General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsEbola: Epidemiologist: Stop the flights now
http://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2014/10/06/epidemiologist-stop-the-flights-now/By
David Dausey, a Yale-trained epidemiologist who works on controlling pandemics, is dean of the School of Health Professions and Public Health at Mercyhurst University in Erie, Pennsylvania.
The incubation period for Ebola is up to 21 days, so a person could get on a plane the day he or she is exposed and spend three weeks in the United States before exhibiting symptoms. Then he or she could potentially infect any number of people here before the disease is properly diagnosed, and they are isolated or quarantined.
Top U.S. government health officials have spoken strongly against creating a travel ban (though members of Congress increasingly disagree). They say restricting flights will also restrict aid to affected countries and will increase the amount of ongoing unrest. But commercial airlines are not the only ways for the United States to send aid and aid workers. The United States has the most advanced military in the entire world; we can transport people and supplies without commercial carriers.
The Ebola outbreak in West Africa has been compared to a war zone. The disease is now being viewed as a national security threat on par with nuclear weapons. The United States has committed nearly 4,000 troops to impacted countries. Its time to take security precautions that align with the gravity of the threat. That means doing whatever it takes to keep infected people from coming here.
rocktivity
(44,577 posts)And if the case of the nurse who got sick after caring for a since deceased Ebola patient in Spain is any indication, maybe it's time to start sending in the kind of aid that will allow all infected and contagious people to be treated there.
rocktivity
dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)those who can are going to want to land in a country that has good health care.
And lie away their symptoms if that is necessary.
human nature.
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)How many folks can afford to suddenly leave their country with their families and stay in another country for a month? (Not to mention folks from most countries in Africa are not nearly as free to travel to Western countries as we are to African countries.)
A lot less folks in Sierra Leone can afford such a trip than folks America, I can tell you that.
Irrational.
LisaL
(44,974 posts)PADemD
(4,482 posts)Airlines have not taken any specific steps to deal with Ebola, representatives from several carriers said. They follow general guidelines issues by the C.D.C. and the World Health Organization. They have also informed their flight attendants about the hazards of Ebola, its symptoms and how the disease is spread. Delta has increased the supplies of gloves and sanitizers on board. But beyond taking simple precautions, airlines said they were not responsible for screening passengers.
The number of those passengers from West Africa is large. According to Airlines for America, the trade association of American carriers, more than 10,000 people flew to the United States from Sierra Leone from April 2013 to March 2014, and more than 17,000 flew from Liberia in the same period. Those figures include only passengers who flew on itineraries involving an American carrier.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/02/us/man-in-us-with-ebola-had-been-screened-to-fly-but-system-is-spotty.html?_r=0
NanceGreggs
(27,817 posts)... "want to land in a country that has good health care," the US, sadly, would not be at the top of their list.
Skidmore
(37,364 posts)I think the big objection is that it would impact trade/money/business. When I was a young woman, there were travel bans made for areas with cholera and other diseases. When the flu gets out of hand at schools in this country, sometimes they are closed for a few days to allow children to recover and reduce the transmission of the virus. I do think that it would not hurt to have travel restrictions for awhle to see if this cannot be contained or slowed down.
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)So unless we shut down all flights into the US, it's a bullshit argument.
Nigeria is no longer affected and is the only nation that was affected with direct flights to the US.
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)This fact about flights is noted as an edit at the link, but not in the posted OP....there is nothing to ban, folks.
LisaL
(44,974 posts)Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)LisaL
(44,974 posts)written on. People lie. And then lie some more.
They are not going to tell you they were exposed to Ebola because they know full well they won't be able to get on the plane.
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)British Airways and some other airlines have suspended flights from those affected countries, and overall traffic to and from the affected areas has dropped.
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/u-s-health-officials-in-opposition-to-ebola-travel-ban/
Tarheel_Dem
(31,239 posts)snagglepuss
(12,704 posts)meaningless.
