General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums'60 Minutes' Just Broke New Details On The Dallas Ebola Case. Here's What They Revealed.
60 Minutes on Sunday told the story of a hospital tackling Ebola. A story of brave nurses and determined administrators. A story of heroes, frankly.
It was the story of Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital in Dallas the hospital that treated the first patient diagnosed with Ebola in the United States. A hospital thats been widely criticized, since Texas Health nurses Nina Pham and Amber Vinson also got sick with Ebola.
You may think you know the details of what happened in Dallas. But 60 Minutes asks you to think again.
60 Minutes correspondent Scott Pelley sat down with four of the nurses who treated Thomas Duncan, the initial Ebola patient.
Heres what we learned.
1. Whether intentionally or not, Duncan misled authorities about his exposure to Ebola.
When Duncan first presented to the hospital on September 25, he didnt specify that hed come from Liberia or even West Africa the center of the Ebola outbreak.
Duncan only said hed returned from Africa, which couldve meant one of dozens of nations, most of them far from the Ebola outbreak. Perhaps the nurses couldve pressed him further. But with Duncans symptoms not that severe yet, and with no real reason to think he had Ebola, they sent him home.
After Duncan was re-admitted to the hospital three days later, significantly sicker, the hospital suspected Ebola might be the cause. But even then, Duncan wasnt wholly honest. He said he hadnt been exposed to anyone who was sick from Ebola, even though later reports revealed that Duncan had bravely helped carry an Ebola-infected woman to a local hospital in Liberia.
Duncan also told a nurse that hed buried his daughter who died in childbirth but he said that she hadnt died from Ebola. Duncan later denied the story to federal officials.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/dandiamond/2014/10/26/60-minutes-just-broke-new-details-on-the-dallas-ebola-case-heres-what-they-revealed/
hobbit709
(41,694 posts)Response to mfcorey1 (Original post)
ann--- This message was self-deleted by its author.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)Sounds like the narrative is being set..
hobbit709
(41,694 posts)"panicked clusterfuck."
marions ghost
(19,841 posts)--but of course they can't just own that.
not in winner-take-all Amurka.
tblue37
(65,340 posts)screening to leave Liberia. He needed medical care, and we can assume he would have liked to survive and not to infect his loved ones with a horrific disease that as far as he knew would kill them. Lying about the possibility that he had Ebola would prevent him from getting appropriate treatment that might give him at least some chance of survival, or if not survival, then at least a somewhat less painful death. All the incentive for lying is on the hospital's side.
Travis_0004
(5,417 posts)If I had Ebola I wouldnt let them send me away with asprin and some medicine. I would fight to get admited. If they would not admit me I would drive to a second or third hospital, not wait 3 days.
Demit
(11,238 posts)Most people go to medical professionals for that purpose.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)RockaFowler
(7,429 posts)They let him go home with a spiked fever.
How about the nurse who originally said that he told her he just got back from Liberia? She supposedly didn't get that information to anyone else.
I find this whole story just horrible. How can you treat the dead with such contempt?
malaise
(268,976 posts)That's how they treat the dead with such contempt,.
Sienna86
(2,149 posts)Parsing this version and the lack of a statement from Duncan doesn't clean up this version of the story from the hospital.
Turbineguy
(37,324 posts)Duncan could have had a brilliant career in investment banking.
gordianot
(15,237 posts)Like most modern media sources they are on constant rightward spin cycle and every story they do is questionable. I for one will never take them seriously.
procon
(15,805 posts)First the story reports the hospital was actively educating staff to cope with Ebola patients, indicating that a knowledgeable training team was at hand. If true, then why were forced the nurses forced to troll the internet looking for the proper protocols instead of relying on their in-house training office? Too many other assumtions and inconsistencies make this storu look more like a snow job and a thinly veiled hospital whitewash.
fredamae
(4,458 posts)the Hospital is Trying to Cover it's arse, to me.
Because Media has lost so much credibility and because it is so Monopolized....I don't believe it....I don't believe MSM. Period.
Vinca
(50,269 posts)davidpdx
(22,000 posts)Obviously it's going to be hard to know for sure what the answers were with Duncan being deceased. And forget releasing records because of HIPPA.
Barack_America
(28,876 posts)Maternity care there is scarce.
There was no reason at the time for Duncan to assume she had Ebola or was even "sick".
As a physician, I would have evaluated her for eclampsia and HELLP first.
Here are the symptoms for HELLP syndrome. Compare and contrast to Ebola.
http://americanpregnancy.org/pregnancy-complications/hellp-syndrome/
TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)Triage nurse didn't flag it, she just put it in the record--MISTAKE from ignorance of what was happening in the world. Doctors/other nurses didn't catch it and put it together either. Doctors appear to never consider his travel history at all, in fact. Patients are not responsible for their own diagnosis, considering that they can come in unconscious, mentally handicapped, stoned/drunk, psychotic.
Pathwalker
(6,598 posts)They no longer have a drop of credibility - might as well be Faux.