General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe war on Christians in America rages on
A North Carolina restaurant dropped its discount for "praying in public" after an atheist group informed the establishment that such a practice is illegal.
In July, two customers received a discount for praying before their meal at Mary's Gourmet Diner in Winston-Salem, N.C., and they posted a picture of their receipt on Facebook, according to the Winston-Salem Journal.
After the receipt gained attention on Facebook and in the news, the Freedom From Religion Foundation sent a letter to the restaurant notifying the owners that such a discount was illegal.
On Wednesday, the diner posted a notice informing customers that they would no longer be offering the discount, noting that they had been threatened with a lawsuit.
TPM
Thanks atheists!
RKP5637
(67,107 posts)Iggo
(47,552 posts)el_bryanto
(11,804 posts)In this case I'm guessing it's non-discrimination laws as people who don't pray wouldn't be eligible for the discount, and one guesses that believers of non-Christian faiths might have a hard time collecting as well.
Bryant
Reter
(2,188 posts)It's a private restaurant, they can give out discounts to who they choose.
Capt. Obvious
(9,002 posts)SammyWinstonJack
(44,130 posts)Enrique
(27,461 posts)on the other hand it seems very different. I'm an athiest, and if I went into Mary's and didn't pray, and saw some praying people get a discount, I wouldn't feel discriminated against. Maybe technically I would be, but it seems different.
el_bryanto
(11,804 posts)In my opinion. There's a discount and because of your lack of religion you aren't entitled to it. One also wonders if a Buddhist or Sikh or Hindu could receive this discount. Or even a Christian who doesn't believe in public prayer.
I suppose it also raises the question of whether a creed should be considered in the same category as ethnicity or race or sexual preference; whether it should have the same protections. I believe it should myself, but I can see an argument against it.
But certainly we would have a hard time accepting a whites only discount or an English only discount or a straights only discount; as it amounts to a surtax on non-whites, non-English speakers, or non-straights.
Bryant
TlalocW
(15,381 posts)Say I sell cars, and I decide to not give you a thousand bucks off the car you're buying because you didn't pray while in my dealership - or you did, and I didn't like how or to whom you prayed. How's that feel?
About 50% had the little light bulb come on.
TlalocW
rock
(13,218 posts)JNelson6563
(28,151 posts)Ug.
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)They are discriminating against religions that do not hold with publicly praying as well as discriminating against people who are not religious as is their right.
Reter
(2,188 posts)They are making some pay less by offering a discount, and anyone can fake it to get it. I worked at a place that gave discounts to police and firefighters. Discriminates against me because I'm neither. Yet perfectly legal. Senior discounts are also discriminatory for those under 65. Still legal.
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)This is no different from allowing white people a 15% discount.
Reter
(2,188 posts)It is also much more offensive. Plus anyone can lie to get the discount and fake a prayer. Pretty hard for a black person to fake being white. I would not be bothered if a restaurant gave discounts to Muslims in religious gear. As long as I'm paying menu prices, I was never supposed to gt the discount to begin with. Discounts are all favors.
Humanist_Activist
(7,670 posts)the Civil Rights Act of 1964 anymore? You know, the federal law, that is still in force, that imposes restrictions on businesses of public accommodation, such as restaurants, and how they are not allowed to discriminate against customers based on race, color, national origin or religion?
Reter
(2,188 posts)CRA bans discrimination. However, this business is making one group pay less than the menu price, and another pay the menu price. No group is being made to more than the menu price (which would violate it). I would take on this case in a second, and be convinced I would win.
Humanist_Activist
(7,670 posts)What are you doing to the other group? Its called discrimination.
You would be convinced that you would win, but you would be wrong.
Here's the relevant part of the Civil Rights Act I'm talking about:
[div class="excerpt" style="margin-left:1em; border:1px solid #bfbfbf; border-radius:0.4615em; box-shadow:3px 3px 3px #999999;"]42 U.S.C. §2000a (a)All persons shall be entitled to the full and equal enjoyment of the goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages, and accommodations of any place of public accommodation, as defined in this section, without discrimination on the ground of race, color, religion, or national origin.
http://www.justice.gov/crt/about/hce/title2.php
Yeah, you are not only wrong, but painfully wrong, giving people a discount for a religious activity is a blatant and obvious violation of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)public. He said pray only in the most private chamber of your own home. With the door shut, no less. But somehow, these Christians take issue with the teachings of their Christ....
Maeve
(42,282 posts)Making a show of religion doesn't gain points with God.
sinkingfeeling
(51,454 posts)thereby, honoring what Jesus said on the subject of prayer.