Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
Wed Aug 27, 2014, 06:00 PM Aug 2014

When It Comes to War in Iraq and Syria, Senate Dems Prefer No Congressional Vote


Speaking anonymously to The Hill, Senate Democrats' aides blast Senator Tim Kaine (D-Va.) for demanding congressional vote on expanding U.S. military operations against ISIS.

Numerous Senate Democrats oppose bringing military operations in Iraq and Syria to a vote before Congress because they think going on the record as for or against will be harmful to their bids for office during an election season, The Hill reported Wednesday. Critics slammed this reluctance to take a position as a sign that cowardice and self gain—not principle—rule the legislature.

Senator Tim Kaine (D-Va.) has been vocally pushing for President Obama to put the expanding U.S. military attacks on ISIS in Iraq and Syria to a vote before Congress, as required by the War Powers Resolution. In a press statement released Monday, Kaine stated, "I do not believe that our expanded military operations against ISIL are covered under existing authorizations from Congress. The 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force does not apply, and the Administration has testified that the 2002 Iraq war authorization is obsolete and should be repealed."

But Democratic Senators' aides, none of whom went on the record, told journalists Alexander Bolton and Amie Parnes that a congressional vote would be a political liability. The comments were captured in The Hill article:

“Asking anybody to take that vote within two months of an election is just stupid. Why would you put people in that position?” said a Senate Democratic aide.

A vote to authorize Obama to strike at Islamic militants in Iraq and Syria beyond the 60-day window set out by the War Powers Resolution would be a de facto referendum on the president, according to another aide.

“I think it’s dumb,” said a second Democratic aide. “The less the president is in the news with anything right now, the better.”


But critics say that now—when the U.S. is currently expanding its war in Iraq and Syria—is exactly the time when presidential powers need to be checked. "The fact that these unnamed people are carping at Kaine and acting like there's something wrong with him for not acting as enabler of their cowardice shows the struggle that we need to wage if we want to have democratic control," Robert Naiman, policy director for Just Foreign Policy, told Common Dreams.

MORE:

http://www.commondreams.org/news/2014/08/27/when-it-comes-war-iraq-and-syria-senate-dems-prefer-no-congressional-vote
1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
When It Comes to War in Iraq and Syria, Senate Dems Prefer No Congressional Vote (Original Post) KoKo Aug 2014 OP
Actually I think this is the position of both parties. n/t sadoldgirl Aug 2014 #1
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»When It Comes to War in I...