Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
104 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
If Zimmerman was injured then it was self-defense by Trayvon Martin (Original Post) LynneSin Apr 2012 OP
absolutely Whisp Apr 2012 #1
Exactly! cottage10 Apr 2012 #2
This just shows how thoroughly twisted the coverage on this has been. annabanana Apr 2012 #3
"I believe that following someone is NOT standing your ground. It is invading theirs." ProfessionalLeftist Apr 2012 #4
Legally correct. TheWraith Apr 2012 #30
I'm not so sure... belcffub Apr 2012 #37
You're right. But New York is slightly unusual in that regard. TheWraith Apr 2012 #39
thanks for the clarification belcffub Apr 2012 #44
If Zimmerman grabbed him, tried to detain him, threatened him, or brandished a gun, then hell yes.nt X_Digger Apr 2012 #5
If Zimmy simply cornered him, and refused to say why, then hell yes. WingDinger Apr 2012 #13
If by cornered, you mean detained, yes. Otherwise? No. n/t X_Digger Apr 2012 #16
Basic Math: Vehicle + Gun = Winner; Pedestrian + Bare Hands = Loser freshwest Apr 2012 #6
That's right, I forgot about that valuable lesson we had back during katrina.... LynneSin Apr 2012 #7
What a difference a little melanin makes in news reports, huh? freshwest Apr 2012 #10
Unfortunately, starting a fight will more likely support manslaughter, not homicde. randome Apr 2012 #8
From what we know so far, this is my take on it, too. Lizzie Poppet Apr 2012 #9
Further, had Zimmy saidstuff it, instead of OK, the dispatcher would certainly have said, cease and WingDinger Apr 2012 #14
HOw do we know Trayvon started it? LynneSin Apr 2012 #15
We don't. Lizzie Poppet Apr 2012 #17
Are you sure about that? hfojvt Apr 2012 #25
"Not to sterotype" geardaddy Apr 2012 #29
well it is not exactly a negative sterotype, is it? hfojvt Apr 2012 #40
Is that you Ron Paul? geardaddy Apr 2012 #47
Naaah, it's Howard Cosell. nt MADem Apr 2012 #49
ask jimmy the greek frylock Apr 2012 #58
Stereotypes are sometimes stereotypes because they are true SATIRical Apr 2012 #52
Yep, and all Irish are drunks. geardaddy Apr 2012 #54
Reading is fundamental SATIRical Apr 2012 #56
Yep, I notice the trend. geardaddy Apr 2012 #63
Yep, so you can make a generalization SATIRical Apr 2012 #66
I doubt most North Americans are faster than people of any other nation geardaddy Apr 2012 #67
Let me know when you get some data SATIRical Apr 2012 #69
Nice try. geardaddy Apr 2012 #70
True, that is unscientific SATIRical Apr 2012 #71
Blech. This is reminding me of the 'why did she STAY'?? bullshit abused wives polly7 Apr 2012 #73
Sure? No, definitely not. Lizzie Poppet Apr 2012 #32
This is an offensive and racist post. If you "don't mean to stereotype," why did you do it? MADem Apr 2012 #48
Post removed Post removed Apr 2012 #55
Republicans politicians are assholes. MADem Apr 2012 #61
Nope, but the statistics show SATIRical Apr 2012 #65
You're showing me photos of men, who are professional athletes, and trying to tell me that because MADem Apr 2012 #76
What does a story about world class sprinters JonLP24 Apr 2012 #62
Sorry, but pretty much all studies SATIRical Apr 2012 #68
Here is someone that disagrees with Mr. Entine JonLP24 Apr 2012 #72
Thank you, Jon. There alot of thinly veiled racist crap being slung through the air here and Ecumenist Apr 2012 #92
If you have two overlapping bell curves, the means aren't all that different eridani Apr 2012 #91
I guess you are right hfojvt Apr 2012 #86
I don't find your schtick even slightly amusing. MADem Apr 2012 #87
WTF??!! Not to stereotype but" IF ANYTHING IS TRUE ABOUT YOUNG BLACK MALES, IT IS Ecumenist Apr 2012 #82
Tell me about it. MADem Apr 2012 #84
This joker seems to hink that he's being witty and cute AND he's not. Ecumenist Apr 2012 #95
Baiting, goading and dogwhistling. It's uncivil behavior is what it is. MADem Apr 2012 #98
saying one thing is not the same as saying all things hfojvt Apr 2012 #85
Really? first of all, I don't subscribe to any broad brush typing of anyone because PEOPLE ARE Ecumenist Apr 2012 #93
A steroetype is a stereotype whether you used one or a million. DAMN. eom Ecumenist Apr 2012 #96
Is that stand your ground? ThomThom Apr 2012 #24
Absolutely, ThomThom! Ecumenist Apr 2012 #94
the only person who says Trayvon initiated physical contact is zimmerman noiretextatique Apr 2012 #35
Zimmerman had no right confronting somebody who was breaking no laws. It wasn't his job WI_DEM Apr 2012 #11
+1 deutsey Apr 2012 #12
"No right" Spoonman Apr 2012 #28
at what point did martin walk around looking into zimmerman's car? frylock Apr 2012 #53
Never HangOnKids Apr 2012 #64
it's just an absolute fail as an analogy frylock Apr 2012 #74
Sending a drowning man an anchor. HangOnKids Apr 2012 #75
I don't believe you can make a case for using physical force against someone for following... slackmaster Apr 2012 #18
You can if that person is threatening you and /oir you see the gun holstered in his Ecumenist Apr 2012 #20
Threatening, yes. Holstered gun, no way. slackmaster Apr 2012 #21
If they're stalking you, following you, being clearly hostile,putting their hands on you,( as the Ecumenist Apr 2012 #77
What you've described here is a far cry from someone simply having a holstered firearm slackmaster Apr 2012 #78
Of course, I don't realise what <<I>> just said..REALLY??!! What else do you think I was Ecumenist Apr 2012 #79
Thanks. I wasn't sure how to parse "and /oir" slackmaster Apr 2012 #81
You're a nut! LOL!! Ecumenist Apr 2012 #83
I'd say that depends on HOW they approach you. Lizzie Poppet Apr 2012 #33
Exactly, Lizzie. If someone approached me in an overtly hostile fashion in the way he most likely Ecumenist Apr 2012 #80
Yes, that's right Yo_Mama Apr 2012 #42
Yes MoonRiver Apr 2012 #19
I have confidence that the time Travyon's call with his girlfriend ended, to his demise, will be an Ninga Apr 2012 #22
you are asserting something you do not know hfojvt Apr 2012 #23
zimmerman had no right to bother Martin...period noiretextatique Apr 2012 #36
What is being bothered? hfojvt Apr 2012 #43
and they have the right to tell you to fuck off and mind your own business noiretextatique Apr 2012 #45
+1,000 nt MADem Apr 2012 #51
telling me those things hfojvt Apr 2012 #88
And its perfectly normal to assume that an armed person following you at night Boabab Apr 2012 #97
so you believe the lying murderer...not a surprise noiretextatique Apr 2012 #100
sounds like a real good way to get your ass kicked.. frylock Apr 2012 #59
you act like I have never done that in the past hfojvt Apr 2012 #89
So are you, with your assertion that Trayvon was a fast runner. But it's "OK" when you do it, MADem Apr 2012 #50
well, it is okay because it is not really key to my argument hfojvt Apr 2012 #90
If it wasn't 'key to your argument' then why did you dog-whistle the supposition? MADem Apr 2012 #99
not clever at all noiretextatique Apr 2012 #101
Yes--it's troubling, isn't it? MADem Apr 2012 #104
someone follows you in a vehicle and then pursues you on foot.. frylock Apr 2012 #57
he's black...he should be used to it noiretextatique Apr 2012 #102
Been saying this all along. RedSpartan Apr 2012 #26
And he is not here to say what happened treestar Apr 2012 #27
The only one with the right to a SYG defense that night was Trayvon. nt obxhead Apr 2012 #31
and Zimmerman's call to 911 PROVES that statement to be correct LynneSin Apr 2012 #41
it most certainly does noiretextatique Apr 2012 #46
I agree guitar man Apr 2012 #34
Correct, if the accounts are true, and I think they are. MineralMan Apr 2012 #38
That applies if gun was pulled before Zimmerman was beaten. Zax2me Apr 2012 #60
unfortunately, the other person who knows what happens is dead noiretextatique Apr 2012 #103
 

