Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

babylonsister

(171,065 posts)
Tue Oct 21, 2014, 08:49 PM Oct 2014

3,000 Flock To See Bill Clinton and Alison Grimes While McConnell Rally Draws Crickets

http://www.politicususa.com/2014/10/21/3000-flock-bill-clinton-alison-grimes-mcconnell-rally-draws-crickets.html

3,000 Flock To See Bill Clinton and Alison Grimes While McConnell Rally Draws Crickets
By: Jason Easley
Tuesday, October, 21st, 2014, 8:38 pm

Momentum is definitely not on the side of Mitch McConnell. While Alison Lundergan Grimes and Bill Clinton drew a crowd of 3,000, the majority of attendees at Mitch McConnell’s rally were campaign staffers.

It was a tale of two tweets.

The Grimes rally in Owensboro, KY:

Mike Memoli ✔ @mikememoli
Follow

Local fire chief says 3,000 on hand for the Grimes/Bill Clinton rally in Owensboro
4:41 PM - 21 Oct 2014


This was the scene at McConnell’s rally:

Ronnie Ellis @cnhifrankfort
Follow

Smaller turnout, more "staffer volunteers" at mcConnell stop in Louisa
4:59 PM - 21 Oct 2014


McConnell’s struggles to draw a crowd are nothing new. It is why the Republican Party is bribing people to pretend to support McConnell during his bus tour.

The Hill reported,

In an email sent earlier this month and obtained by The Hill, Taylor Bumgardner, a Kentucky Republican Party regional political director, offers volunteers the opportunity to join McConnell on his tour, which launched Monday. Meals, lodging and transportation are included in the trip.

“Senator McConnell is seeking volunteers to join him on a 3-day campaign bus tour around the state on October 20-22 to show our support for Kentucky coal. You would join local supporters in contributing to an enthusiastic atmosphere at each of his events,” she wrote.

The mainstream media are saying that Grimes is the candidate who is running a bad campaign, but she isn’t the candidate who has to pay people to be her friend. Anytime a campaign has to start busing in and paying supporters to be there, it is a sign of a campaign that lacks support.

It is even worse, when a campaign has to bribe the supporters to show up. Alison Grimes is attracting thousands of people to her rallies while Mitch McConnell crowds are made up of people on his payroll.

