Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

cui bono

(19,926 posts)
Mon Aug 11, 2014, 05:49 AM Aug 2014

5 things women couldn't do in the 1960s

(CNN) -- Can you imagine pregnancy being a fireable offense? How about job security hinging on your weight or the softness of your hands? What if you couldn't open a bank account or establish a line of credit unless you had a husband to cosign for you? What if you had the grades to attend a school like Princeton, but your gender kept you on the other side of those hallowed, ivy-covered halls?

It was not so long ago that this was the reality for women. If you're 45 or older, you were born into this world.

<snip>

1. Get a credit card: In the 1960s, a bank could refuse to issue a credit card to an unmarried woman; even if she was married, her husband was required to cosign. As recently as the 1970s, credit cards in many cases were issued with only a husband's signature. It was not until the Equal Credit Opportunity Act of 1974 that it became illegal to refuse a credit card to a woman based on her gender.

2. Serve on a jury: It varied by state (Utah deemed women fit for jury duty way back in 1879), but the main reason women were kept out of jury pools was that they were considered the center of the home, which was their primary responsibility as caregivers. They were also thought to be too fragile to hear the grisly details of crimes and too sympathetic by nature to be able to remain objective about those accused of offenses. In 1961, the Supreme Court unanimously upheld a Florida law that exempted women from serving on juries. It wasn't until 1973 that women could serve on juries in all 50 states.

