Sat Oct 25, 2014, 04:14 AM
silverweb (16,395 posts)
My 1st hidden post & the National Parks "artist."This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by In_The_Wind (a host of the General Discussion forum). The "b word," to me, means a vile, obnoxious, nasty, selfish female. I haven't really kept up with the word's evolution from just being vulgar to having sexist implications. A feminist myself, I didn't intend any sexist meaning. (There's also a word for vile, obnoxious, nasty, selfish males that starts with a "b," but I've never been scolded for using that one.) In any case, I greatly appreciate those jurors who kindly understood my reasoning even while disapproving of my angry, knee-jerk word choice for the vile, obnoxious, nasty, selfish female who did the defacing. For the juror who said I "should know better," I humbly invoke age-related creeping decrepitude for my inattention to linguistic evolution and loss of impulse control. In the heat of the moment, I only recognized my intended meaning (see above), not the relatively new focus on sexist implications. In any case, you'll all be very happy to know that the word expansion program I use on my computer now prints "__NO!__" whenever I type that evil word, so I won't make the same mistake again no matter how angry I get at someone's vile, obnoxious, nasty, selfish actions. Adios to my first-ever hidden post... and hopefully my last. Love you all... ![]()
|
50 replies, 9441 views
Cannot reply in locked threads
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
silverweb | Oct 2014 | OP |
TransitJohn | Oct 2014 | #1 | |
silverweb | Oct 2014 | #3 | |
Name removed | Oct 2014 | #34 | |
MADem | Oct 2014 | #39 | |
mountain grammy | Oct 2014 | #48 | |
eShirl | Oct 2014 | #2 | |
silverweb | Oct 2014 | #4 | |
Bluenorthwest | Oct 2014 | #19 | |
MADem | Oct 2014 | #40 | |
davidpdx | Oct 2014 | #10 | |
Crunchy Frog | Oct 2014 | #14 | |
IdaBriggs | Oct 2014 | #16 | |
Bluenorthwest | Oct 2014 | #20 | |
TransitJohn | Oct 2014 | #17 | |
Live and Learn | Oct 2014 | #21 | |
Downwinder | Oct 2014 | #33 | |
Live and Learn | Oct 2014 | #5 | |
silverweb | Oct 2014 | #7 | |
Live and Learn | Oct 2014 | #9 | |
silverweb | Oct 2014 | #12 | |
theHandpuppet | Oct 2014 | #11 | |
Live and Learn | Oct 2014 | #13 | |
davidpdx | Oct 2014 | #6 | |
silverweb | Oct 2014 | #8 | |
GusBob | Oct 2014 | #22 | |
newfie11 | Oct 2014 | #24 | |
Post removed | Oct 2014 | #15 | |
newfie11 | Oct 2014 | #18 | |
GusBob | Oct 2014 | #23 | |
cwydro | Oct 2014 | #25 | |
MADem | Oct 2014 | #26 | |
cherokeeprogressive | Oct 2014 | #28 | |
cwydro | Oct 2014 | #29 | |
BlueJazz | Oct 2014 | #36 | |
cwydro | Oct 2014 | #38 | |
BlueJazz | Oct 2014 | #46 | |
zappaman | Oct 2014 | #44 | |
earthside | Oct 2014 | #27 | |
MADem | Oct 2014 | #37 | |
etherealtruth | Oct 2014 | #47 | |
notadmblnd | Oct 2014 | #30 | |
BlueJazz | Oct 2014 | #31 | |
Duckhunter935 | Oct 2014 | #42 | |
seabeyond | Oct 2014 | #32 | |
Iggo | Oct 2014 | #35 | |
Wounded Bear | Oct 2014 | #41 | |
kestrel91316 | Oct 2014 | #43 | |
avebury | Oct 2014 | #45 | |
mountain grammy | Oct 2014 | #49 | |
In_The_Wind | Oct 2014 | #50 |
Response to silverweb (Original post)
Sat Oct 25, 2014, 04:21 AM
TransitJohn (6,930 posts)
1. You'll probably get a hide for this
you're not adhering to the board's predominant orthodoxy.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to TransitJohn (Reply #1)
Sat Oct 25, 2014, 04:32 AM
silverweb (16,395 posts)
3. Kinda doubt it.
[font color="navy" face="Verdana"]But thanks for the warning.
