Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)
Tue Jul 22, 2014, 10:31 AM Jul 2014

Why are white armed militia called rebels/separatists/militias, any other skin color, terrorists?

It is the same thing wherever you look in the media, the good guys and the bad guys and the really really bad guys are always able to be made out, it is so simple.


When all the guys are brown and just killing and terrorizing each other, then it is best to just ignore them, ergo Iraq for the last two years until one group of brown guys discovered that roaming the countryside in pickup trucks and terrorizing the population came with benefits, then the media paid attention.

If all the roaming bands of heavily armed and loosely organized white militias in America were black, what would the media call and do with them?

Sometimes it all just seems to be a war on semantics, but because words matter so much more in times of war and conflict the semantical war is as important as the real war.

That is all.

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why are white armed militia called rebels/separatists/militias, any other skin color, terrorists? (Original Post) Fred Sanders Jul 2014 OP
You know why. bravenak Jul 2014 #1
+1000 JustAnotherGen Jul 2014 #3
because some fundies are considered "better?" than other fundies? snooper2 Jul 2014 #2
I have no trouble calling the thugs in East Ukraine 'terrorists' nt geek tragedy Jul 2014 #4
Freedom Fighters jakeXT Jul 2014 #5
... NutmegYankee Jul 2014 #8
Many Militant groups in Africa and Asia are called rebels. NutmegYankee Jul 2014 #6
Not sure that's exactly true. The Tsarnaev brothers are white riderinthestorm Jul 2014 #7
The Katrina controversy on photo captions was incorrect. NutmegYankee Jul 2014 #11
Excuse me Fred, there are some Irish gentlemen here who'd like to speak with you about this.... Bluenorthwest Jul 2014 #9
Have they done anything? Calista241 Jul 2014 #10
 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
1. You know why.
Tue Jul 22, 2014, 10:33 AM
Jul 2014

Most people don"t even know they're doing it. They get called terroristsin their own countries by foreign armies that murder their civilians.

 

snooper2

(30,151 posts)
2. because some fundies are considered "better?" than other fundies?
Tue Jul 22, 2014, 10:34 AM
Jul 2014

I agree with you though-


for example-
The pro Rus-Si-A assholes continuing to try to break apart Ukraine are definitely terrorists-

NutmegYankee

(16,201 posts)
6. Many Militant groups in Africa and Asia are called rebels.
Tue Jul 22, 2014, 10:56 AM
Jul 2014

Same in South America. It depends more on the mission and less on the skin color.

 

riderinthestorm

(23,272 posts)
7. Not sure that's exactly true. The Tsarnaev brothers are white
Tue Jul 22, 2014, 10:57 AM
Jul 2014

And have clearly been labelled terrorists.



But yeah, there is a trend that's true. Remember the Katrina pics? Black folks grabbing bread out of a store were looters. White folks were survivors

NutmegYankee

(16,201 posts)
11. The Katrina controversy on photo captions was incorrect.
Tue Jul 22, 2014, 12:18 PM
Jul 2014
http://www.snopes.com/katrina/photos/looters.asp

Different photographers with different scenes and different circumstances. It true that the media treats blacks as dangerous, but this wasn't a good case to use.

Calista241

(5,586 posts)
10. Have they done anything?
Tue Jul 22, 2014, 11:10 AM
Jul 2014

Other than run around the woods with their guns? And posting dumb pictures to the internet?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why are white armed milit...