Whisp

(24,096 posts)
1. absolutely
Fri Apr 20, 2012, 10:44 AM
Apr 2012

it really bothers me that the tone seems to say that just because Zimmerman might have some minor injuries that that excuses him in some way. Very frustrating.

cottage10

(49 posts)
2. Exactly!
Fri Apr 20, 2012, 10:45 AM
Apr 2012

This is the flaw with the right wingers argument. If someone is following you, you get damned paranoid and have a right to defend yourself!

annabanana

(52,791 posts)
3. This just shows how thoroughly twisted the coverage on this has been.
Fri Apr 20, 2012, 10:47 AM
Apr 2012

The media is as bad as the Sanford police department.

TheWraith

(24,331 posts)
30. Legally correct.
Fri Apr 20, 2012, 01:36 PM
Apr 2012

Under every definition of self defense law in the US, including Florida's, it's illegal to pursue a person who is retreating, no matter even if they've just committed a crime right in front of you, be it bank robbery, rape, or murder.

belcffub

(595 posts)
37. I'm not so sure...
Fri Apr 20, 2012, 02:09 PM
Apr 2012

we had a case, about a year ago, just outside Buffalo, NY that seems to contradict your post

No charges for man who shot at bank robber

The customer, who has a legal pistol permit, told Amherst police he didn’t take out his gun inside the bank because he didn’t want any employees or customers to get hurt, Finnerty said.

He also told police he waited until the robber was running outside along the side of a building, where no one else was around, before firing five or six shots at him.

He told police he yelled, “Halt,” and held out his handgun long enough that the fleeing robber could see he was armed before opening fire, Sedita said.
.......
In New York, the law on the use of deadly force is complicated and depends on several factors.

Sedita and Finnerty said their decision came down to a few key points:

The customer had reason to believe deadly force was needed to effect a citizen’s arrest; he had reason to believe the man fleeing the bank had just committed a robbery; and the shooting was neither willfully negligent nor reckless in putting bystanders at risk.

“We feel that the use of deadly physical force was justified,” Sedita said.


so in this case the individual was inside the bank... exited the bank... pursuing the suspect... pulled his gun and yelled halt then shot... and the DA felt he was justified... and this is New York... our gun laws tend to be a lot more restrictive then other states...

It is my understanding that, in New York, deadly force can be used when the suspect is in the act of committing a felonious act... but I would have to check my New York weapons law book for the exact wording

TheWraith

(24,331 posts)
39. You're right. But New York is slightly unusual in that regard.
Fri Apr 20, 2012, 02:38 PM
Apr 2012

Every state I'm aware of provides for the use of deadly force to prevent certain crimes, but that's usually restricted to persons caught in the act of FORCIBLE felonies, and the use of force is limited to stopping the crime. The distinction is that "forcible felonies" is a much shorter list, usually consisting of murder, rape, assault, battery, kidnapping, or attempting to commit any of the above. Here in New York, however, robbery is also considered a forcible felony (while kidnapping isn't), and moreover force is authorized for use on criminals fleeing from a forcible felony, whereas in most other states it is not.

Put another way, in most states you are legally able to shoot and kill someone in the act of, say, attempted rape, but if they turn and run it becomes illegal to kill them. In New York you can chase down someone who's just committed attempted rape, and shoot them if need be to stop them from escaping.

Funny how that always misses the notice of the people who talk about Florida derisively as a "wild west."

However, my point about SELF-defense laws is the same--even New York doesn't allow you to pursue someone who assaulted you and then still claim self-defense, for the simple reason that beyond a certain point the "defender" becomes the aggressor.

belcffub

(595 posts)
44. thanks for the clarification
Fri Apr 20, 2012, 03:17 PM
Apr 2012

I'm not a lawyer and didn't stay in a holiday in express last night

I just remembered that case... I thought the guy was a fool... It wasn't his money... no way I am putting my life on the line for a banks money...

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
6. Basic Math: Vehicle + Gun = Winner; Pedestrian + Bare Hands = Loser
Fri Apr 20, 2012, 10:57 AM
Apr 2012

Supporters of Zimmermann lack both critical thinking and math skills, apparently.

