Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Tsiyu

(18,186 posts)
Thu Aug 14, 2014, 04:58 AM Aug 2014

Anonymous releases Ferguson dispatch tapes from Brown shooting

http://samuel-warde.com/2014/08/anonymous-releases-police-tapes/

Hacktivist group Anonymous is, as promised, making strides in their stated mission to award justice to Michael Brown, his family, the city of Ferguson and victims of police brutality overall.


As part of “Operation Ferguson,” the cyber activist group has leaked the St. Louis County police dispatch audio recording from August 9, 2014, the day Michael Brown was shot and killed by a Ferguson police officer.

To this day the offending officer remains unnamed by Ferguson brass. However Anonymous has stated they are very close to confirming the officer’s identification and they have plans to tweet the information once it is obtained.

The recording was posted by @TheAnonMessage, a twitter account connected with Anonymous. The group promises an ongoing review of those recordings.




off to bed now...if someone else has posted, I will delete...just saw this before turning in

Stay safe and peace out to all




14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Anonymous releases Ferguson dispatch tapes from Brown shooting (Original Post) Tsiyu Aug 2014 OP
I just wish someone had a video. nt kelliekat44 Aug 2014 #1
It would make a huge difference Tsiyu Aug 2014 #2
or like with Andy Lopez the police "Confiscated" the video FreakinDJ Aug 2014 #3
Initially they said they had cellphone video Tsiyu Aug 2014 #14
Thank you, Tsiyu Cha Aug 2014 #4
police would have no problem dropping the name of an accused person all over the press whereisjustice Aug 2014 #5
Your subject line isn't accurate. pintobean Aug 2014 #6
I love Anonymous. They are the reason I still have hope. loudsue Aug 2014 #7
Message auto-removed Name removed Aug 2014 #8
Um....that wasn't a bona fide member.... loudsue Aug 2014 #9
How do you know? pintobean Aug 2014 #10
Because the rest of the true anonymous community outed him/her, and they loudsue Aug 2014 #11
Oh, I get it. pintobean Aug 2014 #12
So you'd rather be without them? loudsue Aug 2014 #13

Tsiyu

(18,186 posts)
2. It would make a huge difference
Thu Aug 14, 2014, 05:13 AM
Aug 2014

ust posted some of yesterday's press conference where Chief Jackson claims there is no video of actual shooting.

Let's hope someone comes forward with something.

And now I really DO have to get to bed.

I mean it.

No, really.....



whereisjustice

(2,941 posts)
5. police would have no problem dropping the name of an accused person all over the press
Thu Aug 14, 2014, 07:45 AM
Aug 2014

regardless of guilt or innocence or threat to life.

This is an escalating class war between the non-rich and the para-military forces being accumulated as an army of the rich.

 

pintobean

(18,101 posts)
6. Your subject line isn't accurate.
Thu Aug 14, 2014, 07:52 AM
Aug 2014

The audio is from St. Louis County police dispatch. Audio from Ferguson police dispatch would be very interesting.

Response to loudsue (Reply #7)

loudsue

(14,087 posts)
9. Um....that wasn't a bona fide member....
Thu Aug 14, 2014, 08:12 AM
Aug 2014
(Update: A reader informs us that @AnonRelations is known in the community as an anti-Anonymous troll account):

It's the other side inserting their trolls into the anonymous community. Same bunch as the cops that did the shooting -- the bad guys.

loudsue

(14,087 posts)
11. Because the rest of the true anonymous community outed him/her, and they
Thu Aug 14, 2014, 08:16 AM
Aug 2014

backed him down. You just don't seem to get it... either that, or you're on the wrong side.

 

pintobean

(18,101 posts)
12. Oh, I get it.
Thu Aug 14, 2014, 08:21 AM
Aug 2014

They can say whatever they want. Who knows what is true and what isn't? That's the problem with anonymous activism.

loudsue

(14,087 posts)
13. So you'd rather be without them?
Thu Aug 14, 2014, 08:29 AM
Aug 2014

Because someone might say something "untrue" before the rest of the anonymous community cuts them off at the knees? I love that "throw the baby out with the bath water" philosophy.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Anonymous releases Fergus...