This contrast makes it easy to spot who is running a bad campaign and here’s a hint for the mainstream press. It isn’t Alison Lundergan Grimes.
88 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
3,000 Flock To See Bill Clinton and Alison Grimes While McConnell Rally Draws Crickets (Original Post) babylonsister Oct 2014 OP
no wonder we are seeing the negative threads start popping up now JI7 Oct 2014 #1
Or maybe some Democrats here legitimately don't like her running from our President. MontyPow Oct 2014 #28
Or maybe some Democrats here ... NanceGreggs Oct 2014 #79
True. MontyPow Oct 2014 #81
There are all kinds of people on DU ... NanceGreggs Oct 2014 #82
Sure. MontyPow Oct 2014 #83
Clairvoyant as well. NanceGreggs Oct 2014 #84
The only wasted vote is the one cast for someone who doesn't reflect your values. MontyPow Oct 2014 #85
No, the wasted vote is cast ... NanceGreggs Oct 2014 #86
I believe in white privilege in most instances but should that be a litmus test for being a davidsilver Apr 2015 #88
Republicans should Bypass Charade and Tour Country Clubs for Check Signing Receptions Stallion Oct 2014 #2
not surprised annabanana Oct 2014 #3
Good sign Robbins Oct 2014 #4
+ 1,000 Perfection is the enemy of progress. Scuba Oct 2014 #13
Gotta hand it to Bill Clinton, he's still the rock star. NaturalHigh Oct 2014 #5
He bites that bottom lip....and all the ladies in the room swoon....to this day! VanillaRhapsody Oct 2014 #6
Not even, at least not me. I like that he's a good babylonsister Oct 2014 #12
Have you seen him in person? VanillaRhapsody Oct 2014 #14
No. So? babylonsister Oct 2014 #16
I was describing the reaction of women who actually had....not just seen him on TV. VanillaRhapsody Oct 2014 #19
I saw him campaign three times in person in 1992. Manifestor_of_Light Oct 2014 #40
Exactly.....these 2 are both forces to be reckoned with! VanillaRhapsody Oct 2014 #44
I have had the good fortune to see Hillary, Bill and Obama in person. greatlaurel Oct 2014 #65
I might feel like that about Obama, to see him speak in person, but not Bill. LawDeeDah Oct 2014 #73
Well, LawDeeDah, Obama has done some things as president that Bill would have never done. greatlaurel Oct 2014 #74
Bill turned the tide, in what way? LawDeeDah Oct 2014 #76
i feel the same way, i like listening to him speak and think he is JI7 Oct 2014 #38
aye yi yi VanillaRhapsody Oct 2014 #61
Not just the ladies. Treant Oct 2014 #55
point accepted! VanillaRhapsody Oct 2014 #62
'all' the ladies? Are you kidding me? LawDeeDah Oct 2014 #71
The President is a rock star. Why is Grimes running from him? MontyPow Oct 2014 #29
because he is....ya know what nt msongs Oct 2014 #33
How many Kentucky votes would she pick up? gratuitous Oct 2014 #35
Why it's almost as if a Democrat couldn't win a state wide election, MontyPow Oct 2014 #36
Why, it's almost as if the presidential campaign didn't happen gratuitous Oct 2014 #47
Yeah. Kind of silly to answer rhetorical questions. MontyPow Oct 2014 #49
No, it was a substantive question gratuitous Oct 2014 #52
Post removed Post removed Oct 2014 #53
Beautifully crafted, NanceGreggs Oct 2014 #80
I really hope she kicks McConnell to the curb. herding cats Oct 2014 #7
McConnell must be happy. Turtles love to eat crickets. Kablooie Oct 2014 #8
Hurk. Rod Beauvex Oct 2014 #41
Poor Mitchie~ sheshe2 Oct 2014 #9
Unfortunately crowd size isn't a good predictor of outcome. BillZBubb Oct 2014 #10
Not if she ran on OKinectCare. But why embrace what your constituents love? MontyPow Oct 2014 #30
The bastard is going to win in spite of this. DavidDvorkin Oct 2014 #11
Some of you guys are so Debbie downer bigdarryl Oct 2014 #15
Or Reality Ralph MontyPow Oct 2014 #31
Better get good poll watchers. N/T SleeplessinSoCal Oct 2014 #17
I hope to hell she defeats Mr. Turtlehead... Hulk Oct 2014 #18
And that is the small fact that Chuck Todd over-looked in his rush to "disqualify"... kentuck Oct 2014 #20
Oh that is good!!!! Peacetrain Oct 2014 #21
A couple of billionaires on your side can buy a lot of election fraud. nt valerief Oct 2014 #22
I could use an all expense paid mini vacation. Do you think Mitch would swing by A Simple Game Oct 2014 #23
Nice job, DSCC! bullwinkle428 Oct 2014 #24
The Big Dawg can still bring it aikoaiko Oct 2014 #25
... and McConnell paid the crickets to show up and chirp Martin Eden Oct 2014 #26
Would love to see the defeat of Mitch McConnell! mountain grammy Oct 2014 #27
Still, Grimes, unfortunately, is not going to win 3rdwaydem Oct 2014 #32
Who are you, again? Hekate Oct 2014 #43
Just the guy telling you how it is. A little cold water reality. 3rdwaydem Oct 2014 #45
I imagine we all like to pretend we "know how it is..." LanternWaste Oct 2014 #58
Whatever you got to tell yourself 3rdwaydem Oct 2014 #60
I saw Bill Clinton at a Malloy rally in West Hartford four years ago.... George II Oct 2014 #34
Bill Clinton is a hero to me. One of the most able Presidents we have ever had. 3rdwaydem Oct 2014 #50
Deregulated banks, gutted welfare, gifted Telecom$ leftstreet Oct 2014 #54
Clinton became President in 1993, banks were deregulated in the 1980s. George II Oct 2014 #63
Try 1999. Glass-Steagall repeal leftstreet Oct 2014 #64
Or the Depository Institutions Deregulation and Monetary Control Act of NINETEEN EIGHTY! George II Oct 2014 #69
Telecommunications Act of 1996 LawDeeDah Oct 2014 #72
You sure do like to make excuses for the GOP and blame the Democratic Party for the GOP mischief. greatlaurel Oct 2014 #77
Well, i don't like Warren LawDeeDah Oct 2014 #78
Isn't it good for McConnell if he drew crickets? wheniwasincongress Oct 2014 #37
Having paid supporters should disqualify McConnell n/t BuelahWitch Oct 2014 #39
You mean people weren't walking out in droves? because, you know, we've been told Dems are losing... Hekate Oct 2014 #42
. libodem Oct 2014 #46
Kentucky, go vote and take a friend with you! nt MaeScott Oct 2014 #48
That's surprising, given what McConnell has done to cricket voting rights. Orsino Oct 2014 #51
Guess Mitch didn't pay enough. malthaussen Oct 2014 #56
I hate to say this dinger130 Oct 2014 #57
K & R Iliyah Oct 2014 #59
Well, turtles don't make that much noise KamaAina Oct 2014 #66
K & R & Tweeted - We Can Shock the World on Nov 4 if Dems Turn out. GOTV Tommymac Oct 2014 #67
They certainly didn't draw this cricket Ampersand Unicode Oct 2014 #68
A rabid racoon would do more for the people of Kentucky than Mitch. EEO Oct 2014 #70
Alison Punches Back! greatlaurel Oct 2014 #75
Now if they omly come out and vote.... n/t bobGandolf Oct 2014 #87
 