![]() |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to silverweb (Reply #3)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Response to TransitJohn (Reply #1)
Sat Oct 25, 2014, 11:26 AM
MADem (135,425 posts)
39. This isn't "disruptive" meta. It's CONSTRUCTIVE. It's not dissing the TOS or SOP, or even the
site, it's recounting a personal experience in a positive and educational fashion. Only "disruptive" meta (e.g. DU sucks, I hate the rulez, jury can kiss my butt, admins are a buncha meanies, waah waah waah, etc.) is verboten. This OP is a cheery recounting of a personal event.
I've participated in this thread so I'm 'out' but if I were called to adjudge the OP I'd vote LEAVE without thinking twice about it. |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to MADem (Reply #39)
Sat Oct 25, 2014, 12:31 PM
mountain grammy (25,127 posts)
48. Agree!
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to silverweb (Original post)
Sat Oct 25, 2014, 04:31 AM
eShirl (18,057 posts)
2. imho "bastard" is inherently gender-neutral
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to eShirl (Reply #2)
Sat Oct 25, 2014, 04:37 AM
silverweb (16,395 posts)
4. Dictionary.com sort of agrees with you.
[font color="navy" face="Verdana"]I've always associated it with males, which dictionary.com also sort of agrees with.
![]() 1. a person born of unmarried parents; an illegitimate child.
2. Slang. (a) a vicious, despicable, or thoroughly disliked person: Some bastard slashed the tires on my car. (b) a person, especially a man: The poor bastard broke his leg. |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to silverweb (Reply #4)
Sat Oct 25, 2014, 07:55 AM
Bluenorthwest (45,319 posts)
19. The word 'bastard' in Shakespeare's time meant 'base, inferior, low, dishonorable, of little value o
unworthy'. It was the opposite of legitimate. Here is a speech by a 'bastard son' deprived of place and standing by the unloved 'legitimate son', Edmund from King Lear:
Thou, Nature, art my goddess; to thy law My services are bound. Wherefore should I Stand in the plague of custom, and permit The curiosity of nations to deprive me, For that I am some twelve or fourteen moonshines Lag of a brother? Why bastard? wherefore base? When my dimensions are as well compact, My mind as generous, and my shape as true, As honest madam's issue? Why brand they us With base? with baseness? bastardy? base, base? Who, in the lusty stealth of nature, take More composition and fierce quality Than doth, within a dull, stale, tired bed, Go to th' creating a whole tribe of fops Got 'tween asleep and wake? Well then, Legitimate Edgar, I must have your land. Our father's love is to the bastard Edmund As to th' legitimate. Fine word- 'legitimate'! Well, my legitimate, if this letter speed, And my invention thrive, Edmund the base Shall top th' legitimate. I grow; I prosper. Now, gods, stand up for bastards! |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to Bluenorthwest (Reply #19)
Sat Oct 25, 2014, 11:29 AM
MADem (135,425 posts)
40. I've always thought it was a great word, very descriptive and emotive.
Especially when preceded by descriptors such as "miserable" or "selfish."
![]() |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to eShirl (Reply #2)
Sat Oct 25, 2014, 05:22 AM
davidpdx (22,000 posts)
10. I've always associated it with males, but then again it is how one looks at the word
I would bet if you asked a group of 10 people they'd probably be pretty much split down the middle.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to eShirl (Reply #2)
Sat Oct 25, 2014, 06:27 AM
Crunchy Frog (26,263 posts)
14. It may be gender neutral, but
it's actually an attack on the person's mother for being a "slut", rather than an attack on the person themselves. In that sense, I'd say that it's inherenly sexist, since we never insult people over their fathers' alleged sexual behavior.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to Crunchy Frog (Reply #14)
Sat Oct 25, 2014, 07:02 AM
IdaBriggs (10,559 posts)
16. Actually, I thought it was a slam on unmarried parents of both genders
when used as it was originally meant.
