Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

babylonsister

(171,065 posts)
Sat Dec 13, 2014, 05:34 PM Dec 2014

The No-Dick Rule

The No-Dick Rule

Why former Vice President Cheney should no longer be allowed on network TV.
By Fred Kaplan


Dick Cheney should no longer be allowed to appear on network TV talk shows. The issue here is not one of ideology or censorship, but rather of compassion and pity. The former vice president has long been a disgrace to his political office; now he is also an embarrassment to himself.

The devolution hit bottom on Oct. 2, with Candy Crowley’s CNN interview of Cheney and his obeisant daughter, Elizabeth (transcript here). Asked about President Obama’s drone strike that killed Anwar al-Awlaki, Cheney called it “a very good strike … a very effective use of our drone technology,” but then added:

Thing I’m waiting for is for the administration to go back and correct something they said two years ago when they criticized us for “overreacting” to the events of 9/11. They, in effect, said that we had walked away from our ideals, or taken policy contrary to our ideals, when we had enhanced- interrogation techniques. Now they clearly have moved in the direction of taking robust action when they feel it is justified. I say, in this case I think it was, but I think they need to go back and reconsider what the president said when he was in Cairo.

After a few more exchanges of this sort, Crowley said, “You’d like an apology, it sounds like.” Cheney replied, “Well, I would.”

Have we ever had a vice president—especially one as powerful and putatively hard-headed as Cheney—who, after serving two full terms, proved himself so thin-skinned and peevish? Cheney makes Nixon, even in his darker days, seem almost dignified.

More than that, Cheney is simply wrong on multiple counts, and in ways that heighten the impression that we’re dealing with a feeble, foolish man. Let us parse the ways.

more...

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/war_stories/2011/10/dick_cheney_s_criticism_of_obama_is_both_undignified_and_inaccur.single.html
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The No-Dick Rule (Original Post) babylonsister Dec 2014 OP
You watch him. That's all they care about. True Blue Door Dec 2014 #1
No Dick on TV mainstreetonce Dec 2014 #2
DicKKK should be taken out dancing hifiguy Dec 2014 #3
This rule should include more than TV RoccoR5955 Dec 2014 #4

True Blue Door

(2,969 posts)
1. You watch him. That's all they care about.
Sat Dec 13, 2014, 05:45 PM
Dec 2014

I don't watch him. I don't listen to him. I dismiss him completely and absolutely as anything other than an unindicted traitor. The only thing he says that I am willing to hear is a plea before a judge.

 

hifiguy

(33,688 posts)
3. DicKKK should be taken out dancing
Sat Dec 13, 2014, 05:50 PM
Dec 2014

at the end of a goddamned rope. It was good enough for the German war criminals, so it's good enough for him. I'd prefer impalement but will take a good hanging.

 

RoccoR5955

(12,471 posts)
4. This rule should include more than TV
Sat Dec 13, 2014, 06:09 PM
Dec 2014

The No-Dick rule should include anywhere on Earth in public.
He should be locked up somewhere, and not see the light of day until he is dead. When he is dead, his carcass should rot there until it is dust!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The No-Dick Rule