MontyPow

(285 posts)
81. True.
Thu Oct 23, 2014, 01:59 AM
Oct 2014

There are many Republicans here on DU. They're usually scolding classic Democrats for expecting the Democratic Party to run Democratic candidates. These Republicans support other Republicans in Democratic clothing like Charlie Crist, or the late Arlen Spector.

NanceGreggs

(27,814 posts)
82. There are all kinds of people on DU ...
Thu Oct 23, 2014, 02:03 AM
Oct 2014

... and some of them are so transparent as to what they really are - know what I mean?

 

MontyPow

(285 posts)
83. Sure.
Thu Oct 23, 2014, 02:16 AM
Oct 2014

I'll bet you thought I voted for McCain when I actually voted for Obama. And you thought I voted for Romney when I actually voted or Jill Stein. And you think I'll vote for the next Repuke when I'll actually vote for Bernie Sanders.

What I do know about you, is that you'll vote for anyone with a D next to their name, regardless of policy.

NanceGreggs

(27,814 posts)
84. Clairvoyant as well.
Thu Oct 23, 2014, 02:28 AM
Oct 2014

Quite frankly, I wasn't the least bit interested in thinking anything about you at all. So the "I bet you thought" point is rendered moot.

And I will vote for anyone with a "D" next to their name. The alternative is an "R" - not even an option - or a third party, which is a waste of a vote.

 

MontyPow

(285 posts)
85. The only wasted vote is the one cast for someone who doesn't reflect your values.
Thu Oct 23, 2014, 03:15 AM
Oct 2014

So your "D" vote can very easily be a wasted vote. My votes never are.

I hope this renders you mute.

NanceGreggs

(27,814 posts)
86. No, the wasted vote is cast ...
Thu Oct 23, 2014, 03:22 AM
Oct 2014

... for the candidate who, despite their policies, has no chance of winning.

That's not rocket science - that's common sense.

And rendering me "mute" is something that ain't never going to happen.

