Prejudice against whites is not the same as prejudice against blacks
Prejudice against men is not the same as prejudice against women.
Prejudice against straight people is not the same as prejudice against those who are not.
Most here will grant that judging someone on the basis of their innate characteristics (race, ethnicity, orientation,gender) is wrong. In that sense, prejudice is the same...but there's more to it and it makes all the difference.
If one is prejudiced against a white person, the larger culture is not backing that up.
For example, in the case of Trayvon Martin, it's not just that he was suspected and then killed as a result of prejudice by one person against African Americans, it's that in the aftermath, media coverage and societal reaction included vicious stereotyping that sought to justify his death. That was possible because such stereotyping is believed and accepted so widely.
And in the case of Sandra Fluke, her health care needs were viewed differently because she was a woman. While it would be wrong if a man's health care needs were discounted by an individual simply because of his gender, that would be wrong. But what wouldn't happen to a man, that did happen to Sandra Fluke was that her personal life was widely used to suggest that she didn't have a right to health care. Denial of health care to a man would not be accepted by society at large on the basis of whether or not he has sex, but for this woman, it was widely accepted as relevant.
All this said, my argument is that when prejudice is dominant against minority groups (or groups treated in similar fashion), individual discrimination is not the exception, it's symptomatic of a societal problem and experienced by people as institutional discrimination because these feelings are so widely held.
And even if a belief isn't held universally, that there is s substantial or even dominant belief in racial, gender or other stereotypes makes it that much harder for the victim of discrimination to overcome the effects of individual prejudice against them.
That is why though discrimination against people when they are white or male or straight, while wrong, often doesn't have the impact on the individual that it does on a minority individual.
This is why it's important to understand the difference between individual prejudice and widespread racism and prejudice. The latter is much more powerful and has made second class citizens of a large percentage of Americans who live with fewer economic opportunities and greater mistreatment by society simply because of the color, gender or other ways that they were born.
= new reply since forum marked as read
is against us white folk? 
Or at least, not as bad, as the traditional racism. Give me a friggin' break.
We'll take rhetorical questions with obvious answers for $200. Thanks. 
You accused me of using "the term "race card" at virtually every mention of racism... " which is bs.
I said in response that I didn't recall using that term. One reason I didn't recall is because it was during the heated primary wars four years ago, and in reference to what I saw as insinuations from some Obama supporters then that other DUers who supported Hillary were racist. (You know the kind of insinuation, you made a very similar one against me upthread, just didn't have the guts to come out and say it.)
You said I used it at virtually every mention of racism. You had to go back four years to find an example. Please, stop embarrassing yourself.
But let me ask you, so what if I have used that term? What does that prove? What are you trying to say? Just say it.
You also said I said Paul isn't racist, with no links to back that charge either.
But here's where you almost come out and say what you are too afraid to say - you said that "so yeah, you have another agenda and isn't equality here..."
CreekDog, your as full of it today as you were when you began attacking me. You have absolutely no basis on which to hurl such accusations at me, to assault my character in such a way, and you're like a fish out of water trying to justify your bs.
What is your problem, and why don't you just come out and say what you mean instead of being so timid?
Please, bring it on.
Or is this all some attempt to divert attention from your ridiculous OP? Btw, have you figured out which of us are more equal and which of us are less equal, when racism is ok and when it isn't?
at the long and widely accepted fact of societal bias and institutional racism/discrimination and its effects.
such ideas don't excuse any kind of bias against people, they just show how much more powerful they are when lots and lots of people get together to enforce a stereotype.
thanks for posting.
anytime. I like you, (well, what I can gather from a forum) and read your posts with pleasure. 
It is systemic.
i don't know why i bother with this topic either. i tried before, on a slightly different angle of it, but that one was little noticed:
Why the Martin case can be about racism, regardless of Zimmerman's race/ethnicity
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002490734
prejudice + power = institutional isms
I was run out of my childhood neighborhood, and almost killed, by black racists--I was a target of hate crimes before the term "hate crimes" was coined. And you're trying to tell me that my life is not worth anything?! 
I have news for you, pal. Prejudice is prejudice and discrimination is discrimination, no matter who's the perpetrator or target.
when she walked by. she was aghast (originally from the Northeast).
of course, a couple years later, i went to her workplace, the bank, and noticed among all their Presidential Portraits --no Lincoln.
Florida, the 1980's.
do people really think things are all better now? that it's all fixed, mostly better now?
I see the poster in question managed three posts before their tombstoning, and all have variations on that cowardly, idiotic theme. 
Response to CreekDog (Original post)
