Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

alp227

(32,020 posts)
Tue Oct 28, 2014, 02:31 AM Oct 2014

USA Today’s Susan Page: Obama administration most ‘dangerous’ to media in history

At some point, a compendium of condemnations against the Obama administration’s record of media transparency (actually, opacity) must be assembled. Notable quotations in this vein come from former New York Times executive editor Jill Abramson, who said, “It is the most secretive White House that I have ever been involved in covering”; New York Times reporter James Risen, who said, “I think Obama hates the press”; and CBS News’s Bob Schieffer, who said, “This administration exercises more control than George W. Bush’s did, and his before that.”

USA Today Washington Bureau Chief Susan Page has added a sharper edge to this set of knives. Speaking Saturday at a White House Correspondents’ Association (WHCA) seminar, Page called the current White House not only “more restrictive” but also “more dangerous” to the press than any other in history, a clear reference to the Obama administration’s leak investigations and its naming of Fox News’s James Rosen as a possible “co-conspirator” in a violation of the Espionage Act.

The WHCA convened the event both to strategize over how to open up the byways of the self-proclaimed most transparent administration in history, as well as to compare war stories on the many ways in which it is not. Peter Baker, the veteran Washington reporter from the New York Times, provided perhaps the best instance of White House-administered madness. In covering a breaking story recently, Baker received a note from a White House handler indicating that President Obama had been briefed on the matter in question.

That information came to Baker “on background.” The gist: Not from me — a meeting has occurred..

full: http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/erik-wemple/wp/2014/10/27/usa-todays-susan-page-obama-administration-most-dangerous-to-media-in-history/

47 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
USA Today’s Susan Page: Obama administration most ‘dangerous’ to media in history (Original Post) alp227 Oct 2014 OP
Today's US media: Most dangerous to the PUBLIC in history. CakeGrrl Oct 2014 #1
Exactly.. they're Projecting onto the President. Cha Oct 2014 #4
Exactly! betsuni Oct 2014 #5
True Man from Pickens Oct 2014 #10
Right on cue. The predictable hyperpartisan wagon-circling. woo me with science Oct 2014 #17
Thank you obxhead Oct 2014 #18
Big old loaf of balogna. Darb Oct 2014 #24
+10 840high Oct 2014 #39
Thread winnah! City Lights Oct 2014 #22
k/r If a Republican administration was accused of this nationalize the fed Oct 2014 #2
+1000000 This thread has already been tagged "doubleplusungood," woo me with science Oct 2014 #7
A Republican was already accused of this Man from Pickens Oct 2014 #9
Horseshit. Darb Oct 2014 #25
Here are some links to help you get up to speed, since it appears you are clueless on this issue: Maedhros Oct 2014 #27
No thanks. Darb Oct 2014 #32
Are you seriously calling "9/11"? Man from Pickens Oct 2014 #36
Imagine if you will the ignore list. Maedhros Oct 2014 #38
Great post. woo me with science Oct 2014 #43
Fuck OFF..US Corporatewhoremedia.. The "press" acted as stenographers for bush.. anyone knows that Cha Oct 2014 #3
Agree! betsuni Oct 2014 #6
Absolutely. Page ridiculed Obama's credentials in 2008 when he ran for President the first time. Major Hogwash Oct 2014 #11
Yeah, Susan Page says PBO most dangerous to media in history like that's a bad thing.. Cha Oct 2014 #12
If Faux Snooze didn't exist already, the Republicans would invent it! Major Hogwash Oct 2014 #15
You will appreciate this - I know you will JustAnotherGen Oct 2014 #13
Sounds like your parents had your best interests at heart, Gen. Cha Oct 2014 #14
I was JustAnotherGen Oct 2014 #16
K&R The murder of a free press is not a partisan issue. woo me with science Oct 2014 #8
So, USA Today, is "free press"? Really? Old and In the Way Oct 2014 #34
For the most part, our corporate media stinks. merrily Oct 2014 #19
Media hacks like this are the real danger to our democracy liberal N proud Oct 2014 #20
...and one for you, too: Maedhros Oct 2014 #28
kick DesMoinesDem Oct 2014 #21
kick woo me with science Oct 2014 #23
USA Today? You mean McNews? SomethingFishy Oct 2014 #26
...and you: Maedhros Oct 2014 #29
Yeah I already said I have no love for Obama and his administration... SomethingFishy Oct 2014 #33
Not a fan of killing the messenger. Maedhros Oct 2014 #37
And Ms. Page couldn't be pushing the Republican dung ball up the hill this Skidmore Oct 2014 #30
For a sec I thought a model and right-wing columnist from Hawai'i named Susan Page had been promoted KamaAina Oct 2014 #31
Those who want to punish the press with the executive branch should be careful what they wish for. DisgustipatedinCA Oct 2014 #35
... 840high Oct 2014 #40
Well said. woo me with science Oct 2014 #44
Yep. Susan Page isn't the only one saying this. nt m-lekktor Oct 2014 #46
Why? Because the media might actually have to report facts instead of opinions for a change? Initech Oct 2014 #41
Barack Obama: The Least Transparent President in History-Democracy Now maced666 Oct 2014 #42
Yup. This. nt m-lekktor Oct 2014 #47
Awwww... Mister Nightowl Oct 2014 #45