 

davidsilver

(87 posts)
88. I believe in white privilege in most instances but should that be a litmus test for being a
Thu Apr 9, 2015, 12:35 PM
Apr 2015

legitimate Democrat?

Robbins

(5,066 posts)
4. Good sign
Tue Oct 21, 2014, 08:52 PM
Oct 2014

Some of us may not like everything about her but country is better off with her winning.So will KT.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
6. He bites that bottom lip....and all the ladies in the room swoon....to this day!
Tue Oct 21, 2014, 08:59 PM
Oct 2014

He's got "it".....whatever "it" is.....

babylonsister

(171,065 posts)
12. Not even, at least not me. I like that he's a good
Tue Oct 21, 2014, 09:16 PM
Oct 2014

Dem, speaker and charismatic; that's it. I hardly swoon, but have at it!

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
19. I was describing the reaction of women who actually had....not just seen him on TV.
Tue Oct 21, 2014, 09:35 PM
Oct 2014

because I saw it with my own eyes...I didn't say it to mean every single woman in the world! Brad Pitt is not every single woman in the world's dreamboat either.....Bill Clinton is not even all that physically beautiful....yet he has that certain something that the ladies seem to respond to. You read about it all the time....

 

Manifestor_of_Light

(21,046 posts)
40. I saw him campaign three times in person in 1992.
Wed Oct 22, 2014, 12:31 AM
Oct 2014

When he came to my city.
This was before anybody really knew who he was.

He had a media circus around him, boom mikes, big cameras and all that.
He was making a speech, but he could have been reading the phone book and he had more charisma than anyone I have ever seen.
He had as much charisma as real rock stars like Sting. I'm using him as an example because I saw The Police perform live in a basketball arena.

All I could do was stand there like an idiot and babble quietly and say "God he's good looking". My brain was putting out a dial tone. I couldn't think.

I also went to a private fundraiser in 1992 where Hillary spoke for over an hour with no notes, and I stood there and videotaped it.

greatlaurel

(2,004 posts)
65. I have had the good fortune to see Hillary, Bill and Obama in person.
Wed Oct 22, 2014, 05:19 PM
Oct 2014

Bill Clinton has a charisma that impacts not just the ladies. When I got to see Bill in person, the men were just as ready to march out of that room and do whatever it was he asked and they did. Every person in that room went out and worked their tails off for Hillary. Bill campaigned hard in Ohio when Hillary was campaigning in the primary in 2008 and Ohio went big time for Hillary in the primary.

Hillary is an amazing speaker. She is very charismatic in person as well. I found her voice and delivery to be imspiring and pleasing at the same time. At the event, I got into a conversation with one of the sound guys. I commented that HRC sounded very different in person. He said that the replays of audio recording are usually altered and women's voices are often messed with to make them less pleasing on replay. (I have read that that was done to Howard Dean's scream, to make him sound terrible.) He said it was common for that to happen in the media and, as a sound technician he knew all the tricks. He was not a Hillary campaigner, he was just hired to do a job, as he said he was voting for the other guy.

One of the things I noticed is that HRC is very genuine and caring to the people around her. She took particular notice of the children of the campaign volunteers who were at the event and spent extra time with the kids and treated them like they were the most important people in the room. Her campaign staff tried to pull her away from the kids and she would have none of it. She took the time to spend with the least powerful people there. She would make a great president. After seeing her in person, I understand why the elites are working at a fever pitch throwing every slur at her they can. The elites are in terror of her because she will act for the good of the American people. It is a shame people did not bother to read her platform when she ran the last time. It was far better than Obama's. I can no longer access a copy of her platform. Sure wish I had printed out the whole thing in 2008.

Obama is a good speaker, but he does not have whatever it is that Bill Clinton has. Obama is a really good speaker and is impressive in his own way.

