General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsUSA Today’s Susan Page: Obama administration most ‘dangerous’ to media in history
At some point, a compendium of condemnations against the Obama administrations record of media transparency (actually, opacity) must be assembled. Notable quotations in this vein come from former New York Times executive editor Jill Abramson, who said, It is the most secretive White House that I have ever been involved in covering; New York Times reporter James Risen, who said, I think Obama hates the press; and CBS Newss Bob Schieffer, who said, This administration exercises more control than George W. Bushs did, and his before that.
USA Today Washington Bureau Chief Susan Page has added a sharper edge to this set of knives. Speaking Saturday at a White House Correspondents Association (WHCA) seminar, Page called the current White House not only more restrictive but also more dangerous to the press than any other in history, a clear reference to the Obama administrations leak investigations and its naming of Fox Newss James Rosen as a possible co-conspirator in a violation of the Espionage Act.
The WHCA convened the event both to strategize over how to open up the byways of the self-proclaimed most transparent administration in history, as well as to compare war stories on the many ways in which it is not. Peter Baker, the veteran Washington reporter from the New York Times, provided perhaps the best instance of White House-administered madness. In covering a breaking story recently, Baker received a note from a White House handler indicating that President Obama had been briefed on the matter in question.
That information came to Baker on background. The gist: Not from me a meeting has occurred..
full: http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/erik-wemple/wp/2014/10/27/usa-todays-susan-page-obama-administration-most-dangerous-to-media-in-history/
CakeGrrl
(10,611 posts)A GOP-owned machine keeping the populace stupid and misinformed on a daily basis.
Cha
(297,188 posts)Man from Pickens
(1,713 posts)but the day the government can tell the press what to print and what not to print - either directly or through intimidation and withholding of information vital to the decision making of a democratic nation - is the day we no longer have a free press.
And you don't want to know what the next George Bush is going to be able to do with that.
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)The predictable massing at the top of the thread to rally us into Blue Team defense mode, the complete absence of any refutation of the content of the article notwithstanding.
Again the absurd bids to deny reality. To pretend that corporate Democrats have not taken up the Bush gauntlet and been aggressively complicit in attacking journalism *and* transparency in government. All you offer here is the stale, predictable call to circle the wagons and deny even the existence of the assaults as long as a Democratic administration is in power....our free press be damned.
These absurd message control tactics get so old. The hectoring to defend the indefensible gets so old. The propaganda gets so old.
This is not a partisan issue, and the Orwellian drumbeat to deny reality does not change the fact that we have a grave problem. Corporate money floods government now on BOTH sides of the aisle, and every avenue that citizens have left to fight back against the corporate takeover and subversion of our democracy for corporate ends is being systematically dismantled. That includes our right to protest, protection of whistleblowers, the right to a free and open internet, the right to a media that is not consolidated into a corporate freak show, and the right to a government that practices transparency instead of merely giving it lip service.
And a free press.
War is Peace. 2+2=5. Secrecy is transparency. Obama's jaw-dropping recent public proclamation that If you blow the whistle-You should be thanked & protected for doing the right thing" ... when we have all witnessed this administration's treatment of Chelsea Manning and Edward Snowden, and the systematic crackdown on whistleblowing in the federal government.
None of it has any credibility anymore. We can see what is happening with our own eyes, and it transcends the corporate dog whistle to divide into our Red and Blue teams to circle the wagons.
Pentagon Papers lawyer on Obama, secrecy and press freedoms: 'worse than Nixon'
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=2551565
Mission Creep: When Everything is Terrorism
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023279560
US Uses Espionage Act To Convict Manning Using Words Added In 1990: "with a computer"
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023375845
Fed Court: Just changed interpretation of Espionage Act to cover leaks that are NOT Harmful To USA
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023365713
NY Times: White House Uses Espionage Act to Silence Employees, Press
http://www.democraticunderground.com/101616764
Obama Has Charged More Under Espionage Act Than All Other Presidents Combined
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023080388
Whats the Point of a Source Protection Law That Wouldnt Protect Chelsea Manning or Edward Snowden?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=4976082
I AM A JOURNALIST. SO ARE YOU.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023708417
Petition Calls On Obama Stop Intimidation Of Journalists And Whistleblowers
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025509395
Obama administration mistakes journalism for espionage
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022874998
Why Is President Obama Keeping a Journalist in Prison in Yemen
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023300531
James Clapper Calls Journalists "Criminal Accomplices" -
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1017174990
Reporters without Borders: 'Security interests threaten press freedom'
http://www.democraticunderground.com/11333723
US Plummets In Press Freedom Rankings
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024487392
Obama's escalating war on Freedom of the Press
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023314296
Risen Case: War on Journalism coming to a head
http://www.democraticunderground.com/101699216
Make No Mistake, Risen Case Is a Direct Attack on the Press
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025047757
Government Surveillance Is Crippling Press Freedoms, Report Shows
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023902153
Journalists criticize White House for Secrecy: 8 ways the Obama administration is blocking information
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025560828
Sibel Edmonds, whistleblowers: Rescind President Obama's 'Transparency Award' Now
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=439x1301068
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=385x593066
Obama vs. the Press - The New Yorker
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022857656
ACLU decries Obama administration secrecy
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002474023
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x5022013
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002859725
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=439x834156
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002257857
Journalists Take White House To Task On Issues Of Access, Transparency
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025552774
Obama's secrecy fixation causing Sunshine Week implosion-Even the most loyal establishment Democrats are now harshly denouncing the president for his war on transparency
http://www.democraticunderground.com/101658163
obxhead
(8,434 posts)Darb
(2,807 posts)Especially that Fux News hack. He got what he deserved. Don't conflate all those items or the important ones will be killed with the ratfuck ones. See if you can separate them out.
