General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCan someone explain what the heck was mean't about this?
On MHP show this morning I happened to hear a former Bush-the minor's official make the following statement:
"When auto-workers are working one shift, they are democrats; when working three shifts, they are voting rePIGlican".
She said that while discussing an opinion article the Mitt man wrote in 2009 or so about the auto-workers in Detroit criticizing labor as pushing "policies that were out of wack" with the previaling auto industry economy, as she claimed.
dems_rightnow
(1,956 posts)... an inference that economic times are better under Republicans?
LASlibinSC
(269 posts)I just awoke. Somethings wrong- I have the dumb, cause I know the words but in that order it's gibberish?!?!
Response to mazzarro (Original post)
LASlibinSC This message was self-deleted by its author.
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)What she is saying is that under Republican policy a worker has to work three shifts in order to be able to pay all their bills.
Zax2me
(2,515 posts)and a lie.
southernyankeebelle
(11,304 posts)where is this idiot coming from. So what many unions are behind democratics. That is all we have. The republicans think its ok to take many from corporations. So what.
1monster
(11,012 posts)we are not democratics, we are Democrats.
Let's not take the issue too far in the other directions and give the neocons another knife with which to cut us.
southernyankeebelle
(11,304 posts)I want. When I use it democratic someone bitches at me about it. So I correct it and I get bitched with using democrat. I can't win with anyone. I appreciate your comment but please when I use it you get the point.