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
10. What a difference a little melanin makes in news reports, huh?
Fri Apr 20, 2012, 11:14 AM
Apr 2012

Honestly, I don't hold individuals as responsible for racism as I do the one-eyed monster. Through film, news and radio. the purveyor of racial division have put a subsconscious trigger through repetition that to be a person of color is a predictor of criminality.

Started with the portrayal of native americans as thieves, never mind that they were being robbed wholesale. The bigger the crime is the more whitewashed it is. When will people learn that?

Only when they shut those voices out and look at the people beside them with respect.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
8. Unfortunately, starting a fight will more likely support manslaughter, not homicde.
Fri Apr 20, 2012, 11:06 AM
Apr 2012

And the only point of view we have left is Zimmerman's.

 

Lizzie Poppet

(10,164 posts)
9. From what we know so far, this is my take on it, too.
Fri Apr 20, 2012, 11:13 AM
Apr 2012

Trayvon Martin may well have initiated the physical part of the conflict, but if so, that still doesn't exonerate Zimmerman. None of this would have happened if Zimmerman hadn't ignored the dispatcher's advice ("OK, we don't need you to do that.&quot . I think there's a good possibility that Zimmerman's approach to Martin was not exactly friendly and reassuring, given the former's words and tone of voice on the call to 911. If someone's been following you around, then gets out of their car to approach you, you're going to be wary and your "fight or flight" instincts are going to be working overtime.

 

WingDinger

(3,690 posts)
14. Further, had Zimmy saidstuff it, instead of OK, the dispatcher would certainly have said, cease and
Fri Apr 20, 2012, 11:39 AM
Apr 2012

desist.

LynneSin

(95,337 posts)
15. HOw do we know Trayvon started it?
Fri Apr 20, 2012, 11:39 AM
Apr 2012

We have a phone call to a friend where it seems he was trying to get away from Zimmerman.

 

Lizzie Poppet

(10,164 posts)
17. We don't.
Fri Apr 20, 2012, 11:43 AM
Apr 2012

Thus my use of the term "may well." And as I said, it's not really relevant to the matter of Zimmerman's responsibility for the situation, anyway. Martin had been put in a situation where it was reasonable for him to believe he was about to be attacked, and for him to be unwilling to let the heavier Zimmerman get in the first blow would have been reasonable. Trayvon had the right to stand his ground, too...

hfojvt

(37,573 posts)
25. Are you sure about that?
Fri Apr 20, 2012, 01:18 PM
Apr 2012

Last edited Sat Apr 21, 2012, 02:46 AM - Edit history (1)

You say "Martin had been put in a situation ..."

How did that situation come about? Listening to Zimmerman's 911 call, it is clear that Zimmerman is following Martin, and at some point in the call Zimmerman says "Sh*t, he's running" and then later Zimmerman says "I don't know where this kid is."

Okay, here's a map and a timeline of the call (probably from some rightwing site, but the time seems accurate according to that audio link) http://www.wagist.com/2012/dan-linehan/evidence-that-trayvon-martin-doubled-back

At 2: 08 Martin goes past Zimmerman and starts running. Zimmerman is on the phone with police for another two minutes. Martin is less than half a mile from his home. If he had wanted to, he could have run halfway home before Zimmerman was off the phone. I am not sure when the confrontation takes place after Zimmerman hangs up the phone, or how. That's what I am asking. How did Zimmerman find Martin and how did he catch him? He didn't catch him with his car, because he was already out of the car.

Not to cover up, bur let me just edit out the apparently offensive line that is getting in the way of the larger point. Martin was athletic, young and thin. It seems like a good bet that he could out-run Zimmerman who is older and heavier, or at least run just as fast. Given that Martin is ahead of Zimmerman and already running before Zimmerman gets off the phone for two minutes, I don't see how Zimmerman catches him unless he is a world class sprinter. So how did the situation happen? How did Zimmerman close the two minute head start that Martin had?

hfojvt

(37,573 posts)
40. well it is not exactly a negative sterotype, is it?
Fri Apr 20, 2012, 02:45 PM
Apr 2012

Is that a terrible thing to think about young black males?

 

SATIRical

(261 posts)
52. Stereotypes are sometimes stereotypes because they are true
Fri Apr 20, 2012, 04:59 PM
Apr 2012

Ever watch a track meet?

There are exceptions, of course, but at least at American high school and colleges, runners get whiter as the distance increases.

On the international level, it is not as true. Heck, the Kenyans swept the Boston Marathon. But they were fricking sprinting as far as I'm concerned! They ran 26 miles at a pace faster than my best mile when I was young, skinny, and in shape!

 

SATIRical

(261 posts)
66. Yep, so you can make a generalization
Fri Apr 20, 2012, 05:31 PM
Apr 2012

that North Americans are faster than others in the world.

And watching most international track events will confirm that.

geardaddy

(24,926 posts)
70. Nice try.
Fri Apr 20, 2012, 05:40 PM
Apr 2012

Where your data supporting that most black men are, per capita, faster than other groups?

Posting the fastest men in the world from Sport Illustrated is hardly hard scientific data.

 

SATIRical

(261 posts)
71. True, that is unscientific
Fri Apr 20, 2012, 05:50 PM
Apr 2012

I'll look to see if they have any studies across the population instead of just the top competitors.

The most difficult problem will be finding one that tries to normalize for weight (and being overweight). Clearly Martin was at a good BMI, which lends itself to being a fast runner, but certainly doesn't guarantee it.

I think finding a study that compared running speed by BMI by race and age is too specific but I'll look.

polly7

(20,582 posts)
73. Blech. This is reminding me of the 'why did she STAY'?? bullshit abused wives
Fri Apr 20, 2012, 06:06 PM
Apr 2012

get to hear over and over.

You don't know a single thing about Trayvon Martin, whether he could run, whether he had a sore foot, whether he panicked and froze ......... nothing.

 

Lizzie Poppet

(10,164 posts)
32. Sure? No, definitely not.
Fri Apr 20, 2012, 01:52 PM
Apr 2012

If there's anything I'm sure about in this case, it's that as a part of the general public, I have a big information gap. There's a lot about this incident we don't know.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
48. This is an offensive and racist post. If you "don't mean to stereotype," why did you do it?
Fri Apr 20, 2012, 04:03 PM
Apr 2012
Not to sterotype, but if anything is true about young black males, it is that they are usually pretty fast runners.


