General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPick Hillary's VP
How about a wise Latino. Could she pick another woman? Sherrod Brown could deliver Ohio and mollify progressives. Wyden would help out West. Who would you like to see on the ticket?
femmocrat
(28,394 posts)madinmaryland
(64,931 posts)femmocrat
(28,394 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)pscot
(21,024 posts)O'Malley would add anything to the ticket. Maryland will vote for Hillary without him and it's hard to see where he helps her.
brooklynite
(94,499 posts)(according to sources from his inside circle).
If you want Hillary to get beaten up in the Primary, you'll need to shop elsewhere.
That just struck me funny!
bigwillq
(72,790 posts)Sometimes we all need to take a deep breath and laugh. Have a good night.
hughee99
(16,113 posts)Optical.Catalyst
(1,355 posts)Have the number two in attack mode constantly. Keep the repukes on the run.
Erose999
(5,624 posts)Hillary going with that.
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)posted in the Hillary group, since I'd leave Hillary off of Hillary's ticket, but, if she has to be on it, and has to be in the top slot, I'd go for someone like Castro or Lee, which covers your first two suggestions. I wouldn't want to see a current Senator going for the VP slot, unless we could absolutely guarantee they'd be replaced immediately by another Dem Senator. Ie, no Senators from states with Republican govs, or who might turn around and elect a Republican to fill a Dem Senator's seat.
pscot
(21,024 posts)This is a thought experiment.
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)That's why I said Castro or Lee.
Tikki
(14,556 posts)Tikki
wyldwolf
(43,867 posts)Evergreen Emerald
(13,069 posts)Gothmog
(145,126 posts)GeorgeGist
(25,319 posts)wyldwolf
(43,867 posts)TBF
(32,047 posts)he will be fantastic as VP and/or President.
misterhighwasted
(9,148 posts)What a fine frenzy that would make. Hard to say whose heads would explode first.
Let the squirming begin!!
Fox & their teabola friends would be a sight to behold..oh please make it happen..
bigwillq
(72,790 posts)Posted the other day that I didn't agree with jokes about Ebola but, damn, that's funny.
Teabola.
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)It is going to be a show down that is for sure.
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Sid
madokie
(51,076 posts)Would be an excellent pick.
joshcryer
(62,269 posts)The Democratic Party always needed to have a Latino candidate after a Woman candidate. This is exactly what is going to happen.
MattBaggins
(7,903 posts)wyldwolf
(43,867 posts)pscot
(21,024 posts)long time ago:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251337790
djean111
(14,255 posts)mostly ceremonial, role. Neutered, as it were.
Wouldn't change my enthusiasm level one iota, and that is no enthusiasm at all.
pscot
(21,024 posts)to the right?
djean111
(14,255 posts)I think a Progressive VP would just be window dressing, it would be the Hillary and Bill show all the way.
Hillary might spout some Progressive campaign rhetoric, but that's about it.
2banon
(7,321 posts)run on that ticket.
joshcryer
(62,269 posts)cascadiance
(19,537 posts)... though I could see either of them being the VP on the other's ticket as a worthwhile position.
joshcryer
(62,269 posts)It's not about livening up progressives because 90% of them already support Clinton. The 10% that don't won't be persuaded if the head of the communist party himself was on the ticket.
earthside
(6,960 posts)We could rename the country "Goldman, Sachs, Clinton and Blankfein, LLC"
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)Between all of her BFFs in the criminal financier class and warmongering rhetoric she seems to be appropriating from her new (war-criminal) friend Kissinger, she may as well bring Cheney back and just be done with it.
pscot
(21,024 posts)That apparition seen with Obama last week was a hologram
nationalize the fed
(2,169 posts)He "advised" her when she was SOS
It's a New American Century!
Hoppy
(3,595 posts)It would save her wasting time going to Wall Street to find out what her overlords want her to do.
Stellar
(5,644 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)I have looked at the Castro twins, O'Malley, Brown, Manchin, Webb, McCaskle, Warren, Grimes, Wendy Davis, this could go on for a while but isn't it comforting to know we have a big field to choose.
pscot
(21,024 posts)all registered Democrats and disregard electability as a requirement. It's that last that worries me.
CK_John
(10,005 posts)hughee99
(16,113 posts)Obama had to pick someone with foreign policy experience, Hillary doesn't. Are Delaware's 3 electoral votes in doubt?
Sancho
(9,067 posts)elleng
(130,864 posts)Gothmog
(145,126 posts)The Texas Democratic Party has been selling Clinton/Castro 2016 merchandise for over a year now
grahamhgreen
(15,741 posts)pscot
(21,024 posts)grahamhgreen
(15,741 posts)GummyBearz
(2,931 posts)Me.
