General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsState Sen Tweets 'F--K You' At Missouri Gov Over Ferguson Response
Frankly, I'm with her. She's been there during this.
A Missouri state senator tweeted "F--K you" at Gov. Jay Nixon (D) Thursday morning, seemingly upset by his absence from the protests in Ferguson.
Sen. Maria Chappelle-Nadal (D), who represents the Ferguson area, has spent time in the city during the protests. KMOZ reported Wednesday that Chapelle-Nadal said she had been hit with tear gas while standing with protesters.
...
The actual tweets at TPM Link.
Bandit
(21,475 posts)When our leaders act in such a crude fashion what can we expect from ordinary citizens?
She'll be getting attention for the wrong reasons.
merrily
(45,251 posts)JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)(surprise, surprise) and this is what upsets you?
Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)Gore1FL
(21,164 posts)He was here on Monday.
merrily
(45,251 posts)I don't know why she would have said that on national TV if it were false.
Gore1FL
(21,164 posts)Physics prevent him from being at Ground zero where he would have done less good.
merrily
(45,251 posts)he had gone to Ground Zero?
IOW, she was correct. He did not go to Ground Zero and, based on what she said, my post did not say that he stayed away, but rather that he kept his distance.
Gore1FL
(21,164 posts)Should we condemn the NAACP too?
There are plenty of legitimate criticism to throw at Governor Nixon. We don't have to make things up.
merrily
(45,251 posts)A second ago it was between Ground Zero and the NAACP.
And what happened to physics prevented him from being there?
And what are we going to blame the NAACP for again? Not refusing to hear the Governor?
Sorry, your logic is escaping me.
I made nothing up. I am taking the word of your state senator, who seems very credible.
Another county heard from about Nixon.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2014/08/14/missouri-gov-jay-nixon-has-been-at-the-center-of-racial-tension-before-ferguson/
Gore1FL
(21,164 posts)The governor was at the NAACP meeting on Monday. Ergo He was involved from Monday.
When the governor was at the NAACP meeting, he was unable to be anywhere else at the same time.
Other People at the NAACP meeting were unable to be anywhere else at the same time.
The only issue I had with the NAACP is that they held it at too small of a venue on a street undergoing construction. I drive by it almost every day. I knew the place was way too small. And with Natural Bridge becoming a "Great Street" (a rant for another time), the location was preposterous.
Had they moved the location of the NAACP meeting 4 miles to ground zero, everyone could have been there at the same time, and we wouldn't be having this aimless conversation.
merrily
(45,251 posts)never been at Ground Zero. And this is Thursday.
So, several posts from you later, my statement that he has kept his distance still seems accurate. If not, take it up with your state senator.
No one thought he could be in two places at once, so yes, your reply was pointless, as was your original statement about physics.
Gore1FL
(21,164 posts)Please do tell. I am interested in your insight in my governor and my neighboring town.
merrily
(45,251 posts)You keep moving the goal post. My statement was only that the Governor had kept his distance.
First, you denied he kept his distance, saying he had been there. Then you said he did more good at the NAACP than he would have done at Ground Zero. Then you said he could not possibly have been there because he was at the NAACP. A And now, you want me to explain to you why should he have been there. Each time you've been challenged you just move the goal post .
I have no patience with posters who do that.
Point is, he wasn't there, exactly as I said originally. If you want to know why it might have been better for him to be at Ground Zero than at the NAACP, take it up with your State Senator, Sen. Chapelle-Nadal, as I urged you to do in my prior post. My guess is she has more insight into this than you do. Doesn't keep moving the goalpost, either.
Good night.
Gore1FL
(21,164 posts)My response is "So fucking what?"
What possible benefit would it be to have the governor at "ground zero?" Do burned QuikTrips have secret powers he could unlock?
He doesn't work in St. Louis. He's come here twice this week. He's not like batman sitting around waiting for the next crisis, he actually has other things to do than walk anonymously through a crowd or grab a photo op which are precisely the two basic options he has when going there.