There are still cultures where being born out of wedlock impacts social standing, up to and including educational opportunities and jobs. Friends who adopted from Ukraine, for example, have told me that "orphan - without family" (due to death or more commonly parental abandonment) stays on all government issued identification for life. ![]() |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to IdaBriggs (Reply #16)
Sat Oct 25, 2014, 07:59 AM
Bluenorthwest (45,319 posts)
20. Originally it meant 'low, base, of little worth or value, dishonorable'
The status of 'bastard' was lifelong, the child was the one punished by law and by society. It meant not inheriting anything, including name and title and property. It meant nothing but loss of position, rights, money and standing.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to Crunchy Frog (Reply #14)
Sat Oct 25, 2014, 07:06 AM
TransitJohn (6,930 posts)
17. No, it's not
It's an attack on the person's 'low' birth.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to TransitJohn (Reply #17)
Sat Oct 25, 2014, 07:59 AM
Live and Learn (12,769 posts)
21. +1 Although, that is pretty gender neutral. nt
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to Crunchy Frog (Reply #14)
Sat Oct 25, 2014, 10:15 AM
Downwinder (12,869 posts)
33. It can also be the result of a religious institution that refuses,
for one reason or another, to accept a marriage.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to silverweb (Original post)
Sat Oct 25, 2014, 05:03 AM
Live and Learn (12,769 posts)
5. When you use the term to describe a woman
(or to portray a man acting like a woman) it is sexist by definition. And, it has always been so. Even if you didn't mean it to be so. Of course most of us our guilty of using the term (or witch, which is no better) on occasion but we shouldn't.
I wouldn't have alerted on you but I personally detest the word. I too am guilty of having used it (although never in writing). It really has been ingrained in us. Perhaps people should be given a chance to change their posts when it is just a word that was the cause of the alert. |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to Live and Learn (Reply #5)
Sat Oct 25, 2014, 05:13 AM
silverweb (16,395 posts)
7. You're absolutely right on all counts.
[font color="navy" face="Verdana"]I especially love your last idea about giving people the opportunity to edit their post to avoid hiding, especially if it's just a poor choice of words that got them in trouble.
In fact, I did decline to hide a post on one occasion not too long ago and suggested that exact thing to the poster in my comment: Just do some editing. Thanks for your very fair comments. ![]() |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to silverweb (Reply #7)
Sat Oct 25, 2014, 05:19 AM
Live and Learn (12,769 posts)
9. I really like that idea too.
Sorry you got a post hidden but it is really easy to have happen these days so I wouldn't worry about it.
As a juror, I always take the entire post in to account (and view the entire thread). I very rarely vote to hide. |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to Live and Learn (Reply #9)
Sat Oct 25, 2014, 05:32 AM
silverweb (16,395 posts)
12. Same here.
[font color="navy" face="Verdana"]I'm not upset that the post was hidden, just that I didn't have the chance to edit it first or explain my error in that thread -- which is why I started this thread to do so.
Yes, based on some of the alerts I've seen, it really is easy to get a post hidden. About done in, so I'm off to bed. Thanks! |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to Live and Learn (Reply #5)
Sat Oct 25, 2014, 05:30 AM
theHandpuppet (19,964 posts)
11. I like that idea also
Giving people a chance to edit their posts. We all make mistakes.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to theHandpuppet (Reply #11)
Sat Oct 25, 2014, 06:05 AM
Live and Learn (12,769 posts)
13. Isn't that the truth?
Last edited Sat Oct 25, 2014, 07:58 AM - Edit history (1) I can't believe how many times I have to edit some of my posts. Especially, those written in the heat of the moment.
On edit: And now I can add this post to the list. lol |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to silverweb (Original post)
Sat Oct 25, 2014, 05:04 AM
davidpdx (22,000 posts)
6. One hidden post in 13 years is pretty good
Yeah, I'd stay far far away from saying that word in any context on DU.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to davidpdx (Reply #6)
Sat Oct 25, 2014, 05:15 AM
silverweb (16,395 posts)
8. True.
[font color="navy" face="Verdana"]On both counts. Thanks.
