Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
Fri Aug 8, 2014, 08:59 AM Aug 2014

It isn’t about the tunnels

Omar Robert Hamilton 4 August 2014

Israel’s justifications for its assault on Gaza have shifted more than once since Operation ‘Brother’s Keeper’ was launched on 12 June, supposedly in response to the kidnapping of three Israeli teenagers. The rockets ‘raining down terror’ on Israel (they have so far killed three people, giving them a kill rate of 0.1 per cent) were the reason given for the launch of operation ‘Protective Edge’ on 8 July; the ground invasion of Gaza on 17 July was said to be aimed at destroying a series of tunnels leading into Israel.

The BBC, ever mindful of the approved Israeli lexicon, refers to them as ‘attack tunnels’. They are, we are told, designed to penetrate Israel and kidnap Israelis. In 2006 Gilad Shalit, a soldier, was captured and held as a prisoner of war. He was released in exchange for 1027 Palestinian prisoners, many of whom were rounded up again during Operation ‘Brother’s Keeper’. No civilian has ever been abducted through the tunnels.

Their primary purpose is economic, a response to Israel’s seven-year siege of Gaza. The tunnels along the Egyptian border weren’t built by Hamas: it merely taxes the goods being moved through by the entrepreneurs that dig and run them. Israel talks of a ‘terrorist organisation’ that ‘deliberately embeds its terrorist infrastructure inside civilian neighbourhoods’. In fact a system of loosely regulated capitalism governs the tunnel industry. If you live near the border you are likely to go into the tunnelling business because there’s nothing else to do.

snip* If the purpose of Israel’s operation is to destroy the tunnels, why has it cost more than 1800 Palestinian lives? There were thought to be at least 1000 tunnels between Egypt and Gaza, which the Egyptian regime – not known for its regard for human life – destroyed without killing anyone. There seem to have been no more than forty tunnels leading into Israel and the operation to destroy them has already taken two weeks.

in full: http://www.lrb.co.uk/blog/2014/08/04/omar-hamilton/it-isnt-about-the-tunnels/?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=3616&hq_e=el&hq_m=3331217&hq_l=14&hq_v=7080157fba

