General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsEbola Screening At JFK Airport Flagged 91 Travelers; None Had Virus
"Newly instituted screening procedures at New York's JFK International Airport identified 91 arriving passengers as having a higher risk of being infected with Ebola based on their recent travel, CDC director Dr. Tom Frieden said Monday. None of the airline passengers had a fever, Frieden said, noting that of five people who were sent for further evaluation, none were determined to have Ebola.
In the wake of the first instance of Ebola being contracted in the U.S., Frieden said the airport screenings at JFK are part of the agency's plan to stop the disease; he said screenings will be instituted at four other airports in Atlanta; Chicago; Newark, N.J.; and Dulles, Va. by Thursday."
http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2014/10/13/355874691/ebola-screening-at-jfk-airport-flagged-91-travelers-none-had-virus
What a colossal waste of time and money and wait until flu season hits when many more people will have fevers and chills.
NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)Preventing the spread of a serious virus is serious work that needs to be done.
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)uppityperson
(115,681 posts)his money to check people than what it will take to treat even one. A colassalwaste of time and energy is 3 oz liquids in the proper sized bag and removing shoes.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)A fair number of false positives, but a low number of fallse negatives. A definite test follows.
nc4bo
(17,651 posts)There is nothing wrong with staying vigilant.
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)WTF?
Sid
rocktivity
(44,577 posts)That had BETTER mean they traveled from or through the Ebola-affected countries!
rocktivity
pnwmom
(108,995 posts)Duncan would probably not have been discovered under this protocol, but some other Ebola patient could.