General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsZimmerman - embedded digital info in photo shows it taken 3 minutes after shots recorded in 911 call
and the GPS information embedded in the photo shows it was taken at the scene of the crime. The photo was taken with an iPhone.
The next shoe to drop will be gunpowder tests on Trayvon's clothing. If there are burn marks and gunpowder residue, Zimmerman will walk IMO.
Go to the 1:30 mark on the video...
http://gma.yahoo.com/warning-graphic-photo-possible-evidence-shows-george-zimmermans-050145810--abc-news-topstories.html
hobbit709
(41,694 posts)True Earthling
(832 posts)an was lucky enough to pick the exact location of the crime?
Your logic is flawed.
hobbit709
(41,694 posts)It's not that hard to do.
and that picture show a different color shirt, it doesn't really look like his head-no way of telling, etc. and where's the grass stains claimed earlier.
So far I've heard about 15 different stories and any half-assed investigator will tell you if the alibi changes every 5 minutes, somebody's lying.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)may have felt he was fighting for his life, and failed to save himself and that he was correct in his assessment that he was in mortal danger. Are you suggesting that when someone is being followed as he told his girlfriend, by a total stranger, who by then he may have realized was carrying a gun, (we do not know if Zimmerman let him know he had a gun, do we?) that person does not have a right to try to defend themselves?
Did Zimmerman eg, tell him that he was with Neighborhood watch and was just wondering if he had a reason to be there? Or did he, as it appears, seem to be threatening to Trayvon?
Charges have been filed after an investigation, I would think the Prosecutor had reasons to file those charges.
Too bad Trayvon only scratched Zimmerman, had he managed to totally disable him, which he had a right to do, he would be alive today.
GoCubsGo
(32,099 posts)It can still be photoshopped without altering the time stamp and GPS information.
Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)Yeah, it could be 'shopped...but that's not really the most likely explanation. There's no Photoshop-style app for the iPhone with enough sophistication to produce that shot, and reloading a 'shopped pic back onto the phone while still preserving the GPS and timestamp data would require a fairly sophisticated hack. Possible? Probably. The most likely explanation? Nope.
In any case, the photo doesn't exonerate Zimmerman. He's still responsible for the altercation. If he hadn't profiled and stalked Martin, and if he'd listened to the advice of the dispatcher, none of this would have happened. It was Zimmerman's actions that may have made Martin sufficiently afraid for his well-being (a completely justified fear, as it turned out) that he decided he had no choice but to fight.
GoCubsGo
(32,099 posts)...that this photo pops up on the day of his bond hearing, and that it doesn't look like the rest of the surveillance photos. But, yes, I agree wholeheartedly with your last paragraph.
(1) firstly, he did not stalk Martin. Stalking is a repeated act. This was a once-off following.
(2) If Martin hit first would that make him the aggressor?
(3) If his head was being pounded into concrete, Zimmerman could be in reasonable fear of grievous harm. If he was under Martin, he could have no path to retreat. All these are elements of self-defense.
Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)(1) firstly, he did not stalk Martin. Stalking is a repeated act. This was a once-off following.
The term "stalking" has multiple definitions. I was using the one associated with pursuing a quarry.
(2) If Martin hit first would that make him the aggressor?
In my estimation, probably not...but it depends very much on the exact circumstances of the confrontation. We don't have all of those details. But there are several plausible possibilities within which I think it would have been reasonable for Martin to have struck first.
(3) If his head was being pounded into concrete, Zimmerman could be in reasonable fear of grievous harm. If he was under Martin, he could have no path to retreat. All these are elements of self-defense.
I concur. In that circumstance, Zimmerman's resort to deadly force would have at least partially exculpatory justification. Not, IMO, enough to fully exonerate him, since the entire altercation was his doing, but possibly enough to downgrade the severity of the charge.
bigapple
(99 posts)looks like there was an altercation after all.
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)Assuming of course this shit is even real
bigapple
(99 posts)that Zimmerman's head was being pounded into concrete. Which could put him in fear of grievous harm.
butterfly77
(17,609 posts)pounded in the concrete he needed his ass kicked for stalking Trayvon he should have stayed in his truck,van or whatever it was.
An unarmed person was protecting himself against a gun wielding nut..
firstly he wasn't stalking Martin. He was following Martin.
Secondly I don't think you can hit someone for following you.
Thirdly there's no evidence that Zimmerman drew the gun until the altercation.
butterfly77
(17,609 posts)but you can hit someone for attacking you which Zimmerman did he should have kept his ass in his truck. He attacked an unarmed person who was protecting himself.