66 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
It isn’t about the tunnels (Original Post) Jefferson23 Aug 2014 OP
The tunnels, like the kidnapped teens, are an excuse for violence. DanTex Aug 2014 #1
At least it will be a counter to the Hamas press release. former9thward Aug 2014 #7
No, It would be akin to a Press Release from Dick Cheney/Rumsfeld,Condoleezza Rice, et al 2banon Aug 2014 #17
Yea, exactly..worse in certain respects. n/t Jefferson23 Aug 2014 #48
yep.. in certain respects, but they're evil twins, imo. dick & bibi that is. n/t 2banon Aug 2014 #63
I don't know - could it be because the COLGATE4 Aug 2014 #2
How would that change the approach to destroy them, the manner Egypt chose vs Israel's choice? n/t Jefferson23 Aug 2014 #3
Hamas was not attacking Egypt. former9thward Aug 2014 #8
That does not answer the question and your reply is concerning. You're suggesting Israel can Jefferson23 Aug 2014 #9
There are casualties in war. former9thward Aug 2014 #10
I see you have no answer to the question..ok. n/t Jefferson23 Aug 2014 #11
Nope. H2O Man Aug 2014 #12
True. n/t Jefferson23 Aug 2014 #13
Hamas was not attacking Israel either, for over a year. sabrina 1 Aug 2014 #18
No one is talking about the natural gas fields off the coast of Gaza... truth2power Aug 2014 #26
Not the same because the Egyptian tunnels had COLGATE4 Aug 2014 #38
Would you happen to have a link that supports/explains any of that..seems what they're suggesting Jefferson23 Aug 2014 #41
Here you go. COLGATE4 Aug 2014 #43
Thanks. n/t Jefferson23 Aug 2014 #46
I'm not seeing their position is supported by the article..not saying they're necessarily completely Jefferson23 Aug 2014 #47
The Egyptian tunnels had exits at both ends... EX500rider Aug 2014 #58
Thanks, I appreciate the link. The information does not answer for me why this operation Jefferson23 Aug 2014 #61
Who exactly was attacked in the past two years? n/t malaise Aug 2014 #5
how many attacks have been lauched from these tunnels? frylock Aug 2014 #28
Shhhhhhhhhhhhhh and Duh!!!!!!!!!!!! malaise Aug 2014 #4
They aren't, agreed. This continues due to the political cover we give them. n/t Jefferson23 Aug 2014 #6
"Mowing the grass" BlueStreak Aug 2014 #14
The children of Gaza would not need to be killed by the Israeli government if Hamas did not hide GoneFishin Aug 2014 #15
Does that mean riverwalker Aug 2014 #16
I hate to imply what the poster meant... awoke_in_2003 Aug 2014 #20
This message was self-deleted by its author Maedhros Aug 2014 #30
LOL, if the reason was to close tunnels they wouldn't have had....... Bonhomme Richard Aug 2014 #19
Yes. The unity government is what they wanted to avoid, at any cost. n/t Jefferson23 Aug 2014 #23
You beat me to it. All they needed to do was plug them with Cement on their end, done! Dustlawyer Aug 2014 #25
Sometimes tunnels only have one end... thesquanderer Aug 2014 #27
A tunnel with another open end is not a trunnel at all. Bonhomme Richard Aug 2014 #33
Note that the tunnels into Israel were constructed so COLGATE4 Aug 2014 #39
That's what I've read as well in many reputable newspapers. riderinthestorm Aug 2014 #44
Makes perfect sense. Complete them until there's only COLGATE4 Aug 2014 #45
Sure they could have -- Hell Hath No Fury Aug 2014 #53
Just a point on that, not the whole issue. From a DU post: freshwest Aug 2014 #49
I'd like to know how that changes anything, how it justifies what has occured in Gaza. Jefferson23 Aug 2014 #50
I only addressed the point he made and the translation from the videos posted here. freshwest Aug 2014 #57
It's always a good and fair approach to consider all materials available and compare/contrast Jefferson23 Aug 2014 #60
Thanks for the throughtful response and link. Regarding this one thing: freshwest Aug 2014 #64
That was beautifully written, freshwest and I can't say we disagree on any significant Jefferson23 Aug 2014 #65
K&R ReRe Aug 2014 #21
Israel could destroy the tunnels on their end. oldandhappy Aug 2014 #22
Right and close to 2000 people did not need to die. n/t Jefferson23 Aug 2014 #24
dmz enid602 Aug 2014 #29
Devil's advocate questions BlueCheese Aug 2014 #31
I have no access to that information yet I imagine Egypt does..they closed them, no deaths. Jefferson23 Aug 2014 #32
Egypt did it no problem AgingAmerican Aug 2014 #35
Cement Unplugged seveneyes Aug 2014 #36
You have any evidence the tunnels to Egypt that are destroyed having been utilized since then Jefferson23 Aug 2014 #37
Rockets, guns, ammo and explosives seveneyes Aug 2014 #40
You could have just said, no. n/t Jefferson23 Aug 2014 #42
Genocidal punishment AgingAmerican Aug 2014 #34
It appears to me that the Israelis are bent on getting rid of all Palestinians in Gaza. nt ladjf Aug 2014 #51
They want them to submit and abandon all resistance, and to abandon Hamas. Using indiscriminate Jefferson23 Aug 2014 #52
Naomi Wolf - Hell Hath No Fury Aug 2014 #54
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Aug 2014 #55
You are always welcome. n/t Jefferson23 Aug 2014 #62
K&R woo me with science Aug 2014 #56
kick nt kelliekat44 Aug 2014 #59
kick woo me with science Aug 2014 #66

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
1. The tunnels, like the kidnapped teens, are an excuse for violence.
Fri Aug 8, 2014, 09:03 AM
Aug 2014

Obviously, the war crimes apology squad will show up soon with a link to some Likud press release.