more:
http://www.cnn.com/2014/08/07/living/sixties-women-5-things/

80 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
5 things women couldn't do in the 1960s (Original Post) cui bono Aug 2014 OP
as late as the 1980s - a colleague hadtrouble getting her name placed 1st on the mortgage. i bet Liberal_in_LA Aug 2014 #1
And do they still put "a single woman" on the deed/mortgage when a woman buys alone? cui bono Aug 2014 #2
they still'put it. just refinanced. Liberal_in_LA Aug 2014 #3
I just edited my post to add the question of if it's done with men as well. cui bono Aug 2014 #4
They do it for men also Travis_0004 Aug 2014 #6
They did it in the 70s with men. former9thward Aug 2014 #30
They didn't on mine. Fawke Em Aug 2014 #21
Married women have special property rights in my state ("Dower rights") Romulox Aug 2014 #23
Yes, they do. politicat Aug 2014 #38
Community property has upsides too jeff47 Aug 2014 #68
Agreed on that aspect of comm prop. politicat Aug 2014 #69
The CO thing was what I was told by an attorney when I lived in CO. jeff47 Aug 2014 #71
Okay. Thanks. I'll ping ours on it. politicat Aug 2014 #72
Mine was "an unmarried woman" which I guess is how they designate a divorcee. LoisB Aug 2014 #64
Yes, in Illinois as of 1987. You'd think simple alphabetizing would be the rational thing. nt ancianita Aug 2014 #27
A banker once told me they do it by credit score davidn3600 Aug 2014 #67
1, 2 and 3 had no problem with but 4&5 yes indeed hollysmom Aug 2014 #5
My mom continually mentions the disgrace of #1 BumRushDaShow Aug 2014 #7
That happened to my parents' neighbor. kcass1954 Aug 2014 #9
Women had no reproductive rights jehop61 Aug 2014 #14
My mother had a hysterectomy in 1972 BumRushDaShow Aug 2014 #15
I had a tubal ligation in 1974. Lugnut Aug 2014 #32
I had to sign in 1984 for husband's vasectomy HockeyMom Aug 2014 #17
Mine had one in 1987 and no one -- neither he, the hospital or any staffer -- told me. Presumptions ancianita Aug 2014 #24
Wow -- I wasn't aware of this one. theHandpuppet Aug 2014 #8
Yup BumRushDaShow Aug 2014 #11
Cornell 1870 MannyGoldstein Aug 2014 #29
Although Yale started admitting women into its law school in 1918. intheflow Aug 2014 #51
Yes. Which is why I get so frustrated Skidmore Aug 2014 #10
There are even some women who support men in that view BainsBane Aug 2014 #80
I could not wear slacks to work and I could not call any bosses by onecent Aug 2014 #12
"My Girl" infuriated me HockeyMom Aug 2014 #18
I couldn't wear slacks to the library at my first college, 1965. The head Librarian was ... Hekate Aug 2014 #49
I worked in a bank in 1991-1995 MadrasT Aug 2014 #78
Not much better now yourpicturehere Aug 2014 #13
This is the kind of control that many men personally deny they've exerted. Because they've had ancianita Aug 2014 #22
I'm a single woman that owns property in Kentucky A Little Weird Aug 2014 #28
Wow. I know there are outdated laws on the books of many states that are not paid any attention to cui bono Aug 2014 #36
Um, if you are married there are laws you have to follow LOL... snooper2 Aug 2014 #41
Depends on which state you live in Sweet Freedom Aug 2014 #57
Slightly off subject, but who can forget "Help Wanted - Male" rurallib Aug 2014 #16
That existed way past the 60s,I graduated from High School in sufrommich Aug 2014 #20
Oh hell yeah. I've still got some old newspapers in a box and looking at ads is an eye-opener Hekate Aug 2014 #50
telephone operator was "gendered". i recall the first time hearing a man's voice Liberal_in_LA Aug 2014 #73
From my experience, women couldn't work while pregnant, either. ancianita Aug 2014 #19
In 1973 my mom was pregnant and looking for a new job. tammywammy Aug 2014 #33
It seems as if pregnancy at work was one of the last accepted realities for male-run America. It ancianita Aug 2014 #34
And now we have mothers rooms at work. tammywammy Aug 2014 #35
Maybe she didn't, but I felt a momentum about women's struggles that gave me hope. We can't go back. ancianita Aug 2014 #39
In the early 1950s one of my mom's friends wore a stout girdle until her 7th month... Hekate Aug 2014 #48
With all the euphemisms used to describe pregnancy back then NickB79 Aug 2014 #40
Yep! And it wasn't boomers who were that way. We were the loosened up generation about all that. ancianita Aug 2014 #42
As a 5th-generation farm kid, I never understood that NickB79 Aug 2014 #43
My mom told me the exact same thing about her growing up on a potato farm in northern Maine. ancianita Aug 2014 #45
I was a child who was truedelphi Aug 2014 #62
I recall meeting a woman Sweet Freedom Aug 2014 #25
That's crazy. n/t cui bono Aug 2014 #37
I got suspended from FSU for breaking women's curfew. Men then had no such curfew. ancianita Aug 2014 #46
I started college in the fall of 1971. Staph Aug 2014 #55
I stayed out the extra hour the night time changed, daylight savings, and got in trouble for it. uppityperson Aug 2014 #74
My mom was widowed in 1958.. mountain grammy Aug 2014 #26
My mom was fired for getting pregnant gollygee Aug 2014 #31
Good lord I didn't realize that some of those changes were that recent... jimlup Aug 2014 #44
Buy a car without her husband present - Varies by state. Aristus Aug 2014 #47
As a single woman in the late 60s I could not buy a house. procon Aug 2014 #52
OMG! A bank demanding sterilization??? cui bono Aug 2014 #59
If you had cash in hand you could--but who has that, realistically? MADem Aug 2014 #77
This is why I want to scream at young women who "don't need feminism" Freddie Aug 2014 #53
They forgot the BIG ONE Warpy Aug 2014 #54
It's #3 on the list you didn't read at the link. TeamPooka Aug 2014 #63
I'm not talking about the pill Warpy Aug 2014 #65
Women were not allowed in McSorley's Old Ale House until August 10, 1970 tk2kewl Aug 2014 #56
I remember this well KauaiK Aug 2014 #58
Vote, if you lived in Switzerland - or as I've just discovered, Liechtenstein LeftishBrit Aug 2014 #60
In the 50s, a female relative applied for a university post (UK; traditionally male subject area) LeftishBrit Aug 2014 #61
In 1970 my mother had to get "power of attorney" to run the family business rickyhall Aug 2014 #66
One more for the list noamnety Aug 2014 #70
The forgot, buy a home or rent an apartment (without a co-signer). nt kelliekat44 Aug 2014 #75
1977, applying for a nursing job was asked what my plans for marriage and childbearing were. uppityperson Aug 2014 #76
or have your own savings account in a bank demigoddess Aug 2014 #79
 

Liberal_in_LA

(44,397 posts)
1. as late as the 1980s - a colleague hadtrouble getting her name placed 1st on the mortgage. i bet
Mon Aug 11, 2014, 06:11 AM
Aug 2014

Males are still automatically placed 1st

cui bono

(19,926 posts)
2. And do they still put "a single woman" on the deed/mortgage when a woman buys alone?
Mon Aug 11, 2014, 06:14 AM
Aug 2014

I can't remember if it's like that on mine, which is from around 20 years ago, but I remember knowing about that. They must have stopped it by now... or am I just being optimistic?

