Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Torture Party: Why Republicans Defend the Most Sadistic Government Program in Recent History
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2014/12/torture-party-republicans.html?mid=googleIf George W. Bushs fervent insistence that his government did not engage in torture does not define and haunt him foreverlike Richard Nixon insisting he was not a crook, or Bill Clinton denying he had sexual relations with that womanit will only be for the paradoxical reason that he insisted as much too many times for any one clip to supply the iconic denial.
The Bush administrations supporters, operating under the assumption that its most brutal enhanced interrogation technique was waterboarding, spent much of the past decade defending this singular practice. Waterboarding did not amount to torture, they insisted, because Navy SEALS allegedly undergo the same treatment as part of their training. Anyway, it happened just a handful of times. Marc Thiessen, the Bush administrations torture point man, later insisted, We waterboarded in the CIAthe CIA waterboarded three terrorists. Just three.
The torture regimen turns out to have been carried out on a vastly broader and more depraved scale than the administrations defenders, or even its critics, ever imagined. The Senate Intelligence Committees report on CIA torture, released this week, describes practices few conservative politicians or intellectuals had prepared themselves to justify. Men were shackled to walls or ceilings for days, in diapers, locked in coffins, rectally violated, subject to days of sleep deprivation, beaten, and (in one instance) murdered. Several intelligence staffers reported being traumatized by the experience.
That is more than one can say for the torture apologists. Having dug in to mount an extended, pointillistic defense of waterboarding, they have found their position suddenly overrun, and have retreated to new ground. Every civilized nation agrees that torture is wrong, Senator Ted Cruz complained after the report was released, but, after six years, enough with saying everything is George W. Bushs fault. To Cruz and other Republicans still in office, the allegation that the Bush administration used torture had gone from outrageous smear to tired news without ever having passed through the stage of acceptable topic of discussion. Senator Marco Rubio insisted on Twitter, Those who served us in aftermath of 9/11 deserve our thanks not one-sided partisan Senate report that now places American lives in danger. Rubios previous tweet boasted that the Senate has passed our bill imposing sanctions against human-rights violators in Venezuela. The cognitive dissonance surely whooshed right over Rubios elegantly coiffed head.
The Bush administrations supporters, operating under the assumption that its most brutal enhanced interrogation technique was waterboarding, spent much of the past decade defending this singular practice. Waterboarding did not amount to torture, they insisted, because Navy SEALS allegedly undergo the same treatment as part of their training. Anyway, it happened just a handful of times. Marc Thiessen, the Bush administrations torture point man, later insisted, We waterboarded in the CIAthe CIA waterboarded three terrorists. Just three.
The torture regimen turns out to have been carried out on a vastly broader and more depraved scale than the administrations defenders, or even its critics, ever imagined. The Senate Intelligence Committees report on CIA torture, released this week, describes practices few conservative politicians or intellectuals had prepared themselves to justify. Men were shackled to walls or ceilings for days, in diapers, locked in coffins, rectally violated, subject to days of sleep deprivation, beaten, and (in one instance) murdered. Several intelligence staffers reported being traumatized by the experience.
That is more than one can say for the torture apologists. Having dug in to mount an extended, pointillistic defense of waterboarding, they have found their position suddenly overrun, and have retreated to new ground. Every civilized nation agrees that torture is wrong, Senator Ted Cruz complained after the report was released, but, after six years, enough with saying everything is George W. Bushs fault. To Cruz and other Republicans still in office, the allegation that the Bush administration used torture had gone from outrageous smear to tired news without ever having passed through the stage of acceptable topic of discussion. Senator Marco Rubio insisted on Twitter, Those who served us in aftermath of 9/11 deserve our thanks not one-sided partisan Senate report that now places American lives in danger. Rubios previous tweet boasted that the Senate has passed our bill imposing sanctions against human-rights violators in Venezuela. The cognitive dissonance surely whooshed right over Rubios elegantly coiffed head.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 668 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Torture Party: Why Republicans Defend the Most Sadistic Government Program in Recent History (Original Post)
KamaAina
Dec 2014
OP
spin
(17,493 posts)1. The Republicans are for torture because the Democrats are against torture. ...
If the Democrats defended waterboarding, the Republicans would hate it.
That's one reason Congress can't accomplish much.
CJCRANE
(18,184 posts)2. Repubs now say rectal feeding is the best thing since sliced bread. I expect Hannity
to offer to insert a tube up his rectum and pump in a hearty three course meal, just to prove how pleasant the experience can be.
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)3. Actually, I'm pretty sure it'll be O'Really? and falafel
Scuba
(53,475 posts)4. We raped little boys in front of their mothers. These fuckwads belong in prison.
Failure to see that they're prosecuted will destroy any last chance America has of survival.