Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RiverLover

(7,830 posts)
Mon Nov 17, 2014, 09:33 AM Nov 2014

Op-ed: Harry Reid plays Elizabeth Warren like a chump

Battenfeld: Harry Reid plays Elizabeth Warren like a chump
11/17/2014

..."Taking Reid’s offer is a risky move for the freshman senator’s future. If Democrats lose big again in two years, she will get part of the blame. After all, she is the “strategic policy adviser for the Democratic Policy and Communications Committee.”

This “job” is beneath Warren’s standing.

...Warren excels at being the outsider, railing against big banks, Wall Street fat cats and Washington lobbyists who have “rigged” the game against ordinary people. It’s a great, simplistic message that is resonating out there among a lot of voters, and not just in liberal Massachusetts.

But the populist hell-raiser fighting for the “hammered” middle class got snookered by Reid. Now that the Cambridge Democrat’s been co-opted by the ultimate Beltway blowhard, it’s going to make it difficult for her to be too tough on the party or the Obama administration.

Guess who is totally fine with being tough on Congress and the Obama administration now? Hillary Clinton. She’s happy to be far removed from her old Senate pals. Reid only brought in Warren to appease discontented liberals. But giving her a sketchy post just shows that the soon-to-be minority party still doesn’t get it.

Senate Democrats suffered an embarrassing shellacking, and what do the remaining Senate Democrats do? Re-elect Reid and the rest of his leaders."

https://www.bostonherald.com/news_opinion/columnists/joe_battenfeld/2014/11/battenfeld_harry_reid_plays_elizabeth_warren_like_a


Well, I thought they were setting her up to run for president with that move. This opinion piece has me re-thinking things. Its fairly depressing. To me. Anyone have insights on this?
24 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Op-ed: Harry Reid plays Elizabeth Warren like a chump (Original Post) RiverLover Nov 2014 OP
This is just one person's opinion Proud Liberal Dem Nov 2014 #1
Exactly. If Reid doesn't give her a position: Outrage! If he gives her a position: Outrage! FSogol Nov 2014 #3
Your post assumes she gets credit in a future where she is not running TheNutcracker Nov 2014 #12
True. ~nt RiverLover Nov 2014 #4
Exactly--and from the Boston Herald at that! riversedge Nov 2014 #13
Heraldz gonna Herald BeyondGeography Nov 2014 #2
The Herald is a crazy right-wing paper, and the column represents all MannyGoldstein Nov 2014 #5
I saw their slant when I read "the ultimate Beltway blowhard" panader0 Nov 2014 #7
Nice post. Feeling better now! :-) RiverLover Nov 2014 #9
Free speech costs nothing aspirant Nov 2014 #15
ROFL: I wonder if this shithead could cram more GOP approved words into a column alcibiades_mystery Nov 2014 #6
It's baloney, and she's not running for president! Lil Missy Nov 2014 #8
http://www.elizabethwarrenforpresident.com/ RiverLover Nov 2014 #10
She said she would NEVER run for Senate either. Just saying. jillan Nov 2014 #23
I felt they were setting her up to marginalize her in any future aspirations. TheNutcracker Nov 2014 #11
ha ha. No one plays Warren--not even ol Harry. What a joke riversedge Nov 2014 #14
Expect the negativity fredamae Nov 2014 #16
Extremely good points!! Terrific post. ~nt RiverLover Nov 2014 #17
Harry Reid? Clearly Elizabeth Warren is too ignorant to know what she's doing. randome Nov 2014 #18
It's Joe Battenfeld sharp_stick Nov 2014 #19
exactly..Battenfeld isn't worried about Elizabeth Warren KinMd Nov 2014 #24
Well, that might be true if it were anyone other than Le Taz Hot Nov 2014 #20
Sound like 'Things a Republic0n that just stole another election would say'. Stellar Nov 2014 #21
Ummm - I seriously doubt that Warren will be played by anyone. And if these rw wackos want to jillan Nov 2014 #22

FSogol

(45,512 posts)
3. Exactly. If Reid doesn't give her a position: Outrage! If he gives her a position: Outrage!
Mon Nov 17, 2014, 09:38 AM
Nov 2014


The author assumes the Democrats will lose and that Warren will not do a good job in her post.