Barack_America
(28,876 posts)Yeah right.
I think it's United who is operating this flight. I suppose they could be asked to suspend it. I have to assume there aren't many Liberian visas being granted these days.
I have to say though, I'm pretty dismayed to see how few DUers have any empathy for those dying in West Africa. Few seem to have any concern what these national quarantines would do to those countries.
grahamhgreen
(15,741 posts)FSogol
(45,525 posts)apples and oranges
(1,451 posts)at least temporarily.
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)pnwmom
(108,991 posts)uppityperson
(115,679 posts)anyone from Liberia was on? And what about people in connecting airports? Or just all Liberians?
pnwmom
(108,991 posts)because Liberians wouldn't be there.
But I didn't say we should ban anyone from Liberia. I was responding to someone else.
uppityperson
(115,679 posts)How are those non-citizens whose flights originated in Liberia to get to our customs if not by a plane? What Flights are there that are not by aircraft?
wtf
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)pnwmom
(108,991 posts)would be unworkable because there are no direct flights from Liberia. That's a weak answer because it's easy enough to determine where a passenger began his travel.
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)grahamhgreen
(15,741 posts)MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)Response to grahamhgreen (Reply #75)
SidDithers This message was self-deleted by its author.
Marrah_G
(28,581 posts)Check a map of Africa.
grahamhgreen
(15,741 posts)Marrah_G
(28,581 posts)All the people in the cluster have either recovered or died. 20 cases, 8 deaths.
progressoid
(49,998 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)And for the most part, it has worked.
You bet your bippy that after Patrick Sawyer flew into Lagos and ended up infecting 20 others, Nigeria isnt screwing around anymore with letting people in.
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)Seriously?
pnwmom
(108,991 posts)One infection. Twelve days after showing symptoms, no more infections.
It's the epitome of success!
LisaL
(44,974 posts)The day he was vomiting all over the place.
Duncan himself developed symptoms 9 days after contact.
So, don't count your chickens before they hatch.
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)So far, no symptoms.
Our culture of washing our hands consistently alone accounts for a lower infection level than West Africa.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)He very well could have exposed others up to that point. It's a little early to say "no more infections". The jury is still out.
As it is, I have confidence in our HC system to contain any further importations to a small number of potential secondary cases, but I still wouldn't want the people I care about to be those secondary cases. And any further clusters of ebola cases are going to wreak all kinds of havoc- schools closed, buildings shut down, etc.
It's totally fucking inane to continue to allow travelers- visa holders- from those 3 countries until this blows over. There is no good reason for it, and a shitload of reasons against it. That doesn't mean we can't provide humanitarian aid and try to stop it there, it just means that for the time being we're not letting people in from L/SL/G.
grahamhgreen
(15,741 posts)XemaSab
(60,212 posts)End commercial airline flights.
The economy of the region is already in the crapper, so why should they be allowed to infect 6 billion more people? Because free trade?
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Who cares if sick people inevitably get on planes and kill countless others all over the globe, the important thing is not to make anyone feel bad.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)Africans could get on boats and reach places from which they could fly to the US.
Clearly, the only safe solution is to incinerate the entire continent. Otherwise someone with ebola will appear in your bedroom tonight.
Alternatively, you could stop the insane paranoia and realize ebola isn't actually that communicable. An infected family member only passes it on to 1 in 7 family members in the same household. In Africa.
LisaL
(44,974 posts)and Mr.Duncan. And some others. Way more than 1 in 7.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)We could call it "statistics". We could look over the tens of thousands of cases of Ebola that have been recorded, and get an idea of what the average really is instead of citing individual cases that help us run around with our hair on fire.
Naaaaaah. Much better to freak out. So when should we start setting fire to Liberia?
LisaL
(44,974 posts)lower than the actual numbers.
Ever thought of that?
jeff47
(26,549 posts)LisaL
(44,974 posts)The official numbers are highly under-reported.