Yeah, and all blacks are great dancers, too, hmmmm? Except the ones with two left feet who wind up on Dancing With The Stars?

I think we're safe making the assumption that you aren't black and don't know many, if any, black people.

Please. Your comments are really out of line. I can't believe a jury voted 3-3 to leave that racist shit up.

Response to MADem (Reply #48)

MADem

(135,425 posts)
61. Republicans politicians are assholes.
Fri Apr 20, 2012, 05:16 PM
Apr 2012

Most Republican politicians are white men.

Does that make all white men assholes?

That's where you're going with your halfassed example, there.

Wow, you're letting your flag fly early.

 

SATIRical

(261 posts)
65. Nope, but the statistics show
Fri Apr 20, 2012, 05:27 PM
Apr 2012

that if you come across a random man, he is more likely to be Republican than Democrat (whereas it is close to even for women)
http://www.gallup.com/poll/120839/women-likely-democrats-regardless-age.aspx



So is that data a sexist stereotype? Yep. It is also data.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
76. You're showing me photos of men, who are professional athletes, and trying to tell me that because
Fri Apr 20, 2012, 07:06 PM
Apr 2012

they are all black, then a teen-aged boy must have the same skill that they possess.

And you don't even see your own racism. And then you double down with a load of bullshit to try to deflect my very clear example about what was wrong with your nonsensical assertion.

Good grief. It's like Through The Looking Glass up in here.

JonLP24

(29,322 posts)
62. What does a story about world class sprinters
Fri Apr 20, 2012, 05:21 PM
Apr 2012

have to do with the stereotype of young black males? I guarantee those listed at that link put in hours of training to get to that level and their race had nothing to do with their success. I don't see how that story is in anyway relevant to a teenager that would likely never reach their level based on odds had he lived.

 

SATIRical

(261 posts)
68. Sorry, but pretty much all studies
Fri Apr 20, 2012, 05:38 PM
Apr 2012

have shown that there is a biological component.

"We see these differences on the playing field, but they are apparent at the micro level as well. In the mitochondria of cells, the body's powerhouse, oxygen combines with the glucose released by carbohydrates and, eventually, fats to produce sustained energy. When the body demands quick bursts, it breaks down carbohydrates quickly, if incompletely. At roughly 400 meters, about 40-50 seconds of running for a top athlete, or 100 meters in swimming, the body has depleted much of its anaerobic capacity. That is the point at which anaerobic athletes experience an accumulation of lactic acid, the waste product of the muscles. If physical activity continues past this bio-physiological divide, the body begins to process energy more deliberately. Scientists are definitive in their findings that athletes of West African ancestry are the most anaerobically efficient athletes, East African are the fittest aerobically, and whites fall in the middle."

"Arthur Ashe, Jr., the first black man to win the US Open, Australian Open, and Wimbledon singles tennis titles, wrestled with this controversy while writing his groundbreaking A Hard Road to Glory, which catalogues the history of black accomplishment in sports. He accumulated thousands of anecdotes of how cultural and environmental forces had shaped black success in sports. Still, Ashe could not put the genetic issue to rest. When asked about what he had come to believe after years of research, whether blacks had a physical advantage, Ashe responded deliberately: "The results are outstanding, nothing short of stellar.

"Damn it," he sighed, frustrated at the political incorrectness of his own beliefs. "My heart says 'no,' but my head says 'yes.' Sociology can't explain it. I want to hear from the scientists. Until I see some numbers [to the contrary], I have to believe that we blacks have something that gives us an edge."

http://run-down.com/guests/je_black_athletes_p2.php

Let me guess. next you are also going to say that men are faster than women just because they train harder?

It's not a bad thing. I don't understand why people want to deny it.

JonLP24

(29,322 posts)
72. Here is someone that disagrees with Mr. Entine
Fri Apr 20, 2012, 06:03 PM
Apr 2012
http://www.wmich.edu/gsac/Hilltop%20Review/Spring%202010/The%20Myth%20of%20Racial%20Supperiority%20in%20Sports_Ian%20B.%20Kerr.pdf

As far as to your question, it depends on how much the individual trains. All things being equal, men would be faster, but as individuals we're all different. There are millions of women that would run faster me because they train harder than me(I don't train hardly at all anymore). My point is, if you see a black athlete or any high level athlete, it is because they put massive amounts of time in training to get there. Not because of some race factor. I was in the Army where they force you to the run so you have a better sample of overall people rather than a sampling of people who choose to run and you will find plenty of black people that don't like running just like anyone else and the results show so to assume a young black male can run fast just because he is a young black male is false & wrong.

Ecumenist

(6,086 posts)
92. Thank you, Jon. There alot of thinly veiled racist crap being slung through the air here and
Sat Apr 21, 2012, 04:24 AM
Apr 2012

I'm getting sick of it. It's disgusting.

eridani

(51,907 posts)
91. If you have two overlapping bell curves, the means aren't all that different
Sat Apr 21, 2012, 03:51 AM
Apr 2012

However if you look at the areas more than three standard deviations out (which is where pro athletes tend to land), you'll see reasons for black people being better sprinters at those extreme ends. TNearer to the means where there is all the overlap, it doesn't make a lot of difference.

Africans also have slighty higher than average bone density, which means they won't be often seen at top level swim meets.

hfojvt

(37,573 posts)
86. I guess you are right
Sat Apr 21, 2012, 02:16 AM
Apr 2012

my dictionary defines racism as:

1. belief in the superiority of a particular race; prejudice based on this
2. antagonism towards other races

It seems we can throw out #2, and I am not sure how the 2nd half of #1 would fit. "prejudice based on this". Maybe, if prejudice is akin to "pre-judging". The dictionary says "preconceived opinion" without including the stipulation whether it is positive or negative. However, for "prejudicial" it includes the synonyms "injurious, damaging, harmful, unfavorable, inimical, deleterious, disadvantageous, pernicious." All of which are negative.

I did, however, assert the athletic superiority of blacks, which I suppose could be racist against whites, asians and native Americans.

I would never assert that blacks are great dancers. I have seen too many black people at dances.