 

2banon

(7,321 posts)
17. No, It would be akin to a Press Release from Dick Cheney/Rumsfeld,Condoleezza Rice, et al
Fri Aug 8, 2014, 10:25 AM
Aug 2014

The Likud Party is, if not worse than, at the minimum equal to the vile, evil U.S. Neo-Cons in the U.S..

In fact they worked hand in glove during the Bush/Cheney years, and the fingerprints of their evil hand on policy matters currently in play, becomes more and more evident with every passing day.

COLGATE4

(14,732 posts)
2. I don't know - could it be because the
Fri Aug 8, 2014, 09:18 AM
Aug 2014

tunnels going to Egypt were primarily for bringing in goods, while the tunnels into Israel were for attacking Israelis?

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
9. That does not answer the question and your reply is concerning. You're suggesting Israel can
Fri Aug 8, 2014, 09:32 AM
Aug 2014

have a disregard for casualties...because they can do it differently. That makes no sense to me.

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
18. Hamas was not attacking Israel either, for over a year.
Fri Aug 8, 2014, 10:31 AM
Aug 2014

Israel attacked Gaza on false pretenses, much like our Cheney led criminal admin attacked Iraq on false pretenses.

Let's at least keep the timeline straight. Facts are important and glossing over them doesn't help anyone or help to end the violence.

COLGATE4

(14,732 posts)
38. Not the same because the Egyptian tunnels had
Fri Aug 8, 2014, 02:53 PM
Aug 2014

clear exits that could be found and blocked. The tunnels into israel were constructed so as not to have an exit until the very day of attack. Nothing to see, nothing to block.

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
41. Would you happen to have a link that supports/explains any of that..seems what they're suggesting
Fri Aug 8, 2014, 03:09 PM
Aug 2014

is they must excavate everything?

COLGATE4

(14,732 posts)
43. Here you go.
Fri Aug 8, 2014, 03:16 PM
Aug 2014

Secret Tunnels Under Israel Reveal Intricate Threat From ...
www.democraticunderground.com/113473488
Democratic Underground
Jul 27, 2014 - 35 posts - ‎8 authors

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
47. I'm not seeing their position is supported by the article..not saying they're necessarily completely
Fri Aug 8, 2014, 03:55 PM
Aug 2014

wrong, yet what I've read does not suggest what Egypt did would not be as effective. In addition,
the criticism involves, as you know from the initial OP, questions the threat level of the tunnels destruction
by means other than what Egypt's methods used vs the level of casualties incurred and whether that is justifiable
by Israel. I don't think that question has been resolved by your article.


snip* For Israel, the below-ground equivalent of the Iron Dome anti-missile system — tunnel-sensing seismic monitors and algorithms — is far from being deployed. Geologists argue that combating tunnels can be solved through technological innovation but are not “rocket science.”

http://america.aljazeera.com/articles/2014/7/23/gaza-undergroundhamastunnels.html

EX500rider

(10,842 posts)
58. The Egyptian tunnels had exits at both ends...
Fri Aug 8, 2014, 07:57 PM
Aug 2014

..that's why they were easier to find.
The Gaza/Israel tunnels had no exit on the Israeli side, Hamas doesn't dig the last bit till they use it in a attack.

Over the years Hamas has learned how to dig tunnels that are virtually undetectable on the Israeli side. This means going deep enough to avoid detection by ground penetrating radar or acoustic sensors. This makes it more expensive and time consuming to build tunnels but Hamas has diverted much foreign aid (cash and building materials) to the tunnel effort. A lot of the concrete and other building materials allowed into Gaza went to building tunnels.

