Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

wilt the stilt

(4,528 posts)
Wed Nov 5, 2014, 05:32 PM Nov 2014

The real reason for democratic failure-Its tribal

If you notice every initiative that is on the ballot that is "democratic passes overwhelmingly".

But the reality is most white people do not want to identify with the party of n****ers,Jews,Mexicans, gays and Asians(except those hot asian women). I know the Asian part because white men will date asian women but white women won't date Asian men( the percentages are astounding).

So it comes down to tribal.

22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The real reason for democratic failure-Its tribal (Original Post) wilt the stilt Nov 2014 OP
You gotta be fucking kidding us here. Seriously? AverageJoe90 Nov 2014 #1
Absolutely serious wilt the stilt Nov 2014 #2
The Rude Pundit isn't exactly correct either, btw. AverageJoe90 Nov 2014 #4
I didn't say it was racist wilt the stilt Nov 2014 #5
Oh, hell -- You live in Georgia? whathehell Nov 2014 #13
What is an accurate estimate? JonLP24 Nov 2014 #21
Over forty percent of White Americans voted for Obama.. whathehell Nov 2014 #18
maybe for Obama wilt the stilt Nov 2014 #20
Yeah, men seem to be the problem, whathehell Nov 2014 #22
I'm going to turn your point around - I think too many in both parties assume that the Democratic hedgehog Nov 2014 #3
Wow! deaniac21 Nov 2014 #6
Think I am wrong wilt the stilt Nov 2014 #7
You might be right on the stats regarding Asians and white women/men, but the cause is "racism"? whathehell Nov 2014 #10
I'm an asian guy wilt the stilt Nov 2014 #11
Whatever..You still don't answer the whathehell Nov 2014 #12
Funny one of my white girl friends is married to an Asian. 12years now. Gay cousin partners with kelliekat44 Nov 2014 #16
Results of your Jury Service LostOne4Ever Nov 2014 #8
LOL, how much research did you have to do on the okieinpain Nov 2014 #9
Tribal? Yes. News flash: we need a bigger tribe. lumberjack_jeff Nov 2014 #14
More or less. moondust Nov 2014 #15
Hmmm...I'm white and "older" whathehell Nov 2014 #17
You do touch on a key issue JonLP24 Nov 2014 #19
 

AverageJoe90

(10,745 posts)
1. You gotta be fucking kidding us here. Seriously?
Wed Nov 5, 2014, 05:40 PM
Nov 2014

All I can say is, honestly, if things really were as horribly awful as you they say are.....well, guess what? We wouldn't even have a *white* Democratic President now(much less an African-American one!). Romney, or maybe someone worse, would have won in a landslide. The Teabaggers would have something like 70 or more in the Senate now, and not 53. I'd even go as far as to say that we might have become a full-blown police state a long time ago.....the last time a country became out and out dominated by outright hardcore racists, overt or not, there was eventually the implementation of a thoroughly planned genocide that may have killed as many as 18 million people whom that nation's ruling elite deemed "inferior". That nation was Germany under the Nazis, and that genocide was the Holocaust.

And before anyone jumps to radical conclusions here, this isn't a denial of any of the various problems we *have* had in this country. But let's get some perspective here, shall we?

 

wilt the stilt

(4,528 posts)
2. Absolutely serious
Wed Nov 5, 2014, 05:46 PM
Nov 2014

for the people who vote. Look at the percentage of white vote the democrats get. It is pretty minuscule. It is in the neighborhood of 30%. How do you explain why every democratic initiative passes yet the people who represent those views lose and yet people who are 180 degree different in those views win. read the rude pundit today.

 

AverageJoe90

(10,745 posts)
4. The Rude Pundit isn't exactly correct either, btw.
Wed Nov 5, 2014, 05:51 PM
Nov 2014

I stand by what I said 100 percent. I'll also say this.....we exaggerate the number of racists in this country at our own peril; that will be just one more thing the GOP will use against us the next time we go to the voting booth.