Or do they do that with men too? Googling came up with things that say "a single man" as well, but my memory is telling me that they only did it with women. Maybe they do it with men now too?

cui bono

(19,926 posts)
4. I just edited my post to add the question of if it's done with men as well.
Mon Aug 11, 2014, 06:17 AM
Aug 2014

Googling it showed some phrases that included "a single man" but I think I remember it being only women back in the day.

Romulox

(25,960 posts)
23. Married women have special property rights in my state ("Dower rights")
Mon Aug 11, 2014, 08:57 AM
Aug 2014

So status of married or single is relevant to the title.

politicat

(9,808 posts)
38. Yes, they do.
Mon Aug 11, 2014, 12:19 PM
Aug 2014

It annoyed me when we closed on my mother's house. It is so pointless and such an invasion of privacy.

It does not apply to men.

The piece that really annoyed me was that there is no way for a married person to buy a house in zir own name without the spouse automatically having a community property right. Given the number of marriages down the drain where the absent spouse refuses to consent to the divorce as a means of controlling the other, it condemns anyone in a bad marriage from exercising financial independence.

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
68. Community property has upsides too
Mon Aug 11, 2014, 10:29 PM
Aug 2014

That controlling spouse can't evict the "subservient" spouse, for example. And you don't run into the "Colorado problem" - the state receives all property that is not explicitly handled by a will in Colorado.

Even in community property states, it is possible for only one spouse to buy the property. It requires the other spouse to relinquish property rights via a notarized contract.

And it does apply to men. In many states, they will have something on the deed to indicate the man is single. &quot my name), a bachelor" is on the deed to my first house. And my divorce was not complete at the time I closed, thus requiring my now-Ex to sign away her rights.

politicat

(9,808 posts)
69. Agreed on that aspect of comm prop.
Mon Aug 11, 2014, 11:21 PM
Aug 2014

Arizona was different from what I'm accustomed to in CO in that the title agent specifically said that men did not have the single designation appended. (The title agent was... interesting, so could have been wrong, but it was a question I did bring up.)

Having watched my parents' divorce, I could easily imagine my sperm donor refusing to relinquish his rights to my mother's purchase of a house along with his refusal to sign the divorce papers or support agreement or anything else. I could see it being a major complication for all major property, including cars and mobile homes.

Do you have a citation on that Colorado problem? I've read the Colorado probate statutes a few times and haven't seen any popcorn like that.

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
71. The CO thing was what I was told by an attorney when I lived in CO.
Mon Aug 11, 2014, 11:36 PM
Aug 2014

I don't have a formal cite, and it could very well be there were details left out of a casual conversation.

politicat

(9,808 posts)
72. Okay. Thanks. I'll ping ours on it.
Mon Aug 11, 2014, 11:53 PM
Aug 2014

That being something I'm pretty sure would have come up in our most recent round, since we are dealing with several issues -- succession of responsibilities, financial instruments, trusts, property, joint tenancies, et al.

I like Colorado, don't get me wrong, and I don't mind the idea of the state getting our "other"ed assets (since my goal is to die as near to broke as possible to prevent future disharmony) but that seems like it would be something our more aggressive anti-gov types would have latched onto.

 

davidn3600

(6,342 posts)
67. A banker once told me they do it by credit score
Mon Aug 11, 2014, 07:51 PM
Aug 2014

I dont know if that's true or not or if its that way at every bank. But according to him, they will usually put the person with the higher credit score as the principle borrower because that gives the better interest rate.

They can put it however the buyers want it to be. However, if the woman is first and she happens to have a lower credit score than the man, they COULD end up paying a higher interest rate.

hollysmom

(5,946 posts)
5. 1, 2 and 3 had no problem with but 4&5 yes indeed
Mon Aug 11, 2014, 06:25 AM
Aug 2014

I could not afford a phone, they wanted a $200 dollar deposit of for my parents to cosign for me to get a phone, that was almost more than I got paid a week. So I lived without a phone. But credit cards _ i could not keep them form coming, they kept showing up in my mail unsolicited , usually with a big print "your new credit cards is inside" on the front of the envelope. How we did not have more fraud I will never figure.

BumRushDaShow

(128,934 posts)
7. My mom continually mentions the disgrace of #1
Mon Aug 11, 2014, 06:44 AM
Aug 2014

and when she became a widow, the best they could do was put a "Mrs." in front of my father's name.