 

LawDeeDah

(1,596 posts)
73. I might feel like that about Obama, to see him speak in person, but not Bill.
Wed Oct 22, 2014, 06:21 PM
Oct 2014

Not a chance. I gravitate to people that I admire and respect.

greatlaurel

(2,004 posts)
74. Well, LawDeeDah, Obama has done some things as president that Bill would have never done.
Thu Oct 23, 2014, 12:46 AM
Oct 2014

It was a great honor to hear Obama speak in person. He gives a good speech, but he does not have that quality that Bill Clinton has. Bill Clinton used his talent for far more good than bad. The speech Bill gave at the 2012 Democratic National Convention for Obama was the greatest speech given in decades. Bill turned the tide for us in that election.

You can throw all the slurs you want at Bill, but he won the White House for the Democratic Party for 8 years and appointed good judges to the Supreme Court and the lower courts and he helped Obama win a second term. There is not a politician ever that is a saint and they all do political favors or end up forced into actions that are wrong, including Jack Kennedy and FDR(neither of whom were faithful to their wives). Obama has done some really horrible things as president and he is still heads and shoulders above and far better for the American people than any of the GOP choices. Really, Obama is no babe in the woods. He is as crafty and cunning as any politician out there. The biggest problem was obvious early on in his primary run in the people he had around him. Rahm Emmanuel and Larry Summers were big warning signs about the direction he was headed.

 

LawDeeDah

(1,596 posts)
76. Bill turned the tide, in what way?
Thu Oct 23, 2014, 12:54 AM
Oct 2014

Subjective stuff. I find Bill unattractive in a lot of ways but I know tastes vary! have fun.

He was speaking at the democratic convention - you mean he convinced 5 million (I think that is what the margin was Obama won by) people to vote for Obama that otherwise wouldn't have? Were Repuglicans convinced to switch over or he got 5 million democrats to get off the couch and vote. I don't understand, please explain because this sounds like another 'Obama owes the Clintons' line that is stupid. Obama owes the Clintons Fuck All.

Oh, what 'horrible' things has Obama done (while Bill is such a wonderman of goodness?) lol. nevermind, you don't have to answer.
Crafty, cunning... un huh.

JI7

(89,249 posts)
38. i feel the same way, i like listening to him speak and think he is
Tue Oct 21, 2014, 11:41 PM
Oct 2014

charismatic and intelligent. but never was into him in "swooning" type of way.

Treant

(1,968 posts)
55. Not just the ladies.
Wed Oct 22, 2014, 01:55 PM
Oct 2014

I mean, a man who could, at one time, answer the question, "You and what army?" with an actual army.

I'd tap that.

 

LawDeeDah

(1,596 posts)
71. 'all' the ladies? Are you kidding me?
Wed Oct 22, 2014, 06:10 PM
Oct 2014

some barf. I can't see what the supposedly attraction to that guy is. At all. Nothing.

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
35. How many Kentucky votes would she pick up?
Tue Oct 21, 2014, 11:17 PM
Oct 2014

How many undecideds or McConnell-leaning votes do you think Grimes would pick up if she came out in Kentucky as foursquare behind President Obama? I don't know the Kentucky electorate (perhaps you do), but my sense is that former Kentucky Secretary of State Grimes knows what she's doing and she has made the political calculation that focusing on her campaign and her issues is the path to victory, without appearing too close to the candidate who didn't win even 40% of the statewide vote in 2012.

 

MontyPow

(285 posts)
36. Why it's almost as if a Democrat couldn't win a state wide election,
Tue Oct 21, 2014, 11:34 PM
Oct 2014

be a Democrat, and embrace the ACA.

Oh, wait. That's Kentucky's governor.

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
47. Why, it's almost as if the presidential campaign didn't happen
Wed Oct 22, 2014, 11:24 AM
Oct 2014

So you don't want to answer the question, instead substituting a non sequitur. Thanks for playing and tune in again for another episode of "Oh, So That's Your Agenda." Good night, everybody!

 

MontyPow

(285 posts)
49. Yeah. Kind of silly to answer rhetorical questions.
Wed Oct 22, 2014, 12:31 PM
Oct 2014

But I'll take a stab at it. We don't know how many votes she would garner because she didn't do it.

