General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHopeful "Democratic" Presidential Candidate Jim Webb Sucks on Climate Change
11/21/14
As Bloombergs Dave Weigel observes, It probably says something about Webbs dark horse statusor about the priorities of the mediathat Webb2016.com was registered on Oct. 20 and nobody really noticed.
...Webb cannot be easily dismissed, though. The white male elite of the Democratic Party is always on the lookout for a candidate with machismo, a military background, or a Southern home state to help them win back the elusive working-class white voters. Gruff, gun-toting Webb has all three. He was talked up in the Beltway media as a possible 2008 running mate for Obama or Hillary Clinton. He excited the liberal blogosphere with his unusually strong official Democratic response to the State of the Union in 2007. Webbs chances of beating Clinton for the Democratic nomination are slim, but he could be a top-tier contender if she didnt run or be on the vice-presidential shortlist.
So its a problem that Webb sucks on climate change. The next president has to be a climate hawk. Were rapidly running out of time to stave off the worst effects of warming. And, with Republicans in control of the House of Representatives until at least 2022 thanks to gerrymandering, federal progress on emissions reductions will only happen through executive action.
When he served in the Senate, Webb was a climate curmudgeon, as Kate Sheppard put it in Mother Jones. A moderate, coal-state Democrat Webb has emerged as a major pain in the ass for Democratic leaders on climate issues. In 2008, when public concern for climate change was at a high point, Webb told Politico that he didnt think reducing emissions was a priority. We need to be able to address a national energy strategy and then try to work on environmental efficiencies as part of that plan, Webb said. We cant just start with things like emission standards at a time when were at a crisis with the entire national energy policy.
Instead of wind and solar, Webb advocates for nukes and the chimera of clean coal.
http://grist.org/politics/jim-webb-sucks-on-climate-change/
Go away, Jim Webb. Just go.
loyalsister
(13,390 posts)we are going to need Bernie Sanders to participate in the presidential debates!
RiverLover
(7,830 posts)He can't win. In a perfect world, he would. But he will change the narrative & get candidates to wake up to what needs to be done to straighten things out here in the US.
loyalsister
(13,390 posts)He can't win. I have historically resented candidates who don't have any chance of winning. But, I think he can accomplish a lot in driving the dialogue in the direction we need to go.
The thing about Sanders that I like is his arguments are practical and he backs them up with hard data.
His positions are based on numbers and morality, but he does not allow his subjective inclinations to cloud the facts when he makes his case.
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)Skeowes28
(62 posts)I would vite for him in a second to conservative supreme cr justices
RiverLover
(7,830 posts)Jim Lane
(11,175 posts)Webb has very very little chance of being the nominee, but if he is, I expect I'll hold my nose and vote for him.
Autumn
(45,120 posts)I agree go away Jim.
woolldog
(8,791 posts)I hope no one here is thinking about supporting his primary bid. He's not a real democrat.
SoCalDem
(103,856 posts)MisterP
(23,730 posts)Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)Or, maybe run him as her "liberal" VP candidate.