By 2014 Israel knew of the new, deeper and more complex Hamas tunnels into Israel but had found only four of them since 2012. In March Israeli troops found one that was 1,800 meters long and extended 300 meters into Israel. Hamas dismissed this find as a tunnel that had been abandoned because of a partial collapse. But the Israelis said the tunnel had been worked on recently and equipment, like generators, was found in it. The tunnel was lined with reinforcing concrete and was 9-20 meters (30-63 feet) underground. Three of these tunnels were near the town of Khan Younis and apparently part of a plan to kidnap Israelis for use in trades (for prisoner or whatever) with Israel.

Israeli intelligence knew Hamas leaders were discussing a much larger tunnel program, involving dozens of tunnels and suspected that dozens of them were already built or nearing completion by mid-2014. Most of the completed one had no exits in Israel, yet. Available monitoring equipment was slow and often ineffective if there was no one actively working on the tunnel below or if there was no exit (yet) on the Israeli side. Another problem was that Hamas had, by trial and error, discovered the limitations or blind spots of Israeli tunnel detection gear and techniques.

The Hamas tunnels already built and “stockpiled” could only be detected inside Gaza, where their entrances were. These were also hidden, at least from aerial observation. Israeli intelligence had discovered possible tunnel entrances by detecting the Hamas activity around the suspected entrances (entering and leaving, removing dirt). Hamas tried to hide this activity and Israel knew this meant they probably succeeded in some cases. Thus before the Israeli troops went into Gaza recently, commanders had lots of information of where to look. By the end of July the Israelis had found 46 entrances to 14 tunnels. They also discovered that many of the tunnels had numerous branches inside Gaza and were meant to be used to move Hamas gunmen and suicide bombers around if the Israelis invaded. These Hamas men could then come to the surface behind Israeli troops and attack. This was one reason why there were so many Israeli casualties this time around (compared to the 2009 invasion).

http://strategypage.com/htmw/htcbtsp/articles/20140808.aspx

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
61. Thanks, I appreciate the link. The information does not answer for me why this operation
Fri Aug 8, 2014, 09:02 PM
Aug 2014

we have seen these last weeks to be necessary. If more information surfaces to support
that, fine..I am open to looking at it.

 

BlueStreak

(8,377 posts)
14. "Mowing the grass"
Fri Aug 8, 2014, 10:06 AM
Aug 2014

Every couple of years, Israel goes into the Palestinian areas and murders a bunch of people. There is always a pretext to it, but internally they simply refer to this as "mowing the grass", i.e. a routine maintenance operation.

These bastards are endangering all of us. If you want to rank the dangers that honestly threaten the average American and our way of life, this has to be near the top of the list -- somewhere right after the hegemony of the 0.1% and Wall Street's rigged systems, the for-profit prison industry and a few other things.

GoneFishin

(5,217 posts)
15. The children of Gaza would not need to be killed by the Israeli government if Hamas did not hide
Fri Aug 8, 2014, 10:15 AM
Aug 2014

tunnels and rockets in their shoes and underpants.

riverwalker

(8,694 posts)
16. Does that mean
Fri Aug 8, 2014, 10:22 AM
Aug 2014

you would condone attacks on Tel Aviv because of the weapons hidden in the base at Hertzlia?

Response to GoneFishin (Reply #15)

Bonhomme Richard

(9,000 posts)
19. LOL, if the reason was to close tunnels they wouldn't have had.......
Fri Aug 8, 2014, 10:39 AM
Aug 2014

to go into Gaza at all.
Here's a clue about tunnels. They have ends on both sides of the border.

Dustlawyer

(10,495 posts)
25. You beat me to it. All they needed to do was plug them with Cement on their end, done!
Fri Aug 8, 2014, 11:29 AM
Aug 2014

They want to make Gaza uninhabitable and motivate the residents to leave next time they open the borders.