 

TheNutcracker

(2,104 posts)
12. Your post assumes she gets credit in a future where she is not running
Mon Nov 17, 2014, 09:53 AM
Nov 2014

If this is it for her, as far as 2016, then i'ts Bernie Sanders all the way.

 

MannyGoldstein

(34,589 posts)
5. The Herald is a crazy right-wing paper, and the column represents all
Mon Nov 17, 2014, 09:41 AM
Nov 2014

that is wrong with America today.

Everyone's so worried about not screwing up. A position like this gives her the opportunity to take a hit, but it also gives her an opportunity to do great things.

I think she's demonstrated that she's capable of great things.

aspirant

(3,533 posts)
15. Free speech costs nothing
Mon Nov 17, 2014, 10:05 AM
Nov 2014

Would these great things be replacing Schumer and Durbin on the talk shows and being able to speak freely?

 

alcibiades_mystery

(36,437 posts)
6. ROFL: I wonder if this shithead could cram more GOP approved words into a column
Mon Nov 17, 2014, 09:41 AM
Nov 2014

The fact that a GOP flack like Joe Battenfeld is mad about this to the point of petulant snark means it was the right move all around.



fredamae

(4,458 posts)
16. Expect the negativity
Mon Nov 17, 2014, 10:20 AM
Nov 2014

they'll do whatever it takes to diminish the "Warren Effect"...to make us doubt not just this particular move, but Warren herself.
They first must "softly destroy" Warren lest it raise any alarm. It begins subtlety, then the volume is slowly turned up.

It is my belief: They know our psyche's well. We've been studied for decades. They understand our "buttons".

The good news for me: I doubt Warren will tolerate that. The question is, will "we" collectively stand solidly behind her (and other progs) no matter What "they" throw at us? Because remember Money Screams and Intimidates and then Wins.

WE must learn to Recognize, Isolate and Ignore the influence of Money from All angles! We can recognize, ignore and rebut their spoken BS-Why the hell can't we get the rest of it down?
I never watched or read a single piece of propaganda these last 4 elections.
Educate. Educate. Educate.
Not everyone has the time and even the means to stay current. Those who do understand, need to help those who don't/can't, understand whats going on, imo.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
18. Harry Reid? Clearly Elizabeth Warren is too ignorant to know what she's doing.
Mon Nov 17, 2014, 10:30 AM
Nov 2014

Don't let this psy-op 'editorial' take up any more of your time.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]TECT in the name of the Representative approves of this post.[/center][/font][hr]

sharp_stick

(14,400 posts)
19. It's Joe Battenfeld
Mon Nov 17, 2014, 10:38 AM
Nov 2014

and the Boston Herald. As a rule of thumb you'll do well to avoid taking anything from either source seriously.

Le Taz Hot

(22,271 posts)
20. Well, that might be true if it were anyone other than
Mon Nov 17, 2014, 10:53 AM
Nov 2014

Elizabeth Warren who has more brain power than all the Senators put together.

Stellar

(5,644 posts)
21. Sound like 'Things a Republic0n that just stole another election would say'.
Mon Nov 17, 2014, 11:03 AM
Nov 2014
Guess who is totally fine with being tough on Congress and the Obama administration now? Hillary Clinton. She’s happy to be far removed from her old Senate pals. Reid only brought in Warren to appease discontented liberals. But giving her a sketchy post just shows that the soon-to-be minority party still doesn’t get it.

Senate Democrats suffered an embarrassing shellacking, and what do the remaining Senate Democrats do? Re-elect Reid and the rest of his leaders."


When Republic0ns lost to the Democrats and took a shellacking in the Presidential race in 2012 what changed...nothing. They just made sure they got the Supreme Court on their side to steal the next election.

Now they are just moving right along as if they didn't steal this election, and think Democrats should bow down to them and get rid of Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi and everybody else that they didn't like in the first place. A couple of the two main Democrats that Baggers hate in the first place.

And, if Hillary Clinton trys to buy into that b.s. - she really is a lost soul, and she may as well NOT run for President.

jillan

(39,451 posts)
22. Ummm - I seriously doubt that Warren will be played by anyone. And if these rw wackos want to
Mon Nov 17, 2014, 12:09 PM
Nov 2014

think that she will - let them.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Op-ed: Harry Reid plays E...