The one thing that she has also mentioned happened into the '70s that is missing off the list, was that the husband had to co-sign if a woman wanted a hysterectomy. This sort of nonsense prompted her generation (she is in her 80s) to support the likes of Gloria Steinem and others (I remember when she got a subscription to Ms. magazine during the '70s).

Rethugs are furiously trying to take us back to their "good old days".

kcass1954

(1,819 posts)
9. That happened to my parents' neighbor.
Mon Aug 11, 2014, 07:14 AM
Aug 2014

She was in the middle of a divorce when diagnosed with cervical cancer. The soon-to-be ex refused to sign the papers. She had to wait until the divorce was final, which ended up being only a couple of months later. Fortunately, everything went well, and she's had no problems since. She was horribly frightened at the time, though.

jehop61

(1,735 posts)
14. Women had no reproductive rights
Mon Aug 11, 2014, 08:10 AM
Aug 2014

I know someone who was separated from her husband (he left for a younger model), was pregnant with her 4th and wanted to have a tubal ligation after the birth. The husband had to be tracked down to sign a "permission" slip so she could limit her family. That was in 1971!

BumRushDaShow

(128,934 posts)
15. My mother had a hysterectomy in 1972
Mon Aug 11, 2014, 08:24 AM
Aug 2014

and my father had to co-sign.

But can you imagine if someone suggests that a man must have his wife co-sign if he decided to have a vasectomy? That idea would have been and always has been, DOA.

 

HockeyMom

(14,337 posts)
17. I had to sign in 1984 for husband's vasectomy
Mon Aug 11, 2014, 08:39 AM
Aug 2014

in NYC too. Maybe they thought this was "equality"?

ancianita

(36,053 posts)
24. Mine had one in 1987 and no one -- neither he, the hospital or any staffer -- told me. Presumptions
Mon Aug 11, 2014, 08:59 AM
Aug 2014

of privilege about control of 'need to know' remain.

theHandpuppet

(19,964 posts)
8. Wow -- I wasn't aware of this one.
Mon Aug 11, 2014, 07:13 AM
Aug 2014

4. Get an Ivy League education:

Yale and Princeton didn't accept female students until 1969. Harvard didn't admit women until 1977 (when it merged with the all-female Radcliffe College). With the exception of the University of Pennsylvania, which began accepting women on a case-by-case basis in 1876, and Cornell, which admitted its first female student in 1872 (also offering admission under special circumstances), women couldn't attend Ivy League schools until 1969 at the earliest. Brown (which merged with women's college Pembroke), Dartmouth and Columbia did not offer admission to women until 1971, 1972 and 1981, respectively. Other case-specific instances allowed some women to take certain classes at Ivy League institutions (such as Barnard women taking classes at Columbia), but by and large, women in the '60s who harbored Ivy League dreams had to put them on hold.

BumRushDaShow

(128,934 posts)
11. Yup
Mon Aug 11, 2014, 07:31 AM
Aug 2014

I started college in '79 and back then, there was reference to "the Seven Sisters", which was the moniker given to the all-women's colleges founded as female "Ivy League" analogs that sought to be "equal" to (but were ultimately "separate" from) the essentially all-male "Ivy League" colleges. The schools were Mt. Holyoke, Smith, Barnard, Radcliffe, Vassar, Wellesley, & Bryn Mawr. I went to UMASS, which was near Smith & Mt. Holyoke and of course the then recently-converted-to-co-ed Amherst college (that converted from all-male to co-ed in 1975).

Nowadays, all but Vassar are still all-women (and Radcliffe was folded into Harvard).

 

MannyGoldstein

(34,589 posts)
29. Cornell 1870
Mon Aug 11, 2014, 09:17 AM
Aug 2014

Ahead of its time.

My sister went to Harvard in the 1980s - she was technically admitted to Radcliffe, but it made no real difference - she ended up with a Harvard diploma.

Skidmore

(37,364 posts)
10. Yes. Which is why I get so frustrated
Mon Aug 11, 2014, 07:28 AM
Aug 2014

when younger women parrot RW talking points regarding women's concerns. I remember. And I made certain that my daughter was aware of how recent in history these changes were and how tenuous they are. I will talk to my granddaughters about these issues when they are a little older.

For every woman who can remember what it was like, there is a man who is fondly recalling the good old days when the little women knew their place.

BainsBane

(53,032 posts)
80. There are even some women who support men in that view
Tue Aug 12, 2014, 11:59 AM
Aug 2014

enabling them to turn around and say, well not all women see that as a problem so it can't be sexist.

