Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
Tue Oct 21, 2014, 01:21 PM Oct 2014

After Blocking Surgeon General Nominee, Republican Blames Obama For Surgeon General Vacancy

http://thinkprogress.org/health/2014/10/19/3581649/republican-blames-obama-for-surgeon-general-vacancy-after-republicans-blocked-surgeon-general-nominee/

It has been nearly a year since Vivek Murthy was nominated by President Obama to serve as the next Surgeon General, but thanks in large part to the gun lobby and their Republican allies in the Senate, there has yet to be any movement on his confirmation.

That vacancy has become a central focus in the last week as government officials and medical professionals try to calm the public about the spread of Ebola....

Todd questioned the wisdom of giving the NRA any kind of influence over the country’s top public health position, but Blunt rejected the notion that the NRA played any role in Murthy’s confirmation. “I’m not sure that’s why, you’d have to ask Senator Reid why he hasn’t move that to the top of his list to be confirmed.”

After the NRA began publicly opposing Murthy’s nomination, several of Blunt’s Republican colleagues including Rand Paul, John Cornyn and John Barrasso said they too would move to block Murthy’s nomination, and Paul placed a hold on the nomination.




6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
After Blocking Surgeon General Nominee, Republican Blames Obama For Surgeon General Vacancy (Original Post) KamaAina Oct 2014 OP
Reed never even brought it up for a vote? Travis_0004 Oct 2014 #1
Dems still hold the Senate, right? ARMYofONE Oct 2014 #2
The key word there is "hold". KamaAina Oct 2014 #3
Holds are a courtesy that Reid has ignored in the past. tritsofme Oct 2014 #4
The usual DINO suspects? KamaAina Oct 2014 #5
Only takes 51 Votes to Release the Hold ARMYofONE Oct 2014 #6
 

Travis_0004

(5,417 posts)
1. Reed never even brought it up for a vote?
Tue Oct 21, 2014, 01:28 PM
Oct 2014

Even if Reed knew it wouldnt pass, he never even held a vote on the issue.

 

ARMYofONE

(69 posts)
2. Dems still hold the Senate, right?
Tue Oct 21, 2014, 02:59 PM
Oct 2014

Um, only 51 votes are necessary for confirmation, and there are 53 Dems in the Senate (as well as 2 independents that caucus with Dems). Stupid line of attack against Republicans.

 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
3. The key word there is "hold".
Tue Oct 21, 2014, 03:02 PM
Oct 2014

As in "Rug Doctor Rand Paul has placed a hold on the nomination." Under Senate rules, that's enough to block it.

tritsofme

(17,377 posts)
4. Holds are a courtesy that Reid has ignored in the past.
Tue Oct 21, 2014, 03:04 PM
Oct 2014

Murthy hasn't been confirmed because some Democrats didn't want to vote on it until the lame duck.

 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
5. The usual DINO suspects?
Tue Oct 21, 2014, 03:05 PM
Oct 2014

Or those from purplish states who are running for re-election and fear the wrath of the NRA?

 

ARMYofONE

(69 posts)
6. Only takes 51 Votes to Release the Hold
Tue Oct 21, 2014, 05:11 PM
Oct 2014

Because Reid changed the Senate rules, only 51 votes are needed to release a hold. The only difference is the confirmation would require two votes, one to release the hold, and the other to confirm. As much as I would like to blame Repubs for this one, the failure to confirm falls solely on Dem shoulders.

http://www.boston.com/politicalintelligence/2014/02/26/rand-paul-places-hold-surgeon-general-nominee-vivek-murthy-but-serious-delay-not-likely-under-new-rules/vgnbvvTNQahsk7S3oEsTEL/story.html

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»After Blocking Surgeon Ge...