General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSony Exec Fires Back at President Obama
<Sony Entertainment CEO Michael Lynton, denying that the studio had "caved" by scrapping next week's opening of "The Interview," fired back Friday after President Obama said the studio had "made a mistake."
Lynton said he would be "fibbing" to say he "wasn't disappointed" in Obama's remarks.
"I don't know exactly whether he understands the sequence of events that led up to the movie not being shown in the movie theaters," Lynton said. "Therefore I would disagree with the notion that it was a mistake."
Lynton's response came just hours after a White House press conference where Obama criticized Sony's decision. >
http://money.cnn.com/2014/12/19/media/sony-executive-michael-lynton-responds-to-president-obama/
951-Riverside
(7,234 posts)Cha
(297,196 posts)Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Sid
Ykcutnek
(1,305 posts)What a disgrace.
bvf
(6,604 posts)Not to defend Sony, but they were going to see a dismal opening due to theater pull-outs. The owners of those theaters are the true cowards here, as I read it.
Still, Sony should have done the right thing and gone ahead with the release, if only to make a statement.
dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)(Reuters) - The comedy on the fictional assassination of North Korea's leader is "desperately unfunny" and would have flopped overseas if it had not been canceled, according to leaked e-mails of international executives of Sony Pictures.
Sony staff in Taiwan said the film "didn't stand a chance" in their market, according to the e-mails. Australian executives, however, enjoyed the film and requested lead actor Franco lead a promotional tour of the country.
randome
(34,845 posts)[hr][font color="blue"][center]A 90% chance of rain means the same as a 10% chance:
It might rain and it might not.[/center][/font][hr]
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)The media in this country sucks.
still_one
(92,187 posts)Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)still_one
(92,187 posts)Enrique
(27,461 posts)in reality, he just responded to a question about Obama in the most moderate terms imaginable. This article turns it into "fires back". And when people only read the headlines that's a problem.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)irisblue
(32,971 posts)make movies that don't just appeal to 16yr old boys, less a problem.
Seth Rogen is horrid.
No idea why anyone would watch him
True Blue Door
(2,969 posts)Ask yourself when the last time the Chinese government was the villain in a major Hollywood movie? Not because they're afraid of violent reprisal, just of losing lucrative business arrangements.
Every other powerful government on Earth is occasionally the villain in a Hollywood movie. Not China. Not ever.
Logical
(22,457 posts)zappaman
(20,606 posts)Stunning.
SomethingFishy
(4,876 posts)called "passwords".
They don't have much room to defend themselves.