If the press attacked me mercilessly like rabid dogs, I'd tell them to go fuck themselves too. If you think today's press is the same as the old days, well I got news for ya, it ain't. This administration just doesn't give out info like Halloween candy, well, that's because the press is a bunch of nitwit lying douchbags that are paid to hyperventilate and get clicks and create memes and make news. The White House don't play that, tough shit.
And remember, every farkin lie about Obama ever told has made it into the news over and over and over. Evey lie about climate change. Every lie about the ACA. Every lie about BENGHAZI!!!! Every fucking bit of bullshit that the Republicans trot out gets put in the news as if it was real. The press is a bunch of farkin whores and your defending them under the guise of press freedom is a damn shame.
You should take some time and pare down that list to the shit that is actually meaningful. Start with that Fux news douchebag. He was conspiring with Repuke aides to ratfuck the President, national security be damned. He deserves what he got.
840high
(17,196 posts)City Lights
(25,171 posts)nationalize the fed
(2,169 posts)there would be lots of posts and recs.
The team mentality has literally ruined this country. Time to GTFO
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)and the hyperpartisan message control swarm has begun.
The slimy pit of antidemocratic propaganda is inescapable in corrupt neoAmerica.
Meanwhile, every avenue to fight back against this corporate takeover is being systematically eliminated, journalism included.
Man from Pickens
(1,713 posts)actually, a lot less than this.
His name was Richard Nixon.
Darb
(2,807 posts)Comparing Obama's administration to Nixon's is positively, mind-numbingly ridiculous.
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/27/business/media/white-house-uses-espionage-act-to-pursue-leak-cases-media-equation.html?_r=0
http://www.aim.org/special-report/president-obamas-war-on-journalists/
http://www.salon.com/2012/04/09/journalists_casualties_in_the_war_on_whistleblowers/
I don't do hyperbole. One man's whistle blower is another man's ratfuck. I am not interested in whinings about Fox News hacks and Republican ratfucks.
Imagine if you will a terrorist attack like 9/11 gets through under Obama. I cannot even fathom the dogs of hell that would be let loose on this admin. It is a crime to leak classified information, no?
Man from Pickens
(1,713 posts)Rudy? Is that you?
The day I buy "we have to live in an Orwellian police state because 9/11" is the day after I have a lobotomy.
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)It's where I put the authoritarians.
/bye.
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)LOVE comparing the substantive posts to the blurting apologism.
Cha
(297,188 posts)BS except if you were under a rock for the last 14 years. And they know that the "media" covers up the good stories about Obama and MegaPhones the Benghazi etc Shite Exponentially.
US Mediawhore$$$$$$ Boo Hoo WAHWAHWAH
Major Hogwash
(17,656 posts)Last edited Tue Oct 28, 2014, 04:55 AM - Edit history (1)
She wrote an article in the middle of the summer long before the debates took place and asked rhetorically how a first term Senator like Barack Obama could compete in the race with a wise, seasoned, ol' veteran like John McCain.
Simple, Obama said he wouldn't lie . . . and wound up beating McCain at the polls like a rented mule!
Cha
(297,188 posts)Somebody has to go around them and level the playing field.. Obama has won two Presidential Elections with the M$M against him. It has helped though that his opponents are so bad they help a lot with doing themselves in.. take John McCain and his bringing moose-sparkle on board for instance.. too bad the "seasoned veteran" was so desperate and didn't have any foresight or vision to know how badly that would end.
Thanks for the history, Major.
Major Hogwash
(17,656 posts)Moose-sparkle really did this country a favor by thinking she was actually qualified for the job as John McCain's veep.
And considering how bad she was at articulating any kind of a coherent political message, her word salad diatribes about Obama "palling around with terrorists" were only intensified by Faux Snooze constantly drooling over her saying how good looking she was all of the time!
As if Miss America contestants are qualified to be the leaders of our country, based solely on their looks alone!
Nevermind the fact that Obama had to pull this country back from the edge of the abyss and create 14 million jobs on his own, without the help of the Republicans!
But, you don't hear a lot of commentary about how well the economy is going these days on almost any tv program, including the supposedly liberal programs on MSNBC.
That's how bad the mainstream media has been at reporting the real news . . the good news of all the good work that President Obama has done in less than 6 years, despite the most intense filibustering attempts by the Republican party in the entire history of the United States!