As for agendas, yes, I have one. So do you. So does anyone who offers up opinion an argument.

But I like how easily people here allow Democratic candidates to abandon the President but should DUers abandon the President, well that's a whole other thing.


But I enjoyed playing "So that's your agenda".

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
52. No, it was a substantive question
Wed Oct 22, 2014, 12:56 PM
Oct 2014

You seem to be riding a particular hobbyhorse. I pointed out that Grimes, former Secretary of State (the person who oversees statewide elections), might have some insights and expertise on the makeup of the Kentucky electorate. I know that I don't, and it's apparent that you don't, either.

However, instead of admitting that you don't know what you're talking about, you prefer to make serial posts, criticizing Grimes for not running in lockstep with President Obama. I pointed out that Obama didn't poll even 40% of the vote in Kentucky a mere two years ago, a fact you avoided like a coughing ebola patient. When I asked you how many votes you think Grimes would pick up in Kentucky that she doesn't already have, you threw out a non sequitur about the governor's race.

Now you finally admit that you don't know how many Kentucky voters Grimes would pick up if she were to feature President Obama more prominently in her campaign, but you have to temper your ignorance with another criticism of Grimes' campaign that sounds like it has the same factual basis as your prior criticism, which is to say none. I submit that Grimes would pick up very few votes she doesn't already have if she were to feature President Obama, and in fact would lose more undecided and leaning voters than she could hope to pick up. I think Grimes knows the electorate in Kentucky pretty well, certainly better than me, and apparently better than you.

Do you have any basis for your criticism other than seeing Grimes lose voters in a race that has been polling very tightly? That's the agenda I alluded to earlier.

Response to gratuitous (Reply #52)

herding cats

(19,564 posts)
7. I really hope she kicks McConnell to the curb.
Tue Oct 21, 2014, 09:01 PM
Oct 2014

A lot of people don't understand how badly we need Dems to win in conservative states, not just the more progressive states. Change is a slow and tedious process which is just beginning to show it's face in Kentucky.

BillZBubb

(10,650 posts)
10. Unfortunately crowd size isn't a good predictor of outcome.
Tue Oct 21, 2014, 09:05 PM
Oct 2014

Grimes still has an uphill battle to win in a mostly red state like Kentucky. I hope she pulls it off.

 

Hulk

(6,699 posts)
18. I hope to hell she defeats Mr. Turtlehead...
Tue Oct 21, 2014, 09:34 PM
Oct 2014

What a worthless, cowardly sack of human waste. To even consider that he might be re-elected makes my head spin. Are the good people of Kentucky that fookin' stupid?

kentuck

(111,094 posts)
20. And that is the small fact that Chuck Todd over-looked in his rush to "disqualify"...
Tue Oct 21, 2014, 09:38 PM
Oct 2014

Alison has traveled all over the state and met tens of thousands of Kentuckians from every walk of life. They like her. There is enthusiasm in her campaign. I think there may be a similar enthusiasm in the Georgia and Wisconsin races also. Alison's supporters are ready to fight for her...I mean really fight...I mean physical fisticuffs.

A Simple Game

(9,214 posts)
23. I could use an all expense paid mini vacation. Do you think Mitch would swing by
Tue Oct 21, 2014, 09:57 PM
Oct 2014

Northern New York and pick me up? I would expect to be dropped of at the same location after the trip was over.

Wait a minute, ride with Mitch McConnell? I thought it said trip with Mitch Ryder! Love me some Mitch Ryder & the Detroit Wheels!

Martin Eden

(12,867 posts)
26. ... and McConnell paid the crickets to show up and chirp
Tue Oct 21, 2014, 10:05 PM
Oct 2014

(not to be confused with Buddy Holly and his mates)

 

3rdwaydem

(277 posts)
32. Still, Grimes, unfortunately, is not going to win
Tue Oct 21, 2014, 10:36 PM
Oct 2014

We need to focus our resources in Kansas. If we can pick off that seat, the Republicans will be unlikely able to gain the Senate. Although it's an "independent" he will almost certainly caucus with the Democrats. They are even in the polls.

