Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

n2doc

(47,953 posts)
Mon Oct 27, 2014, 09:58 AM Oct 2014

Dead babies near oil drilling sites raise questions for researchers

VERNAL, Utah — The smartphone-sized grave marker is nearly hidden in the grass at Rock Point Cemetery. The name printed on plastic-coated paper — Beau Murphy — has been worn away. Only the span of his life remains.

"June 18, 2013 - June 18, 2013"

For some reason, one that is not known and may never be, Beau and a dozen other infants died in this oil-booming basin last year. Was this spike a fluke? Bad luck? Or were these babies victims of air pollution fed by the nearly 12,000 oil and gas wells in one of the most energy-rich areas in the country?

Some scientists whose research focuses on the effect of certain drilling-related chemicals on fetal development believe there could be a link.

But just raising that possibility raises the ire of many who live in and around Vernal. Drilling has been an economic driver and part of the fabric of life here since the 1940s. And if all that energy development means the Uintah Basin has a particularly nasty problem with pollution, so be it, many residents say. Don't blame drilling for baby deaths that obituaries indicate were six times higher than the national average last year.

more

http://www.denverpost.com/news/ci_26800380/dead-babies-near-oil-drilling-sites-raise-questions

Her numbers show an upward four-year trend in infant deaths: One in every 95.5 burials in Uintah County in 2010 was a baby, according to Young. In 2011 it was one in every 53. In 2012, one in every 39.7. And in 2013 the number jumped to one in every 15.

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Dead babies near oil drilling sites raise questions for researchers (Original Post) n2doc Oct 2014 OP
I think she should do better research than just reading obituaries snooper2 Oct 2014 #1
His comments on fossil-fuel packman Oct 2014 #4
Based on the death of that infant, it appears to be either a MineralMan Oct 2014 #2
They are concerned with fetal development. antiquie Oct 2014 #3
As usual there's a focus on trying to demonstrate causation MineralMan Oct 2014 #5
 

snooper2

(30,151 posts)
1. I think she should do better research than just reading obituaries
Mon Oct 27, 2014, 10:04 AM
Oct 2014

"Dr. Karl Breitenbach, a physician who has done deliveries and prenatal and newborn care in Vernal for 27 years, was the only Vernal physician who responded to requests for comment. He said he has reviewed data through 2012 and hasn't seen any increase in baby deaths.

"I am unwilling to speculate until I see some proof that there actually is an increased rate of infant morbidity or mortality," he said in an e-mail."


"For now, infant deaths have dropped back to average. Residents are reluctant to talk about the infant-death issue. Many are focusing on a future that is filled with expanded fossil-fuel prospects. Nearly 85 percent of Vernal residents indicated in a recent survey that they welcome oil shale development."

 

packman

(16,296 posts)
4. His comments on fossil-fuel
Mon Oct 27, 2014, 10:21 AM
Oct 2014

and oil shale development sounds like he is incapable of making an objective analysis of the situation. He sounds prejudicial in favor of the fossil folk .

MineralMan

(146,308 posts)
2. Based on the death of that infant, it appears to be either a
Mon Oct 27, 2014, 10:07 AM
Oct 2014

stillbirth or a problem that was not survivable. The baby died the same day it was born.

I can't see that as evidence of anything. It happens.

 

antiquie

(4,299 posts)
3. They are concerned with fetal development.
Mon Oct 27, 2014, 10:18 AM
Oct 2014

I question the use of obits and percentages of deaths when Utah posts vital records online. If there is a provable correlation, I think actual statistics would have been cited.

MineralMan

(146,308 posts)
5. As usual there's a focus on trying to demonstrate causation
Mon Oct 27, 2014, 10:28 AM
Oct 2014

but there doesn't appear to be any information regarding that. Mere death statistics are pretty useless for this. They need to start digging into actual causes of death.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Dead babies near oil dril...