COLGATE4

(14,732 posts)
39. Note that the tunnels into Israel were constructed so
Fri Aug 8, 2014, 02:55 PM
Aug 2014

as to have no visible exit until the very day of the planned attack. The tunnels were built to be short of exiting with one day's digging. That way, the exit is dug and the attack carried out. No visible exit until then.

 

riderinthestorm

(23,272 posts)
44. That's what I've read as well in many reputable newspapers.
Fri Aug 8, 2014, 03:18 PM
Aug 2014

Israel couldn't locate them on the Israeli side since they hadn't been opened there yet.

COLGATE4

(14,732 posts)
45. Makes perfect sense. Complete them until there's only
Fri Aug 8, 2014, 03:21 PM
Aug 2014

one day of tunneling left to break through and exit. Easy to finish them and carry out the attack on the same day, avoiding detection until it's too late. But that very simple (and very clever) strategy seems to be difficult for some of the Hamas supporters to grasp.

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
49. Just a point on that, not the whole issue. From a DU post:
Fri Aug 8, 2014, 07:02 PM
Aug 2014

I followed a link upthread and searched DU. It says the tunnels don't have an 'end' on the Israeli side:

COLGATE4 (5,973 posts)

18. Many of the tunnels do not yet have an exit. They are left unfinished to prevent detection by the Israelis. When Hamas intends to carry out a strike they finish off the last few meters, creating the exit and attack. So the only way to find many of these is by finding the start of them in Gaza (which is what the iDF on the ground is doing).

http://metamorphosis.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1134&pid=73604

If so, it's a clever design and strategy that would be effective. It wouldn't show up on ground radar. The DUer did not post a link, and if it was an Israeli source, it will be dismissed due to the kind of the heat generated in these threads.

The full shelling of Gaza doesn't seem to be about the tunnels, but making life so unbearable the people there will move away to the Sinai. I don't know what that area is like but a radical Likud deputy said it was the only way to have peace. Although other MP's opposed him in the parliament.

And I've seen three videos here at DU taken in Gaza, posted against the actions of Israel, where several grieving Palestinians were blaming the Arab nations. I saw not one blame Israel for the destruction which I found very odd. A sort of fatalism or accepting it as 'God's will' perhaps.

As to American support of Israel, I have an opinion a to why it exists. And that it's not based on religion, oil, racism or the MIC. I haven't been able to pull it together so I haven't made an OP on it.

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
50. I'd like to know how that changes anything, how it justifies what has occured in Gaza.
Fri Aug 8, 2014, 07:11 PM
Aug 2014

Makes no sense to me. Palestinians are well aware they are valueless among the leaders
of the Arab league, for the most part. There is an important distinction between those leaders
and their citizens regarding support. To suggest the Palestinians do not hold Israel responsible, primarily,
would need support.

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
57. I only addressed the point he made and the translation from the videos posted here.
Fri Aug 8, 2014, 07:50 PM
Aug 2014

The people were very forthcoming about their grief and anger, but did not specify anyone to blame except the Arab nations.

I can't tell you why the word Israel was not used, as even the reporters who have been given press freedom and done a good job there, didn't bring it up either. I can't read their minds, so I can't give 'support' for that.

I simply watched the videos over and read the words on the videos. And that's why I was struck by the lack of vitriol and said it was odd that they did not name Netanyahu or the IDF in those videos.

You may have seen other videos where they did. It's possible that they don't acknowledge the existence of Israel so they don't bother to speak of it. I have watched virtually every video posted on DU about this, from soldiers leaving the IDF and many others. I want to hear all sides, no matter what they say about it. I have posted when I found very credible videos that make sense to me, and most of those out of Gaza look and sound very credible to me and I said that on those videos.

At times, I cannot figure out what is going on in the videos at all, especially the distant views of rockets, no more than I can some of those I've seen in Ukraine. I don't have experience with how the rockets work, and on those threads people have argued where the rockets came from. So I said nothing because I don't have experience.

