWR vote and subsequent verbal acrobatics about it plus her I'm a toughguy stance on recent Mideast developments, I DO FEAR she will attack something early on in her first term just to make a point. Hopefully prior to her winning a Nobel Peace Prize. Don't like my opinion? HIDE IT.

 

snooper2

(30,151 posts)
39. WTF is an "ook muriel"? And why are you one?
Tue Jul 8, 2014, 11:01 AM
Jul 2014

I did a google image search for ook muriel and this was the first hit-


HUH?

Muriel Sarkany stopt met muurklimmen: Ook outdoor nog doelen

?maxheight=460&maxwidth=629&format=jpg

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
48. I think I saw this once on TV.
Tue Jul 8, 2014, 11:19 AM
Jul 2014



Notice the meticulous choreographing of every detail: The thin, dark-skinned ambassador made to look "extra Africa;" the pathos inspiring backstory of beleaguered women in foreign lands; the room of white, male generals all popping to attention when the female president walks into the room; the US officer of African descent standing-by to attend to the needs of the mission; the swaggering dismissive stride of the Davis' character; the general explaining matter-of-factly the death soon to be visited upon his countrymen; the ambassador stammering and dumbstruck by the message of sexual liberality.

Stirring stuff!

It's all so -- perfect. Hopefully future presidents -- whether female or male -- will avoid the need for such ostentatious displays of war-making power. I think we could all live without that (pun intended). I see no need to single out a particular (potential) candidate, let alone based on gender, when it is something they all fall prey to.

MineralMan

(146,307 posts)
11. Sounds like you won't be voting for her, either.
Tue Jul 8, 2014, 10:11 AM
Jul 2014

What's your point? DU has many members who can't vote in the United States.

MineralMan

(146,307 posts)
18. Not really bothered. You clearly state the fact, right below this subthread.
Tue Jul 8, 2014, 10:22 AM
Jul 2014

I don't stalk anybody. I read GD on DU. Sometimes I reply to posts in GD. That's what DU is about. If you post in busy threads, I'm sure I'll see those posts. I may reply to some of them.

Response to L0oniX (Reply #21)

Response to MineralMan (Reply #18)

MineralMan

(146,307 posts)
93. As was my response.
Tue Jul 8, 2014, 01:41 PM
Jul 2014

Are you demanding an answer to your rhetorical question? Well, I don't do that. Sorry.

MineralMan

(146,307 posts)
95. As you say, of course.
Tue Jul 8, 2014, 01:45 PM
Jul 2014

Since you self-deleted your question, this ends my participation in this subthread.

 

ChisolmTrailDem

(9,463 posts)
96. I will self-delete nearly every post I make that I feel may be alterted on by anyone out
Tue Jul 8, 2014, 01:49 PM
Jul 2014

to get me suspended.

Just so you know, that's my method for now.

MineralMan

(146,307 posts)
97. OK. Just so you know, though,
Tue Jul 8, 2014, 01:52 PM
Jul 2014

I never alert on any reply to me. It's a matter of ethics. Instead, I reply to the reply. In fact, I rarely alert on anything except serious personal attacks on other DUers. So, you needn't worry about alerts from me if you reply to me.

 

ChisolmTrailDem

(9,463 posts)
98. It wasn't you I was worried about. I know your policy on alerting. There are others
Tue Jul 8, 2014, 01:56 PM
Jul 2014

here would like like to do to me what others did to nadin.

My question was directed at you, no one else. So, since you already read it and responded, there was no reason for me to take the chance one of my ... fans ... would themselves alert on it.

I think your contribution here is valuable and we'll have our differences. I just feel you dumb down and condescend in the process. And I don't like that. So, I mentioned it. You read it. You reponded. I deleted. No big deal.

As you see in that other thread, I can agree with you.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
63. If she wins the Primary and you DON'T vote for her....YOU sir or madame are no Democrat...
Tue Jul 8, 2014, 12:11 PM
Jul 2014

And therefore irrelevent to DU!

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
64. So you are outright right here and now admitting you WON'T vote for her if she wins the Primary?
Tue Jul 8, 2014, 12:13 PM
Jul 2014

Are you really going to admit that?

Admins are you listening?

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
117. Not hypothetical at all....IF you won't vote for the winner of the Primary....whomever that is...
Tue Jul 8, 2014, 07:43 PM
Jul 2014

You are not a Democrat.....you may have voted for them in the past.....but if you don't commit to whomever your fellow Democrats chose for their candidate...YOU are Independent not a Democrat. Its that simple.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
86. A vote for Hillary is a vote for more trade agreements and more wars and more lost jobs.
Tue Jul 8, 2014, 01:33 PM
Jul 2014

We don't need Hillary. We need Elizabeth Warren. Elizabeth Warren has common sense and has not been in D.C. and on Wall Street so long that her head is full of the propaganda of wealthy people.

