Do you support the latest round of airstrikes in Iraq?

[Cali_Democrat]

15 votes, 0 passes | Time left: Unlimited
	Yes
	12 (80%)
	No
	3 (20%)
	0 DU members did not wish to select any of the options provided.
Show usernames Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll

[randys1]

1. I am against war of any kind, but I dont know what else he could do, cleaning up after

the worst foreign policy disaster in American history (W invasion of Iraq) is not easy

[Cali_Democrat]

2. Obama has had to clean up Dubya's shit his entire presidency

and Dubya's buddies in Congress are still trying to drop turds!

[Ken Burch]

8. Bombing Iraq can't clean ANYTHING up.

And historically, "limited bombing" has a way of not staying limited.

Yes, Bush was a skidmarks of the tighty-whities of history, but that doesn't make MORE KILLING ok.

[bemildred]

3. Send in the drones. At last a useful application for them. nt

[conservaphobe]

4. I've always been strongly against large ground wars and fully supportive of

limited military strikes from the air and sea.

This is what our military should be used for... missions with small objectives.

And I hope future Presidents follow Obama's lead on this.

[Cali_Democrat]

5. ...

[Ken Burch]

7. Er...why did you respond to your own OP with a blank post?

[Cali_Democrat]

10. To piss you off

Obviously it worked...

[Ken Burch]

11. I'm not pissed...just a bit puzzled.

Particularly since you posted that hours before I even knew that this thread existed.

And just so you know, I'm not posting on the bombings out of personal enmity towards you...so you have no reason to feel any towards me.

I just don't want more carnage. Bombing doesn't stop killing. Nor does it have any other effects that are ever good for, as we used to say "children, and other living things".

[Cali_Democrat]

12. There's really nothing to be puzzled about

I created a poll and I bumped it to the top of the page to prevent it from sinking so I could get more responses/votes.

Yours I wasn't expecting, but I find it amusing nonetheless.

[Ken Burch]

13. No reason for snark...I'd just never seen anyone do that.

And no reason for personal hostility...I've shown none to you here.

[Cali_Democrat]

14. Well...think about it...

You yourself said you hadn't seen the post. Why? Because it sank from the top of the page.

I simply replied to my own post so it was "kicked" to the top. That way people who hadn't seen the poll could vote.

It isn't brain surgery.

[Ken Burch]

15. I said I didn't know the THREAD existed-not that I hadn't seen the post before.

And I wasn't baiting you by asking about it...honest.

It was just a question, and I meant nothing by it.

[4139]

6. I support the President...but I don't believe Isis will care a about the limited strikes.

[Uncle Joe]

9. At this point yes, but that could change. I believe

they're in the process of letting Iraq divide among itself with some military influence from us on how that division takes shape.

I posted an OP some months ago that I believe perhaps Iraq would be more stable as three nations or at the least three strong autonomous sectors of one nation.

Thanks for the thread, Cali_Democrat.