But I work at a dance hall and a gym, so I have a selection bias in that I am seeing the athletic black people, the ones who come to work out and to play basketball. Most of them simply are fairly impressive athletes.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
87. I don't find your schtick even slightly amusing.
Sat Apr 21, 2012, 02:50 AM
Apr 2012

You only see the "athletic black people," eh? The ones who work out and play basketball, and oh, you work at a dance hall too so I suppose you see the "ones" that dance well too? And because the "ones" you see are fitter, that makes them better, and that makes it all "OK?"

I'm astounded that people still talk like this in this century. I'm astounded that anyone would talk like this on a Democratic message board.

Your comments are racist and offensive. Not clever, not justifiable in any way. Completely beyond the pale. You should, if you had an ounce of awareness, be ashamed.

Ecumenist

(6,086 posts)
82. WTF??!! Not to stereotype but" IF ANYTHING IS TRUE ABOUT YOUNG BLACK MALES, IT IS
Fri Apr 20, 2012, 10:59 PM
Apr 2012

THAT THEY ARE PRETTY FAST RUNNERS"????!! So, you're not going to stereotypes then use one of the most common stereotypes? Are we super human? You're saying that the fact not because was he young but he had that added cachet of being BLACK is why he should have gotten away? Wow!!

Guess what? I know lots of black folks that CAN'T DANCE, SING;DON'T DRINK MALT LIQUOR, SELL DRUGS, HAVE ELEVENTY THOUSAND CHILDREN OUT OF WEDLOCK AND HAVE NEVER COLLECTED ONE THIN DIME OF WELFARE: who have NEVER STOLEN ANYTHING OR BROKEN INTO ANYONE'S HOME, EVEN THOUGHT ABOUT IT; THAT DO NOT EAT CHICKEN OR WATERMELON; WHO AREN'T ATHLETIC AT ALL! We are HUMAN BEINGS who are as variable in our likes, dislikes, abilities and disabilities as anyone else. WE ARE HUMAN BEINGS JUST.LIKE.YOU! DAMN!

That boy was murdered but someone DETERMINED to appear to be a hero by getting revenge against anyone who resembled the people and trying to twist yourself into unimaginable shapes isn't going to change that fact. Nothing would have saved his life outside of stumbling onto a hair trigger assault rifle before zimmy could murder him. That's not a stereotype but a soon to be established fact!

WOW I never thought I would read something like this on DU from someone other than a troll.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
84. Tell me about it.
Sat Apr 21, 2012, 01:19 AM
Apr 2012

There's all kinds of racist bullshit happening up in here. And I'm bothered that juries are leaving some of it be, too.

Ecumenist

(6,086 posts)
95. This joker seems to hink that he's being witty and cute AND he's not.
Sat Apr 21, 2012, 06:39 AM
Apr 2012

The fact is this: zimmy was seen straddling Trayvon's body by at least 4 witnesses in the grassy area between and behind the townhomes! This being the case, how did zimmy get there if Trayvon circled back and attacked him? Did Trayvon drag him there and make his scream for help while he was trying to cock his 9mm?

So much of this case is horrific and that's being compounded by racists and bigots because Trayvon's future was stolen from him. PERIOD. SMDH

MADem

(135,425 posts)
98. Baiting, goading and dogwhistling. It's uncivil behavior is what it is.
Sat Apr 21, 2012, 01:15 PM
Apr 2012

I'm pretty well disgusted by it, as I'm sure you are as well.

This is the way some people get their sick kicks, I guess. The fact that they are getting them by making unclever remarks about the murder of a teenager is just, well, astounding to me.

hfojvt

(37,573 posts)
85. saying one thing is not the same as saying all things
Sat Apr 21, 2012, 01:42 AM
Apr 2012

And most people I know eat chicken and watermelon.

Trayvon was said to have played football, so I don't get where assuming a young athletic male is pretty fast is a huge deal.

And one of the most common stereotypes? Maybe because of this http://trackandfield.about.com/od/sprintsandhurdles/tp/Top-American-Olympic-Sprinters.01.htm

Twenty top sprinters and maybe one white person. (I am not sure of the race of Lolo Jones (okay, a bit of a mix "Jones, who is of French, African-American, Native American and Norwegian descent,&quot

But maybe now the shoe is on the other foot, as in a couple weeks ago I was arguing against white privilege by saying that just because some white people are rich does not mean that all white people are so privileged. In a similar way, just because some black people are fast, does not mean that all are.

Touche'

But even if Trayvon was as slow as me, or slower, with a two minute head start he could cross a quarter of a mile. And even if a very fast runner spotted him a quarter mile away and took off after him, it would take that person a minute to cross that quarter mile at which point Trayvon has run another 1/8 mile which takes another 30 seconds to close. Well, unltimately Trayvon gets half a mile down the road before he gets caught. Which seems to be about the distance between Zimmerman's car and Trayvon's house, or more.

Even if he was a mediocre runner, which I find dubious, it seems to me evident that he did not run.

Ecumenist

(6,086 posts)
93. Really? first of all, I don't subscribe to any broad brush typing of anyone because PEOPLE ARE
Sat Apr 21, 2012, 06:26 AM
Apr 2012

PEOPLE! Secondly, You know damn well what I meant about the list of fucked up stereotypes that are painted onto black people each and every day. What you were arguing a couple of weeks ago has nothing to do with what you are trying to do today because a) you weren't arguing with me and b) it only has a tangential connection to this case, at best.

BTW, white privilege DOES NOT mean that all white are wealthy and you SHOULD know that! Then, just as now, you were arguing completely erroneous points.

WHITE PRIVILEGE : a way of conceptualizing racial inequalities that focuses as much on the advantages that white people accrue from society as on the disadvantages that people of color experience. White privilege may be defined as the "unearned advantages of being White in a racially stratified society", and has been characterized as an expression of institutional power that is largely unacknowledged by most White individuals.
Most such theories focus on American and European societal condition, since inequality between whites and non-whites is a long-standing feature of these academic areas. White privilege differs from conditions of overt racism or prejudice, in which a dominant group actively seeks to oppress or suppress other racial groups for its own advantage.

Instead, theories of white privilege suggest that whites view their social, cultural, and economic experiences as a norm that everyone should experience, rather than as an advantaged position that must be maintained at the expense of others. This normative assumption implicitly constrains discussions of racial inequality within the dominant discourse: such explanations are limited to factors specific to disadvantaged racial groups - who are viewed as having failed to achieve the norm - and solutions focus on what can be done to help those groups achieve the 'normal' standards experienced by whites.

