I prefer to work with adults or in extracurricular programs.
It's not because I don't think minors can be great students or get anything out of the experience1; it's because I don't want to deal with moronic school-district policies and histrionic parents.
One of the first things we teach aspiring writers of any kind--whether playwrights, screenwriters, novelists, poets, journalists or narrative non-fic writers--is "show, don't tell." Don't tell me Luther is a bad man...show me how Luther is a bad man--show us that he volunteers to carry groceries home from the store for old-women, only to pipe-wrench them in the elevator and steal their groceries. We teach them that good writing requires conflict: person v. person, person v. nature, person v. self, person v. society, person v. custom, etc. More so, we teach them that it necessitates real conflict, real consequence of the conflict...there is nothing compelling about Superman v. the harmless pink bunnies. Your parents and the principal might love it because it's unthreatening...but it's about as interesting as wallpaper and it isn't making you a very good writer. Teaching good writing can be anathema to the security-blanket state of education because it teaches students to both express/explore their thoughts including the fucked-up or unpleasant ones at the same time it provides the means and tools to challenge the world around them, society and authority.
I'd rather have students writing about blowing away their peers like D.B.C. Pierre did in Vernon God Little (then subsequently won the Man Booker for) than actually blowing-away their peers. I'd rather have them writing about teenage sex than pretend that teenage sex doesn't occur or that exploring their thoughts on their sexuality is unhealthy. It's anecdotal but it's my experience that the students writing publicly about such things aren't the ones you need to be concerned about.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
1: In fact, I believe the opposite. I believe that all HS students should receive one full year of composition education as part of an English curriculum. I'm frustrated by the number of adults both in college and post-college who cannot write well. I concede, most people don't have it in them to be professional writers...but the basic-level skill to be able to express oneself in writing is not hard to attain. Worse, we now test them on this as part of the SAT, having not provided them any solid education in the area of composition since the 5th grade in most cases. We expect them to be able to write compelling and cohesive argumentation by the time they get to college. We're shocked when they cannot.
= new reply since forum marked as read
?1334696298