The only evidence we are getting is the made up evidence by the police and the press who believe he is innocent no matter what and are doing their damndest to make it look like the person who was murdered was wrong to protect himself and stand his ground..
I made a promise to myself not to make anymore posts regarding this case, but your posts leave me no choice. As a prior poster said stalking takes on many definitions. It is in the public record that Zimmerman called 911 over 46 times to report suspicious people in the neighborhood, Anybody he didn't know he followed. Not a single call resulted in an arrest. Zimmerman was "stalking" young men in the neighborhood that he didn't know. On the night in question he was clearly agitated when he spoke to the 911 operator because he felt and this is Zimmerman's own words "they always get away', so he took matters into his own hands. My question is this why did he take his weapon with him when he exited the car and started to follow Martin. Martin was not a threat to Zimmerman at that time and he was not looking in peoples windows or walking on their lawns. He was on an established walkway that led to home of his father's girlfriend. I don't give a rats ass about the CWP that he had. Zimmerman went looking for a confrontation and he got one. Do you think for a moment that if Zimmerman did not have that 9mm in his possession that he would have confronted Martin, guns just like alcohol give some people a false sense of bravado. The bottom line is this an unarmed 17 year old boy was confronted by an armed 28 year old man and the unarmed boy is dead. Did you ever think for a moment that treyvon Martin was scared for his life and made a decision to defend himself but because he is dead we will never know his story. However we have apologists like you who are only concerned about upholding gun owner's rights and will do what ever they can to paint the victim as a horrible person who deserved to die.
EOTE
(13,409 posts)Yes, he WAS stalking him. Are you really so daft as to not understand that some words have multiple definitions? You've been corrected on this multiple times and you still don't get it. He was stalking him and continued to do so after he was told not to. If he hadn't so aggressively pursued Martin, he'd still be alive today. But you've got to defend a gun nut's right to murder and be a racist asshole, don't you?
frylock
(34,825 posts)Ohio Joe
(21,774 posts)A man armed with a gun, stalked and murdered a teenager as he begged for his life. If the teenager was able to defend himself a bit from the murderer before his life was taken, it changes nothing.
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)and who supposedly took this miracle picture?
bigapple
(99 posts)that the photographer has shown the photo to investigators.
I'm sure the photographer can be compelled to testify at Zimmerman's trial (if the charges don't get dismissed first).
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)try harder
bigapple
(99 posts)of second degree murder is even more flimsy.
Is there any evidence at all to prove a depraved mind?
anti-alec
(420 posts)First degree murder is more solid.
That's what the state attorney should have charged Zimmerman in the first place.
Now, I don't think you'll be welcomed here in DU much longer, bigapple.
warrior1
(12,325 posts)bigapple
(99 posts)who shot a fleeing Martin in the back
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)but thanks for playing
Taitertots
(7,745 posts)You don't get to beat people up for annoying you, that is illegal.
EFerrari
(163,986 posts)bigapple
(99 posts)was being pounded into concrete, Zimmerman could be in reasonable fear of grievous harm.
maddezmom
(135,060 posts)and waited for the police and he wouldn't have ever been in fear of harm.
frylock
(34,825 posts)if his head were being pounded, there would be lacerations.
warrior1
(12,325 posts)anti-alec
(420 posts)that shot a fleeing Martin in the back.
He should have been charged with first degree murder, facing the needle.
dkf
(37,305 posts)anti-alec
(420 posts)Bet there is none, and George Zimmerman will face life. He may be free for a very short time, but he will face a long time in a 6x8 cell.
ProgressiveProfessor
(22,144 posts)I have seen what the mortician said, which was inconclusive. I have seen anything that has been released to confirm Martin being shot at a distance in the back or front for that matter.
A lawyer here on DU pointed out on one of these Zimmerman threads a while back that powder burns/residue was no longer considered prima facie, but it is an indicator.
annabanana
(52,791 posts)If you had a gun held on YOU wouldn't you fight like hell?
How is this in anyway an excuse for Zimmerman's shooting that kid?
bigapple
(99 posts)What evidence is there that Zimmerman brandished (drew) the gun before the fight?
If Martin was on top pounding his head into concrete, Zimmerman could be in reasonable fear of grievous harm.
annabanana
(52,791 posts)Which is more likely?
frylock
(34,825 posts)you keep admonishing people about what they don't know. you don't know what the fuck happened either.
anti-alec
(420 posts)I don't see any evidence at all, just Zimmerman and his cronies' words.