The general claim of theories of white privilege is that racial inequity cannot be resolved solely by looking at the life conditions of disadvantaged groups. They suggest that solutions to problems of racial inequality can only be achieved by explicitly discussing the implicit advantages that whites as a group hold in society.(THANKS WIKIPAEDIA )

White Privilege is based on BUILT IN ADVANTAGES that whites DO NOT HAVE TO EARN and are availed to them by SIMPLY.BEING.BORN.WHITE, not the amount of tangible wealth they may or may not have. See? There, I fixed it for you.

Now that that's been CORRECTLY defined for you, the fact that you are assuming that based on the word of someone who has demonstrated over and over that he will lie to save his own ass is giving the impression that you might have a problem with black folks too. The very fact that you are essentially blaming him for his own MURDER, (and please don't forget that this was a 17 YEAR OLD BOY, STILL LEGALLY A MINOR!), by saying that he "HAD" to start the altercation, thereby provoking and by your TWISTED "rationale", deserving that 9mm hollow point he caught in the chest.

Why can't you understand that he had EVERY RIGHT TO BE THERE, that he was just walking home from a run to the store to get some sweets and a soft drink? For some reason, people are not taking something into consideration and that is this: Not just anyone can freely walk into a gated community. There's usually some sort of card key or code that has to be entered into a key pad to get into the development. Do you honestly think that he hopped what are probably 8 foot wrought iron gates? Really? Well, I guess if you have the stereotypical view that black folks are different than everyone else, you would assume he would do just that. He HAD EVERY RIGHT TO BE THERE AND HAD NO DUTY TO ANSWER A BLOODY THING THAT ZIMMY ASKED HIM!! Besides, no matter what he claimed or the HOA told the residents, he was NOT the captain of the NW because THERE WAS NEVER A ONE REGISTERED AT THE DEVELOPMENT! Neighborhood Watch REQUIRES registration and EXPRESSLY forbids confrontation and definitely tells their members that they aren't supposed to carry so much as a flashlight, let alone BLOODY 9MM! The National head of N.W has gone on the record in print and Television to make this completely clear!

Why are you so ignoring that zimmy was breathing harshly because HE WAS RUNNING to catch up with Trayvon and in spite of what he's now claiming, even following the directive NOT TO FOLLOW TRAYVON, that harsh breathing can still be heard and that breath rate was UNCHANGED? Why was it incumbent upon Trayvon to run away from the maniac cop wished-he-was who was bound and determined to murder him? Zimmy should have stayed his sorry ass in his vehicle...PERIOD. He claims that he was the captain of the Neghborhood Watch, (I've already debunked this collosal lie) and as such, he was supposed to be fucking watching, damn it!!

But according to you and all the other internet posters who give off the stench of racism, it makes perfect sense that this now dead boy is in that state and it's obvious to you because among other things, being black means that he's "NATURALLY" fast. You go so far as to try to come up with pseudo-scientific equations to try to explain a completely irrelevant argument to what happened Sunday, February 26 2012. What you're ATTEMPTING to do is the same as saying that the length of a rape victims skirt, the color of lipstick and nails, the height of her heels and the depth of her neckline is proof that she really is responsible for her own violation because she should have dressed differently if she didn't want to be raped. THAT'S REALLY WHAT YOU'RE SAYING!

You're compounding this insult to this boy who's been shot and will NEVER get up by basing your premise on the fact that somehow because black people are faster sprinters and more athletically gifted on average than other people, (red,white, yellow and white),that it proves your point. REALLY? You honestly can't see how racist this is on it's face? Adolph Hitler also accused Jesse Owens of being less than a human being and closer to the beasts because he WHIPPED the best they had in track and field. How is what you're saying any different? Don't you see the similarities?

I guess because you're unable to see black people as people, you're also not taking into consideration the fact that Trayvon was 17 YEAR OLD BOY and he did something that most people would recognise as something young men tend to do. Trayvon told his girlfriend, who was PLEADING WITH HIM TO RUN, that he WASN'T GOING TO RUN but WALK FAST! Young male teens and men in general are into posing, showing their bravery, especially when it comes to impressing the ladies, which is EXACTLY what he was doing immediately preceding his murder.

However, since you insist that he should have outrun zimmy, let's explore this more in depth, shall we? Try to keep up.

Now, if Trayvon went to confront zimmy the giggling sociopath at his truck, as zimmy claimed, how did he end up on top of Tray's dead body on the grass between AND BEHIND the homes and the walkway? The Murderer zimmy was seen straddling Trayvon's dead body by at least 4 witnesses. Did Trayvon DRAG him there? I'll bet you all tea in China that he didn't and you know it. By his poor girlfriend's own testimony, she BEGGED him to run but he refused. Why was she begging him to run? BECAUSE TRAY WAS TELLING HER THAT SOME STRANGE MAN WAS FOLLOWING HIM AND HE DIDN'T KNOW WHY!

The next thing SHE HEARS TRAYVON ASKING "SOMEONE" TO TELL HIM WHY THEY WERE FOLLOWING HIM. This is quickly followed by the sounds of shoving and the sounds of the earpiece falling to the ground, which then goes dead. She tried to call him back but had to leave a voice mail. she didn't know what had happened until a day or so later when someone informed her of the tragedy,(and before you try to claim hearsay, DATE AND TIME STAMPED PHONE RECORDS CONFIRM HER STORY). IN actuality, TRAY WAS THE ONE STANDING HIS GROUND and if zimmy got his ass whipped while he was doing it, that's too bad. I have more than a little suspicion that he pulled that gun when he saw that he wasn't going to win without it.

You can postulate, scream and holler until you're blue with white polka dots in the face BUT nothing changes the facts I have laid at the feet of your creepily racist hypothesis. I can truly say that I am NOT racist so I don't understand your mindset. A young human being was MURDERED by another, albeit clearly DISTURBED human being, (barely, though it may be). The thing that placed that bullseye on Tray's chest or back was the color of his skin and the wooly texture of his kinky curly hair and I believe you know it.

