Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
Mon Nov 17, 2014, 03:57 PM Nov 2014

Undercover Supreme Court Police Deployed Outside Courthouse to Spy on Protests

By: Kevin Gosztola
FireDogLake, Monday November 17, 2014 10:18 am

When J. Edgar Hoover was FBI director, he wanted agents to enhance people’s paranoia and make them feel like there was an agent behind every mailbox. His agents were particularly targeting dissent. Now, these days, the use of undercover agents in criminal investigations or general operations has grown to such a degree that a citizen may feel like there is a federal agent behind every action.

According to a report from the New York Times based off information from officials, former agents and documents, there are forty different agencies granting their employees the authority to impersonate people. That is stunning in and of itself, because it is not only the FBI conducting undercover operations anymore. But what truly stands out is the fact that some of these operations are targeting protests at the United States Supreme Court.

William Arkin and Eric Lichtblau describe, “At the Supreme Court, small teams of undercover officers dress as students at large demonstrations outside the courthouse and join the protests to look for suspicious activity.”

SNIP...

In a rare protest in February, Kai Newkirk interrupted oral argument in the Supreme Court and shouted, “Money is not speech,” “Corporations are not people,” and “Overturn Citizens United.” He was protesting the courts Citizen United decision that made it possible for huge amounts of money to be used by corporations or special interest groups to influence the outcome of federal elections.

SNIP...

Which means it is impossible to truly know how often the Supreme Court may have targeted individuals, including students, to suppress protest. It is equally impossible to know if agents are being deployed in a content-neutral manner, meaning anti-abortion protests garner same amount of attention from officers as money in elections. However, given the institutional attitude of the highest ranking court in the judicial branch, a fear that undercover Supreme Court police are snooping on First Amendment activity with virtually no oversight is certainly valid.

CONTINUED...

http://dissenter.firedoglake.com/2014/11/17/undercover-supreme-court-police-deployed-outside-courthouse-to-spy-on-protests/

Can you imagine Scalia as head of the Secret Police? Well, the situation looks a whole lot worse than that.

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Undercover Supreme Court Police Deployed Outside Courthouse to Spy on Protests (Original Post) Octafish Nov 2014 OP
Reminds me of something else SCOTUS was involved in a few years ago. lpbk2713 Nov 2014 #1
Something undemocratic in the way things turned out after that, too. Octafish Nov 2014 #3
What is "suspicious activity?" The Blue Flower Nov 2014 #2
Any one who wonders out loud "WTF is wrong with this picture?" Octafish Nov 2014 #4
Showing leadership capabilities. Luminous Animal Nov 2014 #5

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
3. Something undemocratic in the way things turned out after that, too.
Mon Nov 17, 2014, 08:54 PM
Nov 2014

ENRON Energy Policy. 9-11 Warnings Ignored. USA PATRIOT Act. NSA Surveillance of America. Invade Afghanistan. Invade Iraq. Paperless Selection 2004. Katrina. Bankster Bailout. One Click from Turnkey Tyranny.

Miami 'Riot' Squad: Where Are They Now?

The Blue Flower

(5,442 posts)
2. What is "suspicious activity?"
Mon Nov 17, 2014, 04:30 PM
Nov 2014

I'd be interested in knowing the definition of what constitutes suspicious activity in a lawful protest.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
4. Any one who wonders out loud "WTF is wrong with this picture?"
Mon Nov 17, 2014, 08:55 PM
Nov 2014


ETA: John Roberts appoints nothing but pukes to the FISA court, charged with all manner of perversions of the Bill of Rights in the name of national security.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Undercover Supreme Court ...