Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBuilding a progressive alternative to ALEC
Building a progressive alternative to ALECBy Katrina vanden Heuvel at the Washington Post
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/katrina-vanden-heuvel-building-a-progressive-alternative-to-alec/2014/07/28/36ee41a6-1697-11e4-9e3b-7f2f110c6265_story.html
SNIP...........................
ALEC remains the ubiquitous conservative puppet-master; its fingerprints and that of its most well-known supporters (the Koch brothers, Exxon Mobil, Pfizer, AT&T, etc.) can be found all over right-wing legislation that has made its way through the state and local legislative process. To understand the magnitude of its influence, consider that of the more than 100 bills introduced between 2011 and 2013 to repeal or weaken minimum wage laws, 67 of them related back to ALEC. And in 2009, 115 of ALECs 826 model bills were enacted into law.
Im often asked why progressives havent developed an organization of its own to mirror the success of ALEC. The problem is, its not just the legislation that ALEC writes that progressives should object to; its also the methods they use to get it passed. ALEC operates without transparency, using an army of lobbyists to penetrate state agendas. They strong-arm lawmakers into granting corporate wishes and do the bidding of their biggest funders. What they do runs counter to the values of anyone who considers themselves a big D or small d democrat.
Still, there is the need for some kind of counterweight to ALEC, one built and operated with progressive values in mind. And soon, we might have one.
Recently, the American Legislative and Issue Campaign Exchange and the Progressive States Network announced a merger to build an organization that will be focused on moving a progressive policy agenda in the states. While the goals of the new undertaking may resemble those of ALEC, their methods are vastly different. They will operate transparently, use no lobbyists, and make their model legislation and resources available to everyone; their database already showcases 1,800 examples of progressive legislation. And they will engage with people, not corporations.
...........................SNIP
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 672 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Building a progressive alternative to ALEC (Original Post)
applegrove
Aug 2014
OP
cheapdate
(3,811 posts)1. Its pretty tough to compete with the money of corporations and big business.
I could try to rally every progressive in my community and we can do everything we can do. A big corporation can make a $50,000 media advertisement buy and write it off as a business expense.
There is an inherent inequality.
Gothmog
(145,176 posts)2. ALEC depended on secrecy and avoiding public scutiny
I doubt that a progressive alternative could or should duplicate these tactics. The steps that ALEC takes to hide its actions and bills is really scary. I am glad that any progressive alternative will be in the open
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)3. We need our thinking controlled by information outlets of oligarchs?
Clearly we on the left are shooting ourselves in the foot objecting to the phalangist DLC/3rd way.
Or not.
In this case isn't the "if you can't beat 'em, join 'em" approach a suicide strategy for democracy?