Clarence Thomas doesn't think repealing the Voting Rights Act has implications for race. That doesn't mean he's right.

onecent

(6,096 posts)
12. I could not wear slacks to work and I could not call any bosses by
Mon Aug 11, 2014, 07:42 AM
Aug 2014

their first name. It was "Mr Smith".

 

HockeyMom

(14,337 posts)
18. "My Girl" infuriated me
Mon Aug 11, 2014, 08:43 AM
Aug 2014

"My Girl" will get that for you. I told him Mrs. H will get it. This was in the 70s at a Corporation in Manhattan.

Hekate

(90,674 posts)
49. I couldn't wear slacks to the library at my first college, 1965. The head Librarian was ...
Mon Aug 11, 2014, 02:06 PM
Aug 2014

... the last holdout on the antique dress-codes.

MadrasT

(7,237 posts)
78. I worked in a bank in 1991-1995
Tue Aug 12, 2014, 08:19 AM
Aug 2014

Where women had to wear skirts/dresses and nylons.

Don't know if/when that changed because I quit.

yourpicturehere

(54 posts)
13. Not much better now
Mon Aug 11, 2014, 07:47 AM
Aug 2014

Kentucky STILL thinks a woman can't own property by herself...
My Mom died about 18 months ago and this spring I finally found a buyer for her home. When it came time to sign the papers on the sale, my husband, whom I met after my Mom bought the house, had to sign and they made the check out to BOTH OF US. My Mom paid cash for her house and I was the co-owner, but still my husband had to sign. I asked why and this Southern, car-salesman of a lawyer told me that the state wanted to make sure that my husband KNEW I had that money. Oh, well, that makes it right then doesn't it?

Then I got to thinking...What if a woman was in an abusive relationship and she needed the money to get away? Isn't it nice that he won't be surprised that she has a little money now?

I also own MY house outright with only my name on the deed. The insurance company and several others insist on putting my husband's name on all correspondence.

My devious mind then thought that, in a separation scenario, "Wouldn't it be funny if the ex had to pay capital gains?"

You better believe that some rich legislator or one of his rich friends thought up this law b/c the "old lady" ended up with her own money and he couldn't get his grubby little paws on it.

ancianita

(36,053 posts)
22. This is the kind of control that many men personally deny they've exerted. Because they've had
Mon Aug 11, 2014, 08:56 AM
Aug 2014

such controls dispersed throughout institutions for them. This is the reason we need all the women lawyers we can get anywhere, anytime.

When any man I know laughs at the claim that men, as a group, control 90% of the world's money, I look at that man in a whole new light.

A Little Weird

(1,754 posts)
28. I'm a single woman that owns property in Kentucky
Mon Aug 11, 2014, 09:14 AM
Aug 2014

It sounds like you just had a sleazy lawyer. They exist everywhere.

cui bono

(19,926 posts)
36. Wow. I know there are outdated laws on the books of many states that are not paid any attention to
Mon Aug 11, 2014, 12:13 PM
Aug 2014

but it's hard to believe that those laws/regulations not only exist but are being enforced.

Have you thought about simply refusing? What would happen? Is it an actual law or just a business practice?

 

snooper2

(30,151 posts)
41. Um, if you are married there are laws you have to follow LOL...
Mon Aug 11, 2014, 01:07 PM
Aug 2014

I'm selling my house right now, I bought it before I got married, guess what-

My wife has to sign all the paperwork too because since we are married it is a JOINT ASSET-

Also, we are buying a new house, I'm the only one on the loan since my wife has no credit score to speak of. Guess what- She still has to be on all the TITLE WORK because it is going to be a JOINT ASSET-



Sweet Freedom

(3,995 posts)
57. Depends on which state you live in
Mon Aug 11, 2014, 03:15 PM
Aug 2014

In some states, if you own a home prior to marriage and no marital funds are used to pay for the mortgage or it's improvement, it is yours and is not considered a joint asset. All states are different.

rurallib

(62,413 posts)
16. Slightly off subject, but who can forget "Help Wanted - Male"
Mon Aug 11, 2014, 08:28 AM
Aug 2014

and " Help Wanted - Female" in the newspapers.

You can guess what kinds of jobs went where.

sufrommich

(22,871 posts)
20. That existed way past the 60s,I graduated from High School in
Mon Aug 11, 2014, 08:53 AM
Aug 2014

1975 and the classifieds still read like that. I don't think it changed until much later.