Just imagine how much more President Obama could have accomplished by now if it were not for all of the blocking actions taken by the Gridlock Obstructure Party!!!
<---- Grrrrriiidddlloocckkkkk!!!
Gawd I hate gridlock!!
JustAnotherGen
(31,818 posts)My parents subscribed to USA Today when it came out because they thought (knew) it was a child friendly newspaper. Not kidding - I was about 8 or 9 when it was first published and we were expected to sit down to dinner each night prepared to discuss a world or national issue.
Cha
(297,188 posts)And, look at you.. you're still interested in world events!
I take it you weren't too excited about it in the early years.
JustAnotherGen
(31,818 posts)But I used to read the Wall Street Journal (read at the collegiate level in the second grade) and at the end of the day - they didn't want to be bothered with "business" talk. Those "greed grabbers"!
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)Corporate purchase of our government and use of our government to assault the foundations of democratic government are not partisan issues.
Hyperpartisan calls to circle the wagons around systematic assaults on investigative journalism, whistleblowing, constitutionally protected protest, and diversified media have no credibility whatsoever.
The propaganda has no credibility whatsoever.
Old and In the Way
(37,540 posts)I get Obama is the worst thing for press freedom since the press became owned by a half-dozen corporste Republiban leaning entities. I really get that.
merrily
(45,251 posts)A huge exception are those risking their lives abroad to bring us news of IS and other stories and there are some notable and commendable domestic exceptions as well. For the most part, though, our corporate media stinks.
However, it is also true that each administration has become more secretive than the one before it. The Obama administration is no exception, but it is not alone, either. And the next administration, Republican or Democratic, will probably continue the pattern. Nothing in this post is good for us or bodes well for us.
liberal N proud
(60,334 posts)Is there anything else the media would like to pin to Obama? Any other perceived failures or anything they don't like?
ANYTHING?
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/27/business/media/white-house-uses-espionage-act-to-pursue-leak-cases-media-equation.html?_r=0
http://www.aim.org/special-report/president-obamas-war-on-journalists/
http://www.salon.com/2012/04/09/journalists_casualties_in_the_war_on_whistleblowers/
DesMoinesDem
(1,569 posts)woo me with science
(32,139 posts)SomethingFishy
(4,876 posts)While I have no great love for Obama, this is stupid. Gee maybe if the media didn't spend 2 years yanking my crank on Obama's birth certificate, or acting as stenographers for the White House I might be able to take this seriously.
Dear Susan Page,
Try again when you are an actual journalist. When you actually work and dig for your stories instead of whining that the White House doesn't do your job for you.
Sincerely,
America.
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/27/business/media/white-house-uses-espionage-act-to-pursue-leak-cases-media-equation.html?_r=0
http://www.aim.org/special-report/president-obamas-war-on-journalists/
http://www.salon.com/2012/04/09/journalists_casualties_in_the_war_on_whistleblowers/
SomethingFishy
(4,876 posts)and I know (thanks to Woo Me With Science) exactly what he is doing.
However I don't need someone with even less credibility than Obama to tell me what they think is going on. I have a list of actual journalists I will listen to. There are only about 7 of them... Believe me, Susan "Stenographer" Page isn't even close to being on the list. Now if Moyers, or Risen, or Tiabbi, or Palast wants to tell me this, then I will take the time to listen.
Susan Page can go fuck herself. Coming in with this shit right before the election? Where was this story a year ago? To me this looks just like another stupid attempt to cost Democrats the Senate.
Sorry, while I don't necessarily disagree with her, her timing, and her reasoning are... suspect to say the least.
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)But fair enough, I can see your objection with respect to timing.
Skidmore
(37,364 posts)close to an election, now could she? I notice she is quoting Jonathan Karl who spent his segment this evening on ABC burbling on about what a big sweep of seats the Rs will be getting next week.
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)no, srsly, the woman runs a modeling agency and moonlights writing "Susan's Page" for something called MidWeek that gets mailed to everyone on O'ahu. I'm like, , but it turns out that this is a different Susan Page with actual credentials.
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)Yeah, I get it...much of the mainstream press sucks. But that doesn't mean that Susan Page is wrong about this. We need a free press. The administration doesn't want a free press. That's a problem.
840high
(17,196 posts)woo me with science
(32,139 posts)m-lekktor
(3,675 posts)Initech
(100,068 posts)maced666
(771 posts)USA Today hardly alone on this -
http://www.democracynow.org/blog/2014/3/27/barack_obama_the_least_transparent_president
and the Washington Post...
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/federal-eye/wp/2014/03/17/sunshine-week-transparency-issues-persist-with-obama-administration/
Associated Press - The Associated Press reported that [m]ore often than ever, the administration censored government files or outright denied access to them last year under the U.S. Freedom of Information Act [FOIA]. The AP report continued, The governments efforts to be more open about its activities last year were their worst since President Barack Obama took office.
What Happened to Transparency? - New York Times
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/08/opinion/what-happened-to-transparency.html?_r=0