The videos I mentioned that you are questioning me on were not posted by Israeli or IDF supporters. A great deal of what Israel is doing does not make sense to our American viewpoint. And I am looking for a deeper meaning in all of this, because it's insane.



Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
60. It's always a good and fair approach to consider all materials available and compare/contrast
Fri Aug 8, 2014, 08:59 PM
Aug 2014

information. I am not aware that anyone living in Gaza would not mention Israel due to a lack
of recognition of their state, if that is what you meant. With that said, there are reliable
sources and then there are not, for both sides.

Human rights group, B'Tselem is one of several Israeli human rights groups..Rabbis for Human Rights,
and Physicians for Human Rights ( Israel branch ) are just a few. Videos can be abbreviated and
like anything else, subject to verification. Regardless, that a Palestinian would express a sense of
abandonment from the Arab nations leaders is not surprising..they have a history of doing so.

In the end, these groups, along with Amnesty International and HRW do well to provide the
human story and verification of events..it does take time. What has occurred and why is
insane, deeply so and not at all warranted..but people have to decide that for themselves.

If you like, you can browse the link below and in the top banner, you'll notice there is a link
marked, Human Rights Link. That will bring you to a page with a long list of respected groups.

http://www.btselem.org/side_links/about

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
64. Thanks for the throughtful response and link. Regarding this one thing:
Fri Aug 8, 2014, 11:30 PM
Aug 2014
I am not aware that anyone living in Gaza would not mention Israel due to a lack
of recognition of their state, if that is what you meant.


What I meant is the words I saw translated. It was not mentioned. I don't know why the reporter or the translator would leave that out of the video.

Hamas and others in the past, and other nations, do not 'recognize' Israel as anything but a burden put on them by Europe, or an outlaw nation, and now as a terrorist nation. In that lens, nothing they did, do or will ever do will ever be 'recognized' as legitimate so people seek sources to verify that belief.

Likewise, the Israeli state does not 'recognize' the Palestinian state in any form because they believe they were rightfully put there by history, and not as a favor from Europe or the USA. And the USA had nothing to do with the founding of the state, and Israel doesn't feel it owes us anything. They don't live or die on our dime from what I've read.

But the second largest population of Jews in the world lives in the USA, just barely behind Israel, if we are going to equate the reasons we support them:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_population_by_country

Although I believe our support for Israel is based more upon the American job as assigned by the Allies of WW2 to keep the 'status quo' going. It has not all been an evil thing, but a lot of it has. To be replaced by what - not love and peace at this time in the world, apparently. Under Obama we've been hands off and people are still slaughtering each other for land and resources, as always.

Okay, drifted off topic.

Back to recognizing states:

There is no reason to say automatically that the people of Gaza recognize or don't recognize Israel as if it was any importance, but you found something in that statement. They don't need to, understand?

No more than when most Americans speak of the USA, do they 'recognize' the native tribes and their opinion as of any account.

No more than Russia and China and Canada and nations to the south, or in the Pacific or Africa, not even those not under the control of European cultures, 'recognize' the indigenous people in their nations.

Some native Americans have told me they do not 'recognize' the USA, Canada or Mexico, etc. as legitimate nations. They call them fictions and say the land all belongs to them and they're waiting to see us assimilate to their ways. I'd always thought that would be a good idea, but that's just me, perhaps.

See how complicated this all becomes, and how we are narrowing our focus not to history, but what we are told in the media? But wait - that doe not require proof, as it's an opinion.

I think the disparate life experiences of people posting at DU is a source of conflict due to differing educations and reliance on media sources. I don't look at media as much more than a device to hype public opinion for the profit of those who own the media. When we look at who owns what, and what their financial interest is, it's very telling. I see every story, especially sensational ones, that way.

But I don't usually post on these threads, as I don't do 'evil, evil' whoever the 'devil du jour' media sells. I look more to the history and connections between the people having disputes and fighting with each other.