"The range of estimated cases -- from 550,000 to 1.4 million -- is wide because experts suspect the current count is highly under-reported. The official death toll from Ebola in West Africa has climbed to more than 2,800 in six months, with 5,800 cases confirmed as of Monday, the World Health Organization said."
http://www.cnn.com/2014/09/23/world/africa/ebola-outbreak/
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)To say "well we can't ensure no one could possibly get through, 100%, so let's not do anything" is a false dichotomy, and bad logic. Why have temperature screenings and questionnaires at the airport, even, then? I mean, apparently if a measure can't be 100% foolproof, it shouldn't be done at all.
Why has the rest of Africa closed their borders to these countries? In case you haven't noticed, with the exception of one guy in Senegal, land border closings have WORKED. Ebola has gotten out more effectively by airplane, and there's a reason for that.
The sky will not fall if recreational visa-holders from 3 West African countries are inconvenienced by not being allowed to vacation in the US until this is cleared up. The argument that it impedes humanitarian aid is bs. There are other ways to get aid in without allowing visa holders out.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)And we have tens of thousands of ebola cases to study, not just one guy, right?
I'm not.
I'm saying treating this as the next black death is stupid. Because in a place with terrible sanitation, lousy healthcare and funeral practices that greatly help to spread the disease, the transmission rate is 1 in 7 family members.
Ebola is a serious disease. It demands a serious response that actually uses all of our knowledge, under the guidance of people who have dedicated their entire lives to responding to such diseases. Instead of flippant bullshit spouted by TV news anchors who can't spell "virus" if you spot them the "vir".
They haven't. Only some have.
It's called "long travel time" and "incubation period". Africa doesn't have a great land travel network. It takes a while to go from one country to another by land.
So, should we extinguish your hair, or do you want to panic some more first?
LisaL
(44,974 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Maybe you shouldn't panic at the horrifying and untenable thought that some of the 10,000 Liberian US visa holders might not be able to Vacation in Manhattan or Minnesota until next summer, oh heavens no.
uppityperson
(115,679 posts)LisaL
(44,974 posts)He came in on a tourist visa, not fiancée visa.
uppityperson
(115,679 posts)He came to get married, not simply vacation.
LisaL
(44,974 posts)Imagine that.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)in close personal contact with someone with ebola.
uppityperson
(115,679 posts)quarantine passes easily and healthily.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)On the Airport exit screening form?
You gonna give that snark to President Sirleaf, too? She's pissed as shit with the guy.
uppityperson
(115,679 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Thought so.
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)But certainly what they want to discourage is the inevitable free-for-all of newly infected ebola patients "forgetting" to tell the truth on the forms.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)he hadn't been exposed to anyone with ebola?
uppityperson
(115,679 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Because he claims he was coming over to get married?
He also claimed he hadn't been exposed to ebola, and that was a legal document- which is why Liberia might prosecute him if he ever returns. I don't know, when someone lies once it becomes a bit harder to believe other stuff they say.
Are you suggesting we should let people into the US with ebola if they're coming to get married?
uppityperson
(115,679 posts)did not answer my question. Did you know he came here to get married?
Simple question.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Nor does it matter.
The person he ostensibly came to marry, he put her life in danger with his behavior. Not a particularly noble start to a marriage.
uppityperson
(115,679 posts)refuse to answer. Odd.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Did you know he lied on the form at the airport? Why dont you feel like answering that question?
uppityperson
(115,679 posts)What is going on in regards to their disbelief in micro organisms and passing it on due to how they treat their dead seems incredible to us here.
Tanuki
(14,920 posts)uppityperson
(115,679 posts)equality.
Response to Warren DeMontague (Reply #16)
WhiteAndNerdy This message was self-deleted by its author.
Response to grahamhgreen (Original post)
Post removed
AwakeAtLast
(14,133 posts)President Obama has had his Surgeon General recommendation blocked, and they have cut funding (because, you know, Republicans).