![]() |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to davidpdx (Reply #6)
Sat Oct 25, 2014, 08:20 AM
GusBob (7,137 posts)
22. not to be obtuse
And I don't use the word but is it not the commonly used word for a female dog?
I mean by breeders and such? Is it ok to use it in that context? Also sometimes heard: " to b and moan" Or used by some hipsters to describe something cool ( rhymes with itching) |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to GusBob (Reply #22)
Sat Oct 25, 2014, 08:35 AM
newfie11 (8,159 posts)
24. We show our dogs and usually go out to dinner with dog show friends
Of course we talk dog and that B word is used often and without thinking about non dog folks around. No one has said anything but perhaps they realize there is a dog show in town.
I have had to have talks with my grandkids about using that word in the general public😄. |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to silverweb (Original post)
Post removed
Response to silverweb (Original post)
Sat Oct 25, 2014, 07:31 AM
newfie11 (8,159 posts)
18. Same thing happened to me
Who knew that would be a big deal. Btw I'm female😊and have been known to be one.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to silverweb (Original post)
Sat Oct 25, 2014, 08:29 AM
GusBob (7,137 posts)
23. that story made me very angry as well
Worse words went thru my mind
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to silverweb (Original post)
Sat Oct 25, 2014, 09:00 AM
cwydro (48,532 posts)
25. Vile, obnoxious, nasty, selfish female
is exactly even better than the b word.
Though I would not have voted to hide. People make too much of some words. But your excellent description without using that word shows exactly how profanity is not needed. So many posters here just love to use the "f word" around here. I reckon they think it makes them look touch. No, just vocabulary deprived. |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to silverweb (Original post)
Sat Oct 25, 2014, 09:35 AM
MADem (135,425 posts)
26. You can say the Bee word on TV, pretty much at any time of day or night.
You can't say it on DU.
The Ladies of The View and The Talk can say it, but you cannot. You can hear it on entertainment shows, movies, television series (one even had it in the title of the show) but don't type it here or risk disapprobation. Rappers can rap it, actors can shout it, and you will see it in literature, in magazines, and even in empowering FEMINIST webpages, but say it here on DU and you will have your "a-word" handed to you. That is a word that is censored here and has been for awhile. The whole "names will never hurt me" vibe is not operative on this site, which can be problematic. There is a deliberate refusal to see context in some corners. You just have to roll with it, or risk hides and alert stalking. |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to MADem (Reply #26)
Sat Oct 25, 2014, 09:42 AM
cherokeeprogressive (24,853 posts)
28. ^THIS^
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to MADem (Reply #26)
Sat Oct 25, 2014, 09:44 AM
cwydro (48,532 posts)
29. Good post.
Nail on head.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to MADem (Reply #26)
Sat Oct 25, 2014, 10:29 AM
BlueJazz (25,348 posts)
36. My feelings exactly. There are words used on DU that are more offensive to me than Female dog.
But,,, (put hand on hip and speak with a smirk and whine) "I don't LIKE that worrrrd"
![]() |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to BlueJazz (Reply #36)
Sat Oct 25, 2014, 11:26 AM
cwydro (48,532 posts)
38. I'm a female.
And the word does not bother me either.
And there are those of both sexes who fit that word. Dogs are another thing altogether. They are wonderful animals. Period. People just put too much weight in words. And when you do that, you let those who use the words win, imo. |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to cwydro (Reply #38)
Sat Oct 25, 2014, 12:19 PM
BlueJazz (25,348 posts)
46. What you say is true.
I equate some of the thoughts/actions on this forum with scenarios like (outside of the forum), when people say: "I don't want my money and tax dollars to be used for Planned Parenthood"
Which, of course, returns the answer: Fine, and I don't want my tax dollars to be used for phony wars" There has to be give and take in everything and sending somebody to the courtroom for saying YOUR naughty word is as bad as saying..I'm gonna' tell my Mom on you! Geez... ![]() |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to MADem (Reply #26)
Sat Oct 25, 2014, 12:15 PM
zappaman (20,587 posts)
44. +1000!