I'm not moving the goal post. I have been, apparently ineffectively telling you as a someone walking distance from Ground Zero that it wouldn't have fucking made a gad damn difference and that his actions on Monday and today are what one would expect from a Governor.
His response was appropriate. His response has been effective.
There are legitimate criticisms that can be made against the governor. Neither you nor Sen. Chapelle-Nadal need to come up with ridiculous ones.
On Edit:
Remember when Ted Cruz the Tea Party Criticized Obama for not going to the border when he went to TX?? I do. I felt the same way then.
merrily
(45,251 posts)I've said that four or five times now and you still don't get it. It's not a difficult concept. Yet, you keep talking about how far I am from Missouri.
Senator Chappelle Nadal is not only in Missouri, she is in your State Senate, serving under your Governor and, as I have said before, probably knows him and the situation in Ferguson a hell of a lot better than you do. And, she has also been in Ferguson.
If you want to understand HER argument, give her a call tomorrow.
BTW, for all I know, you live in Ohio. And for all you know, I live in Ferguson.
And, while
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/On_the_Internet,_nobody_knows_you%27re_a_dog#mediaviewer/File:Internet_dog.jpg
It doesn't take long to see what kind of poster you are.
In any event, I am done with what you called a pointless conversation several posts ago, yet insist on continuing, even though your argument is with Sen Chappelle-Nadal and not with me.
Again, good night. For the rest of this conversation, you will be posting to yourself. I have no patience for going in circles endlessly and needlessly for no reason.
Gore1FL
(21,164 posts)I know what kind of a poster I am too. One with an opposing point of view. I am glad, with Congress out of session, Senator Chappelle-Nadal can attend these rallies. Alderman Antonio French has been awesome on the ground. I recomend following him on twitter:
https://twitter.com/AntonioFrench
There is no purpose for the governor to go. None. The Senator is wrong. She is also apparently rather rude.
There are plenty of legitimate reasons for criticizing Jay Nixon. This isn't one of them. If Senator Chappelle-Nadal wants to make up reasons, that is her call. If you want to parrot them. That is yours.
TTFN
leftstreet
(36,118 posts)Bandit
(21,475 posts)They should have enough intelligence that they can get their message across without being loutish.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)heaven05
(18,124 posts)Last edited Fri Aug 15, 2014, 11:35 AM - Edit history (1)
to the RW/Tea partiers and just plain run of the mill racists out there like Bachmann, Issa, Cruz, Limpig et al. She had a reason to be"loutish". A person being racist and piggish does not.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)and she says those foul things, typical of a commoner. I will have my man look into it tomorrow. Crude.....just crude eh Humphrey?"
savalez
(3,517 posts)Shall we go for a game of cricket?
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)chknltl
(10,558 posts)You might consider sending Humphrey out with a jar for a rendezvous during his lunch break.
Jamastiene
(38,187 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)"She must not be one of us. Does she not know that the police are only killing 'those' people to keep us from exposure to the rif-raf. Crude, I say."
"Would you care for another crumpet Humphrey?"
bravenak
(34,648 posts)'I asked him to bring me some creamcakes! One can never find good help these days. The lower classes are just that lazy."
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)Plebs.
riqster
(13,986 posts)"Hrrmph, you're not all that appealing yourself!"
ProfessorGAC
(65,361 posts). . ."You're right, they stink on ice." Thanks to Mel Brooks.
m-lekktor
(3,675 posts)Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)Get a clue. Using a common expletive is not acting "in a crude fashion," given the context. A kid was killed, apparently murdered. The cops are engaged in a massive coverup, and are responding with an iron fist to an outraged public. And you're upset at a bad word.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)thing you know they will be saying those things on TV and in Jr. High.
heaven05
(18,124 posts)how crude is it to shoot an unarmed man with hands in the air, 10 fucking times!!!!! The fake indignation is ...............
