Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsOK, I admit it. I don't understand this chart.
How could there possibly be any blue in it?
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
9 replies, 1803 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (16)
ReplyReply to this post
9 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
OK, I admit it. I don't understand this chart. (Original Post)
Jackpine Radical
Apr 2012
OP
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)1. bah hahah. i was thinking it is simple. what are you not getting
How could there possibly be any blue in it?
then this, lol
Jazzgirl
(3,744 posts)4. LOL, I was thinking the same thing.
When I saw the red I thought there was no mystery to what the chart said. Then I saw your last comment.
Egalitarian Thug
(12,448 posts)2. Had me going there for a bit. n/t
Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)3. Two reasons:
1) Sensible underling who tells the truth and is subsequently fired.
2) Also, note the qualifier "might" since the statement that occasionally comes out is "We might be wrong, but we're not."
The more accurate blue category would then be: We might be wrong (later retracted).
I believe during Vietnam the Pentagon used the statement: "The previous statement is no longer operational."
Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)7. I think that was the Nixon White House:
"The previous statement is no longer operative."
Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)9. You are correct:
right era, wrong criminal enterprise.
gateley
(62,683 posts)5. You got me!
(Am I the only one who typos smilies? :eyes
bluerum
(6,109 posts)6. Iran is hoarding the blue pixels.
liberal N proud
(60,334 posts)8. It is very deceiving
The key makes you think there are republicans who would admit they were wrong.