Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

damnedifIknow

(3,183 posts)
Thu Jul 17, 2014, 12:20 AM Jul 2014

Imagine What We Could Buy If We Didn't Have to Spend Billions on Police Brutality Cases

"The numbers are shocking. "








Every few weeks, a newspaper somewhere in America reports on a million-dollar settlement paid out in a case of police abuse. Sometimes the figures are jarring. In 2012, Chicago gave Christina Eilman $22.5 million after police released the bipolar woman into a violent neighborhood, where she was beaten and raped. Earlier this year, the NYPD agreed to pay out $18 million to various defendants roughed up at the RNC convention in 2004.

It’s true that most cases result in far smaller payouts, but they can add up to nearly a billion dollars a year for just one city. That’s eye-popping when you consider that state governments collectively spend roughly $10 billion on public assistance programs for the poor. When more money is spent consoling victims of brutality than providing assistance for low-income people, that’s both a fiscal and humanitarian crisis. "


Consider New York City. In 2012, taxpayers paid $152 million in claims involving the NYPD. That same year, Mayor Bloomberg voted to cut $175 million from childcare and afterschool programs, affecting 47,000 kids. Child programs not only provide relief to working families with maxed-out schedules, they are the best tools the city has to foster an equal society in the long term. Instead the city is spending money settling cases like the one last month involving Officer Eugene Donnelly, who drunkenly barged into a woman’s home one night and “beat the hell out of her.”

The NYPD forecasts it will spend even more on such cases by 2016. "

* Prosecutors have an extreme reluctance to pick up cases of police abuse. Federal prosecutors decline around 95 percent of such cases for two main reasons: juries are mostly conditioned to side with the police, and various impediments are in place to make prosecution more difficult

http://www.alternet.org/civil-liberties/imagine-what-we-could-buy-if-we-didnt-have-spend-billions-police-brutality-cases

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Imagine What We Could Buy If We Didn't Have to Spend Billions on Police Brutality Cases (Original Post) damnedifIknow Jul 2014 OP
It staggers the mind. JohLast Jul 2014 #1
Assbackwards. SamKnause Jul 2014 #2
You can say that again... defacto7 Jul 2014 #3
Indeed. SamKnause Jul 2014 #4
Or the MIComplex. $400 billion on F-35 that doesnt work ErikJ Jul 2014 #5
Imagine what we could buy if we are AWARDED in a police brutality case. Spitfire of ATJ Jul 2014 #6
Imagine how much it worse it would be if prosecutors brought more than 5% of these cases to court. QuestForSense Jul 2014 #7
How ridiculous. Enthusiast Jul 2014 #8

SamKnause

(13,106 posts)
2. Assbackwards.
Thu Jul 17, 2014, 01:53 AM
Jul 2014

Everything in the U.S. is assbackwards.

A government can not function when facts, data, and research are ignored and manipulated.

When the facts are purposefully ignored and manipulated repeatedly, the intent is clear.

 

ErikJ

(6,335 posts)
5. Or the MIComplex. $400 billion on F-35 that doesnt work
Thu Jul 17, 2014, 02:35 AM
Jul 2014

Enough to give every homeless person in America a $600,000 house.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Imagine What We Could Buy...