CakeGrrl

(10,611 posts)
1. Today's US media: Most dangerous to the PUBLIC in history.
Tue Oct 28, 2014, 02:37 AM
Oct 2014

A GOP-owned machine keeping the populace stupid and misinformed on a daily basis.

 

Man from Pickens

(1,713 posts)
10. True
Tue Oct 28, 2014, 04:09 AM
Oct 2014

but the day the government can tell the press what to print and what not to print - either directly or through intimidation and withholding of information vital to the decision making of a democratic nation - is the day we no longer have a free press.

And you don't want to know what the next George Bush is going to be able to do with that.

woo me with science

(32,139 posts)
17. Right on cue. The predictable hyperpartisan wagon-circling.
Tue Oct 28, 2014, 05:26 AM
Oct 2014

The predictable massing at the top of the thread to rally us into Blue Team defense mode, the complete absence of any refutation of the content of the article notwithstanding.

Again the absurd bids to deny reality. To pretend that corporate Democrats have not taken up the Bush gauntlet and been aggressively complicit in attacking journalism *and* transparency in government. All you offer here is the stale, predictable call to circle the wagons and deny even the existence of the assaults as long as a Democratic administration is in power....our free press be damned.

These absurd message control tactics get so old. The hectoring to defend the indefensible gets so old. The propaganda gets so old.

This is not a partisan issue, and the Orwellian drumbeat to deny reality does not change the fact that we have a grave problem. Corporate money floods government now on BOTH sides of the aisle, and every avenue that citizens have left to fight back against the corporate takeover and subversion of our democracy for corporate ends is being systematically dismantled. That includes our right to protest, protection of whistleblowers, the right to a free and open internet, the right to a media that is not consolidated into a corporate freak show, and the right to a government that practices transparency instead of merely giving it lip service.

And a free press.

War is Peace. 2+2=5. Secrecy is transparency. Obama's jaw-dropping recent public proclamation that “If you blow the whistle-You should be thanked & protected for doing the right thing" ... when we have all witnessed this administration's treatment of Chelsea Manning and Edward Snowden, and the systematic crackdown on whistleblowing in the federal government.

None of it has any credibility anymore. We can see what is happening with our own eyes, and it transcends the corporate dog whistle to divide into our Red and Blue teams to circle the wagons.


Pentagon Papers lawyer on Obama, secrecy and press freedoms: 'worse than Nixon'
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=2551565

Mission Creep: When Everything is Terrorism
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023279560

US Uses Espionage Act To Convict Manning Using Words Added In 1990: "with a computer"
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023375845

Fed Court: Just changed interpretation of Espionage Act to cover leaks that are NOT Harmful To USA
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023365713

NY Times: White House Uses Espionage Act to Silence Employees, Press
http://www.democraticunderground.com/101616764

Obama Has Charged More Under Espionage Act Than All Other Presidents Combined
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023080388

What’s the Point of a Source Protection Law That Wouldn’t Protect Chelsea Manning or Edward Snowden?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=4976082

I AM A JOURNALIST. SO ARE YOU.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023708417

Petition Calls On Obama Stop Intimidation Of Journalists And Whistleblowers
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025509395

Obama administration mistakes journalism for espionage
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022874998

Why Is President Obama Keeping a Journalist in Prison in Yemen
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023300531

James Clapper Calls Journalists "Criminal Accomplices" -
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1017174990

Reporters without Borders: 'Security interests threaten press freedom'
http://www.democraticunderground.com/11333723

US Plummets In Press Freedom Rankings
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024487392

Obama's escalating war on Freedom of the Press
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023314296

Risen Case: War on Journalism coming to a head
http://www.democraticunderground.com/101699216

Make No Mistake, Risen Case Is a Direct Attack on the Press
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025047757