I'm not latino or female. But I would bring in the vote of people who don't want another bought and paid for career politician. After that, I could run for president myself and make actual changes. Who's in?
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)'cause they're all so much smarter and more pure than Hillary.
Sid
LawDeeDah
(1,596 posts)SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Sid
LawDeeDah
(1,596 posts)But that would be weird!
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)Good, because I said it unironically.
arendt
(5,078 posts)just like everything else, we don't need no steenkin rules. We don need nobody messin with La Jefe.
Why don't you wait about two years before you start dictating how I should vote.
ChisolmTrailDem
(9,463 posts)mainstreetonce
(4,178 posts)...
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)Because unlike Kissinger, he's only MOSTLY dead.
AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)peacebird
(14,195 posts)bigwillq
(72,790 posts)AngryOldDem
(14,061 posts)I truly hate the anointing of certain people two years before the election.
pscot
(21,024 posts)One of the people mentioned in this thread would have to step up big time. But who? The bench looks a little thin.
Smarmie Doofus
(14,498 posts)A smidgeon of a difference here and there to appeal to this segment of the center-right electorate or that.
PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)Because, she will not be on the ticket except for write-ins
SheilaT
(23,156 posts)Great! That will sure save a lot of money that can now be spent in the general election.
arendt
(5,078 posts)SheilaT
(23,156 posts)and sometimes I'll skip a segment he's on.
Rachel is the closest thing to mainstream media that I watch. So I miss a lot.
Pisces
(5,599 posts)runs and anti-Obama campaign. She will lose and give up the biggest lead any democrat has ever seen. I hope she changes
her tune.
yurbud
(39,405 posts)truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)yurbud
(39,405 posts)truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)amandabeech
(9,893 posts)Sec. Clinton.
Sec. Castro may be a great future prospect, but I would rather see someone with more experience than Sec. Castro will have in 2016.
Folks have mentioned Brown, Wyden and Manchin. I like Brown & Wyden, and I could handle Manchin, even though he is on the conservative side of our party.
bigwillq
(72,790 posts)Peregrine
(992 posts)yurbud
(39,405 posts)Corruption Inc
(1,568 posts)It's the most popular living thing here.
LawDeeDah
(1,596 posts)arendt
(5,078 posts)Proud Public Servant
(2,097 posts)Hillary doesn't need to court Blacks, Latinos, or progressives; they'll turn out. Her biggest problems are:
1) White guys, especially rural and working-class white guys, don't really like her;
2) She's completely a creature of DC with no "real America" cred; and
3) She's never actually run anything (and no, the State Department doesn't count).
Beshear provides cover on all three of those fronts, and comes with the added bonus of having presided over probably the most successful Obamacare implementation in the country.
Algernon Moncrieff
(5,790 posts)Beshear helps in a state Dems should be able to win, and that has been a model of how to do an ACA rollout.
Before Ferguson, I'd have said Jay Nixon. Now, I think he's damaged goods.
If he's elected, I'd lay an outside shot that she selects Charlie Crist. Not a thought that thrills me, but Florida has to be won.
whatthehey
(3,660 posts)Limited national visibility. It would be, on that front and that front alone, a Palinesque pick. Anyone outside the region who is not a political junkie would start with "Who...?"
From what I've seen DU is, at its most vocal core anyway, far to the left of the mainstreeam party voters so this would really only be a problem for the DU part of the spectrum, but that's not a trivial number even in the wider electorate, and he would only add to the left's disgruntlement with HRC albeit on different issues than her. McKinney he is not. Folks like Schweitzer and Manchin who would serve similar roles for your same stated reasons would have the same drawbacks. A more progressive from the gut backstop might help soothe the grumbles there. I doubt he has the internal seniority, but I'd be curious how Franken would do in that attack dog/surrogate role.
Proud Public Servant
(2,097 posts)Historically, veep picks have not been national names: Lieberman, Gore, Bentsen, Ferraro, Mondale, Eagleton, Shriver, Muskie; or Quayle, Dole, Agnew -- none of them were nationally-known politicians before being selected as veep candidates. I don't think that's as much as issue as you imagine. Plus, in the age of the internet and 24-hour news cycles, "who?' doesn't remain a question for very long.
And while I take your point about how disappointed DU will be if a progressive isn't on the ticket, I suspect Hillary's folks will do (or are already doing) the math not on general support (which doesn't much matter) but on support gained and lost in swing states (which is all that does). Given that the GOP will no doubt spend a fortune casting her as a socialist creature of Washington, her challenge is going to be appealing to undecided white moderates; Franken doesn't help there (much as I like the guy) but a successful Dem governor does.
antiquie
(4,299 posts)Hillary is old, like me. Veep needs to be younger, along with all of the other needs-to-be.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)pscot
(21,024 posts)jen63
(813 posts)He's young enough, down homey enough and progressive enough. I'd love to see him run for POTUS. Plus his wife is a powerhouse in her own right.
arendt
(5,078 posts)Hillary will either lose the primary or lose the general.