Nothing else explains your determination to place the onus on the one who had no weapon, no fault and now, NO FUTURE. I will not assume anything about you other than this: if you're white,, you have proven the existence and power white privilege that alot of caucasians take for granted, because you're assuming Trayvon should have had the same outcome that you would, (if you were a hell of alot luckier that Tray) if you had found yourself in his shoes on that fateful sunday evening. Of course, I have to add in that little thing about how black folks are faster than other human beings, ( based on your anecdotal evidence of working at a gym and dance hall ) and VOILA! You would have awakened the next morning in your dad's townhome completely unharmed and happy.

Of course, there would have been unicorns and faeries running through the house too. Think about what you're saying because it's NOT funny nor witty to anyone else except other bigots.






ThomThom

(1,486 posts)
24. Is that stand your ground?
Fri Apr 20, 2012, 12:51 PM
Apr 2012

Martin stood his ground.
Because he shot him we will never get the other side

noiretextatique

(27,275 posts)
35. the only person who says Trayvon initiated physical contact is zimmerman
Fri Apr 20, 2012, 01:59 PM
Apr 2012

the person who gains by making that claim. and since he has already been caught in a few lies, i don't believe his version of events.

WI_DEM

(33,497 posts)
11. Zimmerman had no right confronting somebody who was breaking no laws. It wasn't his job
Fri Apr 20, 2012, 11:14 AM
Apr 2012

he brought this tragedy on.

 

Spoonman

(1,761 posts)
28. "No right"
Fri Apr 20, 2012, 01:34 PM
Apr 2012

You approach your car and witness a person walking around it looking into it.
They have broken no law, so by your standard, you have "no right" to say ANYTHING to them?

 

slackmaster

(60,567 posts)
18. I don't believe you can make a case for using physical force against someone for following...
Fri Apr 20, 2012, 11:44 AM
Apr 2012

...or questioning you.

Blocking your way would be a different matter - Here in California that can be considered false imprisonment.

It all depends on EXACTLY what happened, and in what order.

 

slackmaster

(60,567 posts)
21. Threatening, yes. Holstered gun, no way.
Fri Apr 20, 2012, 12:12 PM
Apr 2012

Mere possession of a holstered firearm does not qualify as an automatic threat.

Ecumenist

(6,086 posts)
77. If they're stalking you, following you, being clearly hostile,putting their hands on you,( as the
Fri Apr 20, 2012, 09:40 PM
Apr 2012

sweetheart who was on the phone with Trayvon RIGHT before he was MURDERED talked about, saying that right before the phone went dead, she heard Trayvon ask why the person was he was following him and then heard the sounds of him being pushed)...YOU.ABSOLUTELY.CAN!
Are you going to try to tell me wth a straight face that if someone was following you, running to keep up with you, started interrogating you in an OVERTLY HOSTILE FASHION and you saw a gun on them that you wouldn't try to start to defend yourself? REALLY??!!

Considering his comment about how the "these assholes always get away", do you honestly believe that zimmy didn't try to detain him, being a police wannabe and a bad-ass "wished-he-was" that he is? He's a creep and a lying, panty- waisted coward.

 

slackmaster

(60,567 posts)
78. What you've described here is a far cry from someone simply having a holstered firearm
Fri Apr 20, 2012, 10:09 PM
Apr 2012

I hope you realize that.

Ecumenist

(6,086 posts)
79. Of course, I don't realise what <<I>> just said..REALLY??!! What else do you think I was
Fri Apr 20, 2012, 10:13 PM
Apr 2012

talking about? My husband is a gun owner and I have NEVER felt the the need to attack him.

 

Lizzie Poppet

(10,164 posts)
33. I'd say that depends on HOW they approach you.
Fri Apr 20, 2012, 01:56 PM
Apr 2012

If they approach with their body language and facial expression communicating anger and aggression, then I'd say that pre-emptive force isn't necessarily an unreasonable response. Unfortunately, not only is that a rather subjective judgment, but in this case we can only hear one side of the story.

Ecumenist

(6,086 posts)
80. Exactly, Lizzie. If someone approached me in an overtly hostile fashion in the way he most likely
Fri Apr 20, 2012, 10:17 PM
Apr 2012

approached Trayvon, WHAT REASONABLE PERSON WOULDN'T DEFEND THEMSELVES??!!

Yo_Mama

(8,303 posts)
42. Yes, that's right
Fri Apr 20, 2012, 02:51 PM
Apr 2012

I think the cops think that Zimmerman tried to corner the kid and prevent him from getting "away", which would be consistent with his statements on the phone to the dispatcher and consistent with the account of the girlfriend's call.

Simply asking someone what they are doing somewhere is not grounds for attack, ever, at any time, especially in a gated community which is semi-private property. Physically blocking the person being followed could inspire reasonable fear, especially at night when you have been followed by an unknown man, and might well justify an attempt to knock down the person and escape.

Zimmerman's story is that he had turned and was walking back to his vehicle when Martin confronted HIM. That doesn't fit as well with the calls, especially the girlfriend's account as reported by the media.

The question is how well the prosecution's theory of the case can be backed up in court at trial, especially on a murder two charge.

Ninga

(8,275 posts)
22. I have confidence that the time Travyon's call with his girlfriend ended, to his demise, will be an
Fri Apr 20, 2012, 12:17 PM
Apr 2012

important part of the prosecutions case...maybe even the key. Just too sad.






hfojvt

(37,573 posts)
23. you are asserting something you do not know
Fri Apr 20, 2012, 12:19 PM
Apr 2012

If Martin hit Zimmerman, are you sure that Zimmerman had already drawn his gun?

Not that that matters to those who want to lynch Zimmerman.

After all, following someone gives the person being followed an absolute right to attack.

noiretextatique

(27,275 posts)
36. zimmerman had no right to bother Martin...period
Fri Apr 20, 2012, 02:02 PM
Apr 2012

who appointed him guardian of who "looks" right or wrong? i hope Martin had a chance to hit the bastard before the coward murdered him.

hfojvt

(37,573 posts)
43. What is being bothered?
Fri Apr 20, 2012, 03:08 PM
Apr 2012

I think I have a right to follow anybody walking around my neighborhood or, in fact, anywhere. I also think I have a right to ask anybody anywhere what they are doing. I cannot force an answer, but the privacy act of 1974 certainly does not prevent me from asking. (inside joke there, because I used to know this kinda crazy person who was fixated on the Privacy Act of 1974, and he asserted that it did, that the Privacy Act of 1974 made it illegal for anybody except law enforcement to ask anybody a question.)