Perhaps people in the videos didn't mention Israel for positive reasons that lead to reconciliation. They may not have said anything about Israel if they didn't see themselves as as separate from Israelis. Maybe they are not falling for propaganda.

I've read on DU that there are different nationalities living in Gaza, and likely they are all undergoing the same horrific experiences which connects them with people worldwide. What I saw in the videos was a civilized people with good infrastructure being ruined, and valuing their city. That should give any group that disrespects them pause. Just like the days when the American human shields went to Baghdad and we saw them there in the side walk cafes showing us a side of Iraqi life the media didn't want us to see, as it didn't fit their bloodthirsty narrative. It made them human just as these videos have made the people of Gaza human to the world. The ones calling for blood in any conflict, are not showing what is worth protecting. Civil society is worth saving because it allows people freedom.

We learn a lot about the world here, but we also tend to bash each other without giving the other a chance to examine their thinking process as they seek a conclusion of how best to act to change things for the better.

Once again, I thank you for a respectful response.

EOM.

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
65. That was beautifully written, freshwest and I can't say we disagree on any significant
Sat Aug 9, 2014, 08:30 AM
Aug 2014

point. I do find it important to wade through the propaganda and reports, and scholarly
level analysis to consider, good work has been written on this conflict which is near ready
to reach 50 years old. There is a wrong and right, it does not belong to one side yet I feel
it is a great dishonor to not recognize the stacked obstacles before the Palestinians..both
militarily and politically...they're enormous in both areas.

In solidarity for peace...thank you for your response.

enid602

(8,616 posts)
29. dmz
Fri Aug 8, 2014, 11:55 AM
Aug 2014

Right. And furthermore, although a 'buffer zone' might be wise from a national defense strategy and in the interest of promoting calm and peace, one might say that it could have been placed on the Israeli side of the border, where population density is less of an issue. It would not have reduced Gaza's land by 40%!

BlueCheese

(2,522 posts)
31. Devil's advocate questions
Fri Aug 8, 2014, 12:06 PM
Aug 2014

How do you find the tunnels on your end? I assume they're built so as to avoid detection, as that's the whole point of them.

Can you just plug the end with cement? Wouldn't you have to destroy the entire length of it? Otherwise it'd be easy to create a new endpoint, or extend the tunnel from somewhere else along its length. Also, I imagine the people who built a kilometers long tunnel would have the ability to unplug some cement.

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
32. I have no access to that information yet I imagine Egypt does..they closed them, no deaths.
Fri Aug 8, 2014, 12:11 PM
Aug 2014

Unplug them? Again, look to Egypt's success, none are functional that I am aware of.

Fair questions, btw..thanks.

 

seveneyes

(4,631 posts)
36. Cement Unplugged
Fri Aug 8, 2014, 02:00 PM
Aug 2014

They would just dig a couple of feet through the sand and around the cement. It's like plugging a hole in the water.

As for closing the tunnels from the Israeli side, the terrorists don't complete the tunnel exit until they are ready to come through to butcher and kidnap Israeli citizens.

Attacking the tunnels of terror from the side the terrorists dug them is the best route.

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
37. You have any evidence the tunnels to Egypt that are destroyed having been utilized since then
Fri Aug 8, 2014, 02:41 PM
Aug 2014

please post it.

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
52. They want them to submit and abandon all resistance, and to abandon Hamas. Using indiscriminate
Fri Aug 8, 2014, 07:22 PM
Aug 2014

killing was one approach to meet that end.

 

Hell Hath No Fury

(16,327 posts)
54. Naomi Wolf -
Fri Aug 8, 2014, 07:44 PM
Aug 2014

on her FB page has been having some very interesting conversations about the happenings in Gaza. One of the discussions was -- if it really WAS about the tunnels - the myriad of ways they could have been taken care of without resorting to the massive bombing campaign. Everything from their discovery to their destruction could have gone differently, if Israel had wanted it.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»It isn’t about the tunnel...