And you think Zimmerman's word is law?
vaberella
(24,634 posts)True Earthling
(832 posts)If not then Zimmerman's version falls apart. If there are then Zimmerman will walk IMO.
ProgressiveProfessor
(22,144 posts)The burden is reasonable fear of GBI or death. Not yet clear how he is going to meet that burden.
ProgressiveProfessor
(22,144 posts)While the provenance of the original picture can be verified forensically, who knows if what ABC has was modified or not.
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)a seasoned prosecutor went for 2nd degree murder. I'm guessing he shot Mr. Martin from much further away than he's saying and the prosecution has the evidence of that in their hands from the autopsy.
treestar
(82,383 posts)Who took it, where was it up until now, is it of Zimmerman and if so, why does that give Zimmerman the right to shoot Trayvon dead? It doesn't prove Trayvon did it, either.
bluedigger
(17,088 posts)A previously unknown third party arrived at the scene without witnessing the altercation, but had the ability to evaluate the situation and take a photo of Zimmermann within three minutes of the shooting? That's one cool and calm individual... They must have reacted instinctively... Where are the rest of the photos of the crime scene? They just took the one photo?
ProgressiveProfessor
(22,144 posts)Both sides appear to be sitting on a lot of data.
Lawlbringer
(550 posts)bashed his own head on the pavement to make it seem like there was a fight.
butterfly77
(17,609 posts)the police showed up and knew who he was and knew who his daddy was so they helped him to make up his story and helped with false evidence.
Lawlbringer
(550 posts)Unless they were already there, there's no way the police arrived within 15 minutes. I can't even get out of my house, into my car, and down the block in 3 mins lol
cottage10
(49 posts)"The next shoe to drop will be gunpowder tests on Trayvon's clothing. If there are burn marks and gunpowder residue, Zimmerman will walk IMO. "
Try again Sherlock. And the SYG law works both ways--I'd feel threatened if someone was following me. Believe me, I'd be using everything around me--fists, objects etc to get that person to back off. And lastly, head wounds are known to bleed profusely even for a little wound. The telling thing is that Zimmerman was not taken to the hospital. IF it was a serious beating, xrays should have been taken to make sure there was no internal bleeding of the brain.
vaberella
(24,634 posts)Meaning that Trayvon saw and reached for Zimmerman's gun and there was a struggle for the gun at which point Trayvon shot himself. Remember the dad and brother said that Trayvon was reaching for the gun.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)I simply glad this going through the appropriate judicial process. Whether he walks or gets sentenced is not my concern; that he would walk with no appropriate investigation done was my only worry, and now that the process of judicial review has begun, and with so many eyes following the case, I'm confident in the eventual verdict, regardless of what it may or may not be.
uponit7771
(90,370 posts)..and supposedly it was raining that night?
Somethings not right no?
TIA
ecstatic
(32,777 posts)That's the question.
GeorgeGist
(25,326 posts)[s]Disney[/s] exclusive again.
Response to True Earthling (Original post)
Post removed
fascisthunter
(29,381 posts)anyone else surprised. hey mods... leave it up as a prime example that this issue is deeply racist at its roots, and look who defends Zimmy the coward.
countingbluecars
(4,766 posts)with your name.
BeHereNow
(17,162 posts)Please, find an island with like minded hate mongers,
and kill each other off ASAP, while the rest of us work on
building a world of equality, equity and peace for all.
BHN
bemildred
(90,061 posts)NoodleyAppendage
(4,619 posts)I'm seen waaaayyy too many posts today reflexive for DENIAL. If the facts support Zimmerman's case and claims, then that's what we as LOGICAL and SCIENTIFIC MINDED people should accept. Let Justice play out.
J
fascisthunter
(29,381 posts)WTF are you talking... logical my ass.
Skip Intro
(19,768 posts)in rushing to judgment. I don't see that happening.
I agree with you that facts should prevail.
slackmaster
(60,567 posts)...by a court of law.
X_Digger
(18,585 posts)It's not likely we'll see those reports outside of court transcripts, though, thanks to HIPPA. (which is a good thing)
ProgressiveProfessor
(22,144 posts)It makes some legal and tactical sense, but it will all be public at some point.
ProgressiveProfessor
(22,144 posts)but they also need to be made available...and the State Attorney has no interest in that.
TrogL
(32,822 posts)Junkdrawer
(27,993 posts)Not hard.