Government Surveillance Is Crippling Press Freedoms, Report Shows
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023902153

Journalists criticize White House for Secrecy: 8 ways the Obama administration is blocking information
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025560828

Sibel Edmonds, whistleblowers: Rescind President Obama's 'Transparency Award' Now
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=439x1301068
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=385x593066

Obama vs. the Press - The New Yorker
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022857656

ACLU decries Obama administration secrecy
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002474023
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x5022013
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002859725
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=439x834156
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002257857

Journalists Take White House To Task On Issues Of Access, Transparency
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025552774

Obama's secrecy fixation causing Sunshine Week implosion-Even the most loyal establishment Democrats are now harshly denouncing the president for his war on transparency
http://www.democraticunderground.com/101658163








 

Darb

(2,807 posts)
24. Big old loaf of balogna.
Tue Oct 28, 2014, 06:45 PM
Oct 2014

Especially that Fux News hack. He got what he deserved. Don't conflate all those items or the important ones will be killed with the ratfuck ones. See if you can separate them out.

If the press attacked me mercilessly like rabid dogs, I'd tell them to go fuck themselves too. If you think today's press is the same as the old days, well I got news for ya, it ain't. This administration just doesn't give out info like Halloween candy, well, that's because the press is a bunch of nitwit lying douchbags that are paid to hyperventilate and get clicks and create memes and make news. The White House don't play that, tough shit.

And remember, every farkin lie about Obama ever told has made it into the news over and over and over. Evey lie about climate change. Every lie about the ACA. Every lie about BENGHAZI!!!! Every fucking bit of bullshit that the Republicans trot out gets put in the news as if it was real. The press is a bunch of farkin whores and your defending them under the guise of press freedom is a damn shame.

You should take some time and pare down that list to the shit that is actually meaningful. Start with that Fux news douchebag. He was conspiring with Repuke aides to ratfuck the President, national security be damned. He deserves what he got.

nationalize the fed

(2,169 posts)
2. k/r If a Republican administration was accused of this
Tue Oct 28, 2014, 03:13 AM
Oct 2014

there would be lots of posts and recs.

The team mentality has literally ruined this country. Time to GTFO

woo me with science

(32,139 posts)
7. +1000000 This thread has already been tagged "doubleplusungood,"
Tue Oct 28, 2014, 03:37 AM
Oct 2014

and the hyperpartisan message control swarm has begun.

The slimy pit of antidemocratic propaganda is inescapable in corrupt neoAmerica.

Meanwhile, every avenue to fight back against this corporate takeover is being systematically eliminated, journalism included.
 

Maedhros

(10,007 posts)
27. Here are some links to help you get up to speed, since it appears you are clueless on this issue:
Tue Oct 28, 2014, 07:00 PM
Oct 2014
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/michael-barone-more-than-all-past-presidents-obama-uses-1917-espionage-act-to-go-after-reporters/article/2530340

Barack Obama and his Justice Department seem to be of a different mind. They have used the Espionage Act of 1917 six times to bring cases against government officials for leaks to the media six times -- twice as many as all their predecessors combined.


http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/27/business/media/white-house-uses-espionage-act-to-pursue-leak-cases-media-equation.html?_r=0

The Obama administration, which promised during its transition to power that it would enhance “whistle-blower laws to protect federal workers,” has been more prone than any administration in history in trying to silence and prosecute federal workers.


http://www.aim.org/special-report/president-obamas-war-on-journalists/

Critics on both the left and the right are lambasting President Obama for his ongoing policies restricting the freedom of the press, ostensibly in favor of national security, which in some cases amount to a vendetta against reporters who publish what leakers leak, rather than just going after what the leakers have done themselves. “The Obama administration’s unprecedented pursuit of criminal liability against security leakers threatens to rope in the Fourth Estate,” wrote Stanford’s Jennifer Granick and Morgan Weiland for Forbes. (Weiland used to work for the far-left Media Matters.) “The message? Don’t report national security stories or you will become a target.”


http://www.salon.com/2012/04/09/journalists_casualties_in_the_war_on_whistleblowers/

While the Bush administration treated whistleblowers unmercifully, the Obama administration has been far worse. It is actually prosecuting them, and doing so under the Espionage Act — one of the most serious charges that can be leveled against an American. The Espionage Act is an archaic World War I-era law meant to go after spies, not whistleblowers. Strangely, using it to target the media and sources is the brainchild of neo-conservative Gabriel Schoenfeld, who would have sources who disclose information to reporters, journalists who then write about it for newspapers, the newspapers that publish the information and the publisher itself all be held criminally liable.
 