Hillary did not do the research before voting yes on the Iraq War Resolution.

My congressman did do the research and voted no on it. Goes to show the problem with Hillary Clinton. She does not make the best decisions. Neither did Bill on a number of things including GATT and NAFTA. The TPP negotiations took place in great part when Hillary was in the State Department.

Do you actually like the War in Iraq, GATT, NAFTA and the TPP?

Because if you do, I can understand that you disagree with those of us who do not want Hillary to be president. But if you don't then please explain whether you support Hillary and those trade agreements and if you do, why.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
114. So you aren't really a Democrat either then?
Tue Jul 8, 2014, 07:39 PM
Jul 2014

because anyone who says they WON'T vote for whomever wins the primary just.....isn't...

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
118. I'm 71, and I have voted for and worked for Democrats in every election in which I have lived
Tue Jul 8, 2014, 07:50 PM
Jul 2014

in the US. The only times I missed were the years I lived overseas. I am a Democrat.

My parents were Democrats. My mother still is and I most definitely am. I am a strong supporter of my Democratic Representative. I will never vote for Dianne Feinstein again. I support Barbara Boxer. I support my local Democratic candidates.

But I have seen too much. I will not support another corporate Democrat. They stole the party from working people. They looked on as unions were destroyed. They blame the Koch Brrothers and the Republicans. But it was the inaction on the part of Democrats, their acquiescence to the values and ideas of the Extreme Right that destroyed the unions in this country.

And now we see the Obama administration, especially the Education Department aiming their rhetoric toward teachers' unions and other public employee unions.

I am not from Wisconsin. But Obama and Hillary were noticeably absent from the valiant struggle of the public employees of that state to maintain their union rights.

No. I will never again vote for a candidate who answers to and favors the right-wing corporate agenda. Never. California is not a swing state. If Hillary can't win here without my vote, she can't win the nation.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
119. wow you sure needed alot of words to prove your bonafides....
Tue Jul 8, 2014, 07:53 PM
Jul 2014

The fact remains if you aren't committed to voting for the winner of the Primary.....then you are not really Democrat....YOU are an Independent.....no matter what happened in the past.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
120. So far, we haven't entered the primaries. I hope to vote for either Elizabeth Warren or
Tue Jul 8, 2014, 09:34 PM
Jul 2014

Bernie Sanders depending on which of them runs in the Democratic Primary in California.

I will vote this November for my Democratic representative. The California senators are not up for election.

There is neither a litmus nor a loyalty test in the Democratic Party. I am a registered Democrat.

We don't have a Pope in the Democratic Party, no Pope who can excommunicate those who do not follow Democratic doctrine.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
121. that doesn't even matter....YOU cannot commit to voting for the winner of the Primary that WE
Tue Jul 8, 2014, 09:36 PM
Jul 2014

Democrats elect....then you are not a Democrat. You are ipso facto an Independent.....

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
115. Independent EXACTLY my point....IF you are sooooo "Independent" voting....YOU are not a Democrat....
Tue Jul 8, 2014, 07:40 PM
Jul 2014

Simple as that!

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
6. Who?
Tue Jul 8, 2014, 09:59 AM
Jul 2014

Are we talking about Hillary? We should bring up this concern to her during the primary if she runs. I would not like that at all.
We are doing a primary still, i hope? I like them.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
26. So exciting to have the debates!
Tue Jul 8, 2014, 10:42 AM
Jul 2014

I see why republicans hate us. Our primaries are real, theirs is like watching bad fake wrestling.

JustAnotherGen

(31,823 posts)
30. Excellent analogy!
Tue Jul 8, 2014, 10:48 AM
Jul 2014

But they also have a Roman Gladiator feel to them - only they use words to bludgeon each other. It's kind of fun watching their shrill accusations.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
34. Fighting to the death in the arena, with fans screaming for blood in the stands.
Tue Jul 8, 2014, 10:56 AM
Jul 2014

Sounds just like the last republican primary.

 

Chan790

(20,176 posts)
9. Who?!
Tue Jul 8, 2014, 10:09 AM
Jul 2014

Hillary: Maybe, doubtful though. She's more contemplative than that.

Warren: Unlikely. Her best bet to take the nomination is to run as the "domestic fixer". Bombing something is exactly opposite the campaign she needs to run.

