Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Archae

(46,373 posts)
Thu Nov 27, 2014, 11:49 AM Nov 2014

One thing I've noticed about police misconduct cases...

The victim will sue the police, but the city or county those cops are based in? They pay the judgments, out of taxpayer money.

If corrupt cops and their union had to pay those judgments, the numbers of police misconduct cases would drop like a rock.

21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
One thing I've noticed about police misconduct cases... (Original Post) Archae Nov 2014 OP
Exactly and that is why the "color of law" statutes are similar to piercing corporate veil cpamomfromtexas Nov 2014 #1
Wait until you hear about my case Dr. Xavier Nov 2014 #2
Please let us know about it after execution or pm me cpamomfromtexas Nov 2014 #4
Why should the union be more responsible for a violent, unwarranted police action than the city? Enthusiast Nov 2014 #3
The union should "police" its own because they will have to defend the idiots that screw up cpamomfromtexas Nov 2014 #5
Really? The union should weed out the bad guys? How absurd. Enthusiast Nov 2014 #6
police unions "police their own" by covering for criminal cops nt msongs Nov 2014 #8
So you are anti-union? Enthusiast Nov 2014 #11
When a union is used to try to obstruct justice when police murder black children 99th_Monkey Nov 2014 #21
This message was self-deleted by its author Omaha Steve Nov 2014 #7
I don't think archae's anti union. bluedigger Nov 2014 #9
Traditionally it is management (City-State-County), the employer, Enthusiast Nov 2014 #12
If settlement$ were paid out of Police Retirement Funds 99th_Monkey Nov 2014 #10
That would establish an interesting precedent. Enthusiast Nov 2014 #14
Cops abuse "unionization" by using it to protect their murderous asses nt 99th_Monkey Nov 2014 #15
So, if I understand you correctly, you are against "unionization". Enthusiast Nov 2014 #16
You are the one who started talking about unions 99th_Monkey Nov 2014 #20
Completely unrecommended. Enthusiast Nov 2014 #13
Unions are awesome except when they are inconvenient it seems... Oktober Nov 2014 #17
Union buster! joshcryer Nov 2014 #18
We allow it, we pay. Price of citizenship. True Blue Door Nov 2014 #19

cpamomfromtexas

(1,247 posts)
1. Exactly and that is why the "color of law" statutes are similar to piercing corporate veil
Thu Nov 27, 2014, 01:01 PM
Nov 2014

The key is showing malicious intent of the cop and of course you have to pray the judge hasn't been bought off

Dr. Xavier

(278 posts)
2. Wait until you hear about my case
Thu Nov 27, 2014, 01:04 PM
Nov 2014

I am currently representing a young man, who was shot and paralyzed by two of San Francisco 'finest' in April of 2013. The officers involved were recently awarded a Silver Medal of Honor, in spite of the fact that the SF DA's Office hasn't finished its investigation. The story will appear in the San Francisco Examiner next week, I will post a link once it appears. This leaves me with a couple of different legal options; I won't go into details now but if they work, it will be beautiful.

Until then: Happy Thanksgiving!

Enthusiast

(50,983 posts)
3. Why should the union be more responsible for a violent, unwarranted police action than the city?
Thu Nov 27, 2014, 01:15 PM
Nov 2014

The city and county are responsible for hiring these unfit individuals. The city and county are responsible for training the errant individual. Why would you single out the union? Are you just a bit anti-union?

Enthusiast

(50,983 posts)
6. Really? The union should weed out the bad guys? How absurd.
Thu Nov 27, 2014, 01:29 PM
Nov 2014

Management brings actions against errant cops, not the union. I believe you have it ass backwards.

Through what mechanism would the union "police" their own? Oh, you're just going to invent one?

Maybe the city and county should be a little more selective when they hire these idiots. Maybe the city should re evaluate their training methods.

 

99th_Monkey

(19,326 posts)
21. When a union is used to try to obstruct justice when police murder black children
Fri Nov 28, 2014, 05:41 PM
Nov 2014

Then I would be "against" that union doing such thing, yes.

Response to Enthusiast (Reply #3)

bluedigger

(17,090 posts)
9. I don't think archae's anti union.
Thu Nov 27, 2014, 02:51 PM
Nov 2014

Maybe he hasn't thought this one through enough, but it's cool to look for solutions to poor oversight of police.

Enthusiast

(50,983 posts)
12. Traditionally it is management (City-State-County), the employer,
Thu Nov 27, 2014, 06:28 PM
Nov 2014

that brings charges against errant employees.

Why should the union be punished? This notion is wrong headed.

 

99th_Monkey

(19,326 posts)
10. If settlement$ were paid out of Police Retirement Funds
Thu Nov 27, 2014, 03:01 PM
Nov 2014

This shit would stop overnight, as other cops (the "good cops?&quot would abhor
having to pay for this shit out of their retirement and would totally pressure
the bad cops to get right with the law, and to stop murdering citizens in cold
blood.

Enthusiast

(50,983 posts)
14. That would establish an interesting precedent.
Thu Nov 27, 2014, 07:11 PM
Nov 2014

I guess we might as well outlaw all unions and collective bargaining.

Enthusiast

(50,983 posts)
16. So, if I understand you correctly, you are against "unionization".
Fri Nov 28, 2014, 04:47 AM
Nov 2014

You think the union was the reason Darren Wilson was not indicted?

I believe the reason was due to questionable practices by county prosecutor Robert McCulloch. The union didn't have a thing to do with it.

Do you happen to be from a "right to work state"? I just wonder how much anti-labor propaganda you have been subjected to.

 

99th_Monkey

(19,326 posts)
20. You are the one who started talking about unions
Fri Nov 28, 2014, 04:44 PM
Nov 2014

My post was about retirement funds being tapped to pay for settlements to victims of "bad cops".

You then immediately jump to erroneous conclusion that I'm against collective bargaining and unions.

I have no idea by what process police pension funs are collected and invested, but regardless of
if it's by the municipality or the union, I still stand by my original post.

I live in Oregon fyi, and am most certainly not "anti-union" by any stretch of the imagination.

joshcryer

(62,287 posts)
18. Union buster!
Fri Nov 28, 2014, 04:57 AM
Nov 2014


It's obviously in a unions interest to support those that they support.

The problem stems from low IQ hires (a real thing, btw, search for it) and a low judicial standard for corrupt cops.

Unfortunately, police unions, because of the self interest that is natural for a union, aren't willing to support reforms. We have similar things in other unions, but I won't name them. OK, I'll name one, the Hollywood pro-SOPA/PIPA unions. There are others, but the further you delve, the more likely you'll get hate speech or hides here.

In summation, unions look out for their own. Everyone else and society be damned.

True Blue Door

(2,969 posts)
19. We allow it, we pay. Price of citizenship.
Fri Nov 28, 2014, 05:47 AM
Nov 2014

Sticking law-abiding, working-class police officers with the bill because their superiors are douchebags who hired other douchebags would be misguided.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»One thing I've noticed ab...