General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsEbola Is Bad. But the Flu Is Worse.
As we stare with horror at the ravages of Ebola, it is easy to overlook an old familiar foe: the flu. Ebola has claimed fewer than 4,000 lives globally to date, none in the United States. Flu claims between 250,000 and 500,000 lives every year, including over 20,000 in the United Statesfar more American lives than Ebola will ever claim.
Ebola is no joke: The Centers for Disease Control project 1.4 million cases of the disease worldwide by January in a worst-case scenario. But by comparison, the 1918 pandemic killed an estimated 50 to 100 million worldwide. The United States simply cannot afford to be complacent about flu preparedness.
Getting ready for the flu is a complex endeavor, relying on surveillance, detection, communication and detailed response plans. The United States has been fine-tuning its response plans since it first released a national flu pandemic strategy in 2005. The linchpin of the strategy is timely access to an effective flu vaccine.
And thats where the trouble lies. Ten years ago this week, the United States lost nearly half its flu vaccine supply overnight when British regulators detected contamination at a manufacturing facility. U.S. flu planners, who had been eyeing the reemergence of a deadly form of bird flu (H5N1), were deeply shaken. If the manufacturing base was too frail to service seasonal flu, how would it respond to a pandemic?
Read more: http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2014/10/ebola-is-bad-but-the-flu-is-worse-111662.html#ixzz3FbIE3mER
Kendall Hoyt is assistant professor at the Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth and author of Long Shot; Vaccines for National Defense.
ozone_man
(4,825 posts)In the unlikely case that the ebola virus becomes airborne, then that would be catastrophic.
ffr
(22,671 posts)kickysnana
(3,908 posts)Dreamer Tatum
(10,926 posts)Fail.
Jamastiene
(38,187 posts)I get the point and agree that flu has been more deadly, but something about Ebola makes most horror movies look like picnics. It is more the thought of it, I think, with most people.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Or something.
Jamastiene
(38,187 posts)Oh wait, that's right. There is no vaccine to protect from Ebola.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)I'm personally more worried about the flu, but you can do the math yourself.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Regularly, "worrying" about it is pointless.
On the other hand, if people had taken ebola more seriously in April, this could have been contained.
Drayden
(146 posts)It's getting old. Lemme correct some things: flu deaths are unknown, because they are estimated. Second, even the CDC lists it as 3000-40,000 a year, a wildly varying number. Third, flu virus is rampant here. If the Ebola virus became as rampant here as flu, many, many, many more would be dead. Why? Because ebola is much deadlier than the flu.
Response to Drayden (Reply #6)
1000words This message was self-deleted by its author.
davidn3600
(6,342 posts)If you get Ebola, you'll likely die.
Crunchy Frog
(26,630 posts)Sorry.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)hedgehog
(36,286 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Although one hopes with any luck an effective vaccine could be given to ring any outbreaks and effectively stop them. You wouldn't need to vaccinate everyone.
I'd imagine if and when one is widely available vaccinating at-risk populations near the reservoir of the virus; fruit bats or whatever, may be a good idea.
Getting the yearly flu shot is on my list for the next week or so.