Minnie Mouse: Yes. Fuck Yes. Oh God, Yes! This is why I don't trust rodents. Beady eyes, small hearts.

liberal N proud

(60,334 posts)
12. She
Tue Jul 8, 2014, 10:13 AM
Jul 2014

She is a pretty broad term. She could be any woman elected.

And elected could be elected to any office?

You must be more specific to really get flamed here!

CincyDem

(6,358 posts)
17. I agree completely
Tue Jul 8, 2014, 10:19 AM
Jul 2014

If Sarah Palin is elected, she will bomb anything that doesn't have a cross atop it. That'll show everyone that she's Tough Enough.

You did mean SP when you said "she" didn't you ???

SidDithers

(44,228 posts)
29. I agree...
Tue Jul 8, 2014, 10:48 AM
Jul 2014

Just because Warren has absolutely no foreign policy experience, I don't think that she'd start bombing anyone just to show how tough she can be.

This OP is a pile of dreck.

Sid

Squinch

(50,949 posts)
31. Especially if she's "on the rag." Amirite? Amirite?11? Your OP is disgusting. If you have an
Tue Jul 8, 2014, 10:48 AM
Jul 2014

objection to her, say it. Don't play into the asinine sexist crap that everyone will be throwing. You hurt yourself by doing that.

 

elehhhhna

(32,076 posts)
53. Okay. Whatever.
Tue Jul 8, 2014, 11:26 AM
Jul 2014

yeah ouch I hurt myself by expressing a valid fear and guess what? Y'all are doing nothing to defuse it. Nothing. You got nothing, I guess.

Squinch

(50,949 posts)
57. I need to allay your fears that Hillary will bomb something simply to prove she is tough? I need
Tue Jul 8, 2014, 11:30 AM
Jul 2014

to allay some sexist terror of the scary, irrational woman? Well then, you are correct. I have nothing for you there.

tammywammy

(26,582 posts)
84. Nah, she's gotta be post-menopausal.
Tue Jul 8, 2014, 01:24 PM
Jul 2014

She'll bomb during a hot flash. Those women you just can't trust them with the nuclear keys. Cause ya know hormones make us all unstable nut jobs.



Squinch

(50,949 posts)
110. I read a while back that post-menopausal women are the most hormonally balanced of all
Tue Jul 8, 2014, 04:49 PM
Jul 2014

people of all ages, male or female.

I loved reading that.

tammywammy

(26,582 posts)
111. That's interesting.
Tue Jul 8, 2014, 07:37 PM
Jul 2014

I've never heard that before. Well nor have I spent a lot of time contemplating menopause since it's a ways away for me.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
91. And Maggie Thatchers.
Tue Jul 8, 2014, 01:40 PM
Jul 2014

Thatcher's popularity during her first years in office waned amid recession and high unemployment until the 1982 Falklands War brought a resurgence of support, resulting in her re-election in 1983.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Margaret_Thatcher

sharp_stick

(14,400 posts)
42. If she's not elected
Tue Jul 8, 2014, 11:13 AM
Jul 2014

I fear she's going to unleash an Ebola epidemic against America to retaliate against people who can't stop their own hyperbolic idiocy from getting out of hand.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
45. This is pretty sexist thinking. Plus, just because Warren was a Republican for so many long years
Tue Jul 8, 2014, 11:16 AM
Jul 2014

and supported all the military adventures of Reagan and Bush 41 that's no reason to assume she'd be a mass murderer just to make a point.

 

closeupready

(29,503 posts)
47. She voted for the IWR to "keep faith with" the US military.
Tue Jul 8, 2014, 11:19 AM
Jul 2014

So I agree, and I don't think it's an unfounded fear. K&R

bigtree

(85,996 posts)
49. because she's a woman?
Tue Jul 8, 2014, 11:19 AM
Jul 2014

. . . sexist dribble. Warren should feel as secure as any man in that position; maybe more.

CanonRay

(14,101 posts)
54. I just think we have enough to worry about
Tue Jul 8, 2014, 11:27 AM
Jul 2014

without worrying about what someone might do years in the future. Haven't we got enough shit for you to deal with? Worry about who a Republican President would appoint to the SCOTUS...that'll keep you up at night.

Fuddnik

(8,846 posts)
59. Not like she doesn't have a record.
Tue Jul 8, 2014, 11:59 AM
Jul 2014
http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/hillary_clinton_flaunts_her_surveillance_state_baggage_20140707

Who is the true patriot, Hillary Clinton or Edward Snowden? The question comes up because Clinton has gone all out in attacking Snowden as a means of burnishing her hawkish credentials, eliciting Glenn Greenwald’s comment that she is “like a neocon, practically.”

