Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Free Market just vetoed Keystone XL---Economics no longer make Keystone pipeline viable
Economics no longer make Keystone pipeline viableWhat if they voted for a pipeline but nobody came? As Congress rushes to approve the long-delayed Keystone XL pipeline, it is questionable whether or not the project will make as much of a difference as proponents expect. Since June, crude oil has declined by 28 percent, pushing the price that oil from new wells in Canada may command below what the expected cost will be to produce it. The so-called "heavy oil" extracted from sand in Alberta, which the proposed pipeline would carry to Nebraska, en route to refineries on the Gulf Coast, will cost between $85 and $110 to produce, depending on which drilling technology is used, according to a report in July by the Canadian Energy Research Institute, a nonprofit whose work is often cited by Keystone proponents. West Texas Intermediate crude oil traded today at $76.67. "Anything not under construction is at risk of being delayed or canceled altogether," said Dinara Millington, vice president for research at Calgary-based CERI. Her cost estimates include the price of drilling new wells, meaning that existing wells that have already been paid for can continue to pump oil profitably, she said. CERI' s analysis squares with the views of other experts, who have pointed to low prices as a sign that economic facts, at least for now, don't match political rhetoric coming from Washington, where Keystone has been a goal for both Republicans and for Senate Democrats from oil-producing states.
MORE:
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/economics-no-longer-makes-keystone-153213747.htmlgsand
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/11/13/1344639/-The-Free-Market-just-vetoed-Keysonte-XL
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
9 replies, 1429 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (20)
ReplyReply to this post
9 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Free Market just vetoed Keystone XL---Economics no longer make Keystone pipeline viable (Original Post)
kpete
Nov 2014
OP
BREAKING: Pres. Obama's Press Secretary says he will veto any legislation to force approval of
pampango
Nov 2014
#2
If we put the oil subsidie money and 1/5 of the defence budget into Renewable Energy
Half-Century Man
Nov 2014
#3
Key phrase: "at least for now". The long-term trend is probably for higher prices.
Jim Lane
Nov 2014
#9
notrightatall
(410 posts)1. Well that is good, sadly, POTUS will not.
Cha
(297,196 posts)5. Oh is that so? Try to keep up.
pampango
(24,692 posts)2. BREAKING: Pres. Obama's Press Secretary says he will veto any legislation to force approval of
Keystone XL
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025813509
Half-Century Man
(5,279 posts)3. If we put the oil subsidie money and 1/5 of the defence budget into Renewable Energy
How long till fossil fuel use ends?
Wars for oil make no sense then. The first moot point war?
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)4. Well, that's interesting.
Could this be the real reason for the ostentatious veto threat?
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)6. Kick.
Earth_First
(14,910 posts)7. Gotta look TOUGH!
"GRRR!"
Andy823
(11,495 posts)8. You never stop, do you
Always the cynic.
Jim Lane
(11,175 posts)9. Key phrase: "at least for now". The long-term trend is probably for higher prices.
Other sources of oil can't keep producing at their current rates forever (the "Peak Oil" phenomenon). Furthermore, rising population will put upward pressure on consumption. Consumption per capita may be more of a mixed bag, but there will be upward pressures as well as downward.
Overall, I'd see a good chance that, within a few years, the price of oil will be back up at a level that would make Keystone profitabl.