Gore1FL
(21,164 posts)Person 1 shoots person 2. Therefore it is OK for person 3 to say "Fuck You" to person 4.
If that isn't your point, you didn't make it clearly.
deflection, distraction from point, you've got the art down pat. Ha!
Gore1FL
(21,164 posts)TheDebbieDee
(11,119 posts)Was obvious that she's trying to make a name for herself. It was embarrassing. Maybe she will run for Governor in 2016...
What was her name again?
davidpdx
(22,000 posts)and said something at the end of the interview (I can't remember because she said it fast, but it was something about Gov Nixon not coming down to the city where the protests and shooting happening).
Damn I have to get back to work.
valerief
(53,235 posts)WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)Boom Sound 416
(4,185 posts)And do nothing at the same time.
Well played!
CreekDog
(46,192 posts)Boom Sound 416
(4,185 posts)Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)I almost certainly would have called him an asshole. She has every right to be angry.
merrily
(45,251 posts)Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)CaptainTruth
(6,616 posts)A man can dream, can't he?
merrily
(45,251 posts)cal04
(41,505 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)Last edited Thu Aug 14, 2014, 06:44 PM - Edit history (1)
ETA:
Senator to police: Will I be maced again? I was maced yesterday while sitting peacefully. Will I be maced again if I demonstrate peacefully?
Police: I hope not.
I hope not?
cui bono
(19,926 posts)Even though her feelings are warranted, as an elected official she should refrain from such outbursts.
tomm2thumbs
(13,297 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)Fuck You. Getting sprayed with pepper spray, IMO, qualifies. It sounds like Nixon is a Republican in Democratic clothing.
Gore1FL
(21,164 posts)The governor didn't shoot the tear-gas canister. The governor replaced the people who shot the tear-gas canisters with people we all hope will do a better job.
There is a lot of legitimate criticisms to throw at Jay Nixon. We don;t have to make things up.
delete_bush
(1,712 posts)Moving forward, the various levels of neighborhood/city/state government need to come together. Tweeting "Fuck You" and calling the Gov a coward is not only childish but counterproductive, not to mention showing a complete lack of class.
I have no doubt there are right-wingers who would like the Gov to amp it up and call her a fill in the blank. Escalating the situation solves nothing.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)up with a quote. Gov Nixon isn't a friend of the poor and you know it. Yes he did replace the Barney Fife police force, but I'm betting not with our a little pressure. Whose side are you on in this?
Gore1FL
(21,164 posts)You?
And what I suggest you are "making up" is that Gov Nixon could have somehow prevented tear gas from landing near the senator. Otherwise "fuck you" isn't warranted by your own standard.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)the frustration the Sen feels after years of neglect that lead up to this?
heaven05
(18,124 posts)no, this person, you're responding to, CAN'T.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)to stand up and say F-U to those that are working to destroy the lower classes.
heaven05
(18,124 posts)and completely.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)Gore1FL
(21,164 posts)Keep up.
Gore1FL
(21,164 posts)"Waaaaaaasaaa"
heaven05
(18,124 posts)answer. Typical.
Gore1FL
(21,164 posts)What he did was positive. It had great results. He also called for the release of the name of the cop who did thew shooting. n It was released.
What is your issue? Hate facts? Already decided on a narrative and are sticking to it? Perhaps you just want to make false choices.
As a local to this crisis I have one thing to say to you at this time: Fuck you.
heaven05
(18,124 posts)got a chance to be as crude as you accused someone else of being. Feels good, doesn't it. As a local you did not answer my pertinent question and I did know you couldn't, in all honesty, feel the shooting was unjustified. Hate actions against unarmed people offering no threat drive my hate facts/statements and narrative. Thank you for proof of who you really are.
Gore1FL
(21,164 posts)They did so on Saturday during the shooting.