On Friday in England, Clinton boasted that two years ago she had favored a proposal by a top British general to train 100,000 “moderate” rebels to overthrow the Assad regime in Syria, but President Obama had turned her down. The American Thatcher? In that same interview with The Guardian she also managed to get in yet another shot against Snowden for taking refuge in Russia “apparently under Putin’s protection,” unless, she taunted, “he wishes to return knowing he would be held accountable.”

Accountable for telling the truth that Clinton concealed during her tenure as secretary of state in the Obama administration? Did she approve of the systematic spying on the American people as well as on others around the world, including the leaders of Germany and Brazil, or did she first learn of all this from the Snowden revelations?

On Saturday, a carefully vetted four-month investigation by The Washington Post based on material made available by Snowden revealed that while Clinton was in the government, the NSA had collected a vast trove of often intimate Internet correspondence and photos of innocent Americans, including many users of Facebook, Google, Yahoo, Microsoft and other leading Internet companies. The Post reported many files “described as useless by the [NSA] analysts but nonetheless retained ... have a voyeuristic quality. They tell stories of love and heartbreak, illicit sexual liaisons, mental-health crises, political and religious conversions, financial anxieties and disappointed hopes.”

(snip)

Ed Suspicious

(8,879 posts)
61. This must be some sort of DU insider's thread, or a game where we all have to guess who the fuck
Tue Jul 8, 2014, 12:03 PM
Jul 2014

you're talking about. Pronouns needs an objects.

Ed Suspicious

(8,879 posts)
80. Good point . . . Or anybody really. I figured he was talking about Palin, but I didn't understand
Tue Jul 8, 2014, 12:50 PM
Jul 2014

why. Probably just me. Oh well. We don't really need clarity, let's just assume. Sorry for being the bad guy here.

 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
72. Between this and the manufactured outrage over Hil's performing her duties as defense counsel for
Tue Jul 8, 2014, 12:30 PM
Jul 2014

an accused rapist, the Anti-Hillary crap is getting really deep here today. I'm going to need to put my galoshes on.

In_The_Wind

(72,300 posts)
74. The jury results are in.
Tue Jul 8, 2014, 12:39 PM
Jul 2014

12:41 PM
Automated Message
AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service
Mail Message
On Tue Jul 8, 2014, 09:16 AM an alert was sent on the following post:

If she's elected I fear she'll bomb something immediately to prove she's Tough Enough
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025210848

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

Great, start a post with the words "flame away" and not even idientify who you are talking about. This is flamebait, and it keeps the discuorse here at a low point.

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Tue Jul 8, 2014, 09:41 AM, and the Jury voted 2-5 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Alerter may be right; however, I don't think the post should be censored.

Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Weirdly sexist in addition to being obvious flamebait. Hide it.

Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: The posting does lack essential information, it is an incomplete sentence in this context and the meaning that CAN be derived is sexist in my view. It is still an opinion even if it is unclear whom the message is about. Leaving it up is fair because it shows the inability of the poster to express themselves coherently.

Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Who is the flame bait?

Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Flame bait indeed.

Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given

Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given

Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
81. Yep. Tough guy PR is what got us into Vietnam, Iraq, and Afghanistan.
Tue Jul 8, 2014, 12:52 PM
Jul 2014

But, it still remains popular for ambitious politicians like the candidate in question.

 

HooptieWagon

(17,064 posts)
101. Assuming "she" is HRC...
Tue Jul 8, 2014, 03:17 PM
Jul 2014

... I doubt "she" would start bombing a country just to prove "she"'s tough. However, I don't trust her judgement... "she" seems more inclined to make a knee-jerk reaction based on political expediency than a measured thoughtful response to a delicate situation.

 

amandabeech

(9,893 posts)
108. I think that Hillary is just naturally hawkish.
Tue Jul 8, 2014, 04:42 PM
Jul 2014

She strikes me as being almost Scoop Jackson-esque. She also seems to be more interested in nation or democracy building in chaotic areas of the world, judging by the "Arab Spring" efforts which occurred on her watch as Sec. of State. Those actions seem not to be working out as hoped.

If she is the nominee, I will vote for her because whoever the pubs put up will probably want to bomb half the world back to the stone age. And of course, Hillary would be much better on social issues.

But . . . I'd really like to look at some other candidates, including Sen. Warren and Sen. Sanders.

kiva

(4,373 posts)
109. You know, I had a similar fear about Obama in 2008,
Tue Jul 8, 2014, 04:48 PM
Jul 2014

I was afraid he'd order that all Muslims in the United States be arrested and executed to prove he was Christian Enough...oh wait, no I wasn't.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If she's elected I fear s...