Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RKP5637

(67,107 posts)
Tue Nov 4, 2014, 06:51 AM Nov 2014

Democratic candidates not supporting the president have a piss poor strategy. They make

the democratic party look fractured and out of control. If democrats lose, they have them to blame! If democrats lose, there are serious lessons to be learned. If democrats can't support their own president they elected, why the F do they expect others to support a fractured democratic party!

50 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Democratic candidates not supporting the president have a piss poor strategy. They make (Original Post) RKP5637 Nov 2014 OP
it depends where they are. In states where the President cali Nov 2014 #1
I dunno... I think it makes them look gutless. NT Adrahil Nov 2014 #2
but it may help them win. Isn't that worth it? cali Nov 2014 #5
Maybe.... but... Adrahil Nov 2014 #38
They should be supporting the successful poilicies rpannier Nov 2014 #14
alas, that's hard to do in some states. Successful but unpopular policies don't win elections. cali Nov 2014 #26
Agreed. Read this: CurtEastPoint Nov 2014 #3
In a state where the President is unpopular? demwing Nov 2014 #4
Grimes was an Obama delegate in 2012. How was she going to hide that fact, or why should she? B Calm Nov 2014 #8
The reality is, she didn't hide it! demwing Nov 2014 #34
demwing I would say if your opponent is running bonniebgood Nov 2014 #9
Esp if you're running for re-election rpannier Nov 2014 #15
I'd say it's your job to change the narrative demwing Nov 2014 #44
I get so sick of people who don't understand KY politics or read the fucking polls Ykcutnek Nov 2014 #40
One can support the president... But his endless war policy will have consequences. grahamhgreen Nov 2014 #6
Sorry, but that's a naive way of looking at it. badtoworse Nov 2014 #7
Obama's approval numbers are in the toilet at 40% and bonniebgood Nov 2014 #11
I could make a case for both being naive rpannier Nov 2014 #16
That's a rw talking point hammered by fox.. some perspective on President Obama's "unpopularity" Cha Nov 2014 #20
If were in a state where.. butterfly77 Nov 2014 #10
What are your choices butterfly77? Now I understand by bonniebgood Nov 2014 #12
I voted yesterday.. butterfly77 Nov 2014 #13
And sometimes it's because they get little or no support from the national party level. hobbit709 Nov 2014 #17
That's a very good point! n/t RKP5637 Nov 2014 #19
They never learned that thing about... ReRe Nov 2014 #18
Rick Weiland in South Dakota isn't getting help from the national party and he's still not running Cha Nov 2014 #21
I don't get it, for some, it just seems vogue to trash the president RKP5637 Nov 2014 #23
You know I agree with you! Cha Nov 2014 #25
It pisses me off. Vinca Nov 2014 #22
Frankly, I am getting fed up with the democratic party! More and more the democratic base, us, is RKP5637 Nov 2014 #27
And pissed on. Vinca Nov 2014 #28
Thrown under the bus, as usual! n/t RKP5637 Nov 2014 #30
The Democrats that are running away from INdemo Nov 2014 #24
I view them as a Trojan Horse! I don't even think of them as Democrats. n/t RKP5637 Nov 2014 #29
+1 AtomicKitten Nov 2014 #47
fail PowerToThePeople Nov 2014 #31
cowards and traitors heaven05 Nov 2014 #32
What is really sad is the fact INdemo Nov 2014 #41
We are fractured rtracey Nov 2014 #33
K&R! n/t RKP5637 Nov 2014 #35
Funny how the liberals and progressive are not running way Youdontwantthetruth Nov 2014 #36
If people would step outside the echo chamber every now and then, they'd understand... Ykcutnek Nov 2014 #37
The results tonight will be quite interesting, we'll see if their strategy works. All said, I RKP5637 Nov 2014 #42
I've been thinking about this, and I think the strategy is this: hedgehog Nov 2014 #39
... interesting observations/thoughts!!! n/t RKP5637 Nov 2014 #43
Unfortunately, the Democrats waited too long.. kentuck Nov 2014 #45
Quite true. In psych, it's called the primacy principle AKA poisoning the well. Once the RKP5637 Nov 2014 #46
Normally, it is best to dance with them that brung you.. kentuck Nov 2014 #48
Dems fell for the GOP propaganda that applegrove Nov 2014 #49
I hope they enjoy what they brought into power! I won't. n/t RKP5637 Nov 2014 #50
 

cali

(114,904 posts)
1. it depends where they are. In states where the President
Tue Nov 4, 2014, 06:54 AM
Nov 2014

is very unpopular, it's understandable that dems aren't linking themselves to him.