How do you explain why every democratic initiative passes yet the people who represent those views lose.....


The sad truth is, I'm afraid many of those further left than myself may be correct this time: we didn't run on our successes. We tried too hard to not sound the least bit radical. And, frankly, having a white male president really wouldn't have changed all that much in terms of the "mushy middle", not this year.

 

wilt the stilt

(4,528 posts)
5. I didn't say it was racist
Wed Nov 5, 2014, 06:04 PM
Nov 2014

I said it is who we identify with. There is a percentage of people who do not identify with those groups and it will always be like that. My son is handsome and he has a hell of a time getting a date in Georgia. i had a hell of a time getting a date in Georgia and ended up marrying a girl from Chicago.

My daughter is a mix and she likes kind of Mexican. She doesn't get a second look down here. she went to NY and she immediately noticed she was being looked at.
I didn't say all but it is true that many white people just don't want to be associated with the democratic party because of the groups they are identified with.

whathehell

(29,067 posts)
13. Oh, hell -- You live in Georgia?
Wed Nov 5, 2014, 07:35 PM
Nov 2014

Last edited Wed Nov 5, 2014, 09:35 PM - Edit history (1)

Not the best place for multi-cultural acceptance, I'd say, nor is it representative

of America as a whole. Please.

JonLP24

(29,322 posts)
21. What is an accurate estimate?
Wed Nov 5, 2014, 10:27 PM
Nov 2014

I live in Arizona and it isn't an estimate, there are a lot of racists & bigoted people here and it isn't just limited to white folks who have these prejudices.

I didn't even factor the racially charged rhetoric that is common in Arizona when making that statement. One of the weakest state district Obama performed was East Mesa. Same place a convienent store owner that was Sikh was killed because bigots that he was a Muslim terrorist. The legislature is a good place to find this behavior.

I'm sure this study on the racism which seems to be documented throughout Phoenix's entire city history effected present attitudes today.

whathehell

(29,067 posts)
18. Over forty percent of White Americans voted for Obama..
Wed Nov 5, 2014, 09:55 PM
Nov 2014

Not 30 percent, not even "in that neighborhood".

 

wilt the stilt

(4,528 posts)
20. maybe for Obama
Wed Nov 5, 2014, 10:10 PM
Nov 2014

but this year

White men voted Republican by 64-34 percent, the widest GOP advantage in this group in data since 1984. Seniors – 22 percent of voters – backed Republicans for the House by 57-42 percent.
per abc news
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2014/11/a-fresh-blast-of-discontent-reshapes-the-political-order/

whathehell

(29,067 posts)
22. Yeah, men seem to be the problem,
Wed Nov 5, 2014, 10:44 PM
Nov 2014

On the other hand, only 20% of millennials of all races bothered to vote at all.

I'm a white female boomer.

hedgehog

(36,286 posts)
3. I'm going to turn your point around - I think too many in both parties assume that the Democratic
Wed Nov 5, 2014, 05:47 PM
Nov 2014

Party has a lock on the groups you named. The Republicans then figure they can win by energizing the whits who are afraid of those groups. The Democrats think they can win if they can win over a small number of whites by not scaring them. People may support a party's goals, but they won't come out and vote if the party is afraid to stand up for its goals at election time.

While we're at it - I think your "tribal" needs to take into account generational demographics. The Democratic Party has the support of younger whites, it just needs to demonstrate enough of a difference to motivate people to go out and vote.

 

wilt the stilt

(4,528 posts)
7. Think I am wrong
Wed Nov 5, 2014, 06:20 PM
Nov 2014
http://www.lovelovechina.com/relations/chinese-men-white-women-white-men-chinese-women/

More interesting patterns can be discovered if we take a deeper look into statistics. One of such patterns – when it comes to Asians, and especially Chinese – is related to the gender disparity in interracial marriages. That is, the number of Chinese women marrying white men is 2 to 3 times higher than the reverse tendency (Chinese men marrying white women).

whathehell

(29,067 posts)
10. You might be right on the stats regarding Asians and white women/men, but the cause is "racism"?
Wed Nov 5, 2014, 06:54 PM
Nov 2014

What makes you draw that conclusion?

