General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWall Street is up to its bad self, again.
SAN FRANCISCO (MarketWatch) Youd think after bringing the global economy to its knees just a few years ago, Wall Street would clean up its act.
That would be the safe trade: enact reforms internally, lower risk and play by the rules, lest new rules be forced upon the industry.
But why be safe when you can bet big and get rich?
Whats happened instead is the opposite. If anything, bankers and brokers defiantly have hardened in their quest for bigger and bigger paydays. Wolf of Wall Street? What were seeing is a pack of wild dogs that continue to use any means necessary to line their pockets no matter the fines, convictions and settlements that regulators throw at them.
Consider that, in just the past week, a trader convicted of fraud cited his banks bonus culture as motivation behind his crime; a major investment bank was accused of failing to live up to its own promise to root out cheaters from its trading systems; and three powerful, too-big-to-fail institutions have ramped up the use of risky derivatives to goose returns.
Lets begin with the trader. John Rusnak was a currency trader for the U.S. arm of Allied Irish Bank PLC AIB, -3.39% when he made a series of bad bets that cost the bank $291 million. He was convicted in 2002 for unauthorized trades and served five years in jail. This week he told a radio station that Wall Streets bonus culture created a huge incentive to make the bets and that, for supervisors, profit was always a reason to look the other way.
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/wall-street-is-up-to-its-bad-self-again-2014-09-18
______________________________________
The system is so broken that it can not be fixed, the folks in charge of fixing the system, Congress, will not do it because Republicans are in on the fix, or lack thereof.
Just another reason for the 60% who will not vote in the midterms to do a little navel gazing and just do it.
still_one
(92,190 posts)are so corrupt it is sickening
merrily
(45,251 posts)We know deregulating Wall Street is bad.
Would an audit of the Fed also be bad?
blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)Laelth
(32,017 posts)-Laelth
merrily
(45,251 posts)Why on earth would we think that?
Did Wall Street clean up its own mess in 1929? Nope. FDR got Joe Kennedy, one of the most successful Wall Street messers, to advise on laws. They enacted two long securities laws, the first federal ones, and a new bankruptcy law and Glass Steagall.
The SEC was created to watchdog Wall Street and the FDIC to watch dog and insure banks, in order to get the public to trust investing and banking again. The whole shebang worked pretty well for the public. Not perfectly, but well. For the banks and Wall Street, too.
But, Carter repealed the bankruptcy law and replaced it with a code that was much friendlier to corporate officers and directors. Then, Clinton repealed Glass Steagall. Meanwhile, the SEC had been getting friendlier and friendlier with the likes of Madoff. And, duh, none of that worked very well for public. But it worked fantastically for Wall Street and the banks, which made scads of money.
Then, there was 2008.
They got the economy of several nations swirling the bottom of the commode, got bonuses for their performance, got bailed out, settled with the govt so no one could sue for their myriad mortgage misdeeds all over the nation and tried to blame the whole mess on "liar loans." And, for the past five years, they have had such low rates from the fed that they make renters who would live to buy a home weep with envy.
The above was somehow supposed to lead me to think that they were going to clean up their own act?
Bewildered.
Whiskeytide
(4,461 posts)... but a lot of Democratic congress members are in on it too. There is a difference still between many Rs and Ds concerning Wall Street, but its getting less and less discernible every day!
merrily
(45,251 posts)Carter and a Democratic Congress passed bankruptcy laws that eliminated investigation of bankrupt corporations to see if their officers and directors had committed fraud or acted negligently. Clinton and Greenspan both lobbied Congress for repeal of Glass Steagall. A lot of Dems voted for repeal.
At first, I thought no Dem Senator had voted for repeal, but then someone posted to me that the vote I had looked up was not the vote on the final bill. (Looking for anything in Thomas seems hard to me. I don't know why.)
Blaming everything on Republicans, regardless of the facts seems to be important here. Not especially useful to Main Street, though.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)look like a schoolyard bully. These fuckers truly want to destroy the world in the name of their own untrammeled greed. There needs to be a march to the guillotine for the most egregious of these assholes followed by repatriating every dime of what can be found that they have stolen in the last twenty years and selling their families into slavery in Dubai. Nothing else seems to work on these parasites, maybe that would have a deterrent effect in the future.
Harsh, I know, but it is the super-rich who are putting the rest of society in what is rapidly becoming a kill or be killed situation. And they will never concede a thing.
As JFK once said, those who make peaceful revolution impossible make violent revolution inevitable. I do not want or advocate violent revolution but the .01% are literally begging for it at this point.
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)money laundering law so the business of corruption, graft and unrestrained greed is made legal.
After all, it is just a disagreement about morals and principals.
It might not even be so horrific if not for the equal involvement of politicians and mass media.