Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kentuck

(111,095 posts)
Thu Sep 18, 2014, 03:46 PM Sep 2014

Is the vote to arm "moderates" in Syria a massive blunder?

I saw a report that there were as many as 1500 different rebel groups in Syria. Which of those do we sell arms to? Does it really matter so long as the arms dealers get their money? Obviously not.

I cannot understand how any Congress person could vote for such a deal with so many questions and so many dangerous possibilities? I cannot understand why a President would ask for such a proposal?

How do we follow these weapons? Will they eventually be used against our own troops? Probably so.

But the alternative is to give them to our local school boards and local police departments. Perhaps the military has too many weapons?

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Is the vote to arm "moderates" in Syria a massive blunder? (Original Post) kentuck Sep 2014 OP
Same old shit to make rich people richer. WAR, the pasttime of the ruling class insane. nt valerief Sep 2014 #1
We're back in bizarro world. CJCRANE Sep 2014 #2
If history tells us anything The2ndWheel Sep 2014 #3
George W Obama, CIC....same old crap from a different president nt msongs Sep 2014 #4
Yes. Someday those weapons will be used against the US or its allies. n/t Dems to Win Sep 2014 #5
Yes. Sadly, this will only prime the pump. morningfog Sep 2014 #6
Indubitably GeorgeGist Sep 2014 #7
It's the perfect plan scarletwoman Sep 2014 #8
Thw War Machine MUST be fed. 99Forever Sep 2014 #9
Hard to tell. moondust Sep 2014 #10

The2ndWheel

(7,947 posts)
3. If history tells us anything
Thu Sep 18, 2014, 03:53 PM
Sep 2014

it's that you do what you need to do today, and worry about the consequences tomorrow, and then do something about that, and worry about those consequences later, etc, etc, etc.

Clearly, obviously, arming whatever group is going to come back to bit us in the ass at some point, some day, in some way. Even not arming them will bit us in the ass. It doesn't matter what we do.

scarletwoman

(31,893 posts)
8. It's the perfect plan
Thu Sep 18, 2014, 08:37 PM
Sep 2014

to keep us mired in never-ending war in the Middle East.

For the MIC, this is a good thing.

99Forever

(14,524 posts)
9. Thw War Machine MUST be fed.
Thu Sep 18, 2014, 08:51 PM
Sep 2014

Doesn't matter which team ( Red or Blue) supposedly is in control, the Beast that is the MIC WILL have it's needs met and it NEEDS a war, NOW!

moondust

(19,981 posts)
10. Hard to tell.
Thu Sep 18, 2014, 09:12 PM
Sep 2014

One thing that may help is that the Syrian conflict has been going on for a few years now, allowing allied intelligence in the region to follow the players and maybe figure out who can and who cannot be trusted--more or less.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Is the vote to arm "...