Darb

(2,807 posts)
32. No thanks.
Tue Oct 28, 2014, 07:07 PM
Oct 2014

I don't do hyperbole. One man's whistle blower is another man's ratfuck. I am not interested in whinings about Fox News hacks and Republican ratfucks.

Imagine if you will a terrorist attack like 9/11 gets through under Obama. I cannot even fathom the dogs of hell that would be let loose on this admin. It is a crime to leak classified information, no?

 

Man from Pickens

(1,713 posts)
36. Are you seriously calling "9/11"?
Tue Oct 28, 2014, 07:16 PM
Oct 2014

Rudy? Is that you?

The day I buy "we have to live in an Orwellian police state because 9/11" is the day after I have a lobotomy.

Cha

(297,188 posts)
3. Fuck OFF..US Corporatewhoremedia.. The "press" acted as stenographers for bush.. anyone knows that
Tue Oct 28, 2014, 03:25 AM
Oct 2014

BS except if you were under a rock for the last 14 years. And they know that the "media" covers up the good stories about Obama and MegaPhones the Benghazi etc Shite Exponentially.

US Mediawhore$$$$$$ Boo Hoo WAHWAHWAH

Major Hogwash

(17,656 posts)
11. Absolutely. Page ridiculed Obama's credentials in 2008 when he ran for President the first time.
Tue Oct 28, 2014, 04:10 AM
Oct 2014

Last edited Tue Oct 28, 2014, 04:55 AM - Edit history (1)

She wrote an article in the middle of the summer long before the debates took place and asked rhetorically how a first term Senator like Barack Obama could compete in the race with a wise, seasoned, ol' veteran like John McCain.

Simple, Obama said he wouldn't lie . . . and wound up beating McCain at the polls like a rented mule!

Cha

(297,188 posts)
12. Yeah, Susan Page says PBO most dangerous to media in history like that's a bad thing..
Tue Oct 28, 2014, 04:35 AM
Oct 2014

Somebody has to go around them and level the playing field.. Obama has won two Presidential Elections with the M$M against him. It has helped though that his opponents are so bad they help a lot with doing themselves in.. take John McCain and his bringing moose-sparkle on board for instance.. too bad the "seasoned veteran" was so desperate and didn't have any foresight or vision to know how badly that would end.

Thanks for the history, Major.



Major Hogwash

(17,656 posts)
15. If Faux Snooze didn't exist already, the Republicans would invent it!
Tue Oct 28, 2014, 05:12 AM
Oct 2014

Moose-sparkle really did this country a favor by thinking she was actually qualified for the job as John McCain's veep.

And considering how bad she was at articulating any kind of a coherent political message, her word salad diatribes about Obama "palling around with terrorists" were only intensified by Faux Snooze constantly drooling over her saying how good looking she was all of the time!
As if Miss America contestants are qualified to be the leaders of our country, based solely on their looks alone!

Nevermind the fact that Obama had to pull this country back from the edge of the abyss and create 14 million jobs on his own, without the help of the Republicans!
But, you don't hear a lot of commentary about how well the economy is going these days on almost any tv program, including the supposedly liberal programs on MSNBC.

That's how bad the mainstream media has been at reporting the real news . . the good news of all the good work that President Obama has done in less than 6 years, despite the most intense filibustering attempts by the Republican party in the entire history of the United States!

Just imagine how much more President Obama could have accomplished by now if it were not for all of the blocking actions taken by the Gridlock Obstructure Party!!!

<---- Grrrrriiidddlloocckkkkk!!!

Gawd I hate gridlock!!

JustAnotherGen

(31,818 posts)
13. You will appreciate this - I know you will
Tue Oct 28, 2014, 04:53 AM
Oct 2014

My parents subscribed to USA Today when it came out because they thought (knew) it was a child friendly newspaper. Not kidding - I was about 8 or 9 when it was first published and we were expected to sit down to dinner each night prepared to discuss a world or national issue.

Cha

(297,188 posts)
14. Sounds like your parents had your best interests at heart, Gen.
Tue Oct 28, 2014, 05:08 AM
Oct 2014

And, look at you.. you're still interested in world events!

I take it you weren't too excited about it in the early years.