Kansas is the way to block the GOP from controlling the Senate.

 

3rdwaydem

(277 posts)
45. Just the guy telling you how it is. A little cold water reality.
Wed Oct 22, 2014, 10:37 AM
Oct 2014

Put a fork in Grimes - she's done. Kansas is the battleground for we Democrats to retain the Senate.

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
58. I imagine we all like to pretend we "know how it is..."
Wed Oct 22, 2014, 03:09 PM
Oct 2014

I imagine we all like to pretend we "know how it is..." Often allows us to feel a wee bit more clever about ourselves than we in fact, are.

 

3rdwaydem

(277 posts)
60. Whatever you got to tell yourself
Wed Oct 22, 2014, 03:21 PM
Oct 2014

I'll follow up with you on this thread after election night, right around the corner, and we will see who is acting more clever than they are. So, I'll post to this thread and your comment on election night and I can only pray that Kansas is a take away from the GOP so we Democrats hold the Senate.

I'm into accomplishing things and not pipe dreams. I will remind you of all of the on election night and then you might appreciate just how flawed your position is.

My money has gone to Kansas and Georgia - Michelle Nunn might pull it out. Unfortunately, Grimes is a right off no matter how many come out to see Bill Clinton with her.

George II

(67,782 posts)
34. I saw Bill Clinton at a Malloy rally in West Hartford four years ago....
Tue Oct 21, 2014, 11:01 PM
Oct 2014

....he spoke for about 50 minutes solid without a single page of notes, just off the top of his head, and he was BRILLIANT! I could have listened to him for a couple of more hours.

He attracts big crowds where ever he goes, he's now the "elder statesman" of the Democratic Party.

leftstreet

(36,108 posts)
64. Try 1999. Glass-Steagall repeal
Wed Oct 22, 2014, 05:12 PM
Oct 2014
The Gramm–Leach–Bliley Act (GLBA), also known as the Financial Services Modernization Act of 1999 and commonly pronounced ″glibba″, (Pub.L. 106–102, 113 Stat. 1338, enacted November 12, 1999) is an act of the 106th United States Congress (1999–2001). It repealed part of the Glass–Steagall Act of 1933, removing barriers in the market among banking companies, securities companies and insurance companies that prohibited any one institution from acting as any combination of an investment bank, a commercial bank, and an insurance company. With the passage of the Gramm–Leach–Bliley Act, commercial banks, investment banks, securities firms, and insurance companies were allowed to consolidate. Furthermore, it failed to give to the SEC or any other financial regulatory agency the authority to regulate large investment bank holding companies.[1] ”The legislation was signed into law by President Bill Clinton.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gramm%E2%80%93Leach%E2%80%93Bliley_Act

George II

(67,782 posts)
69. Or the Depository Institutions Deregulation and Monetary Control Act of NINETEEN EIGHTY!
Wed Oct 22, 2014, 06:08 PM
Oct 2014
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banking_in_the_United_States#Deregulation_of_the_1980s_and_1990s

Deregulation of the 1980s and 1990s

Legislation passed by the federal government during the 1980s, such as the Depository Institutions Deregulation and Monetary Control Act of 1980 and the Garn–St. Germain Depository Institutions Act of 1982, reduced the distinctions between banks and other financial institutions in the United States. This legislation is frequently referred to as "deregulation," and it is often blamed for the failure of over 500 savings and loan associations between 1980 and 1988, and the subsequent failure of the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation (FSLIC) whose obligations were assumed by the FDIC in 1989. However, some critics of this viewpoint[who?], particularly libertarians, have pointed-out that the federal government's attempts at deregulation granted easy credit to federally insured financial institutions, encouraging them to overextend themselves and (thus) fail.


