General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBlueJazz
(25,348 posts)I'm fairly schooled on the things that Unions/Democrats have done to help the American worker.
I LOVE to debate people on the subject. I rip their "Conservative BS" to ribbons.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)eppur_se_muova
(36,261 posts)the full version is much more to the point.
deurbano
(2,895 posts)SkyIsGrey
(378 posts)From Wikiquote: http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/John_Steinbeck
"Socialism never took root in America because the poor see themselves not as an exploited proletariat, but as temporarily embarrassed millionaires".
As quoted in A Short History of Progress (2005) by Ronald Wright, p. 124; though this has since been cited as a direct quote by some, the remark may simply be a paraphrase, as no quotation marks appear around the statement and earlier publication of this phrasing have not been located.
This is perhaps an incorrect quote from "A Primer on the '30s." Esquire, June 1960: 85-93
"Except for the field organizers of strikes, who were pretty tough monkeys and devoted, most of the so-called Communists I met were middle-class, middle-aged people playing a game of dreams. I remember a woman in easy circumstances saying to another even more affluent: 'After the revolution even we will have more, won't we, dear?' Then there was another lover of proletarians who used to raise hell with Sunday picknickers on her property.
"I guess the trouble was that we didn't have any self-admitted proletarians. Everyone was a temporarily embarrassed capitalist. Maybe the Communists so closely questioned by the investigation committees were a danger to America, but the ones I knewat least they claimed to be Communistscouldn't have disrupted a Sunday-school picnic. Besides they were too busy fighting among themselves."
PatrickforO
(14,572 posts)Populist_Prole
(5,364 posts)But man oh man I know plenty of them.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)I ask her if she had ever worked on a union job and she said no. I ask her how does she gather her information on unions and she stated FOX. I told her it was interested someone who had never before longed to a union "knows" so much for I was an active union member for 31 years and I thought information about unions should come from hose who are familiar with unions such as myself.
I know what unions do and hoe contracts are negotiated, she wasn't aware how this occurs
FOX news is not an expert on unions
DAngelo136
(265 posts)The technicians that work on FoxNews; lighting, electricians, cameramen, and even the technical directors all are union members. The writers likely belong to SAG/AFTRA and i'll even bet that Billo and Hannity belong to a union also (NABET)
7962
(11,841 posts)TiredOfNo
(52 posts)They criticize workers for wanting unions to protect their interests, while they themselves pay agents to do the same thing.
mountain grammy
(26,620 posts)Laelth
(32,017 posts)-Laelth
lame54
(35,287 posts)GeoWilliam750
(2,522 posts)I really do not understand how anyone can be anti-union - but I hear it all the time, often from union members and people receiving benefits because of the unions.
ORGANIZE!!!
Zimmerman's great!
MrsBrady
(4,187 posts)he's great live.
lame54
(35,287 posts)mountain grammy
(26,620 posts)joshcryer
(62,270 posts)Lithos
(26,403 posts)I'm from the South... It was the UNION army which caused all the destruction. That's why I'm against the Union!
</badonionimitation>
L-
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)lpbk2713
(42,757 posts)A CEO, a Teabagger, and a Union worker are all sitting at a table when a plate with a dozen freshly baked cookies arrives. Before anyone else can make a move, the CEO reaches out to rake in eleven of the cookies. When the other two look at him in speechless surprise, the CEO locks eyes with the Teabagger. You better watch that guy, the executive grumbles with a scornful nod toward the Union worker. He wants a piece of your cookie.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)mountain grammy
(26,620 posts)Wolf Frankula
(3,600 posts)you face him alone. With a Union, when you face the boss, you have somebody on your side.
Wolf
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)My principal would not let me leave to go to my mother in a severe health crisis. Severe. I said I would wait for the office to send someone to cover my class, then I was leaving.
I was thankful for my union rep then. Luckily she knew she had crossed the line, so it was not as bad as it could have been. It was a rough time, and I could not have done it alone right then.
Diclotican
(5,095 posts)madfloridian
In Europe - the employee is afraid of the worker - because "he" know the worker can strike - and get support from it from millions of others - in US is it opposite -there the worker is afraid of the employee - and "he" know the employee can get support from millions of others...
If enough workers had get enough - and was fighting for their rights - then the employees really would be afraid of the worker instead of the worker been afraid of the employeer...
When workers can be so afraid of their employees or others - that they would vote against organization a UNION as they did at one of the Volkswagen factories in the US - against the wish of the WV to boot - then you know something is absolutely wrong in the workplace...