JustAnotherGen

(31,818 posts)
16. I was
Tue Oct 28, 2014, 05:23 AM
Oct 2014

But I used to read the Wall Street Journal (read at the collegiate level in the second grade) and at the end of the day - they didn't want to be bothered with "business" talk. Those "greed grabbers"!

woo me with science

(32,139 posts)
8. K&R The murder of a free press is not a partisan issue.
Tue Oct 28, 2014, 03:42 AM
Oct 2014

Corporate purchase of our government and use of our government to assault the foundations of democratic government are not partisan issues.

Hyperpartisan calls to circle the wagons around systematic assaults on investigative journalism, whistleblowing, constitutionally protected protest, and diversified media have no credibility whatsoever.

The propaganda has no credibility whatsoever.

Old and In the Way

(37,540 posts)
34. So, USA Today, is "free press"? Really?
Tue Oct 28, 2014, 07:11 PM
Oct 2014

I get Obama is the worst thing for press freedom since the press became owned by a half-dozen corporste Republiban leaning entities. I really get that.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
19. For the most part, our corporate media stinks.
Tue Oct 28, 2014, 06:18 AM
Oct 2014

A huge exception are those risking their lives abroad to bring us news of IS and other stories and there are some notable and commendable domestic exceptions as well. For the most part, though, our corporate media stinks.

However, it is also true that each administration has become more secretive than the one before it. The Obama administration is no exception, but it is not alone, either. And the next administration, Republican or Democratic, will probably continue the pattern. Nothing in this post is good for us or bodes well for us.



liberal N proud

(60,334 posts)
20. Media hacks like this are the real danger to our democracy
Tue Oct 28, 2014, 06:51 AM
Oct 2014

Is there anything else the media would like to pin to Obama? Any other perceived failures or anything they don't like?

ANYTHING?

 

Maedhros

(10,007 posts)
28. ...and one for you, too:
Tue Oct 28, 2014, 07:01 PM
Oct 2014
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/michael-barone-more-than-all-past-presidents-obama-uses-1917-espionage-act-to-go-after-reporters/article/2530340

Barack Obama and his Justice Department seem to be of a different mind. They have used the Espionage Act of 1917 six times to bring cases against government officials for leaks to the media six times -- twice as many as all their predecessors combined.


http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/27/business/media/white-house-uses-espionage-act-to-pursue-leak-cases-media-equation.html?_r=0

The Obama administration, which promised during its transition to power that it would enhance “whistle-blower laws to protect federal workers,” has been more prone than any administration in history in trying to silence and prosecute federal workers.


http://www.aim.org/special-report/president-obamas-war-on-journalists/

Critics on both the left and the right are lambasting President Obama for his ongoing policies restricting the freedom of the press, ostensibly in favor of national security, which in some cases amount to a vendetta against reporters who publish what leakers leak, rather than just going after what the leakers have done themselves. “The Obama administration’s unprecedented pursuit of criminal liability against security leakers threatens to rope in the Fourth Estate,” wrote Stanford’s Jennifer Granick and Morgan Weiland for Forbes. (Weiland used to work for the far-left Media Matters.) “The message? Don’t report national security stories or you will become a target.”


http://www.salon.com/2012/04/09/journalists_casualties_in_the_war_on_whistleblowers/

While the Bush administration treated whistleblowers unmercifully, the Obama administration has been far worse. It is actually prosecuting them, and doing so under the Espionage Act — one of the most serious charges that can be leveled against an American. The Espionage Act is an archaic World War I-era law meant to go after spies, not whistleblowers. Strangely, using it to target the media and sources is the brainchild of neo-conservative Gabriel Schoenfeld, who would have sources who disclose information to reporters, journalists who then write about it for newspapers, the newspapers that publish the information and the publisher itself all be held criminally liable.

SomethingFishy

(4,876 posts)
26. USA Today? You mean McNews?
Tue Oct 28, 2014, 06:59 PM
Oct 2014

While I have no great love for Obama, this is stupid. Gee maybe if the media didn't spend 2 years yanking my crank on Obama's birth certificate, or acting as stenographers for the White House I might be able to take this seriously.

Dear Susan Page,
Try again when you are an actual journalist. When you actually work and dig for your stories instead of whining that the White House doesn't do your job for you.

Sincerely,
America.