Hekate

(90,674 posts)
50. Oh hell yeah. I've still got some old newspapers in a box and looking at ads is an eye-opener
Mon Aug 11, 2014, 02:13 PM
Aug 2014

Over the decades I've saved some "major headline" newspapers, sometimes the entire thing. Cleaning out the garage once I took the time to flip through one of the early ones, and talk about a trip down memory lane. All my first jobs were gendered.

ancianita

(36,053 posts)
19. From my experience, women couldn't work while pregnant, either.
Mon Aug 11, 2014, 08:51 AM
Aug 2014

I was a long distance operator for Ma Bell (the irony of that name, eh?) in Florida, and as late as 1969 they fired women for pregnancy. Fired. No leave, no suspension.

tammywammy

(26,582 posts)
33. In 1973 my mom was pregnant and looking for a new job.
Mon Aug 11, 2014, 10:17 AM
Aug 2014

She wasn't showing, she told them she wasn't pregnant. She needed the job, since her husband at the time was a loser that couldn't hold down a job and help support the family. She said she worked there a couple of months before she told anyone she was pregnant. Thankfully she wasn't fired. And she told them my brother was surprisingly big for an early birth.

ancianita

(36,053 posts)
34. It seems as if pregnancy at work was one of the last accepted realities for male-run America. It
Mon Aug 11, 2014, 10:29 AM
Aug 2014

probably because more women were in advanced positions in companies by then, and more inclined to push back on sexist policies made higher ups in staff/line structure.

We may not get everything we've paid for but we've paid for everything we've gotten.

tammywammy

(26,582 posts)
35. And now we have mothers rooms at work.
Mon Aug 11, 2014, 11:09 AM
Aug 2014

So women that return after having a child can pump breast milk. I never hear negative talk about "so and so is pregnant", it doesn't stop their career and they're not worried about being fired.

I doubt my mom would ever have expect to see this back in the 70s.

ancianita

(36,053 posts)
39. Maybe she didn't, but I felt a momentum about women's struggles that gave me hope. We can't go back.
Mon Aug 11, 2014, 12:35 PM
Aug 2014

Hekate

(90,674 posts)
48. In the early 1950s one of my mom's friends wore a stout girdle until her 7th month...
Mon Aug 11, 2014, 02:00 PM
Aug 2014

... so she could continue at work that long.

Good for your mom and your "early" brother!

NickB79

(19,236 posts)
40. With all the euphemisms used to describe pregnancy back then
Mon Aug 11, 2014, 01:00 PM
Aug 2014

"In a motherly way", "bun in the oven", etc, I'm not surprised. It's almost like people were afraid to say the P-word or even think about it, because that would lead to thoughts about how that happened in the first place (the dreaded S-word).

ancianita

(36,053 posts)
42. Yep! And it wasn't boomers who were that way. We were the loosened up generation about all that.
Mon Aug 11, 2014, 01:07 PM
Aug 2014

With the help of very few Silent Gen folk, boomers had to break through the Silent Gen euphemistic inertia just to confront outright sexist barriers. It was always about 'correcting' sexist thinking -- time consuming without social network technology ...starting with families, friends of conservative families, coworkers, etc. -- before taking action.

All the more reason boomers are outraged at the current war on women losses that they worked so long to gain.

NickB79

(19,236 posts)
43. As a 5th-generation farm kid, I never understood that
Mon Aug 11, 2014, 01:16 PM
Aug 2014

On a farm, you learn VERY early where babies come from, whether they're puppies, calves, pigs, or people

And when you have 8-10 kids in a 4-bedroom farmhouse with paper-thin walls like my grandparents and great-grandparents did, things like sex and pregnancy quickly lose their taboos. My grandmother had no problem discussing sex, babies, etc in company.

ancianita

(36,053 posts)
45. My mom told me the exact same thing about her growing up on a potato farm in northern Maine.
Mon Aug 11, 2014, 01:31 PM
Aug 2014

She helped birth the farm animals, and couldn't understand how people of her generation were so prissy about it all.

truedelphi

(32,324 posts)
62. I was a child who was
Mon Aug 11, 2014, 06:13 PM
Aug 2014

Adopted, at the age of six weeks.

I was told I was adopted early on and it was probably one of the first two syllable words I knew early on, right up there with Mama and Dada.

When my sister was to be adopted, I was not quite four years old. I was brought along to the court room, and sat and heard the judge discuss the implications of my parents adopting the new baby. I was the one taken into the hallway with a court appointed nurse, who took me in a room, and said, "This is your little sister."