For what it's worth, I'm a white person with no "special" access to Asians, and I've personally

met THREE White women who are married Chinese men.

whathehell

(29,067 posts)
12. Whatever..You still don't answer the
Wed Nov 5, 2014, 07:30 PM
Nov 2014

Last edited Wed Nov 5, 2014, 10:08 PM - Edit history (1)

question of why you think those stats prove "racism" as the cause

for the statistical disparity.

Why, for instance, would white women be more "racist" than white men? ..If membership in the democratic party

is any indicator, while women are less so.

 

kelliekat44

(7,759 posts)
16. Funny one of my white girl friends is married to an Asian. 12years now. Gay cousin partners with
Wed Nov 5, 2014, 08:25 PM
Nov 2014

Asian.

LostOne4Ever

(9,288 posts)
8. Results of your Jury Service
Wed Nov 5, 2014, 06:46 PM
Nov 2014

[div class="excerpt" style="margin-left:1em; border:1px solid #bfbfbf; border-radius:0.4615em; box-shadow:3px 3px 3px #999999;"]On Wed Nov 5, 2014, 04:35 PM an alert was sent on the following post:

The real reason for democratic failure-Its tribal
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025770496

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

This post is the very definition of over the top. From the use of the "N" word (obviously, letters were substituted with *, but I would offer that that is acceptable when quoting hate speech ... not using it as part of your statement. If the poster believes his statements to be true perhaps he could have been less offensive about it. DU is one group (we are white, black, male, female, trans-gender, we are Asian, gay, rich poor ... it is NOT being "too PC" if we try not to use language that hurts members of the DU community


You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Wed Nov 5, 2014, 04:42 PM, and the Jury voted 3-4 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: It seems to me that the poster is essentially quoting hate speech, rather than advancing a racist position.
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Poster complains about white people being racist and then uses a load of racist bilge to make his point.
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: The issue, in my opinion, is that, in he's claiming that "most white people" are racists he's being racist himself.

Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I don't agree...it's borderline hide, but I'll leave.
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I don't think the poster is trying to be offensive, but rather he/she is trying to use the words our opponents use to get a point across. Further, the fact that he censored the word with *'s shows that he is trying to be sensitive to the groups being denigrated by conservative bigots.
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: He is making a point, I do not believe he has these views.

Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.

[font style="font-family:papyrus,'Brush Script MT','comic sans MS',fantasy;" size=3 color=teal] Thought you should know.[/font]

 

lumberjack_jeff

(33,224 posts)
14. Tribal? Yes. News flash: we need a bigger tribe.
Wed Nov 5, 2014, 07:36 PM
Nov 2014

We don't have the luxury of purity tests.

on edit: in politics, tribal doesn't necessarily mean racial, and I agree with what was said upthread; blaming every failure on racism among the electorate is both lazy and self-destructive.

moondust

(19,981 posts)
15. More or less.
Wed Nov 5, 2014, 08:18 PM
Nov 2014

"Older white voters flock to polls aiming to reinstate white power and privilege at all levels of government."

whathehell

(29,067 posts)
17. Hmmm...I'm white and "older"
Wed Nov 5, 2014, 09:49 PM
Nov 2014

Will be 65 at the end of this month -- a boomer -- and definitely do NOT fit that bill.

Maybe you should look at the millennials of all races since only 20% of them even bothered to

get off their butts to vote.

JonLP24

(29,322 posts)
19. You do touch on a key issue
Wed Nov 5, 2014, 09:56 PM
Nov 2014

In elections where old white men pour big money into old white men candidates voted in by old white men people wonder why other demographics have less desire to participate. Especially when it is all a big show with the same acts over and over.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The real reason for democ...