General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCourt spurns Virginia mom's conviction for taking children to school late
Va. (Reuters) - Virginia's compulsory school-attendance law is too vague to be used to prosecute a divorced mother for bringing her children to school late, the state's highest court ruled on Friday, overturning her convictions in a lower court.
The decision by the Virginia Supreme Court was a victory for Maureen Anne Blake, a mother of three who shares custody with her ex-husband. She had been convicted on three misdemeanor charges related to her childrens school tardiness, with each count based on five instances of tardiness, from Dec. 1, 2011, to Jan. 19, 2012.
In the majority opinion, Justice LeRoy F. Millette Jr. said the language of the state law was "ambiguous," especially in directing parents to "send" their children to school. "The word 'send' has a variety of different definitions," Millette wrote.
The children, ages 9, 10, 11, were repeatedly five to 20 minutes late to their classes on Thursdays, according to court records.
http://news.yahoo.com/court-spurns-virginia-moms-conviction-taking-children-school-200351109.html
tazkcmo
(7,300 posts)These are the REAL criminals in America!!! Not the banksters, not the bought politicians, not the corrupt police forces.
lpbk2713
(42,757 posts)when they want to prosecute a parent for a few instances of tardiness
in a year's time. The mother probably did the best she could.
dsc
(52,160 posts)Thursday and apparently was repeatedly late. It is clear she just didn't really give a damn if she got them to school on time or didn't. While jail seems a bit harsh, she should have had her custody altered so that she wasn't responsible for getting them to school.
You seem to know a lot.
dsc
(52,160 posts)It states, in clear unambiguous language that she has custody on Wed. night and that she had them late not once, not twice, not three times, but four times in five weeks. Again, all I did was read the very clearly written article at the link. It isn't like I am the second coming of Carnac.
On edit here is the text in question which was in the article right at the link.
She had been convicted on three misdemeanor charges related to her childrens school tardiness, with each count based on five instances of tardiness, from Dec. 1, 2011, to Jan. 19, 2012.
In the majority opinion, Justice LeRoy F. Millette Jr. said the language of the state law was "ambiguous," especially in directing parents to "send" their children to school. "The word 'send' has a variety of different definitions," Millette wrote.
The children, ages 9, 10, 11, were repeatedly five to 20 minutes late to their classes on Thursdays, according to court records.
Blake had custody of her children Wednesday nights and was responsible for transporting them to school on Thursday mornings.
One last edit it was actually five times in five school weeks (you generally get two weeks off for Christmas).
kcr
(15,315 posts)That is insane. I'm glad her conviction was thrown out.
dsc
(52,160 posts)so she was 0 for 5. And her response was well I have ADHD so oh well. Being a parent means actually being a parent.
Manifestor_of_Light
(21,046 posts)This is a trend. Like all the traffic warrants in Ferguson, MO, and the private debtors' prison in Alabama that the SPLC recently got closed.
PatrickforO
(14,572 posts)shraby
(21,946 posts)never got us there in time. This was true at various times throughout the school year due to the bus breaking down, weather, and other reasons like several families not being ready and the bus had to wait for them.
I had to ride for an hour to get home after school, but was the last one picked up in the morning. School was 8 miles away.