Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

hlthe2b

(102,236 posts)
3. The philosophy is beautiful.. The implementation, though....
Sun Aug 10, 2014, 12:16 PM
Aug 2014

is inexplicable. I think, despite the beautiful sentiments, that perhaps a little discussion of "putting thought into practice" was in order and sadly, missing.

unblock

(52,206 posts)
5. directing this simplistic drivel to only one party defeats the whole point of the philosophy.
Sun Aug 10, 2014, 12:29 PM
Aug 2014

if that's the premise for family therapy, where both father and son hear the same speech and both are wanting to connect on a personal level, then sure, that's a great frame for the hard work that lies ahead.

but we all know people (mostly fauxsnooze addicts) who can't help but inject their hatred into every social gathering. it's not enough to tell the people on the receiving end of this inappropriate behavior to just love and respect everyone. that only works if both sides play nice, which obviously isn't the case here.

hlthe2b

(102,236 posts)
7. Indeed...
Sun Aug 10, 2014, 12:34 PM
Aug 2014

I am going through this with an elderly well educated gentleman who likewise frequents the dogpark. I never wanted to talk politics with him, but over the past year and a half he has continually diverted discussions in that direction and of course, it has ended quite badly. Now, he makes everyone uncomfortable since he won't even look at me, much less talk to me, even as others direct group conversation to both of us. His wife is a kindly lady with early Alzheimers, who apparently has Faux on all day. She is a classic 50s style housewife by nature and doesn't really enter into discussion. The husband has taken to glaring at me, even when I greet his wife and make small talk

Uggh.

REP

(21,691 posts)
4. This one is excellent - advice to a girl whose boyfriend treats her badly
Sun Aug 10, 2014, 12:26 PM
Aug 2014
http://blogs.villagevoice.com/music/2014/07/ask_andrew_wk_my_boyfriend_treats_me_badly.php

When I read the column you linked, at first I thought I disagreed ... but then I realized I didn't. The letter writer won't change his father's mind with the attitude he displayed in his letter, and if his father is a good father and an otherwise decent and kind man, disagreeing over politics is a shit reason to lose a parent. It sucks to disagree over something important to you, but souring an otherwise good relationship is worse. (Assuming the father is otherwise okay; the letter didn't say he was abusive or racist or anything awful other than right wing).

unblock

(52,206 posts)
8. very likely a wrong assessment of the situation.
Sun Aug 10, 2014, 12:44 PM
Aug 2014

sure it's possible that the letter-writer can't let a simple political disagreement get out of hand. it's certainly possible to have a political discussion and disagree and still maintain mutual respect and friendliness. or at least it used to be before fauxsnooze and modern politics poisoned the well, i suppose it's still possible, if only harder to find.

but in all likelihood, the letter wouldn't have been written if that were the case. most likely, the father here is not playing by the rules, and so the advice can't be just and airy version of shut up and take it.

Orrex

(63,207 posts)
6. How can anyone who's ever dealt with another human actually find that useful?
Sun Aug 10, 2014, 12:30 PM
Aug 2014

Very possibly the most dismissive and simplistic "advice" that I've read in years.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The best advice on intra-...