She is busy trashing a sitting president who bent over backwards to conciliate her.
She is toasting herself.
LawDeeDah
(1,596 posts)I bet he would be cool with that.
Dirty Socialist
(3,252 posts)Great thinker and great ideas. Also, He would do well with Republicans in congress. He has experience dealing with bullies.
whatthehey
(3,660 posts)All the smarts and vision he could need, but not really a politician per se. That's a two edged sword. Can sell the outsider schtick but can he really do a national campaign well?
Mister Nightowl
(396 posts)The Hudson River Ticket.
tularetom
(23,664 posts)She needs to show republican voters she isn't a wuss like Obama. That way she can appeal to her core constituency, moderate republicans. The Dems? Screw them, they got no other choice. What are they gonna do, vote for Ted Cruz?
LawDeeDah
(1,596 posts)just skipped a beat.
That is so very likely...
Betrayus and Clinton, what a perfect team.
cali
(114,904 posts)First Speaker
(4,858 posts)...unlikely to be picked, but I wish she would. He's a very impressive figure...
still_one
(92,130 posts)tazkcmo
(7,300 posts)She's inevitable.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)Someone that understands where Hillary's coming from, but who can recognize and rein in her difficulties with empathy.
The woman/ huge Latino wave election.
mr_liberal
(1,017 posts)ffr
(22,669 posts)If you don't get off your dead ass and get people to the polls, 2016 won't matter!!!
truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)longship
(40,416 posts)I do not like the idea of HRC as a president. She has a whole lot of baggage, much of it bad.
I do not object to her being a 2016 candidate as much as I object to her being THE candidate. Especially since she has not expressed her intent to running for the office. Plus, there's the deal where I do not like her politics. Not at all.
LWolf
(46,179 posts)FreeJoe
(1,039 posts)...to balance the ticket.
truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)99Forever
(14,524 posts)gopiscrap
(23,756 posts)Zorra
(27,670 posts)Katashi_itto
(10,175 posts)Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)Preferably from the MIC.
LawDeeDah
(1,596 posts)cascadiance
(19,537 posts)Since he likes her more than he likes Rand...
truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)fadedrose
(10,044 posts)truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)Black-white thinking is generally something I associate with RWNJs.
fadedrose
(10,044 posts)Don't know what black-white thinking is, so I never associate it with anything.
I also don't know what RWNJs stands for. I get the feeling I was insulted, but it's pretty hard to insult somebody who doesn't understand the insults.
Unless it was complimentary - In which case, I say, 'Thank You."
truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)I don't like Clinton so you feel free to imply that I would like Eric Cantor? That's black/white thinking, and insulting.
And RWNJ = Right Wing Nut Job, a type of individual that does typically see the world in black and white.
You're welcome.
merrily
(45,251 posts)yurbud
(39,405 posts)We don't need to start picking the VP for a moderate Republican one.
KentuckyWoman
(6,679 posts)I'm more concerned with November at the moment.
Ditch Mitch.
pscot
(21,024 posts)About Mitch as well.
TheKentuckian
(25,023 posts)Ichingcarpenter
(36,988 posts)Hillary's twin sister.
Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)Kira would be a much better choice.
Ichingcarpenter
(36,988 posts)with their ties to the banksters so why not
Quark?
backscatter712
(26,355 posts)...but it seems strangely appropriate as a reply here.
Rhinodawg
(2,219 posts)KamaAina
(78,249 posts)shenmue
(38,506 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)They like spending time together.
Stellar
(5,644 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)sadoldgirl
(3,431 posts)backscatter712
(26,355 posts)What, you really think she'd pick someone that isn't a DINO?
IDemo
(16,926 posts)which on second thought will likely happen regardless of who she picks...
Stellar
(5,644 posts)She can have Rahm.
Tweedy
(628 posts)We have a very important election in a few weeks. This is where we should be focusing.
HuckleB
(35,773 posts)I think she should take Oregon Governor Kitzhaber. Both of them have dealt with spouses with ethical lapses, so they'd be a great team. And the jeans Governor might just bring in some extra votes.
hobbit709
(41,694 posts)pscot
(21,024 posts)It'll be a kind of medieval arrangement.
GoneOffShore
(17,339 posts)They'd fit right in.
Rowdyboy
(22,057 posts)Someone young, reasonably progressive with potential to be a force in the future.