 

Adrahil

(13,340 posts)
38. Maybe.... but...
Tue Nov 4, 2014, 10:20 AM
Nov 2014

I think it hurts the brand overall.

I think we should be convincing people why our way is better, not trying to pretend we don't believe what we believe. WE should not be selling our ideas as "not quite so crazy Republican."

But I do get your point.

rpannier

(24,329 posts)
14. They should be supporting the successful poilicies
Tue Nov 4, 2014, 08:06 AM
Nov 2014

Hagan hasn't been playing up Obama in her campaign (as far as I can tell)
But she has played up the ACA

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
26. alas, that's hard to do in some states. Successful but unpopular policies don't win elections.
Tue Nov 4, 2014, 09:04 AM
Nov 2014
 

demwing

(16,916 posts)
4. In a state where the President is unpopular?
Tue Nov 4, 2014, 07:28 AM
Nov 2014

They shouldn't have to sell the accomplishments of the President. That's the White House's job. These candidates should sell themselves.

You may not like it, but that's reality.

 

B Calm

(28,762 posts)
8. Grimes was an Obama delegate in 2012. How was she going to hide that fact, or why should she?
Tue Nov 4, 2014, 07:49 AM
Nov 2014

It's time to educate the residents of Kentucky of Obama's accomplishments, not distance herself from them.

 

demwing

(16,916 posts)
34. The reality is, she didn't hide it!
Tue Nov 4, 2014, 09:59 AM
Nov 2014

her quote:

"I'm a lifelong Democrat," Grimes told the Herald-Leader. "I'm very proud of that and the values our party stands for. My support of our party and our nominee is well known."

You're buying what the MSM is selling.

bonniebgood

(940 posts)
9. demwing I would say if your opponent is running
Tue Nov 4, 2014, 07:50 AM
Nov 2014

against the President instead of you, then It IS your responsibility to sell the accomplishments of the President.

 

demwing

(16,916 posts)
44. I'd say it's your job to change the narrative
Tue Nov 4, 2014, 01:21 PM
Nov 2014

When you play their game, you play defense.

NEVER.PLAY.DEFENSE

 

Ykcutnek

(1,305 posts)
40. I get so sick of people who don't understand KY politics or read the fucking polls
Tue Nov 4, 2014, 10:21 AM
Nov 2014

pontificating about what our candidates here should or should not do to win...

Guess what? Liberal Dems support her in large numbers. It's the conservative Dems who will be voting for Mitch McConnell. Poll after poll after poll has shown this, but all one hears is that she didn't embrace POTUS enough... as if that's why she's losing in Kentucky.

The latest polls also said a majority of voters didn't give two fucks about her not answering the question of how she voted. 53% DID give two fucks about Mitch's non-answer on climate change.

Data and common sense are good treatments for Head-In-Ass Disorder.

 

badtoworse

(5,957 posts)
7. Sorry, but that's a naive way of looking at it.
Tue Nov 4, 2014, 07:43 AM
Nov 2014

In case you hadn't noticed, Obama's approval numbers are in the toilet.

bonniebgood

(940 posts)
11. Obama's approval numbers are in the toilet at 40% and
Tue Nov 4, 2014, 07:53 AM
Nov 2014

a teabag Congress approval rating is 13%. Oh I see fox tells you 13% is
larger than 40%. who's naive?

rpannier

(24,329 posts)
16. I could make a case for both being naive
Tue Nov 4, 2014, 08:08 AM
Nov 2014

13% yes
But poll them on THEIR individual congressperson and the numbers spike

Cha

(297,196 posts)
20. That's a rw talking point hammered by fox.. some perspective on President Obama's "unpopularity"
Tue Nov 4, 2014, 08:42 AM
Nov 2014
 

butterfly77

(17,609 posts)
10. If were in a state where..
Tue Nov 4, 2014, 07:50 AM
Nov 2014

the candidate was running away from the President I may not vote for that person.

hobbit709

(41,694 posts)
17. And sometimes it's because they get little or no support from the national party level.
Tue Nov 4, 2014, 08:11 AM
Nov 2014

It's a two way street.

