Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Liberal_in_LA

(44,397 posts)
Tue Nov 11, 2014, 06:34 PM Nov 2014

inspired by Occupy camps, Oregon allows bare bones permitless shed village for homeless,



Http://www.citylab.com/housing/2014/11/eugene-oregons-radical-solution-to-homelessness-a-bare-bones-shed-village/381970/

Http://www.citylab.com/housing/2014/11/eugene-oregons-radical-solution-to-homelessness-a-bare-bones-shed-village/381970/




Bathroom building



The city agreed to donate an acre plot of land to the project and gave them a year lease as a pilot project. Heben and the other organizers raised $100,000 in cash donations and about another $100,000 worth of donated materials to build the village, which would ultimately provide shelter for 42 previously unhoused people. (By contrast, the median value of a single family home in Eugene is $250,000.)

Heben's idea to help Eugene's homeless was to move from a model of scattered and temporary "tent cities" to a consolidated village of "tiny homes.

They built small wooden sleeping units measuring either 8-by-8 feet or 8-by-10 feet. (Heben eventually replicated plans for some of the units and formed a company called Backyard Bungalows to supply them to others interested in the designs. However, his village designs predate the company, and neither he nor the company made any profit from the Opportunity Village project.) They also put up several smaller, domed shelters called conestoga huts, designed by Michael Carrigan, a community organizer and Opportunity Village board member. Kitchen and bathroom facilities for everyone are located in communal buildings.

None of the shelters fit the city code’s definition of a dwelling or residence, so, while a building official did inspect them for safety, the units were given an exemption from official building code restrictions.

“If you get the right people supporting a project, they can find a way to do it if they want to,” Heben says. Wisth, who was the city’s lead staff person working with Opportunity Village, says the mandate from city council led him and other city staffers to make it happen. “We interpreted the building codes in terms of what applied to the project. It was like finding the roundest square peg to fit in an octagonal hole,” he says.

Today, Opportunity Village features brightly painted shelters, garden boxes, a communal yurt with public computers, weekly village meetings, and a seven-member council working continually to improve the quality of life of the village’s residents. It would be wrong to glorify the place as as a permanent way out of homelessness for the people living there, but the community is something special in its own right.
22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
inspired by Occupy camps, Oregon allows bare bones permitless shed village for homeless, (Original Post) Liberal_in_LA Nov 2014 OP
Eugene got the idea from Portland's Dignity Village 99th_Monkey Nov 2014 #1
I'm thinking of taking my hipster azmom Nov 2014 #2
She'll love it... Bryce Butler Nov 2014 #7
She's in the east coast right now. azmom Nov 2014 #18
I love what they are doing d_r Nov 2014 #3
big structure required permits and plannind and council meetings. this was quick Liberal_in_LA Nov 2014 #20
I love this village project and here is their own website with much information and future plans Bluenorthwest Nov 2014 #4
This is right in my neighborhood central scrutinizer Nov 2014 #5
u r lucky Liberal_in_LA Nov 2014 #19
I was curious how they finished off the 2 rounded roofs in 1st photo ErikJ Nov 2014 #6
Looks like the wire supports plastic sheeting.n/t A Simple Game Nov 2014 #8
Some can't live in something that small.. panader0 Nov 2014 #9
1900 sq. ft.? My parents' house is smaller than that, and we're far from poor. n/t nomorenomore08 Nov 2014 #12
i feel spoiled because my house is 1100 square feet and it's just me. then again... the music dionysus Nov 2014 #15
Very cool. nt Live and Learn Nov 2014 #10
I work with the homeless as a volunteer quaker bill Nov 2014 #11
+1 nomorenomore08 Nov 2014 #13
right on point reddread Nov 2014 #21
While basically no one builds them anymore quaker bill Nov 2014 #22
as a last resort for the poorest among us, that's excellent. dionysus Nov 2014 #14
on the one hand, i think it's cool, on the other.. i built a shed that large to put my lawn mower dionysus Nov 2014 #16
Meanwhile in Florida.... Takket Nov 2014 #17
 

99th_Monkey

(19,326 posts)
1. Eugene got the idea from Portland's Dignity Village
Tue Nov 11, 2014, 06:51 PM
Nov 2014

along with a fair amount of technical assistance and moral support. It was
about 14 years ago, I served as one of DV's founding supporters and was
eventually hired to assist with their incorporation as a 501c3.