 

Maedhros

(10,007 posts)
29. ...and you:
Tue Oct 28, 2014, 07:02 PM
Oct 2014
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/michael-barone-more-than-all-past-presidents-obama-uses-1917-espionage-act-to-go-after-reporters/article/2530340

Barack Obama and his Justice Department seem to be of a different mind. They have used the Espionage Act of 1917 six times to bring cases against government officials for leaks to the media six times -- twice as many as all their predecessors combined.


http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/27/business/media/white-house-uses-espionage-act-to-pursue-leak-cases-media-equation.html?_r=0

The Obama administration, which promised during its transition to power that it would enhance “whistle-blower laws to protect federal workers,” has been more prone than any administration in history in trying to silence and prosecute federal workers.


http://www.aim.org/special-report/president-obamas-war-on-journalists/

Critics on both the left and the right are lambasting President Obama for his ongoing policies restricting the freedom of the press, ostensibly in favor of national security, which in some cases amount to a vendetta against reporters who publish what leakers leak, rather than just going after what the leakers have done themselves. “The Obama administration’s unprecedented pursuit of criminal liability against security leakers threatens to rope in the Fourth Estate,” wrote Stanford’s Jennifer Granick and Morgan Weiland for Forbes. (Weiland used to work for the far-left Media Matters.) “The message? Don’t report national security stories or you will become a target.”


http://www.salon.com/2012/04/09/journalists_casualties_in_the_war_on_whistleblowers/

While the Bush administration treated whistleblowers unmercifully, the Obama administration has been far worse. It is actually prosecuting them, and doing so under the Espionage Act — one of the most serious charges that can be leveled against an American. The Espionage Act is an archaic World War I-era law meant to go after spies, not whistleblowers. Strangely, using it to target the media and sources is the brainchild of neo-conservative Gabriel Schoenfeld, who would have sources who disclose information to reporters, journalists who then write about it for newspapers, the newspapers that publish the information and the publisher itself all be held criminally liable.

SomethingFishy

(4,876 posts)
33. Yeah I already said I have no love for Obama and his administration...
Tue Oct 28, 2014, 07:08 PM
Oct 2014

and I know (thanks to Woo Me With Science) exactly what he is doing.


However I don't need someone with even less credibility than Obama to tell me what they think is going on. I have a list of actual journalists I will listen to. There are only about 7 of them... Believe me, Susan "Stenographer" Page isn't even close to being on the list. Now if Moyers, or Risen, or Tiabbi, or Palast wants to tell me this, then I will take the time to listen.

Susan Page can go fuck herself. Coming in with this shit right before the election? Where was this story a year ago? To me this looks just like another stupid attempt to cost Democrats the Senate.

Sorry, while I don't necessarily disagree with her, her timing, and her reasoning are... suspect to say the least.



 

Maedhros

(10,007 posts)
37. Not a fan of killing the messenger.
Tue Oct 28, 2014, 08:09 PM
Oct 2014

But fair enough, I can see your objection with respect to timing.

Skidmore

(37,364 posts)
30. And Ms. Page couldn't be pushing the Republican dung ball up the hill this
Tue Oct 28, 2014, 07:04 PM
Oct 2014

close to an election, now could she? I notice she is quoting Jonathan Karl who spent his segment this evening on ABC burbling on about what a big sweep of seats the Rs will be getting next week.

 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
31. For a sec I thought a model and right-wing columnist from Hawai'i named Susan Page had been promoted
Tue Oct 28, 2014, 07:06 PM
Oct 2014

no, srsly, the woman runs a modeling agency and moonlights writing "Susan's Page" for something called MidWeek that gets mailed to everyone on O'ahu. I'm like, , but it turns out that this is a different Susan Page with actual credentials.

 

DisgustipatedinCA

(12,530 posts)
35. Those who want to punish the press with the executive branch should be careful what they wish for.
Tue Oct 28, 2014, 07:12 PM
Oct 2014

Yeah, I get it...much of the mainstream press sucks. But that doesn't mean that Susan Page is wrong about this. We need a free press. The administration doesn't want a free press. That's a problem.

 

maced666

(771 posts)
42. Barack Obama: The Least Transparent President in History-Democracy Now
Tue Oct 28, 2014, 11:56 PM
Oct 2014

USA Today hardly alone on this -

http://www.democracynow.org/blog/2014/3/27/barack_obama_the_least_transparent_president


and the Washington Post...
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/federal-eye/wp/2014/03/17/sunshine-week-transparency-issues-persist-with-obama-administration/


Associated Press - The Associated Press reported that “[m]ore often than ever, the administration censored government files or outright denied access to them last year under the U.S. Freedom of Information Act [FOIA].” The AP report continued, “The government’s efforts to be more open about its activities last year were their worst since President Barack Obama took office.”

What Happened to Transparency? - New York Times
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/08/opinion/what-happened-to-transparency.html?_r=0

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»USA Today’s Susan Page: O...