Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Liberal_in_LA

(44,397 posts)
Tue Oct 7, 2014, 08:42 PM Oct 2014

Lawmaker that voted for mandatory water conservation, used enough for 8 households

quote from interview played on radio - he said "I need to keep my property values up" or something close to that.



RIVERSIDE – Mike Soubirous is a prodigious water user, pumping more than 1 million gallons per year at his lushly landscaped home on a hot, windy, Southern California hilltop.

Soubirous also is a member of the Riverside City Council, and one of his jobs in that position is to make decisions for the Riverside’s water utility. In July, Soubirous voted with the rest of his council colleagues to impose tough new water conservation rules in this desert city of 317,000.

Yet as California’s drought worsened from 2012 to 2013, Soubirous consumed enough water to supply eight California households — more than any other water official in the state.

Soubirous knows he should cut his water use to set a good example, he told The Center for Investigative Reporting. But he has a one-acre lot with cascades of flowering shrubs and a weeping willow tree, and summer temperatures hit 100 degrees. Conservation isn’t that simple, he said.

“Do I have to sell my house to set that example, or do I have to just abolish all my shrubs?” Soubirous asked. “I don’t know what to do. I don’t know how I can reduce my water rate.”

http://ww2.kqed.org/news/2014/10/06/california-water-officials-arent-following-own-call-for-conservation/

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Lawmaker that voted for mandatory water conservation, used enough for 8 households (Original Post) Liberal_in_LA Oct 2014 OP
"or do I have to just abolish all my shrubs" BlueJazz Oct 2014 #1
ugh jollyreaper2112 Oct 2014 #2
First thing, get rid of the lawn. A-hole. Shrike47 Oct 2014 #3
Willows need a lot of Water. PeoViejo Oct 2014 #4
Well, everybody else is staring at brown lawns Warpy Oct 2014 #5
Eight households? customerserviceguy Oct 2014 #6
 

PeoViejo

(2,178 posts)
4. Willows need a lot of Water.
Tue Oct 7, 2014, 08:58 PM
Oct 2014

That Tree probably uses a third of it.

This guy is a Dolt Extraordinaire.

Perhaps some Desert Plants or Date Palms, then he can sell it to some wealthy Middle Easterner.

Warpy

(111,383 posts)
5. Well, everybody else is staring at brown lawns
Tue Oct 7, 2014, 08:58 PM
Oct 2014

and barely alive shrubs so maybe he needs to do that, too.

Well established shrubs and trees will probably come through it if the rains are back over the winter. Stuff that's totally out of place will likely die off and need to be replaced by stuff that is more drought tolerant.

I'm so used to xeriscape gardening here in NM that the broad expanse of green punctuated by a few trees looks really odd, a little bleak, downright ugly. The flag placement makes it look like a post office or boarding school.

I wonder if the interior is as devoid of character as the exterior is.

customerserviceguy

(25,183 posts)
6. Eight households?
Tue Oct 7, 2014, 09:15 PM
Oct 2014

The average person uses about fifty gallons per day, and a million gallons per year works out to 54-55 people per year of regular domestic usage. Those households would consist of about 7-8 family members, a bit larger than the average household.

Of course, I'm not factoring in a household's use for a pool (probably common in California), car washing or even a modest sized lawn, but maybe the writers of this news story are.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Lawmaker that voted for m...