It was seriously one of the most awesome "jobs" I have ever had. The
concept is very simple, just let homeless people have a little public land
to organize themselves into a caring community, with minimal shelter
and code requirements. It's amazing what the previously homeless people
come up with, as they have had to be very resourceful living on the street.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dignity_Village







azmom

(5,208 posts)
2. I'm thinking of taking my hipster
Tue Nov 11, 2014, 06:58 PM
Nov 2014

Daughter to Portland during her winter break. I bet she would love it there. There doing some cool things there.

d_r

(6,907 posts)
3. I love what they are doing
Tue Nov 11, 2014, 07:17 PM
Nov 2014

And I don't want to downplay it anyway.

I was just thinking , and I am not criticizing, just thinking. Would it be better for heating costs to have one big structure with individual spaces in it than to have separate little shacks? It doesn't get that cold on eugene but it does get cold. Anyway I love what they are doing.

 

ErikJ

(6,335 posts)
6. I was curious how they finished off the 2 rounded roofs in 1st photo
Tue Nov 11, 2014, 08:35 PM
Nov 2014

but they didnt show thwem completed. Whats the wire for I wonder?

dionysus

(26,467 posts)
15. i feel spoiled because my house is 1100 square feet and it's just me. then again... the music
Tue Nov 11, 2014, 10:31 PM
Nov 2014

equipment takes up a lot of space

quaker bill

(8,225 posts)
11. I work with the homeless as a volunteer
Tue Nov 11, 2014, 10:12 PM
Nov 2014

So I get how much an improvement this is over arresting folks for sleeping on park benches and under underpasses.

What is interesting to me is that this looks all together like a step up to get to third world standards, or just a bit better. Don't get me wrong, I am a fan because what passes for normal now is so much worse.

I think my concern is for how far up the economic scale does this move over time. Many of the working poor are just a slice of a paycheck from homelessness right now.

It is clear that the entire economic model needs rethinking. I do like the community based nature of this sort of project.

 

reddread

(6,896 posts)
21. right on point
Wed Nov 12, 2014, 06:08 PM
Nov 2014

the underlying issue of what standard of living the poor should suffer, and the wealthy/and government permit.
These small sheds and a stable environment/address are much preferable to life on the streets.
one school of thought detests the minimal doghouse approach, another sees the security of acceptance.
most if not all see the manufactured mortgage crisis, and the foreclosure epidemic.
the causes of homelessness are legion. the economy isnt helping, and the government appears to be doing
nothing to improve prospects for the POOR MAJORITY.

Right about here we either cease using the word equality and democracy, or we start to apply them.

quaker bill

(8,225 posts)
22. While basically no one builds them anymore
Wed Nov 12, 2014, 09:54 PM
Nov 2014

small and tight free standing homes were once common. They were once so common that when I look in a place developed between the 1920s to say 1950, I have my pick of small efficient designs. A bit after that, things started going big and then bigger.

The go big and fancy, or sleep on a park bench model needs to end.

The difficulty here is that there is so little money to be made selling stuff to poor folks, the market incentive is to sell big and fancy stuff with impossible mortgages and "creative financing".

A very different idea is needed.

dionysus

(26,467 posts)
16. on the one hand, i think it's cool, on the other.. i built a shed that large to put my lawn mower
Tue Nov 11, 2014, 10:35 PM
Nov 2014

and bike in.

to keep poor folks from the elements.. YES... but god damn...

we're better than this folks... we're the richest nation on earth and these poor people can't get suitable housing

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»inspired by Occupy camps,...