Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDEA steals private data of woman, impersonates her on Facebook to befriend criminal
http://www.buzzfeed.com/chrishamby/government-says-federal-agents-can-impersonate-woman-online#2w8tetbhttps://www.documentcloud.org/documents/1309429-arquiett-civil-complaint.html
Quotes from article:
"Not long before, law enforcement officers had arrested Arquiett, alleging she was part of a drug ring. A judge, weighing evidence that the single mom was a bit player who accepted responsibility, ultimately sentenced Arquiett to probation. But while she was awaiting trial, Sinnigen created the fake Facebook page using Arquietts real name, posted photos from her seized cell phone, and communicated with at least one wanted fugitive all without her knowledge."
...
"The DEAs actions might never have come to light if Arquiett, now 28, hadnt sued Sinnigen, accusing him in federal district court in Syracuse, New York, of violating her privacy and placing her in danger.
In a court filing, a U.S. attorney acknowledges that, unbeknownst to Arquiett, Sinnigen created the fake Facebook account, posed as her, posted photos, sent a friend request to a fugitive, accepted other friend requests, and used the account for a legitimate law enforcement purpose.
The governments response lays out an argument justifying Sinnigens actions: Defendants admit that Plaintiff did not give express permission for the use of photographs contained on her phone on an undercover Facebook page, but state the Plaintiff implicitly consented by granting access to the information stored in her cell phone and by consenting to the use of that information to aid in an ongoing criminal investigations [sic]."
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 778 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (8)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
DEA steals private data of woman, impersonates her on Facebook to befriend criminal (Original Post)
DetlefK
Oct 2014
OP
A note to those who rationalize that it's ok for the govement (and therefore corporations) to spy
rhett o rick
Oct 2014
#2
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)1. Oh good...the third thread posted on this in GD!!! nt
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)2. A note to those who rationalize that it's ok for the govement (and therefore corporations) to spy
on us, because if you don't do anything wrong you won't have anything to worry about. The govment will use whatever means necessary to achieve their goals. And corporations will use whatever means necessary to achieve their goals. Neither can be trusted with your personal information. Neither have morals.
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)3. Well...I get your concerns but this is a poor case to make that argument.
This was not spying...this was action undertaken by a government agent under the authority of a federal plea deal.
This case raises several Constitutional concerns, none of which have anything to do with "spying" per se.