 

LawDeeDah

(1,596 posts)
72. Telecommunications Act of 1996
Wed Oct 22, 2014, 06:14 PM
Oct 2014
The Telecommunications Act of 1996 was the first significant overhaul of United States telecommunications law in more than sixty years, amending the Communications Act of 1934. The Act, signed by President Bill Clinton, represented a major change in American telecommunication law, since it was the first time that the Internet was included in broadcasting and spectrum allotment.[1] One of the most controversial titles was Title 3 ("Cable Services&quot , which allowed for media cross-ownership.[1] According to the FCC, the goal of the law was to "let anyone enter any communications business—to let any communications business compete in any market against any other".[2] The legislation's primary goal was deregulation of the converging broadcasting and telecommunications markets.[3] However, the law's regulatory policies have been questioned, including the effects of dualistic re-regulation of the communications market [4] [5]

wiki


Combine the change in media with Glass Staegal and you got the message, loud and clear. Make funny money for Wall Street with derivatives and have a media that plays dumb about it.

greatlaurel

(2,004 posts)
77. You sure do like to make excuses for the GOP and blame the Democratic Party for the GOP mischief.
Thu Oct 23, 2014, 12:57 AM
Oct 2014

Starting to look like you just do not like anyone who is a member of the Democratic Party. Those are good gish gallop talking points you have been using in this thread.

We need to get out the vote this November for Alison and every other Democrat running this year. We need to stop backstabbing fellow Democrats and start to reverse some of the damage inflicted on the American people by the GOP and the Koch brothers.

 

LawDeeDah

(1,596 posts)
78. Well, i don't like Warren
Thu Oct 23, 2014, 01:03 AM
Oct 2014

I love her. And it is sounding more so that she is considering running.

Those debates will be lovely and exciting. Warren, Clinton, maybe Sanders and the half dozen or so others. Can't Wait!

Hekate

(90,683 posts)
42. You mean people weren't walking out in droves? because, you know, we've been told Dems are losing...
Wed Oct 22, 2014, 03:40 AM
Oct 2014

... by somebody who's posted the same debunked article about an Obama appearance twice. Plus Chuck Toad.

Seriously, this is good news. Thanks for posting it, babs.

Orsino

(37,428 posts)
51. That's surprising, given what McConnell has done to cricket voting rights.
Wed Oct 22, 2014, 12:42 PM
Oct 2014

How long are crickets going to continue voting against their interests?

malthaussen

(17,195 posts)
56. Guess Mitch didn't pay enough.
Wed Oct 22, 2014, 02:52 PM
Oct 2014

A free night in Motel 6 apparently didn't attract enough enthusiasts.

-- Mal

dinger130

(199 posts)
57. I hate to say this
Wed Oct 22, 2014, 03:07 PM
Oct 2014

but Owensboro is a much larger town than Louisa.

Louisa is in the mountains and coal country. Owensboro is in western Kentucky and is a more heavily populated region.

I know all about Louisa. My ancestor traded the town of Louisa for a gunstock back in the 1800s.

EEO

(1,620 posts)
70. A rabid racoon would do more for the people of Kentucky than Mitch.
Wed Oct 22, 2014, 06:08 PM
Oct 2014

It would have a lot more energy and drive to get what it wants and be above corruption, anyway. Not the strongest endorsement for Grimes, but whatever.

greatlaurel

(2,004 posts)
75. Alison Punches Back!
Thu Oct 23, 2014, 12:52 AM
Oct 2014

Tell it like it is Alison. The GOP will just think its Hell.

"During a rally in Kentucky will Bill Clinton, Democratic Senate candidate Alison Lundergan Grimes said, “Kentucky is ready for a senator that’s an independent thinker that can put the partisanship aside and actually fight for the people for this state. One that won’t be bullied by Mitch McConnell or Chuck Todd. We can do this Kentucky.” "

http://www.politicususa.com/2014/10/22/alison-lundergan-grimes-punches-bullied-chuck-todd.html

Wish I lived in Kentucky, so I could vote for her.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»3,000 Flock To See Bill C...