They did so on Sunday, Monday, Tuesday, and Wednesday as well.
The governor is not the police. The governor replaced the police.
It's very frustrating that you equate the governor with the police. I deceives your ignorance on the matter at hand.
Bye.
Gore1FL
(21,164 posts)The criticism is absurd.
There are legitimate reasons to Criticize Gov Nixon. this is not one of them.
Standing with the governor vs standing with the people is a false choice.
I stand with the people, and believe the criticisms of the governor are stupid.
heaven05
(18,124 posts)if you're "within walking distance", have you walked that distance to see for yourself or to make a statement? They really are lucky, I'm not within "walking distance". I've shed blood to gain my human right(s) in this country, have you ever? Just a couple of questions.
Gore1FL
(21,164 posts)Doing so now isn't a big change. In fact, I have reason to do so now.
I haven't "shed blood" specifically, but I work for the State and take a hell of a pay/benefit cut doing so. Does that count, or are you insistent on on making things false choices, and continue you inexplicable assholish attempt to twist my words?
SleeplessinSoCal
(9,175 posts)Then today, hearing that he ordered the Highway Patrol to replace the Ferguson PD, with a black captain from Ferguson, I was thrilled.
I think, possibly like ISIS, it takes seeing the ruthless ugliness of some people to show why civilized behavior is essential. And unfortunately, many pay the price for the lesson.
savalez
(3,517 posts)Situation in Ferguson does not represent who we are. Must keep the peace, while safeguarding rights of citizens and the press
@GovJayNixon @DKSheets You don't know shit bc you never communicate. FUCK you, Governor!
As Governor, I'm committed to ensuring pain of last weekend's tragedy does not continue to be compounded by this ongoing crisis. #Ferguson
@GovJayNixon @jmannies FUCK you, Governor. I'm calling your bullshit!
10:56 PM - 13 Aug 2014
tomm2thumbs
(13,297 posts)savalez
(3,517 posts)http://www.mediaite.com/tv/missouri-state-senator-calls-governor-a-coward-on-msnbc/
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)heaven05
(18,124 posts)Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)Iron Man
(183 posts)Where's my fainting couch?
bravenak
(34,648 posts)[URL=.html][IMG][/IMG][/URL
47of74
(18,470 posts)I have family in the St. Louis area so I was a bit concerned about all this. Granted they live some distance from Ferguson but it still concerns me that Civil War II is happening next door to them. It's past fucking time someone calls bullshit on the Governor for not clamping down harder a bit sooner on the Ferguson PD.
Response to MohRokTah (Original post)
ailsagirl This message was self-deleted by its author.
Skidmore
(37,364 posts)her more on the national level. She's fearless.
bullwinkle428
(20,631 posts)I heard his "look forward, not back" comment.
tea and oranges
(396 posts)is the picture of that young man lying face down in a pool of his own blood, left there for four hours, uncovered.
First this young man was shot 10 times by people who then desecrated his remains in full view of the community. Almost like a head on a pike. . . or deliberate incitement.
That's what I call crude.
mythology
(9,527 posts)Being rude rarely accomplishes as much as people think it does. Her actions don't further the end goal of getting a peaceful and just resolution. Instead she's assuming the worst and acting on that assumption.
heaven05
(18,124 posts)you get tired of unarmed men and women being killed and physically accosted by the "officers of peace' who are supposed to "protect and serve"--BIG sarcasm smilie....maybe, just maybe, you'll start swearing too. But of course, you're too civilized to do something as "crude" as that.
malaise
(269,263 posts)and support her 100%. She too has First Amendment rights.
LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)She could use her position to tell why she's angry and make a suggestion, like all police officers wearing video recorders.
How perfectly useless.
Gore1FL
(21,164 posts)It's like when Ted Cruz criticized Obama for not going to the border of TX to discuss the crisis there.
She has a right to be angry at the events, but her criticism is emotional, misplaced, and unhelpful.