ReRe

(10,597 posts)
18. They never learned that thing about...
Tue Nov 4, 2014, 08:24 AM
Nov 2014

... "circling the wagons" during elections. And I know at least one of them that's going to loose because of it. How unfortunate for that state and for this country.

Cha

(297,196 posts)
21. Rick Weiland in South Dakota isn't getting help from the national party and he's still not running
Tue Nov 4, 2014, 08:47 AM
Nov 2014

from the President.

There's all kinds of different scenarios.. but, I like what Letterman had to say..

"Republicans don't like the President, even the Democrats running don't want him anywhere near him....

"Gasoline is less than $3 a gallon, unemployment is under 6%, and the Stock Market is breaking records,.....

No wonder everyone's mad at him.."

fadedrose http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=5754303



RKP5637

(67,107 posts)
23. I don't get it, for some, it just seems vogue to trash the president
Tue Nov 4, 2014, 08:54 AM
Nov 2014

as a recreational sport. Obama is not a god on Mt. Olympus. He has to work through an enormous amount of BS to get anything done. Every which way he turns, there are numbers of people/organizations and powerful forces trying to trip him. No president is perfect, no president can satisfy everyone. Given the obstacles that have been thrown at him, I think he's done a damn excellent job! I also think some of the propaganda has brainwashed some of the democratic candidates!



Vinca

(50,269 posts)
22. It pisses me off.
Tue Nov 4, 2014, 08:52 AM
Nov 2014

Democrats had plenty of good things to run on re Obama this time around, but the GOP told them those things were bad so of course the Dems crumpled into a ball and profusely apologized for doing good things. I don't get it. I really don't get it. If a Republican voter has a choice between a real Republican and someone trying to act like a Republican, they'll opt for the real Republican. In the meantime, the Democratic base is - like me - pissed off.

RKP5637

(67,107 posts)
27. Frankly, I am getting fed up with the democratic party! More and more the democratic base, us, is
Tue Nov 4, 2014, 09:08 AM
Nov 2014

pissed off.

INdemo

(6,994 posts)
24. The Democrats that are running away from
Tue Nov 4, 2014, 08:56 AM
Nov 2014

Obama are not really Democrats. They are Republican lites and that would include Hillary

Check the jobs growth record, the deficit compared to when Bush left it in shambles, Osama is dead,GM is making money and Repukes cant stand those facts.

Republicans strategy was to switch the downfall of our economy in 2008 to Obama.Bush should be in jail but yet the Repukes blamed the high deficit on Obama and it worked because way back when in 2008, Democrats sat there and kept their mouths shut and allowed this to happen. So not supporting the President just didn't start in this election cycle.

 

heaven05

(18,124 posts)
32. cowards and traitors
Tue Nov 4, 2014, 09:34 AM
Nov 2014

to the POTUS, the Democratic Party and all progressive liberal democrats everywhere. COWARDS!!!!!! BLUE DOG COWARDS!! And if these types have not learned yet that they destroy unity, they never will.

INdemo

(6,994 posts)
41. What is really sad is the fact
Tue Nov 4, 2014, 10:52 AM
Nov 2014

that Democrats have bee bought. The Kochs are now the proud owners of The US Congress and have their sites on the White House.suppose we will see oil wells and fracking on the White House Lawn?