![]() |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to silverweb (Original post)
Sat Oct 25, 2014, 09:38 AM
earthside (6,960 posts)
27. Hypersensitivity and 'political correctness' ...
... are invidious and corrosive to progressivism.
The 'thought' and 'word' police breed anger from those we are seeking to persuade. They ultimately become Robespierrian victims of their own 'purity'. Censorship is not a liberal or progressive value. |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to earthside (Reply #27)
Sat Oct 25, 2014, 11:20 AM
MADem (135,425 posts)
37. Beautifully articulated. nt
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to earthside (Reply #27)
Sat Oct 25, 2014, 12:28 PM
etherealtruth (22,165 posts)
47. Respect for others is a liberal or progressive value
It is irrelevant whether you are offended or whether I am offended .... there are a significant amount of folk that are. Part of civil discourse is NOT to use words or terms that many find disrespectful, offensive or inflammatory.
I have yet to hear anyone support censorship; i have heard folk insist that when in their space (DU for example) one follow the established "rules" of civility (which is a far cry from censorship) |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to silverweb (Original post)
Sat Oct 25, 2014, 09:52 AM
notadmblnd (23,720 posts)
30. It was in response to my post about making the spoiled, selfish brat scrub the shit
off the monuments she defaced. You pointed out that it was not chalk. I just want to let you know that I did not take offense to the word and I did not alert.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to silverweb (Original post)
Sat Oct 25, 2014, 09:52 AM
BlueJazz (25,348 posts)
31. I never hide posts for just "words" or even an opinion. Now I think about it, I just about ...
...never hide posts. (maybe 1/60)
If you have me on the jury, you only have to worry about the other 6. ![]() |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to BlueJazz (Reply #31)
Sat Oct 25, 2014, 12:04 PM
Duckhunter935 (16,974 posts)
42. same here
I set the bar very high in favor of free speech.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to silverweb (Original post)
Sat Oct 25, 2014, 09:58 AM
seabeyond (110,159 posts)
32. ya. i was gonna suggest calling her an asshole. but was late at night and didnt bother. so you
got a hide. good to know. using sexist slurs goes about 50/50 on du.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to silverweb (Original post)
Sat Oct 25, 2014, 10:22 AM
Iggo (46,295 posts)
35. "Expansion"
![]() |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to silverweb (Original post)
Sat Oct 25, 2014, 11:30 AM
Wounded Bear (54,867 posts)
41. I think your post should be hidden for the blue text...
![]() J/K. ![]() |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to silverweb (Original post)
Sat Oct 25, 2014, 12:10 PM
kestrel91316 (51,666 posts)
43. I would have let your post remain. I use the "b" word all the time.
It isn't sexist in the least. I define it the same way you do.
DU is full of too many thought police with too much time on their hands. The feminists hate me in spite of my decades of feminism. The animal lovers hate me in spite of my career spent helping them for far too little reward. And the LGBT hate me for various and sundry reasons in spite of my decades of unwavering support for them. So don't let it bother you. |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to silverweb (Original post)
Sat Oct 25, 2014, 12:19 PM
avebury (10,810 posts)
45. I was not on the jury, but if I had, I would
have voted to leave it. I saw nothing worthy of alerting on it.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to silverweb (Original post)
Sat Oct 25, 2014, 12:36 PM
mountain grammy (25,127 posts)
49. My last pooch was a bitch, no, really!
I like your post. Way to rise above the fray!
![]() |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to silverweb (Original post)
Sat Oct 25, 2014, 12:54 PM
In_The_Wind (72,300 posts)
50. We have a strong consensus to LOCK.
Statement of Purpose
Discuss politics, issues, and current events. Posts about Israel/Palestine, religion, guns, showbiz, or sports are restricted in this forum. Conspiracy theories and disruptive meta-discussion are forbidden. |
Cannot reply in locked threads