Zimmerman has a right to do anything that is not illegal, including things that are racist and/or obnoxious and/or annoying. We all have those rights. And nobody has a right to assault us for doing so. It is not illegal (generally) to be obnoxious or racist. It's not illegal to follow somebody and it's not illegal to ask them what they are doing.

noiretextatique

(27,275 posts)
45. and they have the right to tell you to fuck off and mind your own business
Fri Apr 20, 2012, 03:31 PM
Apr 2012

zimmerman does not have the right to profile, stalk, and murder anyone. Trayvon had every right to defend himself against someone creepy asshole following him around in the neighborhood where he lived. how was he supposed to know this asshole considered himself some sort of wannabe cop? for all he knew, he could have been a rapist...or a murderer.

hfojvt

(37,573 posts)
88. telling me those things
Sat Apr 21, 2012, 02:57 AM
Apr 2012

is a long ways from striking me. It's not generally "defending yourself" if you strike first, because you could easily be striking somebody who was not going to attack you.

Boabab

(120 posts)
97. And its perfectly normal to assume that an armed person following you at night
Sat Apr 21, 2012, 06:44 AM
Apr 2012

isn't going to "attack you"?

What planet are you from? Stop posting idiotic defenses for GZ's actions. There are none.

noiretextatique

(27,275 posts)
100. so you believe the lying murderer...not a surprise
Sun Apr 22, 2012, 12:33 PM
Apr 2012

because HE is the only one who claims Trayvon attacked him. and frankly, after listening to the 911 tapes, i find it hard to believe that the wannabe cop did not start the confrontation.

frylock

(34,825 posts)
59. sounds like a real good way to get your ass kicked..
Fri Apr 20, 2012, 05:08 PM
Apr 2012

tell you what, as a sociology experiment, why don't you go around and follow some people this weekend. see what happens. but be sure and follow them in your car before you pursue them on foot, for full effect.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
50. So are you, with your assertion that Trayvon was a fast runner. But it's "OK" when you do it,
Fri Apr 20, 2012, 04:18 PM
Apr 2012

isn't it?

Nice use of the "lynch" word, too.

You're something else. Not even subtle.

hfojvt

(37,573 posts)
90. well, it is okay because it is not really key to my argument
Sat Apr 21, 2012, 03:07 AM
Apr 2012

Further, it seems good odds that Martin was at least as fast a runner as Zimmerman. With a two minute head start Martin needs to be really slow and Zimmerman really fast to catch him.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
99. If it wasn't 'key to your argument' then why did you dog-whistle the supposition?
Sat Apr 21, 2012, 01:21 PM
Apr 2012

You think you're being clever, but all you're doing is showing us what you are.

You should be ashamed of yourself.

noiretextatique

(27,275 posts)
101. not clever at all
Sun Apr 22, 2012, 12:36 PM
Apr 2012

this poster is also advancing zimmerman's LIE about Trayvon hitting him first. i don't believe as asshole who profiled and stalked suddenly became shy after confronting Trayvon. zimmerman has a history of violence, so it is not a stretch to believe he started the confrontation. and he is a proven liar. race tends to color some people's ability to see things clearly.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
104. Yes--it's troubling, isn't it?
Sun Apr 22, 2012, 12:54 PM
Apr 2012

Talk about profiling! Zimmerman is a guy who had no problem calling a little kid playing in a driveway a "black male suspect between age seven and nine." He was used to throwing his weight around. He was used to being a bully and getting his way. He had no regard for the directives of the dispatcher, he just wanted to do what HE wanted to do.

frylock

(34,825 posts)
57. someone follows you in a vehicle and then pursues you on foot..
Fri Apr 20, 2012, 05:04 PM
Apr 2012

and you're cool with that? it is perfectly reasonable to think that martin believed that he was in danger at that point. this wasn't just two people walking down the street ffs.

noiretextatique

(27,275 posts)
102. he's black...he should be used to it
Sun Apr 22, 2012, 12:39 PM
Apr 2012
that seems to be the gist of the argument. because you are black, you should accept racist projections about who you are, and answer questions about your right to walk down a street because some racist asshole thinks you are suspicious.

RedSpartan

(1,693 posts)
26. Been saying this all along.
Fri Apr 20, 2012, 01:30 PM
Apr 2012

Trayvon was standing his ground against an unknown, armed man who was stalking him through the neighborhood. Sickeningly ironic.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002510702

treestar

(82,383 posts)
27. And he is not here to say what happened
Fri Apr 20, 2012, 01:32 PM
Apr 2012

We'll never get his side, except maybe for some forensic evidence.

guitar man

(15,996 posts)
34. I agree
Fri Apr 20, 2012, 01:57 PM
Apr 2012

Z got out of his vehicle and went after him.
And a very important thing to note is, Travon was doing nothing wrong. Not a thing.

MineralMan

(146,288 posts)
38. Correct, if the accounts are true, and I think they are.
Fri Apr 20, 2012, 02:17 PM
Apr 2012

When Zimmerman got out of his vehicle and followed Trayvon, there was no reason for Trayvon to see him as other than an assailant. Who follows someone near their own home? As a kid, he'd be fearful of any adult who was following him. Defending himself was a natural reaction, especially if he saw that Zimmerman was armed.

He was defending himself from a stranger who had followed him. Any sensible person would do the same thing.

 

Zax2me

(2,515 posts)
60. That applies if gun was pulled before Zimmerman was beaten.
Fri Apr 20, 2012, 05:10 PM
Apr 2012

At what point was the gun pulled out?
As has been the case, we don't know yet.
Like people were 'certain' Zimmerman had no injuries now there is a photo.
Too many experts that know jack shit.
There are still not even facts made public to speak with certainty.
Won't stop people from still doing so.

noiretextatique

(27,275 posts)
103. unfortunately, the other person who knows what happens is dead
Sun Apr 22, 2012, 12:42 PM
Apr 2012

and suddenly a photo of zimmerman's injuries magically appears, but he did not seek medical attention. the 911 tape is great evidence against zimmerman, despite his claims of victimhood in a vain attempt to save his ass.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If Zimmerman was injured ...