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)former9thward
(32,074 posts)He refuses to allow a vote.
JI7
(89,263 posts)cwydro
(51,308 posts)Like closing the barn door after the horse is out?
We need to shut that disease down over there. So we need the flights.
I suppose they could only allow military and medical flights.
But, people will get out. Trust me on that one.
SheilaT
(23,156 posts)someone with Ebola who is asymptomatic can infect others. That's just not true. The danger period is when the person develops symptoms and hasn't been isolated.
And even then you still must come in direct contact with body fluids: blood, vomit, sweat, semen.
former9thward
(32,074 posts)He had no contact. Tell that to doctors who have treated patients in HazMat suits who have been infected.
SheilaT
(23,156 posts)and there's something he's not saying.
As for the doctors in the Hazmat suits, the protocol for putting them on and taking them off is, as I understand it, very strict. Here's a quote from Dr. Billy Fischer of the University of North Carolina School of Medicine. He was on the Diane Rehm show on July 31 this year he said:
" So when you put on all of this equipment, it can get as hot as about 115, 116 degrees on an average temperature day inside your suit. And then you work for as long as you can before you start being -- coming very dehydrated and then you have to exit. But you have to take off your equipment in exactly the same way every single time. So Doctors Without Borders, MSF, has established these rules, these routines that really provide a safe way of removing these clothes, which have potentially infectious bodily fluids on them." (My italics)
Keep in mind these doctors over in Africa are not working in lovely, air-conditioned, western style hospitals. No, they're out there in conditions that can kindly be called primitive, and it's no wonder that a good number of the local health care workers have been infected. Keep in mind that while it's not easy to get Ebola, once even a few Ebola virus particles get in you, they multiply exceedingly well, far beyond your body's ability to overcome them. So once again, it's not easy to get infected in the first place, but once you do, oh boy.
The full transcript of that show is worth reading: http://thedianerehmshow.org/shows/2014-07-31/understanding-deadly-ebola-virus/transcript
As for the cameraman, I just looked at a USA Today article about him and it says, "Although Mukpo isn't sure how he was infected, he told his father that it's possible he was exposed when he was spray washing a car in which someone had died to disinfect it. That can expose people to Ebola, if blood or other fluids splash up and get into a person's eyes." So yes, he had contact. Not directly with a human with symptomatic Ebola, but he was in a situation where there was virus present. And he wound up having contact. I'm guessing that if he'd simply worn eye protection he'd have been okay.
So we are back to the fact that it is not airborne. It's not that easy to get. Despite the three doctors and the cameraman.
quadrature
(2,049 posts)100K
1Mil
?
before travel restrictions are appropriate?
greytdemocrat
(3,299 posts)That hurts some people's feelings here.
Vinca
(50,303 posts)Sounds like a GOP plan. Only they would be so stupid to think an African person might not fly to a European or Asian hub and catch another flight.
grahamhgreen
(15,741 posts)Vinca
(50,303 posts)librechik
(30,676 posts)no need to close the airports if all the passengers are symptom-free.
LisaL
(44,974 posts)If back in the home country, the waiting period is useless as they can get infected during the waiting period.
rocktivity
(44,577 posts)As an alternative to a complete travel ban, it's not much, but it would make the difference between few infected people and a few dozen infected people entering other countries.
rocktivity
LisaL
(44,974 posts)If they stay home, and get infected during these 21 days, it's not going to stop the infected people from coming into the US.
rocktivity
(44,577 posts)within that 21-day waiting period, because they wouldn't be allowed to get on a plane in the first place. No, it wouldn't stop everyone, but it would stop some -- which, in the absence of a travel ban, it better than nothing.
rocktivity
LisaL
(44,974 posts)During which they can get infected. They might have been safer if you didn't make them wait 21 days.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,361 posts)So Congress better start lobbying the United Nations, if that's what they want. It would be almost worth it to see Republicans having to ask the UN nicely.