On the ride home, with the new baby in the car, both parents explained that most kids never experience what I had just experienced and that these other kids were lied to and not told about the real process.

Well, I didn't realize my parents meant most kids who help adopt a sibling. I really thought that is where all babies came from - the court room, with the smiling judge and sympathetic lady nurse.

When two or three years later, the older kids I knew started talking about conception and how that was where babies came from, I knew they didn't know a thing about it!

Sweet Freedom

(3,995 posts)
25. I recall meeting a woman
Mon Aug 11, 2014, 09:00 AM
Aug 2014

who was the first female engineer enrolled in her college (early 70s) and she said she wasn't allowed out of the dorms after 8 pm.

Staph

(6,251 posts)
55. I started college in the fall of 1971.
Mon Aug 11, 2014, 03:03 PM
Aug 2014

The curfew in the women's dorms was 11:00 PM on weeknights and 2:00 AM on Friday and Saturday nights. But that only applied to freshmen women (freshwomen?). The upperclass women had no curfew (presumably because they were all over eighteen), and men had no curfew.

I felt the need to stay out until curfew every night. I got much more sleep the next year, when all curfews were discontinued!


FYI -- in 1972, my university's marching went co-ed. The last all male band had 88 members. Eleven women (and me!) joined the band that year, to the near universal disapproval of the existing members of the band. Today there are about 360 members in the band (more women than men) and one has to audition to get in. Fifteen years after adding women, the band was awarded the Sudler Trophy (sometimes called the Heisman Trophy for bands).

uppityperson

(115,677 posts)
74. I stayed out the extra hour the night time changed, daylight savings, and got in trouble for it.
Tue Aug 12, 2014, 05:21 AM
Aug 2014

I explained that time changed, gave an xtra hour so they had to let me in the dorm without hassling me. Freshmen girls had curfew and no keys, " men" and older "girls" had no such thing. But for some reason my dorm put frshmen on the ground floor, with windows big enough to climb in.

mountain grammy

(26,620 posts)
26. My mom was widowed in 1958..
Mon Aug 11, 2014, 09:01 AM
Aug 2014

she couldn't buy a car, a house or get a credit card. A woman with two pre teen daughters who had served in the US Marines, needed her brother's signature to buy a car.

jimlup

(7,968 posts)
44. Good lord I didn't realize that some of those changes were that recent...
Mon Aug 11, 2014, 01:24 PM
Aug 2014

I was born in 1957 and accept these things as given but apparently they were not until around 1970 or so.

Aristus

(66,329 posts)
47. Buy a car without her husband present - Varies by state.
Mon Aug 11, 2014, 01:33 PM
Aug 2014

My mother's parents were two ultra-conservative Southern Baptists who still managed to irk male-dominated Southern culture with some unconventional views. My grandmother (who was also pro-choice, by the way; surprise, surprise) did all the financial dealings of the household, including buying the cars. She told me several times how she would walk into a car dealership to buy a car, only to have the saleman or the sales manager give her one variation or another of: "Sure thing, lil gal! Just come back with your husband, and we'll give you a good deal!"

"No thank you. I'm doing the purchase."

"Well, lil lady, if you just get your husband to come in, we-"

That's usually when she'd leave and not go back.

procon

(15,805 posts)
52. As a single woman in the late 60s I could not buy a house.
Mon Aug 11, 2014, 02:52 PM
Aug 2014

It was no different than Sharia Law even though I had a professional career and a large deposit in hand, the lending bank would only count half my earnings and still required a male cosigner. Rather to go ask Daddy to stand in for me, I put off buying a house until I married in '73.

Once again, despite the fact that I made more than twice my spouse, only half my earnings counted. At that time the bank even demanded that I sign an agreement to submit to sterilization to ensure my income would remain intact. I could not have conceive due to medical reasons, but it wasn't until they received a detailed report from my doctor that they condescended to approve my home loan; not in my name as requested, but as "Mr. and Mrs."

Just one of the many, many reasons I am a feminist.

cui bono

(19,926 posts)
59. OMG! A bank demanding sterilization???
Mon Aug 11, 2014, 05:26 PM
Aug 2014

That I had never heard of, that is insane. And only counting half your income is insane too and makes no logical sense no matter how you look at it. Shows it was all about oppression.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
77. If you had cash in hand you could--but who has that, realistically?
Tue Aug 12, 2014, 06:02 AM
Aug 2014

You wouldn't have had to deal with a banker with an attitude.

Wealthy women had more power than working women...money, as always, talks.