 

rtracey

(2,062 posts)
33. We are fractured
Tue Nov 4, 2014, 09:50 AM
Nov 2014

We, as Democrats are not fighting hard enough for our own causes. Health care for all, education for all, seniors, Latinos, women rights, equal pay for equal work..... I heard very little about these issues this election, only mudslinging and money laundering.... I know this will get a reaction, but I actually hope that every elected democrat that didn't support our president lose their election. Why would any democrat not support a president that took a 10% unemployment rate to just above 5%, reduced the deficit, had 40ish months of job growth, heath care ACA that IS working, saving lives and money. Ended two costly wars, and has the balls to keep our soldiers boots out of this ISIS and Ukrainian civil wars.....and countless other things that is improving our nation. We not sit on the eve of a possible Republican takeover of the congress. I see a stalemate for another 2 years, until 2016. Our jobs now....staring now is to begin new GOTV campaigns. First thing I want to call for is the replacement of Debbie Wasserman - Schultz as DNC. She was an absent chair. Next, I want to call for better candidates to run for office. Younger, progressive, liberal strong candidates that will bring our causes front and center. I want a unified party behind our presidential candidate, whomever it may be. Lets primary the best candidate for president, not just the popular choice, but the choice for our causes, for our country.

 
36. Funny how the liberals and progressive are not running way
Tue Nov 4, 2014, 10:09 AM
Nov 2014

always the non-liberal and non-progressive democrats that are running away, the ones you can never really count on and the ones that deservedly need to lose.

 

Ykcutnek

(1,305 posts)
37. If people would step outside the echo chamber every now and then, they'd understand...
Tue Nov 4, 2014, 10:14 AM
Nov 2014

The midterm electorate and Presidential year electorate are like two different countries.

The midterm electorate hates this President. The Presidential year electorate is less white, less hateful, more liberal, and consists more of folks who rarely participate in elections, but did so in large numbers for President Obama.

And everyone, including advisers to the President himself, know this and have publicly stated this.

It would be unwise for Senate candidates or the nominee to distance themselves from Obama in 2016, but in 2014, it makes perfect sense.

RKP5637

(67,107 posts)
42. The results tonight will be quite interesting, we'll see if their strategy works. All said, I
Tue Nov 4, 2014, 11:11 AM
Nov 2014

certainly hope lots of Democrats win tonight!

hedgehog

(36,286 posts)
39. I've been thinking about this, and I think the strategy is this:
Tue Nov 4, 2014, 10:21 AM
Nov 2014

People who support the President already are going to vote for the Democratic candidate, so there is no advantage to be gained there. People who are ambivalent or against the President might be won over by a candidate's personality, so that's where the campaign goes.

kentuck

(111,089 posts)
45. Unfortunately, the Democrats waited too long..
Tue Nov 4, 2014, 01:45 PM
Nov 2014

...to defend the Presidents policies. They permitted the Repubs to create a narrative about incompetence and were put on the defensive many months ago.

As for Alison Grimes, she needed independent voters, women voters, as well as the traditional Democratic voters, in order to have a chance at winning. She would have lost support by embracing President Obama in Kentucky. She did not fall for the Republican trap. No doubt she will be double-guessed if McConnell wins. But the President was very unpopular in Kentucky and if the Party had been successful at defending his record a year ago, it would have been an easier path.

RKP5637

(67,107 posts)
46. Quite true. In psych, it's called the primacy principle AKA poisoning the well. Once the
Tue Nov 4, 2014, 01:58 PM
Nov 2014

negative stuff sets in, it is very hard to turn it around. That, IMO, is what is happening with democrats, they are letting republicans set the stage while some democratic candidates run around trying to be more republican and/or not supporting the president.

The republicans have defined the message some voters are taking to the polls despite how much democrats might try to change the perception the president is bad as is the democratic party. As you say, it is now too late! And even some democrats running are indirectly telling them the party is bad too, as well as Obama by not supporting the president. IMO, It makes the democratic party look weak, ineffective and not capable of having chosen a leader they respect. To me, it's bad all the way around.

kentuck

(111,089 posts)
48. Normally, it is best to dance with them that brung you..
Tue Nov 4, 2014, 02:22 PM
Nov 2014

But there are exceptions to every rule.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Democratic candidates not...