Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPlants still offer best way to remove CO2 from atmosphere, says UAF scientist
I recently wrote about a thought experiment proposed by Fairbanks scientist Jim Beget. He suggests raining down crystals of a compound that captures carbon dioxide onto a frigid plateau in Antarctica. There, the greenhouse gas might remain locked for a few hundred thousand years.
Beget will present his idea at the fall meeting of the American Geophysical Union in San Francisco next month. Alarming levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere are a frequent topic of discussion at the meeting, which will pull more than 20,000 scientists to California.
Dan Mann will also attend that meeting. Though the UAF geographer's presentation in San Francisco has nothing to do with carbon dioxide, he, too, has an idea how to remove some from the blanket of gases that surround our planet.
Mann suggests enhancing a carbon-dioxide removal system that has worked for a few billion years the silent breath of plants.
http://www.adn.com/article/20141116/plants-still-offer-best-way-remove-co2-atmosphere-says-uaf-scientist
Since Global Climate change is a much bigger threat than ISIS, not to mention the daily threat to millions of Americans who are homeless, more homeless school children than ever...
Instead of spending $25 Billion per year bombing ISIS in Iraq (and I am sure it is more than that)...
Why don't we create jobs in America, planting things?
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 1100 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (8)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Plants still offer best way to remove CO2 from atmosphere, says UAF scientist (Original Post)
J_J_
Nov 2014
OP
I have already read articles up on forums in the UK, where it is detailed that
truedelphi
Nov 2014
#3
DustyJoe
(849 posts)1. Circular Firing Squad
After you 'remove CO2 from atmosphere', then the plants die.
Orsino
(37,428 posts)2. Hope the plants hurry up and get themselves some lobbyists. n/t
truedelphi
(32,324 posts)3. I have already read articles up on forums in the UK, where it is detailed that
These big metal structures with certain properties do better at removing carbon dioxide from the natural cycle than trees do.
It made me realize that for a profit, the compnay that makes these structures is going to go after trees.
And who knows if the "scientific study" that "proves" the structures remove carbon dioxide really is a legit study. In the new world of Corporate Science, we all know that if you give a person enough money then they can prove almost anything "scientifically."