Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)
Thu Oct 16, 2014, 08:36 PM Oct 2014

The Guardian: Why are the media playing lapdog and not watchdog - again - on war in Iraq?

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/oct/10/media-lapdog-sold-war-in-iraq

Seeing as the media will soon tire of fear mongering on Ebola when the small breakout is contained and helicopter shots of hospitals at a distance are not cutting it, they will turn to ISIS, so this article from non American media is worthy for its truthiness.

...............


"No matter who is in power, the media finds a reason not to question the march to war."

"A war-weary American public that a year ago resoundingly rejected US military intervention in Syria to overthrow the Assad regime now is rallying behind the use of force to destroy the so-called Islamic State (Isis). In just three months, from June to September, support for US airstrikes in Iraq soared from 45% percent to 71%, and to 65% for airstrikes in Syria.

How did such an astounding turnabout occur? Certainly it wasn’t due to the persuasive powers of President Obama, who seems to have been reluctantly dragged into a conflict that he once acknowledged has no military solution.

The credit for selling Obama’s war on Isis must go to the mainstream American media."
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Guardian: Why are the...