Diclotican
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)Good to see you around again. I guess we haven't crossed paths in a while.
Diclotican
(5,095 posts)madfloridian
I have been around here - but not crossed path with you for a while I guess But I am here - and have read a few of your posts about things you have in your life
Diclotican
blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)The Magistrate
(95,247 posts)Thank you for sharing it.
bleedinglib
(212 posts)Unions built the middle class in this country during the 40's,50's & 60's.
Mom could stay home & make sure the kids were raised properly. Now that's family values!!
I was a union lather in Calif. for 40 years & when I was hurt on the job, the union protected me & made sure I was cared for. See how that works in a non-union Co.??
I remember when the union bashing started during the RR admin. It seemed like over nite the whole country hated unions. They were blamed for high prices & were ruining the country.
People were told that if we get rid of union's, prices will come down. (how'd that work out)??
When I was a kid, there were about 600 millionaires in the U S. Now there are about 600 Billionaires. Boy, those unions did ruin the country!!
Lee-Lee
(6,324 posts)Oppressive patriarchal values keeping the women at home "where they belong" is right wing fundie bullshit with no place in a progressive movement.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)L0oniX
(31,493 posts)WTF buddy ...you should delete that shit while you can.
Populist_Prole
(5,364 posts)A non political message board but the random A-hole always pops up to politicize things. The bottom panel of the comic, 2nd from the left being the issue I want to highlight.
Jerk went on about "special interest" lobbying, unions the most pointed subject. I mentioned and asked what he thought about business interests lobbying, and their wads of cash. Through a couple of increasingly heated back and forth exchanges of clarification of obfuscations, I found he believed that business is NOT a special interest: That business looking out for #1 is like some form of natural law of the way things should be.
These are the people ( apparently that's what they are ) we are up against. I mean, to be deliberately obtuse to defend an ideology, rather than a result.
olegramps
(8,200 posts)Corporations are not evil. It is simply the nature of the beast to maximize profits for their investors. When government and unions fail to regulate their profit driven motives it is their failure, not the corporations. Who can blame them when CEOs and upper management awards themselves astronomical benefits. The failure in that case is the very investors who elect boards who are to be their representatives that are populated by CEOs. The members of the boards of major corporations are little more than a corporate country club in which they nominate each other to sit on various boards. They just rubber stamp the rip off in a quid pro quo agreement.
ctsnowman
(1,903 posts)Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)L0oniX
(31,493 posts)MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)"I've had a snoot full of that #/^&."
leftstreet
(36,107 posts)octoberlib
(14,971 posts)Zorra
(27,670 posts)B Calm
(28,762 posts)tea and oranges
(396 posts)11 Bravo
(23,926 posts)that might possibly get me a hide or even a TS. Boy, was I mistaken. A (belated) K&R!
11 Bravo (Proud union member since 1976)
mountain grammy
(26,620 posts)colsohlibgal
(5,275 posts)If it is any right to wok it's to work for less in worse conditions.
I think socialism has never taken off here because people don't get that it's an economic term, not a political one. Also they confuse it with totalitarianism.
So to thwart that evil socialism we let the top 1% have about half the money. We let the Waltons get obscenely wealthy while they pay their employees low, low wages with crappy benefits.
Too many of the people in this country have been so misinformed and/or uninformed that they have worked hard against their own self interest. It's remarkable as well as maddening.
WillyT
(72,631 posts)ymetca
(1,182 posts)It seems to me that we tend to confuse the terms "union" and "labor". They aren't really the same thing. Moreover, unions are organized on the same hierarchical principle that capital is --a way of ordering human behavior that is as old (and obsolete) as the ancient pyramids.
For a modern global union to succeed in today's world it needs to be non-hierarchical, and include everybody by default. I.e. a global, one-person/one-vote Democracy. That means cloud computing and cheap, rugged, satellite-connected handheld units that allow every person on the planet to vote for everything everywhere.
While the competing, hierarchical, capitalist/socialist systems are racing to establish dominance over pretty much every resource on Earth, a "Union of All Peoples" should be arising to combat these global systems of coercion and control.
R. Buckminster Fuller once suggested that the objective of modern civilization was to eliminate "labor" in the sense that our survival should be more and more assured by technological, robotic means, while individual human leisure, innovation, and self-actualization needs should be realized by as many people as possible as quickly as possible. Such goal is completely contrary to the so-called "work ethic", and the institutions that tend to stratify "labor" vs. "capital".
The eons-old dialectic of hierarchical systems of human self-organization must come to an end.
In the immortal words of Bob Black, "No one should ever have to work."