Freddie

(9,265 posts)
53. This is why I want to scream at young women who "don't need feminism"
Mon Aug 11, 2014, 02:54 PM
Aug 2014

They take the rights that my (and my mother's) generation won totally for granted and can't fathom that there's folks in power right now that would take those rights back in a split second if we let them.
My mother was forced to quit her teaching job when she became visibly pregnant; that was just how it was back then. Thankfully my daughter knows how hard things were for women and how they could turn back if we're not vigilant.

Warpy

(111,255 posts)
54. They forgot the BIG ONE
Mon Aug 11, 2014, 02:57 PM
Aug 2014

Contraception was unavailable for unmarried women and barely available to married women. Abortion was also unavailable unless one were desperate enough to risk maiming, and thousands of women were just that desperate every year.

Women's health was largely ignored except in whispered conversations about "female trouble." Anything pertaining to women between the waist and knees was far too icky to speak about freely.

TeamPooka

(24,223 posts)
63. It's #3 on the list you didn't read at the link.
Mon Aug 11, 2014, 06:57 PM
Aug 2014

3. Go on the birth control pill: Issues like reproductive freedom and a woman's right to decide when and whether to have children were only just beginning to be openly discussed in the 1960s. In 1957, the FDA approved of the birth control pill but only for "severe menstrual distress." In 1960, the pill was approved for use as a contraceptive. Even so, the pill was illegal in some states and could be prescribed only to married women for purposes of family planning, and not all pharmacies stocked it. Some of those opposed said oral contraceptives were immoral, promoted prostitution and were tantamount to abortion. It wasn't until several years later that birth control was approved for use by all women, regardless of marital status. In short, birth control meant a woman could complete her education, enter the work force and plan her own life.

Warpy

(111,255 posts)
65. I'm not talking about the pill
Mon Aug 11, 2014, 07:19 PM
Aug 2014

which wasn't approved until 1959 and was being fought tooth and nail to the point that many drugstores didn't stock it because patriarchal doctors refused to prescribe it. I'm talking about diaphragms, sperm killing creams that actually killed sperm, and even condoms that couldn't be sold to single women. It was the age of the Coca Cola douche for a very good reason. Too bad it didn't work.

 

tk2kewl

(18,133 posts)
56. Women were not allowed in McSorley's Old Ale House until August 10, 1970
Mon Aug 11, 2014, 03:12 PM
Aug 2014


And they didn't build a women's restroom until 16 years later

KauaiK

(544 posts)
58. I remember this well
Mon Aug 11, 2014, 05:15 PM
Aug 2014

AND was shocked when I realized the simple things I could NOT do b/c of my gender. It is why I am still the bra-burning, bleeding heart feminist fighting for the rights of everyone regardless of sex, ethnic background, sexual orientation or preference or whatever.

LeftishBrit

(41,205 posts)
61. In the 50s, a female relative applied for a university post (UK; traditionally male subject area)
Mon Aug 11, 2014, 05:31 PM
Aug 2014

and was openly told that the reason for her rejection was that the department had appointed one woman in the past, and she hadn't turned out well!

This was before the 60s, but it wouldn't have been illegal till 1975.

rickyhall

(4,889 posts)
66. In 1970 my mother had to get "power of attorney" to run the family business
Mon Aug 11, 2014, 07:34 PM
Aug 2014

in my dad's absence.

It wasn't until 1972 that public schools in Ft. Worth allowed girls to wear pants.

 

noamnety

(20,234 posts)
70. One more for the list
Mon Aug 11, 2014, 11:36 PM
Aug 2014

Keep your college scholarship if you get married. Because married women didn't need a job, so why waste an education on them, and why have them take a job away from a man who would need it?

uppityperson

(115,677 posts)
76. 1977, applying for a nursing job was asked what my plans for marriage and childbearing were.
Tue Aug 12, 2014, 05:26 AM
Aug 2014

It took me aback, wtf? But then I've always been uppity. None of your damn business! but no, I was polite and told them what I needed to get the job. We were prohibited from not just wearing our nametags if we stoppped at a restaurant or bar on the way home from work, but even wearing the basic white uniform, could be fired it they found out we had a drink dressed in polyester white clothes.

demigoddess

(6,640 posts)
79. or have your own savings account in a bank
Tue Aug 12, 2014, 11:56 AM
Aug 2014

if married, a husband could clean out that bank account without your consent. Actually, it even happened to me in 2002. not much has changed.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»5 things women couldn't d...